logo
U.N. Fudges the Data on West Bank Violence

U.N. Fudges the Data on West Bank Violence

Who's terrorizing whom in the West Bank? President Biden had one answer, backed by United Nations data, and built an unprecedented sanctions regime to address Israeli 'settler violence,' a suddenly ubiquitous term. On Tuesday the U.K., Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Norway announced sanctions on two Israeli ministers. But the data doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
A new report by Regavim, a right-wing Israeli NGO, takes the trouble of scrutinizing the statistics from the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), on which the Biden case relied. Poring over the U.N.'s list of 6,285 violent incidents by settlers from January 2016 through April 2023, Regavim noticed something: 'The UN database includes thousands of clearly non-violent incidents in its count of violent events.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ABC: Trump Administration Fails To Rescind Biden's Anti-Merit Labor Mandate
ABC: Trump Administration Fails To Rescind Biden's Anti-Merit Labor Mandate

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

ABC: Trump Administration Fails To Rescind Biden's Anti-Merit Labor Mandate

WASHINGTON, June 12, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Associated Builders and Contractors today responded to the announcement from the Office of Management and Budget that President Donald Trump's administration will continue to enforce former President Joe Biden's anti-competitive policy mandating project labor agreements on federal construction projects of $35 million or more. 'This decision cannot be reconciled with the president's philosophies of merit, fairness and nondiscrimination because it inhibits fair and open competition and prioritizes special interests over taxpayers and workers,' said Michael Bellaman, ABC president and CEO. 'Today's memorandum doubles down on an unfair, wasteful, anti-competitive, Biden-era policy that inflates costs and delays critical construction projects, including those important to the defense of our country. 'It is unfortunate that this guidance states that maintaining Biden's PLA mandate final rule is necessary because the Trump administration 'supports the use of PLAs when those agreements are practicable and cost-effective,'' said Bellaman. 'To be clear, this policy is not needed to allow the use of PLAs on federal construction. At no point, under any administration, have federal contractors ever been prevented from voluntarily entering into a PLA when such an agreement makes sense for their workforce. Fair and open competition works because it not only preserves worker choice but also gives contractors the freedom to choose to enter or not enter into a PLA. At the end of the day, it is based on merit and nondiscrimination. Every qualified contractor should have the opportunity to build America. 'This policy effectively excludes the 90% of the U.S. construction workforce that does not belong to a union from nearly all large-scale federal construction contracts, regardless of whether PLAs are 'practicable or cost-effective' on a given project,' said Bellaman. 'The ongoing confusion and legal uncertainty this policy creates will result in unnecessary delays and cost increases to critical national security projects needed to protect our border and rebuild our military, including land ports of entry and military bases.' ABC has long opposed government-mandated PLAs, which force contractors to sign union agreements in order to win federal work. This policy keeps merit shop contractors from bidding on infrastructure projects in their own communities. While ABC members won 54% of federal construction contracts of $35 million or more by value during fiscal years 2009-2024, today's guidance prevents many of these experienced and qualified contractors from delivering public works projects safely, on time and on budget. 'ABC will continue to fight the Biden-era illegal and anti-competitive PLA mandate in court and support our federal contractor members in opposing PLA mandates on any project where they are implemented,' said Bellaman. 'The administration should rescind this PLA mandate executive order immediately.' CONTACT: Erika Walter Associated Builders and Contractors ewalter@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil posts $1 bond after federal judge rules Trump admin can't detain him
Anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil posts $1 bond after federal judge rules Trump admin can't detain him

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil posts $1 bond after federal judge rules Trump admin can't detain him

Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University anti-Israel ringleader, has posted bond after the Trump administration was temporarily blocked from deporting him amid their continued effort to hold him on "foreign policy" grounds. Khalil posted his $1 bond on Thursday afternoon. He has not been released. The government has until 9:30 a.m. on Friday to appeal the decision before Khalil must be released. The move came after U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz sided with Khalil on Wednesday, writing: "The government cannot claim an interest in enforcing what appears to be an unconstitutional law." Federal Judge Sides With Anti-israel Ringleader Mahmoud Khalil, Halts Trump Administratino's Deportation Bid Anti-israel Ringleader Mahmoud Khalil's Free Speech Lawsuit Against Us Government Must Be Heard: Judge Read On The Fox News App The ruling was a significant legal setback for the administration's efforts to deport Khalil, who has been held at a detention facility in Louisiana following his involvement in anti-Israel demonstrations at Columbia University. The court's decision will remain on hold until Friday morning, giving the government time to appeal. Khalil, a green card holder, was arrested after leading student protests on the Ivy League campus. He has argued that his free speech rights were being "eroded" by the Trump administration. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attorneys have argued that Khalil's free speech claims were a "red herring," saying that the 30-year-old lied on his visa applications. Federal Judge Says Attempted Deportation Of Anti-israel Ringleader Mahmoud Khalil May Be Unconstitutional Khalil, they said, willfully failed to disclose his employment with the Syrian office in the British Embassy in Beirut when he applied for permanent U.S. residency. The agency also accused Khalil of failing to disclose his work with the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees and membership in Columbia University Apartheid Divest. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has cited a provision in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 to justify Khalil's removal from the U.S. The provision allows the Secretary of State to deport noncitizens if the secretary determines their presence in the U.S. "would have serious adverse foreign policy consequences." Rubio accused Khalil of participating in "antisemitic protests and disruptive activities, which foster a hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States." "Condoning antisemitic conduct and disruptive protests in the United States would severely undermine that significant foreign policy objective," Rubio wrote. Khalil has Algerian citizenship through his mother, but was born in a Palestinian refugee camp in article source: Anti-Israel ringleader Mahmoud Khalil posts $1 bond after federal judge rules Trump admin can't detain him

GM's electric future just got way more future
GM's electric future just got way more future

Politico

time34 minutes ago

  • Politico

GM's electric future just got way more future

General Motors stunned the auto world four years ago when it pledged to go all electric by 2035. That goal quietly died this week when the company announced a $4 billion investment heavily skewed toward gasoline-powered vehicles, writes David Ferris. The companies' EV target was always more on the aspirational side — and highly dependent on federal policies and market trends, analysts told David. 'It was always a long shot at best,' said auto analyst Sam Abuelsamid. But the goal was emblematic of a burgeoning push toward phasing out gasoline-powered vehicles under former President Joe Biden, who made boosting electric cars and trucks a cornerstone of his climate agenda. GM finds itself in a starkly different world under President Donald Trump, who has raced to dismantle federal tax EV credits, frozen grants for building charges to power them, and implemented high tariffs that make production more expensive. Not even Trump's once-close relationship to Tesla CEO Elon Musk blunted his attacks on EVs. While GM isn't abandoning its electric vehicle portfolio — 'We still believe in an all-EV future,' a spokesperson told David — the auto giant's renewed investment in gasoline-powered cars and trucks means its all-electric future just got much further away. 'GM's doing a better job than many of their competitors, but there's obviously a relatively low ceiling because of the lack of supportive policy,' said Alan Baum, an independent Detroit auto analyst. Earlier this week, GM trumpeted the fact that it sold 37,000 electric vehicles in the first quarter of the year, making it the No. 2 EV maker in the U.S. behind Tesla. But the company has also announced new investments in gasoline-powered production, signaling it plans to make internal combustion engines well behind 2035. It is also a member of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which has vociferously opposed California's plans to require all-electric auto sales by 2035. It's Thursday — thank you for tuning in to POLITICO's Power Switch. I'm your host, Arianna Skibell. Power Switch is brought to you by the journalists behind E&E News and POLITICO Energy. Send your tips, comments, questions to askibell@ Today in POLITICO Energy's podcast: Alex Guillén breaks down how the Environmental Protection Agency's proposed rollback of a historic Biden-era climate rule for power plants will impact efforts to fight global warming. Power Centers Legal pitfalls in climate rule rollbackEPA's proposal to stop regulating power plant climate pollution is built around a bold claim that the industry emits too little heat-trapping pollution to be worth it, write Jean Chemnick, Niina H. Farah and Lesley Clark. Legal experts say that rationale could create legal stumbling blocks. House approves cuts packageThe House approved a $9.4 billion rescissions package Thursday, a White House priority that would claw back more than half a billion dollars for international disaster aid and clean energy programs, writes Andres Picon. Among other cuts, the bill would repeal the country's entire $125 million contribution to the international Clean Technology Fund for fiscal 2025. In Other News Floodplain buyouts: As floods keep coming, this small city can't afford to let people leave. Submarine warfare: Submarines are hard to detect. Climate change might make it even harder. Subscriber Zone A showcase of some of our best subscriber content. The Trump administration is bailing on a climate summit in Bonn, Germany, that has long served as a stepping stone to broader international talks later in the year. House Republicans are again pushing legislation to rewrite the Clean Air Act, but with a fresh argument: that changes are needed to keep up with the explosive demand for data centers. California energy officials greenlit the country's largest solar and battery project ever via a new permitting process to streamline certain clean energy projects. That's it for today, folks! Thanks for reading.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store