
Building and zoning reforms emerge as wedge in unusually competitive Anchorage Assembly race
One area where that is not the case is District 1, which covers downtown Anchorage, as well as neighborhoods like Fairview, Government Hill and Mountain View.
Assembly seats are nonpartisan, but residents in the district tend to consistently elect liberal officials, often by wide margins. In this cycle, though, the progressive incumbent, Daniel Volland, is facing a robust challenge from a Realtor with a background in Republican politics and community-level public service.
The challenger, Daniel George, has backing from an unusual coalition that runs the political gamut, from conservative stalwarts and former Republican politicians to progressive elected officials and left-leaning community activists. He also raised close to the same amount of money as Volland in the most recent round of campaign finance reports filed with the state, $8,824 to Volland's $10,540, although Volland had already raised substantially more prior to that, and upcoming reports to the Alaska Public Offices Commission may look quite different.
One of the animating issues in the race is housing, and how members of the Assembly, including Volland, have pushed for reforms to get more homes and residential units added to Anchorage's inadequate supply.
"Our worldviews are very similar," former South Anchorage Assembly member John Weddleton said about Volland.
"But he's not turned out well," he added.
Weddleton has been lending his support to George, donating money to his campaign and co-sponsoring a fundraiser for the first-time Assembly candidate earlier this month.
[Anchorage election guide: Q&As with candidates for Assembly and school board]
'A critical inflection point'
Volland was elected in a 2022 special election after the Assembly voted to add a 12th seat. Prior to that, the downtown district was represented by just one member.
Turnout in that election was poor, even by the standards of District 1, which tends to have some of the lowest voter participation in the municipality. And because it was a special election among six candidates, Volland won by receiving the biggest share of votes — close to 39% — but not a majority. The second-highest vote getter received about 31%.
Since joining the body, Volland, an optometrist with a business downtown, has a track record of advocating for changes to housing and zoning rules, improved pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure, and more resources for behavioral health in the public safety system, among other issues.
He connects the support for his rival from traditional backers of progressive candidates to his work on housing policy, and a "change-averse" attitude among some when it comes to building and development.
"I think a lot of it comes from the work we've done on housing to make it more possible to build more multifamily duplexes and threeplexes and fourplexes," said Volland, who has backed several initiatives — some successful, others not — to make it easier to build multifamily structures through code changes to land-use and permitting.
Housing is a touchy subject in Anchorage politics, and one that doesn't always break across traditional political fault lines. Volland said some people have criticized Assembly members like himself for being "too bold on housing," but he also hears from constituents who don't think measures enacted in the last few years go far enough to address the scale of the affordability crisis and shortage in new units.
"I think Anchorage is at a critical inflection point right now. In some ways we are in decline. But I also feel like there's a lot of folks who are embracing a positive view," Volland said.
Volland pointed out that many of the people backing his opponent do not actually live in the district. Because housing and zoning policy tend to affect residents all over the city, he said, some people who oppose denser developments in neighborhoods that have long barred anything but single-family homes have been drawn to the downtown race.
Daniel George grew up in Anchorage, and though a chunk of his professional career was spent working for state and congressional politicians, he's remained engaged in the city's neighborhood-level political system, both as leader of the Mountain View Community Council and Federation of Community Councils, as well as serving on the Planning and Zoning Commission. That perspective, along with his work selling homes, he said, has given him a level of technical insight into policies that are and are not working in the municipality.
"Our housing stock is aged, and it's aged poorly," he said. "I'm a Realtor, I've sold a lot of houses in the Mat-Su in recent years."
His campaign has drawn support from people who don't usually donate to the same candidates or socialize at fundraisers. An event on March 3 included some unlikely bedfellows. The list of co-sponsors included conservatives like former Eagle River state Sen. Anna MacKinnon, former Anchorage first lady Deb Bronson, and Mayor Dave Bronson's former Chief of Staff Sami Graham. And there were solidly liberal co-sponsors, as well, including former Assembly member Sheila Selkregg, entrepreneur and activist Eleanor Andrews, and outgoing Assembly member Karen Bronga, who represents the east side.
George said the breadth of that coalition reflects relationships he's built through volunteering and public service.
Part of his problem with the Assembly's approach to housing policy, he said, is less about specific policies it has pursued than the way it has tackled them. At times, he said, members have speedily advanced reform ordinances that he thinks have run roughshod over the public process. In other instances, he thinks the body's priorities have been off, like pursuing denser housing options in neighborhoods rather than finding ways to incentivize development of unused lots.
"Density is not the only solution, it only nips around the edge of the solution," George said. "How do we unlock stranded parcels?"
[Here are the bonds and levies on the ballot in Anchorage's city election]
'It's about the process'
Not everyone's support for George over the incumbent Volland comes down to policy preferences.
"He's very combative. And he draws lines and he alienates people," Weddleton said of Volland.
