
Dementia risk depends on more than lifestyle factors. Overstating this can cause stigma, blame
New Delhi: Sydney University and Gilbert Knaggs, University of Sydney Sydney, May 13 (The Conversation) As public awareness of dementia grows, so too does the appetite for prevention.
Global headlines tout the benefits of exercise, diet, brain training and social activity in reducing dementia risk.
In recent years, medical journals have amplified this message to encourage people to take control of their cognitive futures through lifestyle change. Last year, The Lancet estimated up to 45 per cent of dementia cases worldwide could theoretically be delayed or prevented by addressing modifiable risk factors.
These messages are undeniably hopeful. They suggest personal effort, combined with emerging scientific evidence, can help to overcome a disease long seen as inevitable.
But public health messaging that focuses too narrowly on behaviour may be misleading and potentially harmful, as we argue in The Lancet.
This can lead to a two-tiered system, where affluent people are praised for their proactive brain health, while marginalised groups face barriers to participation and are blamed for their perceived inaction.
What is dementia and what causes it?
Dementia is a neurocognitive disorder and describes conditions that affect memory, thinking and the ability to do everyday tasks. Alzheimer's disease is the most common type, but there are others such as vascular and Lewy body dementia.
It happens when brain cells become damaged and stop communicating properly. This can cause confusion, forgetfulness and changes in behaviour or mood.
Dementia is linked to some of our deepest cultural fears: the limits of autonomy, dependency on others, the stigma of being diagnosed and the unknown.
So, what increases your risk of dementia? Some risk factors can't be changed. Age is the biggest one. Family history and certain genes, such as APOE-e4, also raise risk.
But many risk factors are modifiable, which means we can do something about them. Obesity, high cholesterol and high blood pressure raise your risk. Low levels of exercise or education can also increase the chances of developing dementia.
The science behind prevention
The science of dementia prevention has evolved significantly over the past decade. Lifestyle trials, from Finland, France, Australia and the United States are exploring whether combinations of diet, physical activity, cognitive training and managing cardiovascular risk (high blood pressure, cholesterol, obesity and smoking) can reduce dementia risk.
The Finnish study, the most widely cited of these, demonstrated modest but meaningful cognitive benefits in older adults at risk for dementia after a two-year lifestyle intervention.
Its success has spurred a wave of similar studies globally (to date, more than 40 trials). Collectively, these trials provide a scientific foundation for an increasingly popular public health message: brain health tomorrow is linked to healthy behaviours today.
New possibilities for preventing dementia are certainly promising. However, the translation of these findings into broad public campaigns is where complexity, and ethical tension, emerges.
Dementia risk is related to socioeconomic disadvantage
Dementia risk is also determined by a complex array of extrinsic factors - conditions outside our control - that are unevenly distributed across society: air quality, ethnicity, gender, occupation, the built environment.
These factors influence not just if, but when, dementia might develop.
Dementia prevalence is disproportionately higher in communities facing social disadvantage partly because modifiable risk factors such as diabetes, obesity and low education are also more common in these areas.
But there's another layer: access. The same communities at greater risk often lack access to the very interventions meant to reduce that risk.
Low-income neighbourhoods may have fewer green spaces, safe walking paths, or affordable, healthy food. They also face higher levels of pollution, noise and chronic stress. All of which can damage brain health.
Not everyone can access the kinds of healthy lifestyles to counteract dementia risks. Telling people to eat a Mediterranean diet or join a gym may be a cold comfort for those without the money, time, services or mobility to do so.
Positioning dementia as something people can avoid also risks implying dementia is something individuals can fail to prevent. This could reinforce existing narratives which equate disease in later life to poor lifestyle choices rather than social inequity.
So how do we do better?
First, prevention messaging must be framed within a social and cultural context.
This means acknowledging and addressing barriers such as food insecurity, lack of green space, caregiver stress and health system distrust.
Messages must be co-created with communities, not imposed on them, and have a visual, motivating appeal.
Second, we must shift from individualistic narratives to collective responsibility. Brain health should be supported through public infrastructure, equitable access to care, and culturally sensitive health promotion.
Prevention doesn't just happen in the home. It also happens in preschools, schools, shopping centres, clinics, parks and policy rooms.
