Musk's AI bot praised Hitler. Will the new Tesla robotaxis?
Elon Musk passes the buck after his AI chatbot goes full Hitler
I'm old enough to remember a time when creating something that suddenly transformed into a malevolent Hitler robot would end a business and prompt that business's owner to offer a profound apology and live in eternal shame.
Alas, it's 2025, so officials at the social media site took the hateful posts down and promised they'd teach Grok that Nazis are bad while Musk blamed X users for provoking his bot to like Hitler.
Opinion: Musk can spend a fortune on the 'America Party.' But can he have an impact?
"Grok was too compliant to user prompts," he wrote in an X post. "Too eager to please and be manipulated, essentially. That is being addressed."
Musk did not mention actually doing something about the X accounts, some reportedly run by neo-Nazis, that were egging the AI on in a pro-Hitler direction.
Musk is doing a fabulous job of destroying the Tesla brand
If you own Tesla stock or, heaven forbid, a Tesla and also have morals, hearing the company's owner effectively say "You guys bullied my technology into hating Jewish people!" might be the latest of his many last straws.
Musk already has made an arm gesture that looked for all the world like a Nazi salute and defended hate speech on his X platform as a cure for the nonexistent "woke mind virus."
Opinion: Elon Musk's 'odd-looking' salute sure looked like a 'Sieg heil' to me
Between this and his ongoing and calamitous foray into right-wing politics, Musk seems hellbent on eviscerating his own electric vehicle brand.
Which brings us to the Tesla robotaxis.
What if a Tesla robotaxi's AI turns antisemitic mid-ride?
Musk's robotaxis rely on artificial intelligence, and since I just watched one Musk-led AI creation praise Hitler as "history's prime example of spotting patterns in anti-white hate and acting decisively on them," I have a few concerns.
'Major fail' indeed: Musk's AI told the truth, so now he has to fix it | Opinion
Musk's driverless vehicles began offering rides in Austin on June 22, and for now, they have company employees riding in the front passenger seat to monitor things and intervene if there are problems.
One potential problem would be the robotaxi's AI greeting a new passenger like this: "Howdy! I am your Tesla robotaxi, and on our short ride today, I'd like to chat with you about the international Jewish conspiracy ..."
Sorry, I don't want a ride from a potentially anti-Jewish driverless Tesla
Or: "Hi there! I'm your autonomous driver, MechaHitler. Welcome to this wokeness-free ride, during which I'll be happy to answer any questions you might have on The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and ..."
Or possibly: "Salutations! Are you White, straight and Christian? If not, please get out immediately."
Call me overly sensitive, but I'm not interested in rolling the dice on whether the vehicle transporting me from point A to point B might harbor antisemitic views.
If nothing else, perhaps Musk's robotaxis will encourage more people to walk.
Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @rexhuppke.bsky.social and on Facebook at facebook.com/RexIsAJerk
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
36 minutes ago
- Spectator
The mixed legacy of Zbigniew Brzezinski, strategist of the Cold War
In the autumn of 1938, within nine weeks of each other, two boys arrived in New York, fleeing the gathering storm: a 15-year-old Jewish German and a ten-year-old Catholic from Poland. Both would repay the mortal debt they owed by dedicating their lives to the Land of the Free. The older boy was, of course, Henry Kissinger, later Grand High Poobah to Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. The younger was Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's national security adviser from 1977 to 1981 and the subject of a magisterial biography bythe Financial Times'sWashingtonsupremo, Edward Luce. From the first, Zbigniew Brzezinski (pronounced 'ZbigNieff BreshinSki', as Carter helpfully informed his team) sat in Kissinger's shadow, always a step or two behind the great Bavarian. Their first encounter was at Harvard in 1950 when Zbig's first-year lecturer handed the reins to his protégé, described by Zbig as a 'youngish, somewhat rotund… scholar with a strong German accent'. The Pole disliked the sub's penchant for 'Germanic philosophers'. 'Not my meat,' he recalled. 'I rather impolitely rose and left.' The two circled one another for decades. Alternately respectful, cordial, even playful, they also briefed against each other with the spite only arrogant, erudite rivals can exhibit. To Kissinger, Zbig was a 'total whore who has been on every side of every argument'. Brzezinski saw in his senior 'an unprincipled politician, and a political chameleon who only cares about staying visible in US public life and returning to power'. As Harry S. Truman once said: 'If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog.' That Kissinger is more remembered is partly due to his being an 'Olympic gold medal-winning flatterer', according to Luce. 