logo
Warnings on unsafe state of bridge went unheeded

Warnings on unsafe state of bridge went unheeded

Time of India09-07-2025
Vadodara: After the Gambhira Bridge over the Mahisagar river — between Mujpur and Gambhira villages of Padra taluka in Vadodara — collapsed on Wednesday morning, killing at least 11 people, it has emerged that several representations by local leaders on the unsafe condition of the bridge, built in 1986, were ignored by the authorities.
Three years ago, a member of the Vadodara district panchayat, Harshadsinh Parmar, who is from Mujpur village, wrote to the roads and buildings (R&B) department, saying the derelict bridge posed a threat to public safety.
In Aug 2022, Parmar urged the authorities to immediately declare the bridge unsafe, close it to vehicles to prevent an accident and start the process of building a new bridge immediately.
Parmar's letters to the R&B department, copies of which are with TOI, warned the authorities that they would be responsible for any loss of life if timely action was not taken.
Speaking to TOI, Parmar said that after his letter, the additional chitnis at the Vadodara district collectorate sent a missive to the executive engineer of the R&B department, to do the needful that same month.
After the Morbi bridge collapse on Oct 30, 2022, which killed 135, Parmar sent reminders to the R&B department and district collectorate.
"As there were vibrations in the pillars of the bridge, I repeatedly demanded that the report on the condition of the bridge be made public.
All we were told was that the matter was under consideration. The authorities knew well that the bridge would collapse, but unfortunately, no action was taken," he said.
Ironically, N M Naykawala, executive engineer of the R&B department, told mediapersons after the Gambhira bridge collapse that the department's report had not found any major fault in the bridge. "There was an issue with its bearings, which was attended to last year," he told mediapersons.
RTI activist and local leader Lakhan Darbar, however, said that an executive engineer of the R&B department in 2022 had himself confessed that the bridge was unfit for use. "This bridge was not safe. The testing report was negative, but despite our demands, the report was never made public. For three years, they allowed the bridge to function knowing very well that it was unsafe. Today, it turned into a 'death-bridge' and we are demanding that the strictest action be taken against the officials concerned," he said.
On action taken by the state govt in response to representations about the Gambhira bridge being unsafe, state govt spokesman Rushikesh Patel said, "The bridge collapse was discussed at the cabinet meeting. CM Bhupendra Patel sought an explanation from officials of the roads and buildings department on the issue. A team of experts from the R&B department and private experts visited the site. The report of these experts is awaited.
Once the report is available, the govt will be able to fix responsibility for the tragedy."
Patel added that the govt had sanctioned Rs 212 crore for rebuilding the bridge and the project is at the tendering stage.
Vadodara district collector Anil Dhameliya told TOI, "The chief engineer (design) of R&B department has been assigned the task of ascertaining the reasons behind the collapse," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bihar's wanted gangster W Yadav gunned down in Hapur encounter
Bihar's wanted gangster W Yadav gunned down in Hapur encounter

Time of India

time33 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Bihar's wanted gangster W Yadav gunned down in Hapur encounter

W Yadav, a resident of Begusarai, had been absconding for several months after being accused of a murder in Bihar. NEW DELHI: A man with an Rs 50,000 bounty on his head, wanted in a murder case from Bihar, was gunned down in an early morning encounter by a joint team of the Uttar Pradesh Special Task Force (UP STF) and Bihar Police in Hapur district's Simbhaoli police station area. W Yadav, a resident of Begusarai, had been absconding for several months after being accused of a murder in Bihar, and law enforcement agencies had been tracking his movements across state lines. Additional superintendent of police (ASP) Vineet Bhatnagar said the operation was carried out based on specific intelligence inputs regarding W Yadav's whereabouts in western Uttar Pradesh. The joint team moved swiftly, laying a trap in the Simbhaoli area on Sunday morning. "On being challenged, the accused opened fire at the police team, prompting retaliatory action. In the brief exchange of fire, Yadav sustained bullet injuries. He was taken to the hospital where doctors declared him brought dead," said ASP Bhatnagar.