Finally, we need to reframe success. Preventing dementia is a worthy goal, but so is ensuring dignity, inclusion and care for people who live with it. A just approach to brain health must do both.
The next generation of dementia messaging must be not only evidence-based, but also equity-focused. It should strive to educate without shaming, to empower without excluding, and to promote brain health in ways that honour the realities of ageing.
(The Conversation)>
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Alzheimer's disease: A blood test can detect early symptoms, finds study
Imagine getting tested for Alzheimer's with just a simple blood draw instead of going through complicated brain scans or spinal taps. Sounds like the future, right? Well, it's pretty much here. Researchers at the Mayo Clinic in the U.S. have been working on a new blood test that can accurately detect early signs of Alzheimer's disease, and the results are seriously impressive. This test looks at two specific proteins in your blood—amyloid beta 42/40 and p-tau217—both of which are linked to that gunky buildup in the brain called amyloid plaques, a telltale sign of Alzheimer's. So how accurate is it? Try 95% sensitivity, meaning it correctly identifies people who do have memory problems 95% of the time. That's pretty hard to beat. It also has 82% specificity, which means it's also really good at ruling out people who don't have Alzheimer's. What's even better? This isn't just lab testing. The study was done on over 500 real patients in a memory clinic—so it's based on actual, day-to-day medical situations, not just controlled experiments. Dr. Gregg Day, who led the study (published in Alzheimer's & Dementia journal), said this new blood test works just as well as the more invasive and expensive options we currently use. "It's about as accurate as spinal fluid testing," he told The Guardian, 'but way easier, less painful, and much cheaper.' In people who had Alzheimer's, the levels of p-tau217 were clearly higher compared to those who didn't, which helped the team confirm the diagnosis confidently. The best part? This blood test has already gotten the green light from the U.S. FDA—so it's not just theory anymore, it's actually available. 6 million Americans are living with Alzheimer's disease Alzheimer's disease is becoming a huge concern across the U.S.—and it's not just about forgetfulness in old age. It's a progressive brain disorder that slowly chips away at memory, thinking skills, and the ability to do everyday tasks. Right now, more than 6 million Americans are living with Alzheimer's, and that number is expected to nearly double by 2050. Most people with Alzheimer's are 65 or older, but it can also hit younger adults in what's called early-onset Alzheimer's. The biggest risk factor is age, but family history and genetics also play a role. The disease usually starts slow—maybe forgetting names or getting lost in familiar places—and worsens over time. The best part is science is catching up. New blood tests and brain imaging tools are helping doctors catch the disease earlier than ever before. There are also a few new medications out that might slow down the progression if taken early enough. Next up, researchers want to test it on even more diverse groups of people and also those who might be in the very early stages of Alzheimer's but don't have any symptoms yet. In short: diagnosing Alzheimer's just got a whole lot simpler—and that could change everything when it comes to early intervention and treatment. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change


Time of India
10 hours ago
- Time of India
Maha's anti-venom pioneer targeted by predatory journal
Mumbai: The world of medical research is battling its own version of cyber frauds: predatory or 'pseudo' journals, deceptive publications that claim to be scholarly but rarely follow ethical publishing practices and seek hefty payment from authors. On Friday, Dr Himmatrao Bawaskar (75), a Mahad-based physician who won a Padma Shri in 2022 and is known for his rural Maharashtra medical practice and research, wrote in 'The Lancet' about his two-year struggle with a predatory journal that swiftly published his work, then started demanding 1,000 pounds and issued threats when he objected. "I received threatening emails stating they would take serious action and damage my reputation in India," he said. Mahad-based Dr Himmatrao Bawaskar, whose pioneering work in anti-venom for scorpions and snakes has been published in numerous peer-reviewed medical journals, was so "devastated" by his struggle with a predatory journal that he developed "anxiety, insomnia and palpitation". Within six months, the 75-year-old doctor lost 8 kgs and needed psychiatric help. In recent months, various medical associations across the world have voiced concern about the growing number of predatory journals. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Tausende schwärmen von diesem Nagelpilz-Gerät – wir haben es überprüft Med-Aktuell Undo The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors in Feb estimated there are over 15,000 such journals. While medical research paves the way for new treatments, these journals are undermining its credibility. Dr Bawaskar's ordeal began when he submitted his self-funded diabetes research to high-impact journals. After many rejections, a case report journal approached him. "In my submission to this journal, I stated I work without funding and would not be able to pay fees," he said. Yet the journal sent him a proof in a couple of days. "I was shocked—how could the peer review and publication process be completed so quickly? I again appealed, stating my inability to pay. The journal ignored my requests and proceeded to publish the article, then sent me an invoice with exorbitant fee," he added. The journal then sent threats and said they were giving him "a 40% discount." "But during a call with my son who is a cardiologist in the US, my wife mentioned my stress to him," said the doctor. His son identified the predatory nature of the journal and blocked their communications. While the doctor hasn't paid the journal, this experience has prompted him to work out a checklist. He said, "Since this episode, I have not attempted to publish again. Instead, I find fulfilment in seeing my patients recover and walk again—living testaments to my diagnosis and management; these are my true publications." Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Eid wishes , messages , and quotes !