'Even with me he would say things I knew to be patently untrue about how he always read my column first thing every morning.' For his part, Zbig favoured abrasive argument. He would 'specialise in decapitating people he thought were fools'. And he chose to leave the greater part of his story to be told by Luce, who has had unrestricted access to a voluminous corpus of diaries, letters and papers. The result of this bequest is a landmark study unlikely to be equalled. This is a high-definition account of one of the great – and most neglected – postwar statesmen and strategists, who helped to shape the end of the Soviet Union. From 1950 on, when he was a mere Masters student, Zbig could see that the simmering nationalisms within the USSR were its Achilles' heel. As a proud Pole, he knew only too well that non-Russian peoples in the Soviet Union retained deep national feelings that would not tolerate Moscow's imperialism indefinitely. His rivals and colleagues, Kissinger included, pursued détente, thinking the Reds would inevitably catch up and overtake the US. But Zbig saw clearly how the massive Soviet hulk was vulnerable to degeneration. His 'systematic bent of mind' pushed Carter to weaponise human rights against the USSR, normalise relations with the Chinese – leading to the opening of listening posts on the Sino-Russian border – and to provide support to Afghan rebel groups following the 1979 Soviet invasion, leaving the Russians bogged down in an unwinnable war. But nowhere was his historic calling more apparent than in Polish affairs. Zbig saw the profound potential of Lech Walesa's Solidarity trade union and used American might to protect and nurture it. In this he was aided by a countryman, one Karol Jozef Wojtyla (aka Pope John Paul II), who became a lifelong ally (Brzezinski had 'P' for 'Pope' added to his White House phone). So it was that in 1980, with the Soviets poised to invade Poland, the two powerful Poles conspired to defend the homeland: Zbig by having Carter issue public and private threats to Leonid Brezhnev; John Paul II by quietly beseeching Solidarity to avoid any action that might give the Soviets an excuse to advance. Years later, the CIA director Robert Gates would conclude that it had been the 'fragile seeds' sowed by Brzezinski that had done for the USSR. If Zbig was responsible for Carter's greatest foreign policy legacy, he was also central to its greatest failure. Having mistaken the Iranian Ayatollah for a 'non-violent Shiite version of Mohandas Gandhi', he advocated successfully for the US to admit the ailing and displaced Shah. It was a decision which precipitated the storming of the US embassy in Tehran and an awful hostage crisis which ultimately destroyed the credibility of Carter's administration. That there have been such very long tails to the Carter presidency's calculations and miscalculations – in eastern Europe, Iran and Afghanistan – speaks loudly of a time when big brains played big dice on the Cold War Risk board of the world. Luce's exceptional study vividly revives the memory, strategies, tactics and foibles of one of the greatest players of that lethal game.
Spectator
38 minutes ago
- Spectator
Recognising Palestine isn't a path to peace
The children of Gaza are enduring horrendous suffering. The control of aid has been restricted. Innocent lives have been set at nothing. Ruthlessness well beyond the terms of realpolitik has put hundreds of thousands at risk. The people responsible deserve global condemnation. But instead it seems they are to be rewarded. It is Hamas which is responsible for the suffering in Gaza. The terrorist organisation has, for years, used its thugs to control international development assistance to enrich its leaders and subdue the population. Its murderous – indeed, genocidal – intent was made manifest on 7 October 2023 when it unleashed an assault on innocent Israelis which resulted in the biggest single loss of Jewish life since the Holocaust. In many cases, Hamas fighters sexually assaulted their victims and gleefully celebrated their deaths. The organisation's leadership exulted in the slaughter and declared that if they could, they would kill and kill again until they had eliminated the Zionist entity. Since that attack, and the Israeli response, Hamas has demonstrated disdain not only for Jewish lives, but also Palestinian ones. By placing command posts in hospitals, putting children deliberately in harm's way and continuing to use food aid as a weapon against its own people, Hamas has shown they are not noble liberators but barbaric murderers. And the West's response to this butcher's bill? To give Hamas the political victory of recognising a Palestinian state. This week the chair of parliament's foreign affairs select committee, Emily Thornberry, was the latest MP to call for British recognition of a Palestinian state. She reflects the views of dozens on the Labour benches – and, it is feared, even the instincts of the Prime Minister himself. Later this month, France and Saudi Arabia will co-chair a conference that aims to obtain recognition of a Palestinian state. Last year, Ireland, Norway and Spain joined more than 140 other members of the United Nations in formally recognising Palestine's statehood. According to Thornberry, it is 'just a question of when' Keir Starmer does so. Before the Prime Minister contemplates any such step, he might do well to study the7 October Parliamentary Commission Report compiled by the UK-Israel All-Party Parliamentary Group chaired by Lord Roberts of Belgravia. To read it is to be reminded of who will cheer loudest if Hamas's atrocities are rewarded with diplomatic recognition. The people responsible for the indiscriminate massacre of 378 Israelis at the Nova musical festival, shot down as they were fleeing for their lives, will be jubilant once more. The terrorists who carried out the gang-rape and mutilation of female victims, filmed for the perpetrators' twisted glory, will rejoice