Crusaders vs Chiefs: Cowbell ban adds spice to Super Rugby final
An explanation...
The fact it's been ho-hum reminded me of when ex-Crusaders prop Joe Moody said the quiet part out loud in 2020 and admitted there was some genuine hatred between his side and the Chiefs. Maybe it was the lockdown talking, but it was the most honest a player has been and added some genuine spice to the fixture. Unfortunately, the art of tribalism has largely been lost in Super Rugby.
All Blacks and Crusaders prop Joe Moody. Photo / Photosport
A suggestion...
Not winning a final can hang over you. Long after the initial disappointment dissipates, you can be tagged as not having what it takes to win the big games. The top two inches.
Just ask Ian Foster, who admits in his new book that there was a lot made of the fact he never won a title with the Chiefs.
If Clayton McMillan oversees a fourth final loss in five years tomorrow night, that tag could follow him long after he's left New Zealand - and back again if he returns to try for the All Blacks job down the track. It's a bit much to say McMillan's coaching future could be decided tonight but, should he win the decider, suddenly those three defeats become less important in the overarching narrative.
A prediction...
The final will be a coin flip, and the referee will probably decide it. There's a somewhat bizarre symmetry between this year and 2023, when these sides last met in the final. The Chiefs won twice that season and then ... couldn't get over the Crusaders in the final. If that happens, I can recommend to Chiefs fans a great documentary, the Four Falls of Buffalo (screening on Disney+), about the Buffalo Bills' four straight Super Bowl defeats in the 1990s. It won't necessarily be cathartic, but you may find solidarity.
A question...
Is it better to have Ardie once or never to have had Ardie at all? That's what Moana Pasifika fans must be asking themselves after having their recently acquired 'toy' loaned out to Kobe for another season, with the promise he'll come back in 2027.
Just as Moana Pasifika began to get a foothold in Super Rugby, they must appoint a new captain and start somewhat from scratch again. Is there any other sport in the world where a player would trade a stronger competition for a lesser one for a few months? It's only rugby's skewed financials that allow such moves.
And would it be better or worse for Super Rugby not to have Savea at all over the current contract period, rather than the 'is he or isn't he here' question with two sabbaticals? Do you gain more by having Savea for one year on, one year off than you do allowing him to head to Japan for four years – clearing any confusion – and still allowing him to be eligible for the All Blacks?
Elliott Smith is a Rugby Commentator and Deputy Sports News Editor for Newstalk ZB. He is the host of the Rugby Direct podcast.
For live commentary of this weekend's Super Rugby Pacific final between the Crusaders and the Chiefs, go to GOLD SPORT or iHeartRadio.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Ranking every Super Rugby final from worst to best
Cameron McMillan updates his annual rankings of previous Super Rugby final encounters with the help of a hazy memory, YouTube highlights and Herald match reports. 31) Bulls 61 Chiefs 17 - 2009 Stephen Donald set up Lelia Masaga for the opening try thanks to some classy footwork to give the
RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Cowbell-Gate and Toxic Crusaders push Super Rugby Pacific in the right direction
Super Rugby Pacific Grand Final Crusaders v Chiefs Kick-off: 7:05pm Saturday 21 June Apollo Projects Stadium, Christchurch Live blog updates on RNZ Analysis: Are we finally getting there as a rugby fanbase? This week's big rugby story wasn't about injuries, selections or even the impending All Black squad announcement. No, it was about the banning of an either beloved or despised noise maker (depending on where you're from) for Saturday night's grand final . The news that the Crusaders have forbidden cowbells for the game came out of nowhere on Wednesday. Well, almost nowhere as that's the best way to describe LinkedIn. The last time the headquarters of humblebragging made rugby news was during the fallout of Ian Foster infamously ducking a press conference, but this time it was the platform Crusaders chief executive Colin Mansbridge used to pass his heavy-handed edict on the use of cowbells at Apollo Projects Stadium. Was it a total work from the start? Given the Chiefs' response was to encourage travelling fans to use a recently launched cowbell app, it certainly seems so. But if Mansbridge and his Chiefs counterpart Simon Graafhuis cooked this all up over a beer then it doesn't really matter, because it's this sort of outside the box thinking that rugby needs. Rugby writer Jamie Wall with Crusaders chief executive Colin Mansbridge Photo: Supplied It's all on the back of a concerted effort by the Blues to use their social media platforms to show a bit of attitude, while Rieko Ioane is happy enough to simply do it himself. The current environment is one that's catching up with the way things are done overseas but also shows that things can head into that sweet spot of suspended disbelief and still generate legitimate interest. To put things in perspective: an RNZ Facebook post about the