Australia, New Zealand invest AUD $7 million in cyber education
The report provides an analysis of cybersecurity readiness based on how likely employees are to fall victim to social engineering or phishing attempts. The PPP metric, developed by KnowBe4, reflects the percentage of users who are susceptible to phishing prior to any security training. For Australia and New Zealand (ANZ), this baseline figure of 36.8% is higher than both the global average of 33.1% and the European average of 32.5%.
KnowBe4's study draws on data from 67.7 million simulated phishing exercises conducted among 14.5 million users in 62,400 organisations worldwide. Employees underwent a programme of security awareness training, with their PPP tracked at intervals of ninety days and again after more than a year, to evaluate the effectiveness of ongoing training in reducing cyber risk.
The findings highlight a marked improvement in resilience to phishing threats following sustained training. Within the first ninety days of awareness training, the average PPP in the region dropped from 36.8% to 19.9%. After twelve months, this figure declined further to just 4.9% on average. KnowBe4 noted that these results are consistent with global patterns, where ongoing security awareness initiatives play a substantial role in strengthening defences against cyber attacks.
Large organisations in Australia and New Zealand were identified as the most susceptible globally, with an initial PPP of 44.6%. The report shows these organisations reduced their risk dramatically to 4.7% after a year of continuous security awareness training. The data also indicated that the critical infrastructure and banking sectors were the most vulnerable to phishing in the ANZ region at the outset of the study.
Government action in response to the findings has included an investment of AUD $7 million, distributed among 200 recipients, to support community-level cyber education initiatives. This forms part of broader efforts to build long-term resilience, which also include legislative measures to address the increasing sophistication of cyber threats targeted at critical infrastructure sectors.
International cooperation has become a core strategy in the region's response to cyber challenges. Australia and New Zealand have engaged with partners through the Five Eyes security alliance and invested in developing a skilled cybersecurity workforce as part of their approach to strengthening organisational and national resilience.
Erich Kron, Security Awareness Advocate at KnowBe4, commented on the results: "Our report shows that large ANZ organisations began with the highest phishing vulnerability globally at 44.6% yet achieved a remarkable reduction to just 4.7% after ongoing training. The most significant shift we are seeing is the growing recognition by the Australian government of the critical role that community-level education plays in building a resilient cyber ecosystem, evidenced by their AUD $7 million investment across 200 recipients. While progress is being made, it is clear from the data in the report that sustained security training is essential to drive long-lasting change."
The KnowBe4 report reiterates the importance of regular, comprehensive security training in reducing individuals' susceptibility to phishing and social engineering, particularly within sectors deemed high risk. The report underlines the necessity of a multifaceted approach that combines education, government policy, industry collaboration, and workforce development to address the persistent risk posed by phishing attacks in the region.
Follow us on:
Share on:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Rich Aussies on the hunt for $3m-plus properties
A high-end Arrowtown-based realtor recently named New Zealand's best real estate agent says there's a big shortage of luxury Whakatipu properties for sale compared to the number of interested buyers. "The current market is seeing a 10-fold imbalance of buyers versus available high-end properties, with Lake Hayes noted as a hot spot for demand," Oliver Road managing director Cam Winter says. "We are contacted daily by buyers with budgets of between $5million and $25m, but they have very specific requirements and aren't going to part with that sort of money if something isn't quite right." People with $8m to spend won't just buy the best available option, he notes — "they're happy to wait until the perfect place comes along". Winter, who's been joined by sales partner Omea Swanson over the past six months, won the best NZ agent award (2025-26) at the International Property Awards' Asia Pacific awards in Bangkok, Thailand — he also spoke on a panel about the Queenstown property market. Oliver Road also won best real estate agency website in NZ and the top NZ marketing award. With the first two awards, Winter and his firm are also in the running for Asia Pacific and international awards which will be announced in December. When his company solely operated in the Bay of Plenty, he also won the Asia Pacific best agent title in 2021-22. He set up his Arrowtown office in '23 and, since launching with three listings 18 months ago, the firm's sold 18 properties ranging from about $3m to $12m. Winter notes buyers like his agency's transparent pricing. "As the agent for a property worth $7m or $8m, we have a responsibility not only to the seller of that property to get the best price but also to the current and future sellers of other properties in what is such a small market segment. "The results heavily impact what can be obtained for other properties." He notes about 60% of his buyers are from Australia, and primarily Sydney. "A notable recent sale of 408 Littles Rd at $7.23m took place after a multiple offer situation with both buyers being from Australia." Following recent comments from NZ First leader Winston Peters, whose party's in the coalition government, "we expect the current overseas buyer settings [allowing only Australian and Singaporean foreign residential buyers] to change, though this is likely to allow only those investing in the country to acquire property here, over a threshold such as $5m".
