Linda Hamilton spent 'hundreds of thousands' on mental health treatment
The Terminator actress has spoken openly in the past about her struggles with depression and bipolar disorder but after decades working on herself, she feels she has finally found "true balance and steadiness" and knows how to cope with bad days.
She told People magazine: 'Nobody ever thinks that I'm going to struggle. [They think] I'll be fine — 'It's Linda Hamilton'.
'I have found just true balance and steadiness in my day and in my life. And I also can activate all of the safeguards that I learned from 20 years of therapy.
"If I'm having a bad day, that doesn't mean that my behaviour has to be bad or that my actions [have to be].
"I'm experienced enough now to go, 'Well, [doing] that might sound good right now, but really in an hour, are you going to want to have done that?'
'I can apply the brakes because I spent years and years and hundreds of thousands of dollars to get better."
The 68-year-old star has found contentment by focusing on other people more than herself.
She said: 'I never think about myself. That was the first 40 years.
"And when I got the balance, I made a deal with myself that it would never be about me again. And it hardly ever is. It's just not about me.
"I want to pitch in, help people, make people laugh, make my house beautiful. The normal things. Love my dogs to death. [And] it all makes me very happy."
Linda joked she was a "hot mess" for the first 40 years of her life and urged those struggling with their own mental health to keep going.
She said: 'People just can't give up on themselves. That's the thing. It's just keep looking until you find your way through it. I'm living proof that it can be done. And I was a hot mess for the first 40 years.'
The Stranger Things actress revealed in 2004 she had both depression and bipolar disorder, but it took her a long time to understand why she was experiencing intense mood swings.
She said: 'I would say [I had] 20 full years of symptoms, not counting my childhood. From 20 to 40. I call them my lost years.
'My first husband [actor Bruce Abbott] said you have the most incredible joy and the most incredible sorrow that goes with it. Without giving it a name, he had pretty much summed it up for me."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Denise Richards wants court's help to get Aaron Phypers out of home
Denise Richards has asked a court to order Aaron Phypers and his family out of their marital home. The Wild Things actress' estranged husband has been living in the Calabasas house with her parents and brother but she has made a request that they vacate the abode so she can retrieve her pets and belongings without breaching the temporary restraining order which they currently have in place. According to documents obtained by People magazine, Denise claimed that while both she and Aaron, 54, are named on the lease, she moved out two years ago under the guise his relatives would only be staying there temporarily. The 54-year-old star went on to claim she told Aaron he would be solely responsible for the rent in January when they were still in the house and she was told "several times" they would be leaving. And according to the filing, the landlord told the Real Housewives of Beverly Hills star he had tried to contact Aaron several times about unpaid rent but hadn't been able to reach him, resulting in an eviction order being issues. She wrote: 'I left many of my personal items and my late mother's items at the house based on Aaron telling me that his family would be moving back to Canada and we would be moving back into the [property]. 'If I am not able to [retrieve] my dogs and belongings, I believe my dogs will be harmed and my property destroyed or discarded during the eviction process.' Denise alleged Aaron and his family "have severely damaged" the property, leaving it "in a state of disarray", with images included as evidence depicting patches of removed flooring, several boxes and other items scattered through the rooms. She wrote: 'I was shocked at the condition of the home, having not lived there for over two years." Earlier this month, police were called to the property when Denise showed up to retrieve her pet dogs after one was allegedly put down "without her knowledge and permission". Aaron later disputed her version of events and insisted Denise hadn't "interacted with the animals in two years". But in her filing, the World is Not Enough actress insisted she had only temporarily left her pets there in May while she underwent surgery. She wrote: 'While I was attempting to leave the [property], Aaron's brother blocked me from leaving and placed blocks under the tire[s] of my vehicle so that I could not move my car. 'Aaron's mother let me in the house and then Aaron's parents interfered with me trying to leave the [property]. Aaron's mother called Aaron and told him to come back to the [property] while I was there, which would have been a violation of the TRO.' She insisted she had multiple attempts to resolve the matter but now "will have no way of retrieving my dogs and belongings in a safe manner that ensures Aaron and his family do not come near me or harm me' without a court order. She pledged there would be 'no recording or listening devices in or around' the property when she is there. Aaron and Denise were married for six years before he filed for divorce on July 7. She later accused him of physical abuse and was granted a temporary restraining order on July 16, though he has denied her claims. He previously said: "Let me be unequivocally clear: I have never physically or emotionally abused Denise - or anyone. These accusations are completely false and deeply hurtful. Denise and I, like many couples, have faced our share of challenges, but any suggestion of abuse is categorically untrue. I have always tried to approach our marriage with love, patience, and respect."