cowbell ban on Wednesday pulled in over 10 times the number of comments than any other story that day. Why? Because it was an easy outlet to vent frustration. You didn't need to know anything about the Crusaders and Chiefs final, or even rugby, but the door was opened to have a view on a much more black and white issue. Scott Barrett scores a try during the Crusaders v Chiefs, Super Rugby Pacific match, Apollo Projects Stadium, Christchurch. Photo: Martin Hunter/ActionPress Because really, this was the Crusaders finally embracing the very powerful 'you might hate us, but we hate you even more' attitude, one they've unfortunately earned full right to make use of thanks to their now extensive trophy collection. Teams don't owe each other anything on the field, so why would they off it? Admittedly, due to the wider issue of hooliganism, football's restriction makes away trips all the more intimidating nonetheless. In a lot of countries you have to sit in one specific part of the stadium, alcohol is prohibited, and fans aren't even allowed in certain parts of the city before and after the match. English football fans jump the fence to get away from the violence. Photo: AFP There's nothing wrong with making another team's fans feel uncomfortable. If anything, it'll force them to adapt and support their team even louder, which is what happens when you pen everyone in an away section. Rugby has, for far too long, used the British crutch of it being a sport for the landed gentry to preclude itself from any forward-thinking marketing strategies. The irony in that is the cloyingly class-based restrictions being presented with a straight face, like the laughable 'respect the kicker' tradition in UK stadiums. The best part of Cowbell-Gate is how it should hopefully start some serious feudalism going forward. Win or lose, the Chiefs now have the entire off season to think of a way of getting back at the Crusaders and their fans, perhaps making each one entering FMG Stadium Waikato pass an eye test or proving their family's genealogy doesn't overlap too much. But if the Chiefs can pull of a win, there will be absolutely no surprises at all if the first thing they do is pull a cowbell out and give the home fans something to listen to when they're trudging home.
NZ Herald
10 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Crusaders vs Chiefs: Cowbell ban adds spice to Super Rugby final
An explanation... The fact it's been ho-hum reminded me of when ex-Crusaders prop Joe Moody said the quiet part out loud in 2020 and admitted there was some genuine hatred between his side and the Chiefs. Maybe it was the lockdown talking, but it was the most honest a player has been and added some genuine spice to the fixture. Unfortunately, the art of tribalism has largely been lost in Super Rugby. All Blacks and Crusaders prop Joe Moody. Photo / Photosport A suggestion... Not winning a final can hang over you. Long after the initial disappointment dissipates, you can be tagged as not having what it takes to win the big games. The top two inches. Just ask Ian Foster, who admits in his new book that there was a lot made of the fact he never won a title with the Chiefs. If Clayton McMillan oversees a fourth final loss in five years tomorrow night, that tag could follow him long after he's left New Zealand - and back again if he returns to try for the All Blacks job down the track. It's a bit much to say McMillan's coaching future could be decided tonight but, should he win the decider, suddenly those three defeats become less important in the overarching narrative. A prediction... The final will be a coin flip, and the referee will probably decide it. There's a somewhat bizarre symmetry between this year and 2023, when these sides last met in the final. The Chiefs won twice that season and then ... couldn't get over the Crusaders in the final. If that happens, I can recommend to Chiefs fans a great documentary, the Four Falls of Buffalo (screening on Disney+), about the Buffalo Bills' four straight Super Bowl defeats in the 1990s. It won't necessarily be cathartic, but you may find solidarity. A question... Is it better to have Ardie once or never to have had Ardie at all? That's what Moana Pasifika fans must be asking themselves after having their recently acquired 'toy' loaned out to Kobe for another season, with the promise he'll come back in 2027. Just as Moana Pasifika began to get a foothold in Super Rugby, they must appoint a new captain and start somewhat from scratch again. Is there any other sport in the world where a player would trade a stronger competition for a lesser one for a few months? It's only rugby's skewed financials that allow such moves. And would it be better or worse for Super Rugby not to have Savea at all over the current contract period, rather than the 'is he or isn't he here' question with two sabbaticals? Do you gain more by having Savea for one year on, one year off than you do allowing him to head to Japan for four years – clearing any confusion – and still allowing him to be eligible for the All Blacks? Elliott Smith is a Rugby Commentator and Deputy Sports News Editor for Newstalk ZB. He is the host of the Rugby Direct podcast. For live commentary of this weekend's Super Rugby Pacific final between the Crusaders and the Chiefs, go to GOLD SPORT or iHeartRadio.
