
The Real Message Andy Jassy Is Sending to Employees on AI
Amazon reaps a relatively small amount of revenue per worker.
Amazon chief Andy Jassy had a chilling message for employees this week: AI is coming for your jobs. But things at Amazon are more nuanced than that.
The company is unique among its big-tech peers: Amazon's business model requires a huge number of warehouse workers and delivery drivers. The company reported 1.56 million full-time employees in its last quarterly filing—nearly seven times the total of the next-largest megacap tech giant.
That equates to nearly $417,000 in annual revenue per Amazon employee. That is actually up 43% from three years ago, when Amazon was feeling the aftermath of its Covid-era hiring binge. But it is also the lowest of that efficiency measure of any tech company producing more than $100 billion in annual sales, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence.
Microsoft, Nvidia, Apple, Meta Platforms and Google-parent Alphabet all generate $1 million to $3.6 million in annual revenue per employee. Getting to even the low end of that range would require Amazon to slash more than half of its total workforce at its current sales level.
That's not going to happen. So Jassy's memo likely has another aim. More tech leaders are propagating the view that job security in the age of AI means learning to use it—fast. 'You're not going to lose your job to an AI, but you're going to lose your job to somebody who uses AI,' Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang told the Milken Institute in late May.
Write to Dan Gallagher at dan.gallagher@wsj.com
Get 360° coverage—from daily headlines to 100 year archives.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
I will lead through collaboration, says new IOC President Coventry
Kirsty Coventry, the newly elected president of the International Olympic Committee, emphasised collaboration with stakeholders as a key priority for her tenure, in remarks made on Thursday ahead of her official takeover next week. Coventry, a former Olympic swimming champion from Zimbabwe and Africa's most decorated Olympian, was elected to the post in March, succeeding Thomas Bach. She will formally assume the role following Monday's handover ceremony in Lausanne. 'I like to collaborate, to be able to listen, hear everyone's opinions. I think it is very important,' Coventry said during an online media roundtable. 'I also know I am the president and need to take decisions and that we need to move.' Coventry, 41, is the first woman and the first African to lead the IOC. Her approach is expected to differ from her predecessor's, as Bach was known for the rapid speed and volume of his decision-making and concentration of power. READ | PT Usha on IOC president-elect Coventry: Africa and Asia will have more say in the Olympic movement now Bach's presidency was marked by wide-ranging reforms, including overhauling the Olympic bidding process, introducing new sports and reducing costs for host cities. He also navigated challenges such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which delayed the Tokyo 2020 Olympics and led to a spectator-free Beijing 2022 Winter Games. Coventry said the IOC would hold a two-day workshop for its members, starting on June 24, the day after the handover ceremony, as part of ongoing discussions with stakeholders on key issues. 'It was not about title or power,' she said when asked about her decision to run for president. 'Sometimes those things get in the way and make you focus on the wrong things.' Reflecting on her appointment, Coventry acknowledged the significance of her role as the first woman to lead the IOC. 'It is not something I have thought about a lot in terms of impact it can have,' she said. 'In the past days now, I have a much greater understanding of that importance.' The IOC generates annual revenues of several billion dollars and Coventry noted the 'responsibility' that comes with leading the organisation. 'As we get closer to the 23rd, yes, it is an exciting day but a day with a lot of responsibility. I am very proud of the fact that we as members chose at this moment in time to elect the first female president,' she added.


