5 Lessons I Learned the Hard Way About Business Success
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
I've been through it all — companies that soared, companies that sank, deals that looked like gold and turned out to be sand and partnerships that either multiplied value or silently killed it. If there's one brutal truth I've learned after decades of building, buying, selling and sometimes burying companies, it's this:
Relationships — not ideas, capital or even timing — are the ultimate determinant of success.
It's a lesson that no spreadsheet will teach you and no pitch deck will fully convey. But it's the one thing every founder, CEO, investor and partner needs to internalize if they want to build something that lasts.
Let me explain through five unfiltered truths I learned the hard way — some through exits, some through bankruptcies.
Related: How to Build and Sustain Deep, Meaningful Business Relationships (and Why It's the Key to Long-Lasting Success)
1. Bad partnerships are more expensive than bad products
A bad product can be fixed. A misaligned partner? That's a cancer in the system.
I once co-founded a company with incredible potential — strong unit economics, great early adoption and even some early buzz in the media. But internally, the leadership team was fractured. One partner prioritized short-term revenue. Another obsessed over product perfection. And I, caught between the two, tried to play referee.
Guess what happened?
We burned cash arguing. We stalled decisions. Morale tanked. Ultimately, the company died — not because of the market, but because we couldn't get out of our own way.
Looking back, I now ask this before every deal: Do I want to be in a foxhole with this person when things go wrong? If the answer isn't a hell yes, it's a no.
2. Bankruptcy is a leadership failure, not a market failure
Yes, markets change. Yes, industries shift. But most of the bankruptcies I've seen — including my own — weren't because of the economy. They were because we made poor decisions, delayed hard conversations and ignored red flags.
We had a company that seemed unstoppable — fast-growing, flush with investor interest and scaling quickly. But internally, management was siloed. Sales leadership was misaligned with operations. Decisions were made based on ego instead of data. We ignored tension because things were "good enough."
Until they weren't.
When it collapsed, it was easy to point fingers at external market conditions. But the truth? We failed ourselves.
That experience forever changed the way I build. Now, every leadership meeting starts with alignment. If leadership isn't rowing in the same direction, I don't care how good the boat is — it's going nowhere.
Related: Want Strong Business Relationships? Avoid These 3 Mistakes.
3. Buyers don't buy products — they buy people
When I've successfully exited companies, there's a pattern that shows up every time: We were aligned with the buyer on values, vision and execution style.
One of our best exits came not because we had the best tech, but because the acquiring team said, "We want to work with you guys." They knew we had strong relationships across departments, high employee retention and a culture of transparency.
Deals get done when there's trust. Period. It doesn't matter how great your EBITDA is if the buyer doesn't believe in your leadership or your people.
If you're preparing to exit, ask yourself: Would you buy this company if you didn't know the numbers, but just knew the people running it?
If the answer is no, you've got work to do.
4. Decision-making is a muscle — train it or lose it
Poor decision-making doesn't show up all at once. It's a slow erosion — a hundred little moments when you defer, delay or delegate decisions you should own.
One business I led started slipping when we over-delegated key choices to mid-management without ensuring those managers were aligned with the company strategy. Over time, execution drifted. Product launches missed the mark. Marketing lost focus. And we didn't notice until revenue plateaued.
Strong companies don't just have good leaders — they have good decision-making systems.
Now, in every company I touch, we prioritize decision hygiene. Clear frameworks. Accountability. Retrospectives. You can't outsource judgment. You have to train it.
Related: 8 Strategies for Building Long-Lasting Business Relationships
5. The exit isn't the end — it's the mirror
When you sell a company, the terms of that exit reflect everything you did right — or wrong.
Great exits happen when:
You have strong internal processes
Your financials are airtight
Your leadership team is trusted
Your reputation precedes you
Bad exits — or worse, failed exits — happen when:
You patched things together just for the data room
Buyers smell desperation
You can't clearly explain how the company runs without you
I've lived both sides, and I'll tell you: Nothing haunts an entrepreneur more than realizing they killed a great business by not focusing on the fundamentals early enough.
So, what's the takeaway? If I could give one piece of advice to any founder building a startup today, it's this:
Invest in relationships before you invest in features. Build trust before you build scale. Fix your internal operating model before you chase more revenue.
