There are already Civilization 7 mods that improve the UI, unlock all civs, and add 'ludicrous'-sized maps
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Civilization 7 is officially here, and with it comes (at least for now) a "Mixed" review status on Steam and a lot of complaints about the 4X strategy's UI. While we're keeping up with all the latest Civ 7 news and developments, the community has been busy too: the first Civ 7 mods have arrived on the same day as the game's global launch.
This is the rare occasion where I'm not directing you to Nexus Mods: the early mods that have appeared for Civ 7 are over at the civfanatics.com forums. There aren't a ton of them yet, but there are definitely a few to point out.
Right out of the gate, there are a couple of mods that address one of the biggest complaints about Civ 7: the UI. Civ 7's interface is taking a serious pounding: I've seen Steam reviewers calling it "buggy," "inconsistent," "junk," "a total disaster," and most damningly, "somehow worse than Civ 6."
Firaxis has already issued a patch to address a few of the complaints about the UI and I suspect there will be more coming, but in the meantime you might check out Sukritact's Simple UI Adjustments. I haven't tried it myself yet, but it's got nothing but 5-star ratings in the forums. Here's a quick rundown on its features:
Diplomacy with other Civs and IPs can now be initiated by clicking on the city banner (provided you have met them).
Plot Yield icons are smaller on tiles that are not improved/worked
Tooltips are enhanced.
The default improvement is now shown on unimproved tiles.
All Constructibles now display their icon.
Wonders receive a large fancy icon with description.
Buildings now note if they are damaged or in-progress or ageless.
Another mod is also focused on improving the UI: TCS Improved Plot Tooltop adds tons more info so it's easier to find what you need, including leader relationship status, settlement ownership, flags for obsolete or unique buildings, district types, and other useful tidbits you can spy at a glance.
If you're an eager beaver and are interested in instant gratification, check out the Civ 7 Unlock All Civs mod. With it, you no longer have to meet the requirements to access civilizations when you reach the Exploration and Modern Ages, they're all immediately available to you.
Work is already underway on bringing you bigger maps, with a beta of Larger Map, TSL, Continents++ available to download. It unlocks "large" and "huge" map sizes and adds a "massive" (128x80) map. The mod also lists experimental (not playable) "giant" maps (180x94) and "ludicrous" maps (230x116) to test out.
That's not bad for a game that only just came out, and you can find more mods at the Civ Fanatic forums. Make sure you carefully read the installation instructions on each mod's page before downloading.
Civilization 7 review: Our verdictCiv 7 performance analysis: How it runsCiv 7 victory guide: All win conditionsHow Civ 7 towns/cities work: Settlements guideCiv 7 age transitions guide: Everything that changesView Deal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Intel draws a line in the sand to boost gross margins — new products must deliver 50% gross profit to get the green light
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Intel will not be entertaining any projects that do not promise to double its money going forward. Michelle Johnston Holthaus, CEO of Intel Products, announced at Bank of America's global technology conference that Intel is no longer approving new projects that cannot be proven to earn at least 50% gross margin "based on a set of industry expectations." Holthaus explained Intel's new risk-averse policy as "something that we probably should have had before, but we have it now so that product doesn't move forward; you actually don't get engineers assigned to it if it's not 50% or higher gross margins moving forward." Holthaus also clarified that while Intel is not expecting or projecting 50% gross margins across all operations, it is a number the company is aspiring toward internally. All of Intel's future roadmap operations, including Panther Lake and Nova Lake, are also currently expected to reach the 50% gross profit number that the rest of the business aspires to. The drive behind this initiative is reportedly coming from Intel's new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan. Tan is reportedly "laser focused on the fact that we need to get our gross margins back up above 50%." To accomplish this, Tan is also said to be investigating and potentially cancelling or changing unprofitable deals with other companies. Intel's margins have slipped to new lows for the company in recent months. MacroTrends reports Intel's trailing 12 months gross margin for Q1 2025 was as low as 31.67%. Intel's gross margins had hovered around the 60% mark for the ten years leading up to the COVID-19 pandemic, falling beneath 50% in Q2 2022 and continuing to steadily fall ever since. Holthaus predicts a "tug-of-war" to ensue within Intel in the coming months as engineers and executives reckon with being forced between a rock and a hard place. "We need to be building products that... fit the right competitive landscape and requirements of our customers, but also have the right cost structure in place. It really requires us to do both." CEO Lip-Bu Tan has done much to streamline Intel's operation and right a rocking ship inherited from previous Intel chief Pat Gelsinger. Another major round of layoffs, potentially up to 20% of the remaining workforce, is coming in Q2, arriving after a major leadership change-up to remove middle management between Tan and other team leads. Tan is also quoted as wanting to turn Intel into an "engineering-focused company" again under his leadership. To reach this, Tan has committed to investing in recruiting and retaining top talent; "I believe Intel has lost some of this talent over the years; I want to create a culture of innovation empowerment." Maintaining a culture of empowering innovation and top talent seems, on its face, at odds with layoffs and a lock on projects not projected to gross 50% margins, but Tan seemingly has Intel investors on his side in these pursuits. Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News to get our up-to-date news, analysis, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia's Hopper GPUs are now dead to the Chinese market after export controls that made the company take a 'multibillion-dollar write-off'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. There was more than the usual swell of anticipation for Nvidia's latest earnings call, primarily because the last quarter has been tumultuous in the wake of US tariffs and trade restrictions. On this front, and despite the fact that the AI chip giant still seems to be doing phenomenally well, Nvidia has admitted export controls have fully killed off its Hopper generation GPUs in China. During the company's recent Q1 earnings call, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang explained: "The H20 export ban ended our Hopper Data Center business in China. We cannot reduce Hopper further to comply. As a result, we are taking a multibillion-dollar write-off on inventory that cannot be sold or repurposed. We are exploring limited ways to compete, but Hopper is no longer an option." Hopper is the company's previous-gen GPU/AI accelerator architecture. While its Blackwell architecture—the architecture at the heart of the RTX 50 series—is rolling out to fill up data centres despite previous delays, Hopper chips still line many server racks and they were the primary Nvidia export to China. The past couple of years have seen the same scene play out over and over again: The US restricts what Nvidia can export to China, Nvidia starts exporting a slightly less powerful Hopper chip to China, then the US restricts it further so that less powerful Hopper chip is restricted, too. Rinse and repeat. No longer, though, according to Nvidia. Now, there is seemingly no less powerful chip that Nvidia can comfortably make and export to the country. Nvidia Hopper is dead in China. Nvidia CFO Colette Kress says: "our outlook reflects a loss in H20 revenue of approximately $8 billion for the second quarter." H20 is the Hopper chip that Nvidia was previously exporting to China, and $8 billion revenue loss for Q2 is a lot more than the company lost for Q1. Nvidia had previously said that it could lose $5.5 billion in Q1 because of export restrictions, but it looks like that amount turned out to be $2.5 billion in the end: "We recognized $4.6 billion H20 in Q1. We were unable to ship $2.5 billion, so the total for Q1 should have been $7 billion." Despite praising President Trump's "bold vision", the company doesn't seem to agree with his trade restriction strategy in this case. Huang says: "The question is not whether China will have AI, it already does. The question is whether one of the world's largest AI markets will run on American platforms. Shielding Chinese chipmakers from U.S. competition only strengthens them abroad and weakens America's position." Your next upgrade Best CPU for gaming: The top chips from Intel and gaming motherboard: The right graphics card: Your perfect pixel-pusher SSD for gaming: Get into the game ahead of the rest. We've heard Huang say similar before, and it's certainly an argument to take seriously. At the same time, though, we can hardly expect the CEO of a chip company to support the banning of its exports to one of its biggest markets. The China export restrictions were certainly the main talking point in the earnings call, other than the usual "AI factory" stuff and a sliver of gaming talk. On that front, Nvidia claims a "record $3.8 billion" gaming revenue, but the wow-factor shrivels a little when we remember that Nvidia's pushed out a bunch of its new GPUs over a very short period, so we can expect an inflated number there. Nvidia all but admits this when it calls Blackwell its "fastest ramp ever"—that's "fastest", not "biggest". Anyway, trade talk aside, Nvidia seems to be doing pretty well in the wake of this news. I'm sure the multi-billion company will survive Hopper waving farewell to China. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia's research boss claims the company's Chinese AI researchers are now writing programs for Huawei instead and is blaming the US chip exports
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Nvidia's been banging the drum against the United State's China chip export restrictions for a while now, but while it had previously highlighted this in broad terms, the company now seems to be getting more direct with its claims. According to a machine translation of a report from Taiwan Economic Daily (via Wccftech), Nvidia's chief scientist and senior VP of research, Bill Dally, claims that Huawei is scooping up ex-Nvidia AI researchers as a result of the restrictions. According to Dally, admittedly via a machine translation, the growth in the number of AI researchers working in China—apparently growing from a third of the world's researchers in 2019 to almost half of them today—has been forced by the US export restrictions. The idea is that without these restrictions, Huawei wouldn't be forced to lean so strongly into home-grown AI solutions, but now it must do so to keep up. Nvidia is clearly keen on presenting this argument (probably in hopes that the US administration specifically will hear it) to show that there are arguable downsides of banning its exports to China for the US. It certainly appeals to the ears of those concerned about the US-China technological arms race. As I said, though, the general argument isn't new—Nvidia has been touting it for a while. At Computex last month, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang said: "AI researchers are still doing AI research in China" and "if they don't have enough Nvidia, they will use their own [chips]." And regarding Huawei specifically, Huang said the company has become "quite formidable". There is, of course, another reason other than US national interest that might make Nvidia keen to highlight possible negatives of export controls. Namely, the fact that these restrictions have cost and will cost the company lots of money. Nvidia itself has confirmed this, stating that after billions of dollars lost through restrictions of its H20 chips to China in Q1, it's expecting another $8 billion to be lost for the same reason in Q2. That's because Hopper, the company's previous chip architecture, "is no longer an option", according to the CEO. Huawei's latest Ascend 910 and 920 chips, courtesy of China's SMIC (Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation), will probably now be better options for Chinese AI companies than trying to get hands on Nvidia silicon somehow. And with ex-Nvidia researchers now apparently padding out the Chinese industry, who knows what will be cooked up next and when. Nvidia certainly seems to be presenting itself as worried about what's to come. The company can't complain about the vaguely 'poachy' aspect of this, though, really—not when Nvidia seems to be enticing likely TSMC employees in Taiwan with high salary job advertisements. Sometimes business is just business, you know? Best gaming PC: The top pre-built gaming laptop: Great devices for mobile gaming. Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen.