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Apple iPhone 15 is available for Rs 26,005 only on Amazon; know how to grab the deal
Apple iPhone 15 (Black, 128GB) Apple iPhone 15 has been included in numerous discount promotions on Amazon since its release in 2023. While the constant availability of deals might cause some shoppers to lose interest, those still looking to buy the iPhone 15 can benefit from substantial savings. Here's a breakdown of the latest offer. With the launch of the iPhone 16 series, Amazon has significantly reduced the price of the iPhone 15 (128 GB, Black). This price drop presents a great opportunity for buyers to purchase this model at a highly competitive rate. Apple iPhone 15 Amazon deal: Credit card offer and exchange discount The Apple iPhone 15 (128 GB, Black) is now available on Amazon at an initial price of Rs 79,900. However, a generous 14% discount brings the price down to Rs 59,900 . Shoppers looking to maximise their savings can take advantage of Amazon's trade-in program. For instance, trading in a used iPhone 15 (512 GB) in good condition can provide you Rs 30,900 in additional savings , effectively reducing the net price of the iPhone 15 to Rs 29,000 . Furthermore, customers who use an Amazon Pay ICICI Bank credit card can enjoy an additional discount of Rs 2,995 . This brings the total price of the iPhone 15 down to an impressive Rs 26,005 , making this deal one of the most attractive options for anyone looking to upgrade their smartphone. With trade-ins and credit card offers, buyers have a chance to buy the iPhone 15 at a fraction of its original cost. iPhone 15 exchange deal iPhone 15 specifications and features Display and design : The iPhone 15 features a 6.1-inch display and was launched in pink, yellow, green, blue, and black colour options. Apple retained the design from previous models but introduced a Dynamic Island notch instead of the traditional notch, which was well-received in the iPhone 14 Pro models. Camera upgrades : This model boasts a 48-megapixel primary camera sensor, offering significant improvements in daylight, low-light, and portrait photography compared to its predecessor. Battery life : Apple claims the iPhone 15 has "all-day battery life," though real-world usage suggests it can last over 9 hours with average usage. Processor : Powered by Apple's A16 Bionic chip, an upgrade from the A15 chip used in the iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus, with Pro models receiving the faster A16 chip. Charging port : Notably, the iPhone 15 features a USB Type-C charging port, replacing the Lightning port used in previous models and aligning with the more commonly used USB Type-C standard. Also read | Bill Gates sees hope in the fight against Alzheimer's, and it's deeply personal, 5 years after his father's loss AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Americans split on AI's future as leadership stalls and classrooms struggle
In a rare moment of political symmetry, Americans across all ideologies have found common ground, not in unity of belief, but in collective uncertainty. Artificial Intelligence, once the darling of Silicon Valley hype and academic theory, now stands at the centre of a divided American consciousness. According to the NBC News Decision Desk Poll powered by SurveyMonkey, opinions on AI are fractured and unresolved, with no clear party, age group, or ideological bloc leading the charge. The future, it seems, is no longer left or right; it's undecided. This ambivalence plays out in stark numbers. Just 7% of Americans believe AI will make their lives 'much better,' while 16% believe it will make things 'much worse.' The bulk of the nation hovers in the gray middle, unsure, anxious, and watching. Policy paralysis in Washington Despite AI's growing ubiquity, from customer service to content creation, Washington remains stubbornly inert. The few regulatory frameworks introduced under President Joe Biden have largely been dismantled by the Trump administration. President Donald Trump's rollback of AI oversight has since become part of a broader Republican embrace of tech deregulation, allowing powerful AI corporations to operate in an ethical vacuum. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Laku keras kat Guardian! Umur 40-an pun tak perlu kolagen dah URUHIME MOMOKO Undo Yet, this isn't a battle of partisan lines. The poll reveals that Democrats, Republicans, and independents use AI tools like ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, and Google Gemini at nearly identical rates. This technological neutrality, though rare in a polarized nation, has resulted not in consensus but in chaos. Schools on the frontline If AI is the future, then America's classrooms are its proving grounds. But here, too, the nation is torn. A narrow majority, 53%, believes integrating AI into education better prepares students for the future. The remaining 47% argue the opposite, fearing dependency, diminished learning, and ethical blind spots. Educators are divided, not by doctrine but by desperation. Some are reverting to old-school tactics, handwritten essays, in-person exams, and AI detection software, while others are innovating with AI-integrated assignments. No red, no blue—just gray Surprisingly, the AI debate defies political stereotypes. Fifty-seven percent of Democrats support classroom AI use, compared to 50% of Republicans and 51% of independents. On the flip side, half of Republicans and nearly half of independents say banning AI better equips students, a view shared by 43% of Democrats. This strange ideological neutrality extends beyond education. When asked whether AI will improve their families' futures, 50% of Republicans said yes, alongside 42% of Democrats and 41% of independents. Similarly, 39% of Republicans and 47% of Democrats believe AI will worsen lives. For once, the partisan compass is spinning without direction. A nation holding its breath Even age, often a key indicator in tech adoption, offers no clear fault lines. Younger adults, ages 18–29, are evenly split on whether schools should embrace or ban AI. Those aged 30–44 lean slightly more toward integration, but older generations remain similarly indecisive. The result: A technological revolution without a generational leader. Despite AI's explosive potential, the national mood is less one of enthusiasm and more of caution, an eerie calm before an uncharted storm. Waiting for a tipping point In the absence of decisive legislation, AI's integration into American life is being dictated not by lawmakers but by market forces, educators, and individual choices. Companies continue to roll out AI education tools, OpenAI's ChatGPT Edu, Google's Gemini for education, and Microsoft Copilot, while platforms like Khan Academy experiment with AI-powered tutors. Yet without a guiding national vision, these tools risk deepening inequality and confusion. The NBC poll doesn't merely capture public opinion; it reveals a country stuck in philosophical limbo. The question is no longer whether AI will shape the future; it already is. The question now is: whose future will it serve, and at what cost? Until America decides, AI remains a mirror, not of what we believe, but of what we fear to answer. Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.