Money follows alignment. Buyers follow leadership. Teams follow purpose. And if you get those right, the next big thing might just follow you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CCM Health breaks ground for $2.4M child care center in Montevideo, Minnesota
May 31---- As groundbreaking ceremonies go, this one was complicated. Twenty-nine children had first digs at tossing the dirt as hosted a groundbreaking ceremony Wednesday for a $2.4 million child care center on its Montevideo campus. "This is what it's really about, all these kids," said Brian Lovdahl, CEO of CCM Health, as the 29 children — most of them preschool age — were led by staff from the existing child care center to the site of the groundbreaking. As a point of fact, the rules and regulations involved with child care are complicated too, but worth the navigating, according to Lovdahl. Having child care available is a definite help for the health system's staff. The nearly 350 employees skew younger than is the average for health care facilities in the country, meaning there are many with young children, he explained. The availability of on-campus child care benefits both staff recruitment and retention, according to the CEO. A new provider had no more than inked his contract when the first thing he mentioned was the desire to enroll a child in the center, Lovdahl said. CCM Health became one of the first small health care systems in the country to offer child care services when it opened its existing center in January 2020. It continues to receive inquiries from other systems about how to make it happen, according to Lovdahl. The move into the new facility should happen in October, if not sooner. Groundwork is completed and the footprint for the new facility is readied, all ahead of schedule, according to the CEO. The new, 5,000-square-foot center will offer more than three times the space of the existing facility. The new facility will be licensed for 70 children. The current facility is licensed for 31 children but serves around 40 when counting drop-ins. It is located in a building housing the ambulance operations. The new facility will be located on the site where the original Montevideo Veterans Affairs Clinic stood. The location puts the young children no more than 60 feet away from the nearest doctor in CCM Health's Medical Clinic and Hospital if they should need medical help. It also means nursing mothers can drop over to the center during breaks. Staffing needs led to the decision more than six years ago to open an on-campus child center. Lovdahl said CCM Health was being served by traveling nurses in 2018-19 to meet staffing needs. Permanent staff members expressed an interest in working more hours, he said, but they cited the lack of child care as a major impediment to doing so. It took about eight months from the beginning of the discussions on child care needs to the opening of existing center. In about six months, it reached capacity, and has pretty much stayed at that level ever since, according to Lovdahl. Operating a child care center can be challenging, but Lovdahl pointed out that the value goes well beyond the health care center. The new spaces for the children of CCM Health's employees should free up spaces in other child care operations in Montevideo, he said. As in most communities, there is a gap between the number of available and needed child care spots. Montevideo had a shortage of 145 child care spaces according to a June 2024 analysis by the nonprofit and funded by the Minnesota Department of Children, Youth and Families. The new facility will feature a prairie-style architecture with large windows in its corners. It will be divided inside according to ages. It will hold a commercial kitchen and feature a modern security system. An outdoor patio area will be available. CCM Health had studied the possibility of re-purposing the former Montevideo VA Clinic, which opened in 2002. It was found to be cost-prohibitive to renovate the three-section modular building that had served as the clinic, and it was razed. Lovdahl used the groundbreaking as an opportunity to thank the CCM Health board of directors, Montevideo City Council and the Chippewa County Board of Commissioners for their support of the child care project. The city of Montevideo and Chippewa County jointly own CCM Health. The existing child care area within the ambulance building will be returned to its former use as a training and conference center.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nursing strike at Madison's UnityPoint Health-Meriter ends in tentative agreement
A four-day strike at Madison's UnityPoint Health-Meriter Hospital where hundreds of nurses have been asking for safer working conditions is ending in a tentative agreement between the hospital and SEIU Wisconsin, which represents 934 Meriter nurses, according to a May 31 announcement from the labor union. While the tentative agreement does not outline broad safety measures for staff across the board, it does consist of protections for some staff, an 8% raise over the next two years for all and new framework for staff to voice concerns, bargaining team member Amber Anderson said at the May 31 news conference outside the hospital. In particular, the bargaining team won commitments specific to staff and patients working in Child Adolescent Psychiatry and the Emergency Room, as well as commitment to a tip sheet for violent incidents, Anderson said. The bargaining team was not able to win actionable commitments from management that would more tangibly prevent workplace violence across the board, she said, particularly on staffing ratios. However, Anderson did say they obtained language that will be easier for nurses to collectively voice concerns on staffing and safety and work with management to find solutions. Union members will vote to ratify the agreement during the evening on May 31 and then return to work at the hospital by 7 a.m. June 1, which is when the strike had been scheduled to end. The strike — the first for Meriter nurses — began on May 27 