Why are MPs debating changes to daylight saving?
For many who dislike dark winter nights, this weekend will be one to savour as the clocks spring forward by an hour on Sunday 30 March from 01:00 Greenwich Mean Time (GMT).
This marks the end for some and the gloom that can be caused by GMT, and the start of British Summer Time (BST) and lighter evenings.
However, the Labour MP for Dunstable and Leighton Buzzard, Alex Mayer, has called for a "major overhaul of time" and a conversation about "how best to use our nation's daylight hours" in a parliamentary debate.
But why do the clocks go back and forward in the UK each year?
The process of moving the clocks forward by one hour in the summer was started during World War One in Germany in 1916, as a way to save energy resources during lighter evenings.
Weeks later other countries followed suit, including the UK, where it was named British Summer Time. During World War Two in 1941, the then-prime minister Sir Winston Churchill introduced a system where clocks were advanced by two hours.
This meant that during winter, while clocks went back an hour they were still one hour ahead of GMT to increase productivity during daylight.
This ended in 1945, but briefly returned two years later due to severe fuel shortages that summer.
Mayer wants a return to how things were in World War Two and hosted an adjournment debate in Parliament on the subject.
She argued that a return to what is known as "Churchill Time" could help save a combined £485m in yearly electricity bills - and reduce carbon emissions by more than 400,000 tonnes.
She called this "a low-cost, high-impact proposal" to "help meet climate goals, reduce energy bills, and boost our High Streets by making better use of the daylight hours we already have".
Responding for the government, Business Minister Justin Madders said despite public debate about changing the clocks, the government was not going to introduce double summer time.
Mayer is not the first MP to bring this discussion to Westminster.
In 2012, a bid by Conservative MP Rebecca Harris to move UK clocks forward by an hour for a three-year trial period failed after the legislation ran out of time in the House of Commons.
In 1968, there was a three-year experiment to keep BST in place throughout the year. On average, there was a huge reduction in road casualties, but this has since been attributed to new drink-driving legislation in 1967.
During that experiment in northern Scotland, there was a net increase in the number of people killed or seriously injured on the roads, because during the darkest days of December sunrise would not take place until 10:00.
In 2012, when MPs voted against it, many objections focused on the impact of a change on road accidents.
Critics argued it would make the lives of outdoor workers harder and increase road accidents due to the darker mornings - although those in favour of a change argue it would reduce evening accidents.
Other sources have expressed concerns about the negative impact of extended daylight evenings to health and sleep patterns.
Recent studies suggested modern power consumption habits mean energy savings made by reducing evening lighting were now offset by increased energy consumption, in the warmer lighter evenings.
Follow Beds, Herts and Bucks news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
When do the clocks go forward?
MP urges longer daylight saving as clocks go back
Places around the world that opt out of daylight savings - and why
Adjournment debate
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Reeves announces £6 billion to provide millions of NHS tests and procedures
Rachel Reeves has announced a £6 billion investment to speed up tests and treatment within the NHS, after setting out huge year-on-year rises in the health service's budget. New scanners, ambulances and urgent treatment centres are among the things which the additional cash will pay for, with the aim of providing up to four million more tests and procedures over the next five years. The announcement comes after the Chancellor put NHS funding at the heart of her spending review on Wednesday, raising its budget in a move worth £29 billion a year. This comes, however, at the expense of other areas of public spending. The new £6 billion funding will help to meet the Government's target of reducing NHS waiting lists in England, the Chancellor claimed. 'Over a decade of underinvestment from the previous government put the NHS on its knees, with people across the country unable to get the care they need. We are investing in Britain's renewal, and we will turn that around,' Ms Reeves said. She added: 'Part of our record investment will deliver four million tests, scans and procedures, so hard-working people can get the healthcare they and their families need. 'There is no strong economy without a strong NHS, and we'll deliver on our Plan for Change to end the hospital backlog, improve living standards and get more money in people's pockets.' The latest spending commitment will help patients get access to diagnostic scans and treatment in places such as shopping centres and high streets, speeding up their diagnoses. The Government hopes this will help to cut NHS waiting lists, meeting Labour's goal of ensuring the health service carries out 92% of routine operations within 18 weeks. Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'Since taking office we have been relentless in our drive to cut waiting times for patients, delivering over 3.6 million extra elective care appointments and reducing the overall waiting list by over 200,000. 