During his two terms on the Assembly, Weddleton earned a reputation as a moderate with an interest in technical details. He said that while he supported Volland in his first bid for office, the approach to housing policy from him and some other members of the Assembly has repeatedly bypassed opportunities for public engagement, and in so doing damaged public trust among constituents.
"If they don't toe his line, they're a 'NIMBY,'" said Weddleton. The acronym stands for "Not In My Backyard," and is often used to criticize people who might support development in general, but not when it happens near their homes or neighborhoods.
Weddleton said his support for George comes partly out of his shared background on the Planning and Zoning Commission and as a fellow "community council guy," who in spite of his own political positions, prioritizes civility and pragmatism.
That was likewise what drew Karen Bronga to back George.
"We don't agree on a hell of a lot of things, but we agree on engaging with people, being civil," said Bronga, who opted not to run for re-election.
In 2023, Bronga beat another first-time candidate who was aligned with the conservative Bronson administration. Though generally she votes with the Assembly majority, she has often split with it. And she's critical of political orthodoxy she believes has put the body out of step with many residents, even those who support a more liberal-leaning agenda for the city.
"We have an Assembly that has swung too far left in some areas," she said. "I'm hearing more and more from people that contributed to my campaign that are considered very progressive ... And they are like, 'What the hell is going on with this Assembly? It's gone too far to the left.'"
One resident who typifies some of the trends at play in the District 1 race is Dianne Holmes. A retiree who lives on the south side, Holmes regularly testifies before the Assembly and is highly engaged with land use and zoning issues across the city. Typically, when she donates to local political campaigns, it is to more liberal-leaning candidates. But this cycle she has contributed to George.
"We had great hopes for Volland. And I think it has to do a lot with the housing situation. No one will say 'we're against more housing,' because we need it. But it's about the process," Holmes said.
She ticked off a number of housing and zoning measures from the last two years that have gone before the Assembly. Some, she said, were decent proposals. But what bothered her were the ways she believes Volland and others steered them away from public input or diminished oversight and review from city planners.
Holmes and others do not expect George to win. It is hard to unseat an Assembly incumbent. And though George has raised a respectable amount of money, he filed to run for the seat at the very last minute and has raced to stand up a visible campaign. But, she said, this may get him some name recognition for next year, when Assembly Chair Christopher Constant, who is barred by term limits from running again, is not on the ballot.
Other races this cycle are drastically more lopsided, with many local politicos treating them as foregone conclusions, either because of an incumbency advantage, or because one candidate has a monopoly on resources over the challengers. Or both. The Eagle River contest includes two candidates both running for Assembly for the first time who are closely matched on fundraising.
Municipal ballots were mailed out earlier this month and have to be postmarked or cast in person by April 1.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
What is Trump's approval rating? See states where he is most, least popular
President Donald Trump's approval ratings nationally are in the red, but for about half of the states, more people approve of his job peformance. State legislatures could determine Trump's political future. Texas' push to redraw its Congressional map to add more Republican seats has dragged the states into a bit of a standoff, as heavy hitter Democratic states threaten to do the same if Texas moves forward. That's because Democrats are looking to take back control of the U.S. House in the midterm elections, and doing so would subvert Trump's efforts for his last two years in office. While Trump's approval rating nationally remains historcially low, a look at state-by-state survey results show a more complicated picture. Here is what we know: More: Did Trump remove the Rose Garden? He has pushed these White House renovations Trump has positive approval rating in 27 states Trump's approval rating is above water in 27 states. That is according to an Aug. 12 update from Morning Consult, which gathers polls over the course of three months to get a look at state-level data among registered voters. The number of states is unchanged from July's update. Trump is most popular by Morning Consult in Wyoming, where 66% of voters approve of his job performance, and least popular in Vermont, where 64% disapprove of his job performance. But his approval is net negative in two states with gubernatorial races this fall: New Jersey and Virginia, according to Morning Consult. In Texas, 53% of voters approve of Trump's performance while 44% disapprove. In California, where Gov. Gavin Newsom has threatened to counter changes in Texas' redistricting, 41% approve of Trump's job peformance while 56% disapprove. California is Trump's seventh worst rating among the states, according to Morning Consult. What is Trump's approval overall? RealClearPolitics Poll Average shows Trump's approval rating was becoming more negative throughout the first few weeks of July before buoying toward the end of the month. Aggregated polls by the New York Times show a similar trend. As of Jan. 27, Trump received a +6.2 percentage point approval rating, but as of March 13, it flipped to slightly negative, the RealClearPolitics graphics show. The approval rating reached its most negative on April 29 at -7.2 percentage points, which fell around Trump's 100-day mark. It came close to that low again on July 22 and 23 at -7.1 percentage points, as the controversy over Epstein carried into its third week. His average approval rating margin as of Aug. 12, according to RealClearPolitics, is -5.4 percentage points. The approval margin according to the New York Times aggregator on Aug. 12 is -8 percentage points. How does Trump's approval rating compare to previous presidents? A historical analysis by Gallup shows Trump's approval ratings in July of his first years in office − both as the 45th and 47th presidents − are lower than any other modern president at the same time in their administrations. In a Gallup poll conducted from July 7-21, 37% approved of Trump's job performance. Here is how that compares to other presidents in July of their first year of their term, according to Gallup: Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MAGA queens Laura Loomer & Marjorie Taylor Greene go nuclear on one another in brutal war of words