Perth Now
4 hours ago
- Perth Now
Dame Helen Mirren could have been a racing driver
Dame Helen Mirren believes she could have been a competitive racing driver. The 80-year-old actress is "foolishly vain" about her skills behind the wheel and is convinced that if she hadn't had such a successful screen career, she'd have done just as well on the race track. She told People magazine: "I'm rather foolishly vain about my driving. I'm sure I could have been a racing car driver.' Although Helen - who is married to director Taylor Hackford - turned 80 last month, she insisted she doesn't "recognise" birthdays because "life rolls on" and isn't interested in extravagant celebrations. She said: 'Honestly, I don't celebrate birthdays. I don't recognise them because life just rolls on,. 'I expect to be very, very nicely treated on my birthday. That's all I want. Cup of tea in bed in the morning.' But the Red star doesn't expect a lie-in if she does get her cup of tea. She admitted: 'If I'm still in bed after 8 o'clock, I start feeling guilty. There's always stuff to do.' One thing that Helen dislikes about getting older is the way they can be written off by younger generations. She said: 'People who are retired have had extraordinary, productive, challenging, difficult, professional lives, and they're not finished. It doesn't suddenly screech to a halt. 'Younger people cannot comprehend the fact that the older generation had sex, had fun, danced, were obsessed with their hair and their weight. And of course, the older people are looking at them and going, 'You know what? We've done that. We've been there.' " And the Oscar-winning actress hates being thought of as "sweet" just because of her age. She fumed: 'One thing that I find galling as I get older is the sort of patronising condescension: 'Oh, that's so sweet.' 'I hate the word feisty. I'm alive. Don't give me those sort of awful labels.' Over six months in 2024 and 2025, Helen had a string of projects on the go, including 1923, MobLand and The Thursday Murder Club but she enjoyed her "intense" schedule. She said: 'It was intense, but you just get into the rhythm of it. 'Sometimes you have what I call a bit of a 'car crash of projects,' and they all want to go at the same time.'
Perth Now
8 hours ago
- Perth Now
Jimmie Allen loses sexual assault lawsuit
Jimmie Allen has lost a lawsuit which alleged he sexually assaulted a woman. The country singer was also anonymously accused of filming a sexual encounter in a Las Vegas hotel room without Jane Doe's consent, and though he has insisted he is innocent, Judge Aleta A. Trayger entered a judgement on Monday (18.08.25) against the 40-year-old star over the claims of assault, battery, invasion of privacy and infliction of emotional distress because he failed to comply with court-imposed deadlines and orders. In documents obtained by People magazine, the judge wrote: 'The defendants throughout have failed to comply with case management discovery deadlines and even failed to comply with specific Orders of this court." Jimmie - who failed to obtain new legal representation after an attorney left his team - was also ordered to pay almost $5,000 to his accuser's lawyers for cancelling a mediation session at short notice. The judge added: 'For these reasons, the plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions and Judgment Against Defendants Jimmie Allen and Aadyn's Dad Touring, Inc. is GRANTED." Jane Doe's lawyer, Elizabeth Fegen, said she was "pleased with the Court's decision to grant judgment for Plaintiff in light of Jimmie Allen's refusal to participate in the litigation process." She added: "We look forward to proving up Plaintiff's damages caused by Allen's predatory acts." The Small Town Anthem singer's legal representative declared the judgement to be "purely procedural" and "the direct result of his prior counsel's repeated failures to comply with discovery obligations and court orders", and so they are planning to take "immediate action" to have the judgement discarded. Ted Anastasiou, who has taken on Jimmie's legal representation, added to People magazine: "This ruling was not based on the merits of the allegations. Mr. Allen has consistently and unequivocally maintained his innocence, and he firmly denies these accusations. "As with earlier accusations brought on the same baseless grounds, this case is equally meritless. The default judgment reflects the shortcomings of prior representation, not any wrongdoing by Mr. Allen. " It is well-established that a client should not be penalized for the failures of their attorney, and Mr. Allen should not be deprived of his right to a fair defense. "We intend to take immediate action to set aside this judgment and to ensure that the matter is decided on facts and evidence, rather than procedural missteps. Mr. Allen looks forward to the opportunity to clear his name in court." The lawsuit was filed in June 2023, in which the anonymous woman claimed the singer had violated her privacy by secretly filming their encounter and continuing to engage in sexual conduct with her even after she'd revoked her previously given consent. Jane Doe insisted she had no idea who Jimmie was when he first approached her on a plane to Nashville in May 2022 but they began to text and FaceTime daily, with the Freedom Was a Highway hitmaker leading her to believe he had separated from then-wife Alexis, who he ultimately divorced last year. Two months after their first meeting, the pair met in Las Vegas where Jane Doe felt "comfortable and safe" in Jimmie's hotel room because she thought she'd also have her own separate room, and while she "willingly joined" him in the bedroom, she alleged she had no idea he would be filming their sexual encounter and had insisted he use a condom. Her complaint stated: "He told her he would respect her request. Yet, as their encounter progressed, Allen penetrated Plaintiff during sex with his penis and without a condom. Allen told Plaintiff he wanted to get her pregnant. Plaintiff said no….He refused." The woman claimed she repeatedly asked him to stop and verbally revoked her consent but he continued. When he fell asleep, she went to leave the room and "panicked" when she noticed a phone in the closet which was "recording the scene." Jane Doe took the phone and deleted the video then claimed she turned the device over to her local police department. In July 2023, the Beer 99 singer filed a countersuit, with his lawyers arguing he had obtained permission from the woman to record their encounter, and accusing her of illegally taking his phone. She filed a motion to dismiss the countersuit in August that year and it was granted.