'The £6 billion investment we are announcing today will generate millions more vital diagnostic tests, scans and procedures for patients across the country.' On Wednesday evening, Ms Reeves said the Government was 'confident' it could meet its pledge to reduce waiting lists after giving the NHS a 3% annual increase in funding at the spending review. Some health leaders are, however, sceptical that the Government will meet its target, despite the funding boost provided at the spending review. Matthew Taylor, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, which represents all health organisations, warned 'difficult decisions will still need to be made as this additional £29 billion won't be enough to cover the increasing cost of new treatments, with staff pay likely to account for a large proportion of it'. He added: 'So, on its own, this won't guarantee that waiting time targets are met.' Sarah Woolnough, chief executive of the King's Fund charity, said: 'The Chancellor said she wants the public to have an NHS there when they need it. 'It is hard to see how all the things she mentions: faster ambulance times, more GP appointments, and adequate mental health services and more can be met on this settlement alone. 'Particularly when large parts of this additional funding will be absorbed by existing rising costs, such as the higher cost of medicines, which are currently being negotiated, and covering staff pay deals.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Los Angeles police impose curfew in downtown area for second day
A night-time curfew in a portion of protest-hit downtown Los Angeles will remain in effect for at least one more night, the Los Angeles Police Department announced on Wednesday. The curfew will run from 8 pm Wednesday to 6 am Thursday (0300 GMT to 1300 GMT Thursday). Mayor Karen Bass first imposed the measure on Tuesday and has indicated it could remain in place for several days. She said it was to stop vandalism and looting during protests against the expanding raids by federal agents on undocumented immigrants. Bass has stressed that the curfew area is tiny - amounting to less than 3 square kilometres in a city that spans some 1,300 square kilometres. Further protests against US President Donald Trump's immigration policies took place overnight in Los Angeles, remaining largely peaceful. Demonstrations of various sizes have also popped up in a slew of other places, including New York and Philadelphia. Dozens of protesters were arrested in the two East Coast cities on Tuesday night, with more rallies planned in the coming days. Los Angeles has seen days of demonstrations opposing Trump's hardline stance on migrants and recent deportation raids. In response, Trump mobilized 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 marines for deployment in Los Angeles, despite opposition from California Governor Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Bass. The soldiers are arriving gradually; according to media reports, no marines have yet been seen in downtown LA. City leaders say Trump's moves are out of proportion to the protests and only inflaming tensions.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
China has an ace up its sleeve in trade talks with the U.S. and stocks are going nowhere until Beijing plays it
Investors seem to be in a wait-and-see mode this morning as trade talks between the U.S. and China continue in London. Stocks were largely flat in Asia and Europe, and S&P 500 futures aren't going anywhere either. S&P 500 futures were flat this morning, following Asian and European indexes which also moved only marginally. The lack of drama in the markets seems to be an indicator that investors are waiting to see what emerges from the U.S. trade talks with China in London. There is no telling how the trade talks between the U.S. and China will pan out but China appears to be sitting at the table with a persuasive advantage: It has a global monopoly on samarium, a rare earth mineral that has magnetic properties and can withstand high temperatures. The U.S. military is dependent on the substance for its fighter jets. That implies that the White House may now be more willing to make a deal with China that leads to lower tariffs—which would likely boost stocks. The U.K.'s FTSE 100 rose 0.42% this morning, maintaining its all-time high above 8,869, on news of a major spending package proposed by Keir Starmer's Labour government and NATO plans to increase defense spending continent-wide to 5% of GDP for each member country. Apple's WWDC event, which historically has delivered new-product surprises for investors in the widely held stock, was underwhelming. Apple declined 1.2% yesterday and barely moved in overnight trading. Here's a snapshot of the action prior to the opening bell in New York: S&P 500 futures were flat before the market open this morning, but are still priced above the 6,000 mark. The S&P 500 rose 0.1% yesterday. The index is up 2.1% YTD. All the major Asian indexes closed up, with the exception of the markets in China and Hong Kong, which moved down marginally. The Stoxx Europe 600 was down 0.1% in early trading. The U.K.'s FTSE 100 maintained its all-time high and was up 0.42% in early trading. Apple closed down 1.2% yesterday after its annual developer event delivered no major surprises. This story was originally featured on Erreur lors de la récupération des données Connectez-vous pour accéder à votre portefeuille Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données Erreur lors de la récupération des données