grounded in frustrations over hospital management's lack of response to multiple requests for a safer work environment. Contract negotiations started in January. Since then, nurses had been asking for their contract to guarantee greater security measures at the hospital, including adding a metal detector and smaller staff-to-patient ratios in the hospital's medical-surgical units. They also sought increased pay for working nights and other less desirable shifts. Pat Raes, a Meriter nurse and president of SEIU Wisconsin, previously told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that there had been instances where patients and visitors brought guns into the facility without the knowledge of staff. Violence against health care workers has been on the rise, Raes said, and nurses sought action before a serious incident occurs, not after. Anderson said on May 31, "This victory is not just for the bargaining team. It belongs to all of us. To every single one of you who showed up, spoke out and stood strong, we thank you." Behind her stood over a dozen other hospital staff and supporters decked out in the union's signature color: purple. In her speech, Anderson thanked SEIU staff, UW nurses, workers at the Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin and community members and other local unions who donated time and resources. In a Facebook post on the agreement, the hospital issued the following statement: "We respect the union's process and look forward to the outcome of their decision. We believe this is a strong, fair contract that demonstrates the value and respect we have for the nurses on our team." 'We are grateful for the dedication and hard work of everyone involved in the negotiations. This tentative agreement represents meaningful progress toward a contract that recognizes the important contributions of our nurses," Market Chief Nursing Officer Sherry Casali said. The hospital in downtown Madison is part of UnityPoint Health, an Iowa-based health system with locations across southern Wisconsin. In 2017, the hospital entered into a joint operating agreement with UW Health, allowing patients to get care from both providers. UW Health is also no stranger to labor negotiations. The health system's nurses union was dissolved in 2014 as a result of Act 10, and nurses began the fight to restore it in 2019, including threatening a three-day strike in 2022 that ultimately did not occur. The Wisconsin Supreme Court is currently deciding whether UW Health is required to negotiate a collective bargaining contract with the union. The court heard oral arguments in the case in February. Madeline Heim contributed to this report. Contact Claudia Levens at clevens@ Follow her on X at @levensc13. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Nursing strike at UnityPoint Health-Meriter ends in tentative agreement
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Trade Vision Prevails Despite China's Deceptions
(The Center Square) – President Donald Trump accused China on Friday of breaking a short-term trade deal with the U.S. Earlier this month, the two countries reached a 90-day deal to reduce high tariffs on trade between the world's two largest economies. The global superpowers agreed to slash tariffs that had been so high that nearly all trade between the two nations stopped. The U.S. reduced its tariffs on China from 145% to 30% while the two nations continued to talk. China cut its levies on U.S. imports from 125% to 10%. 'China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. U.S. markets retreated on the news in what has been a challenging month for investors. Trump also lashed out at the three judges on the U.S. Court of International Trade who unanimously ruled on Wednesday that Congress did not give tariff authority to the president under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. That court voided most of Trump's tariffs, but the administration appealed the decision to a higher court, which paused the Court of International Trade ruling for now. 'Where do these initial three Judges come from? How is it possible for them to have potentially done such damage to the United States of America?' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'Is it purely a hatred of 'TRUMP?' What other reason could it be?' The Court of International Trade said the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 didn't give Trump 'unbounded' authority to set tariffs. The ruling was a setback for Trump's foreign and domestic policy agenda, which is underpinned by tariffs. 'Worldwide and Retaliatory Tariffs do not comply with the limitations Congress imposed upon the President's power to respond to balance-of-payments deficits,' the Court of International Trade judges wrote. 'The President's assertion of tariff-making authority in the instant case, unbounded as it is by any limitation in duration or scope, exceeds any tariff authority delegated to the President under IEEPA.' On Thursday, the Trump administration filed an emergency motion asking for a stay. 'The injunction threatens to unwind months of foreign policy decision-making and sensitive diplomatic negotiations, at the expense of the Nation's economic well-being and national security,' DOJ attorneys wrote. The appeals court granted the stay Thursday afternoon. 'The ruling by the U.S. Court of International Trade is so wrong, and so political!' Trump wrote. 'Hopefully, the Supreme Court will reverse this horrible, Country threatening decision, QUICKLY and DECISIVELY. Backroom 'hustlers' must not be allowed to destroy our Nation!' Trump made it clear he didn't want to work with Congress on tariffs. 'The horrific decision stated that I would have to get the approval of Congress for these Tariffs. In other words, hundreds of politicians would sit around D.C. for weeks, and even months, trying to come to a conclusion as to what to charge other Countries that are treating us unfairly,' Trump wrote. 'If allowed to stand, this would completely destroy Presidential Power – The Presidency would never be the same!'