again. The men who shot an unborn child in her mother's womb and murdered a 92-year-old Holocaust survivor before taking 250 men, women and children hostage will have new cause for celebration. The answer to such evil should not be the granting of global respectability but a determination to prevent such atrocities from happening again. That is what Israel, almost alone, is seeking to achieve. Its military campaign is based on the far-from-unreasonable desire to liberate the hostages and permanently eliminate the death cult of Hamas. For its troubles, it enjoys not sympathy and support but a wilfully blind campaign of condemnation. Recent reporting of Israel's continued distribution of food aid to Gaza has ignored the reality of aid distribution in the past, when Hamas would confiscate the support offered by the international community and use it to reward compliance and punish internal opponents. It is to the shame of some aid groups, and certainly of the United Nations' organisation UNRWA, that they made themselves the accomplices to this oppression. The reason Hamas has sought to disrupt, often violently, Israel's aid distribution is because it has been robbed of a tool of political control and a source of illicit finance. Israel's defence forces have made errors in this conflict, sometimes grievous ones. But there is a world of difference between the citizen army of a rule-bound democracy fighting a counter-insurgency campaign while seeking to rescue hostages in urban settings and a terror group that regards every innocent life lost as another propaganda win. Israel's actions in setting back Iran's nuclear weapons programme and obliterating Hezbollah's military structures have made the world safer. It has dismantled much, but not all, of the Hamas command structure. If it can further reduce the ability of Hamas to ever again conduct operations like 7 October, it will have also helped prepare the ground for a more sustainable future for the whole Middle East. A path to genuine peace relies not on the knee-jerk recognition of Palestine, but on the extension of the Abraham Accords. Saudi Arabian recognition of Israel and a broader partnership between pragmatic Arab states and Jerusalem would lay the ground for a future Palestinian state, guaranteed and supported by its Arab neighbours. If the leaders of the West truly want the best future for the Palestinian people, they will want Hamas defeated not garlanded. Choose the latter, and Islamists everywhere will know that in our hearts we are not prepared to defend democracy against barbarity.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Tesla pledges to make cheaper cars as issues mount
Tesla has said it will build cheaper cars and win approval for its self-driving software in Europe this year, as it tries to revive its struggling Musk's electric vehicle (EV) firm told investors it had started "first builds of a more affordable model in June" while posting a slump in car deliveries and shrinking firm is struggling as it faces cuts to US government support for electric cars, competition from Chinese carmakers, and a brand hit from Musk's controversial political Tesla told investors US tariff policy had cost it $300m over the three months to June and warned of further pain in the months ahead. Chief financial officer Vaibhav Taneja said the end of a tax credit for buyers of electric cars in the US is also likely to did not provide an update on its outlook for the year, warning it was "difficult to measure the impacts of shifting global trade and fiscal policies".Revenue in the three months to June fell 12% year-on-year - the biggest drop in at least a decade - after deliveries plunged 14%. Profits fell 16%.Musk told investors on Wednesday he expected the firm's sales in Europe to increase once customers there are allowed to use the firm's self-driving software. He said he expected the first approval to come in the Netherlands but that the firm also hoped to win sign-off from the European Union, despite it having a "kalfka-esque" bureaucracy."Autonomy is the story," Musk said. "Autonomy is what amplifies the value [of the company] to stratospheric levels."But the firm's once-fat margins have shrunk sharply, with profits down in five of the last six quarters. Shares have fallen roughly 30% from the peak last year, after Musk's support for Trump helped win the White House. In May, as concerns about the company mounted, the head of the company's board had to publicly deny it had started looking for a replacement. Investors cheered after Musk said he was leaving the Trump administration, hoping he would focus on the company and steer clear of politics. But the messy break-up with the White House, as Musk has flirted with starting a new political party, has kept investors on this month, Tesla investor and Trump supporter James Fishback wrote to the Tesla board, calling on it to determine if his political ambitions are "compatible" with his obligations as chief Dan Ives, known as a fan of the company, also urged the board to impose guardrails, prompting Musk to snap back on social media: "Shut up, Dan".Musk's "shenanigans" have cost it some of the passionate support that had allowed it to grow without spending on advertising, said Daniel Binns, global chief executive of brand consultancy Tesla now facing much stiffer competition, he said it was unlikely that the launch of a new model would fix the firm's problems by itself."It will help... but it's got to be more than just another car," he said. "The market's caught up to them."