MAGA firebrand and racist conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer and Trump devotee Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's years-long fight has picked up again, but this time the two women are going full scorched earth while the internet sits back and watches. It's hard to tell when the women's feud actually began, especially since they mostly fight on X (formerly Twitter) and are both prolific posters, but while they share a love of President Donald Trump and his MAGA ideology, their battle of wills quickly turned nasty. After Loomer posted about what a disgrace it was that the Army presented a Medal of Honor to Retired U.S. Army Capt. Florent Groberg instead of 'a Republican and US born soldier,' Greene called her out for having 'ZERO respect or reverence for even the most heroic people in America.' At some point, Loomer blocked Greene on X, who posted a screenshot of the block notification, and then the gloves came off, and in classic Loomer style, she started flooding the social media site with post after post calling out Greene. But instead of well-reasoned critiques, the barbs were decidedly nasty and overwhelmingly misogynistic. Loomer accused Greene of funneling government money to her own daughter and went full nuclear, calling her a 'Fake Christian Jezebel,' a 'harlot,' a lying fake Christian whore,' 'a white trash hick,' a "loud mouthed bitch,' and posted over and over again calling out Greene for her alleged affair. The rant started on Monday, when she posted things like Greene 'ruined her marriage when she got to Congress because she can't keep her mouth or her legs closed,' and wrote that the congresswoman was 'on her knees all night. And it's not for praying.' Loomer didn't stop, also writing, 'How do you call yourself a Christian when you're wearing a cross while getting bent over backwards inside the gym by every man who isn't your husband?' Greene called Loomer out for being 'a coward' and wrote that 'she psychotically turns on everyone' and is "the most unstable person and worst liability to ever walk in the Oval Office.' The hateful back and forth seems to stem from two things: Loomer thinking MTG is a sell-out who doesn't support Trump and who is using her role in Congress to line her own pockets and Greene calling Loomer out for being a MIGA (in case you're not terminally online like these two rivals, that stands for Make Israel Great Again). The two have been arguing about the U.S.'s support of Israel since Loomer is Jewish and an outspoken supporter of Israel, while Greene has broken with the Republican Party and begun referring to the Israeli government's treatment of Palestine as a 'genocide' and has called on the U.S. to stop sending money and arms to the country. Loomer, on the other hand, wants the Trump administration to crack down on pro-Palestinian protests and call anyone speaking out against the Israeli government antisemitic. As of August 13, Loomer is still on the attack, reposting a Mediate article about Greene sending campaign funds to her daughter, writing, 'I don't ever want to hear anyone in the GOP again criticize the left for using campaign funds to pay their kids if Marge gets a pass.' The two women going for the jugular on such a public platform is an odd choice, especially when they have both already blown through so much political capital. Loomer used to have the ear of the president, even accompanying him on the campaign trail before she got pushed aside when her overt racism was exposed, and Greene used to be one of Trump's most ardent supporters, but she's since been condemned by a growing number of Republicans and largely ignored by Trump. Who knows where it will all end, but the fight seems to be continuing on, and people on social media are laughing at how ridiculous it is! This article originally appeared on Pride: MAGA queens Laura Loomer & Marjorie Taylor Greene go nuclear on one another in brutal war of words RELATED Trump-obsessed Laura Loomer seemingly got dumped, is MELTING DOWN & we can't stop CACKLING MAGA queen Laura Loomer eviscerates Elon Musk in epic rant & we're cackling BREAKING: Marjorie Taylor Greene officially urges Trump to commute George Santos's prison sentence
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Affordability and jobs: major proposals from NYC mayoral candidates
NEW YORK CITY (PIX11) — From city-run grocery stores to increasing the minimum wage to childcare proposals to tax changes, the candidates seeking to be mayor are proposing big ideas to make life more affordable to New Yorkers. Henry Rosoff, senior political reporter for PIX11, breaks down all those positions candidate by candidate, including Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani, Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa, and independent candidates former Governor Andrew Cuomo, Mayor Eric Adams and lawyer Jim Walden. More News: Politics Many of the ideas will be subject to approval and funding help from state lawmakers in Albany. J.C. Polanco, political analyst, attorney and assistant professor at the University of Mount Saint Vincent, helps break down the plausibility of each proposal. Watch the video player for the full story. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.