Not my child: In Hyderabad, a clinic of lies
Not my child: In Hyderabad, a clinic of lies

Time of India

time33 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Not my child: In Hyderabad, a clinic of lies

NEW DELHI: In a chilling twist to a suspected surrogacy scam, Hyderabad police have arrested eight people — including doctors and agents — for allegedly duping a Rajasthan-based couple by handing them a baby bought from a poor family and passing it off as their own biological child born through IVF. The racket centres around the Universal Srushti Fertility Centre in Secunderabad, run by Dr Athaluri Namratha (64), who is the prime accused. Among those arrested is Dr Nargula Sadanandam (41), an anesthetist at the state-run Gandhi Hospital, along with technicians and agents who allegedly facilitated the baby trade. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad HOW THE SCAM UNFOLDED August 2024 : The couple from Rajasthan approached the Secunderabad clinic for IVF consultation. Advised surrogacy : Dr Namratha allegedly convinced them to go for surrogacy, claiming their embryo would be implanted in a surrogate. Vizag referral : The couple was then asked to visit the Visakhapatnam branch for further procedures. Rs 35 lakh paid : Over the following months, the couple made payments totalling Rs 35 lakh. June 2025 : They were informed that the surrogate had delivered a baby boy via C-section. Rs 2 lakh extra : The clinic allegedly demanded Rs 2 lakh as delivery charges and handed over the baby — along with forged documentation. DNA shocker : Suspicious, the couple had a DNA test conducted in Delhi — which confirmed the baby was not genetically related to them. According to police sources, the clinic had actually bought the baby from a poor family for just Rs 90,000 and presented it as the result of the surrogacy. "The couple were misled into believing the child was theirs. The clinic fabricated the entire surrogacy procedure, and forged papers to hand over a baby purchased from another family," said a senior Hyderabad police officer, adding that more victims may come forward as the investigation progresses. Police have also flagged that Dr Namratha had been previously linked to a 2020 child trafficking case. Further investigation is underway to determine the scale of the operation, the involvement of hospital staff, and how many such 'IVF' babies were in fact trafficked.

NGT issues notices on alleged plastic waste violations by tobacco brands
NGT issues notices on alleged plastic waste violations by tobacco brands

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

NGT issues notices on alleged plastic waste violations by tobacco brands

The National Green Tribunal ( NGT ) issued notice on a plea from The Citizens Foundation, which alleges widespread non-compliance with the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, by manufacturers of gutkha, pan masala, and tobacco products. The petition claims that banned plastic packaging materials are still being used and calls for strict enforcement of existing regulations. This includes the closure of units violating the rules and the recovery of environmental compensation. A judicial bench led by Justice Prakash Shrivastava and Expert Member Dr. A. Senthil Vel has issued notices to relevant authorities, including the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC), seeking their responses. Counsel for the petitioner pointed out that, despite the CPCB's earlier directives, issued on October 22, 2021, under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, to 25 manufacturers to halt operations unless they adopted eco-friendly packaging, these directives remain unimplemented. The CPCB had instructed the defaulting companies to submit a timeline for switching to sustainable materials and to pay Environmental Compensation (EC) with interest for any delays. The plea highlights violations of Rules 4(f) and 4(i) of the 2016 Rules, which prohibit the use of plastic sachets and specific polymers in packaging gutkha and related products. CPCB's previous reports suggested that such non-compliance could result in stern penalties, including seizure of goods, shutting down of factories, and levies of Rs 5,000 per ton of plastic used. Repeat offences could attract additional fines of up to Rs 20,000 per ton. The applicant also cited a CPCB report from January 2021, which outlines enforcement under the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regime. According to this, delayed EC payments could be penalised with annual interest ranging from 12 per cent to 24 per cent. Delays exceeding three months could lead to factory closures and criminal prosecution under Section 15(1) of the Environment Protection Act. Recognising the gravity of the environmental concerns raised, the NGT has scheduled the next hearing for September 26, 2025. The applicant must serve notices on the remaining respondents and file an affidavit of service one week prior to the scheduled date, as stated by the Tribunal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store