Time of India
15 hours ago
- Time of India
Want to boost brain health? Scientists recommed finding a person with THIS quality
Having someone who listens attentively may significantly boost cognitive resilience, according to a recent study. Researchers found that adults with readily available listeners demonstrated better cognitive function, even with age-related brain volume loss. This social support could potentially slow cognitive aging and delay Alzheimer's symptoms. Keeping the brain sharp is crucial for overall well-being. From cognition, memory, and emotional regulation, a healthy brain plays a key role in how we function daily. While we often turn to puzzles, exercise, and diet to maintain brain health, scientists now say something much simpler, yet often overlooked, could be just as powerful: having someone who listens! A study published in JAMA Network found a link between having someone you can count on to listen to you when you need to talk, with improved cognitive resilience. A person who is all ears According to the study, adults who have access to a good listener, a person who is available most or all of the time to provide emotional support, show significantly better cognitive resilience. This interaction will help the brain from declining, even with aging or diseases like Alzheimer's. 'We think of cognitive resilience as a buffer to the effects of brain aging and disease. This study adds to growing evidence that people can take steps, either for themselves or the people they care about most, to increase the odds they'll slow down cognitive aging or prevent the development of symptoms of Alzheimer's disease—something that is all the more important given that we still don't have a cure for the disease,' lead researcher Joel Salinas said. About 5 million people in America are living with Alzheimer's disease, a progressive condition that affects mostly those over 65. This condition interferes with memory, language, decision-making, and the ability to live independently. Salinas added that the results of this study indicate that people younger than 65 would benefit from social support. For every unit of brain volume loss, people in their 40s and 50s who had fewer listeners showed cognitive abilities similar to someone four years older than those who had more listeners. 'These four years can be incredibly precious. Too often, we think about how to protect our brain health when we're much older, after we've already lost a lot of time decades before to build and sustain brain-healthy habits. But today, right now, you can ask yourself if you truly have someone available to listen to you in a supportive way, and ask your loved ones the same. Taking that simple action sets the process in motion for you to ultimately have better odds of long-term brain health and the best quality of life you can have,' Salinas said. The study Researchers analyzed data from 2,171 participants in the Framingham Heart Study, one of the longest-running community-based studies in the U.S., with an average participant age of 63. The participants self-reported about the various types of social support they have, including access to someone who listens, offers good advice, and provides emotional support. The cognitive resilience of the participants was measured as the relative effect of total cerebral brain volume on global cognition, using MRI scans and neuropsychological assessments. Lower brain volumes tend to be associated with lower cognitive function. The researchers examined the modifying effect of individual forms of social support on the relationship between cerebral volume and cognitive performance. They found that the cognitive function of individuals with greater availability of one specific form of social support was higher relative to their total cerebral volume. This particular form of 'social support' was the availability of a listener, and it was linked with increased cognitive resilience. What you should do 'Loneliness is one of the many symptoms of depression, and has other health implications for patients. These kinds of questions about a person's social relationships and feelings of loneliness can tell you a lot about a patient's broader social circumstances, their future health, and how they're really doing outside of the clinic,' Salinas said. Researchers noted that further study is required for further understanding of the biological mechanisms that link psychosocial factors to brain health. 'While there is still a lot that we don't understand about the specific biological pathways between psychosocial factors like listener availability and brain health, this study gives clues about concrete, biological reasons why we should all seek good listeners and become better listeners ourselves,' Salinas concluded. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change