Scoop
12 hours ago
- Scoop
How Bad Is The Tariff News For NZ, Really?
, Money Correspondent New Zealand has been hit with a higher tariff rate than Australia on exports to the US - but economists say the situation could have been worse. It was revealed on Friday that New Zealand exports would have a 15 percent tariff applied, up from 10 percent announced earlier. Australia remains at 10 percent. Brad Olsen, chief executive at Infometrics, said that was a clear challenge for New Zealand. "There is now a wedge between us and Australia." There were other parts of the world that previously had a higher tariff rate that were now on the same level as New Zealand, such as Europe. "Wine, for example, under the original tariffs, we might have had a slight advantage. Now we don't." But he said it was not necessarily true that the country would have been better off had it negotiated a deal. He said New Zealand did not have a lot to "give up" in those negotiations, and it could have ended up being costly. "I'm a little bit surprised by comments, including from the opposition's trade spokesperson, that the government failed to achieve a lower tariff rate. "The comments seem to make the implication that New Zealand could have found a way to come up with a trade agreement that might have given us a lower tariff rate. "That might be true, but we have no idea what we would have had to give up to achieve that… some of what had to be given up by other countries to get a 15 percent tariffs rate is consequential - Japan and other countries had to give up to half a trillion dollars of further investment into the US." He said the impact on New Zealand's trading partners might not be as bad as had been expected, which should prove positive for the economy. "It will be slightly more challenging to export to the US from a New Zealand point of view, but our trading partner activity might not be hit as bad as was feared in April. That's probably a net benefit for us." Mike Jones, chief economist at BNZ, said the increase was not unexpected given indications of the past few weeks. "It's obviously unhelpful for NZ exports into the US, particularly how we line up with those coming from Australia and the UK, given the lower 10 percent baseline tariff rate for those countries. "Beef and wine exports could be affected. It's interesting in this context that we've seen the NZD/AUD exchange rate fall a little today in the wake of the announcements." Kelly Eckhold, chief economist at Westpac, said he thought New Zealand was in roughly the same position as in April. "On one hand, the tariff is higher, so there is a bigger direct cost, but it's a bit lower for a lot of our trading partners, so it's better for the economy than would otherwise be the case." He said how the lingering elements of uncertainty played out over the coming weeks would be important. "The legal basis of these tariffs, whether they're going to be able to continue or need to be replaced with a different type of tariff, is an issue. And the sectoral tariffs have not yet really been negotiated. "While I don't think these things affect the sort of goods New Zealand trades with the US, there may be some impact on our trading partners." He said it seemed strange that the US was calculating tariffs based on which countries exported more than they imported. "The concept that US authorities have had of countries ripping them off by selling more stuff to America than they're been buying is quite myopic. "We're only talking about goods trade here, we buy a lot of services from the US. "In large part, the trade imbalance is a cyclical rather than a structural story. "In the last few years, the economy has been relatively weak compared to the US. We're not sucking in as many imports, and the exchange rate has been lower than would normally be the case, which has encouraged export revenues. "I would have thought trade policy metrics like tariffs would be determined on the basis of structural, not cyclical factors. "All those things could easily be the other way around in a few years' time."
Otago Daily Times
18 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Working from home a legal right in Australian-first reform
Working from home for two days a week would become a legal right under a proposed reform in Victoria. Photo: Getty Employees in Victoria will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed. The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office. The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home. Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026. It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win. The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader. Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy. "Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said. "If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right." The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day. New South Waled Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices. More than one-third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 percent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics. The bureau says 43 percent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
