logo
AGNC Investment Vs Annaly: Which High-Yield mREIT is a Smarter Play?

AGNC Investment Vs Annaly: Which High-Yield mREIT is a Smarter Play?

Yahoo28-04-2025

AGNC Investment Corp. AGNC and Annaly Capital Management NLY are two of the biggest names within the mortgage real estate investment trusts (mREITs) industry. Both offer favorable long-term stockholder returns and massive dividend yields.
But which one offers the better opportunity for investors right now? Let us break down the strengths, risks and growth potential of these two leading industry players.
AGNC has maintained its focus entirely on agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS), a strategy that has positioned it as a strong player in this specialized market segment. The company primarily focuses on leveraged investments in Agency RMBS, including residential mortgage pass-through securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. A U.S. Government agency or a U.S. Government-sponsored enterprise guarantees the principal and interest payments for such investments.
The fundamental outlook for fixed income, particularly agency MBS assets, has shown signs of improvement lately. AGNC Investment's management believes that the agency MBS market can benefit from a combination of factors, including a steepening yield curve and reduced rate volatility. However, execution will be crucial to achieving these advantages.
Conversely, NLY has adopted a broader diversified capital allocation strategy. The company's investment portfolio includes residential credit, mortgage servicing rights (MSR), and agency MBS. This comprehensive strategy aims to lower volatility and sensitivity to interest rate changes while simultaneously generating appealing risk-adjusted returns.
NLY's diversified investment strategy will likely be a key contributor to long-term growth and stability. Annaly's diversified strategy is not just for stability but also for long-term growth, with multiple aspects to pull across different cycles in the housing and credit markets.
AGNC Investment and Annaly are showcasing strong capital distribution programs that reflect confidence in their liquidity and earnings stability. Both have a record of paying monthly dividends.
AGNC currently has a staggering dividend yield of 16.27% compared with the industry's average of 11.3%. It currently sits at a payout ratio of 81%. The company has raised its dividend once in the last five years.
NLY also pays a quarterly dividend. In March, it announced a cash dividend of 70 cents per share for the first quarter of 2025, marking a 7.7% hike from the prior payout. Its current dividend yield is 14.58%, and its payout ratio is 96% of its earnings. The company has raised its dividend twice in the last five years.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Dividends aside, AGNC has a share repurchase plan in place. In October 2024, the company's board of directors terminated the existing stock repurchase plan and replaced it with a new plan authorizing it to repurchase up to $1 billion of common stock through Dec. 31, 2026. Similarly, Annaly has a share repurchase plan in place. In December 2024, NLY's board of directors authorized a common share repurchase program, which will expire on Dec. 31, 2029. Under the program, the company may repurchase up to $1.5 billion of its outstanding shares of common stock.
AGNC and NLY are sensitive to interest rate changes, though the impacts vary.
AGNC Investment's performance and prospects are significantly influenced by the interest rate environment due to its concentrated agency MBS exposure. While these government-backed assets offer low credit risk, they leave AGNC vulnerable to rapid shifts in short-term rates.
When interest rates rise, AGNC's borrowing costs increase quickly, hurting profit margins. Though the company actively uses hedging strategies such as interest rate swaps and options to manage some of this exposure, hedges can only partially reduce the impacts.
AGNC's financials have been adversely impacted since early 2022 when the Fed began its interest rate hiking cycle. It recorded interest expenses of $75 million in 2021, which surged 733% to $625 million in 2022. Also, the interest expenses rose 266% year over year to $2.3 billion in 2023.
On the contrary, Annaly has positioned itself to better withstand interest rate volatility through its diversified portfolio, particularly with its investments in MSR, and residential and commercial credit assets. Given this, the increase in NLY's borrowing costs was lower than AGNC's in the period of high interest rates.
In 2021, Annaly recorded an interest expense of $249 million, which increased by 425% to $1.3 billion in 2022. Also, interest expense rose 193% year over year to $3.8 billion in 2023.
MSR increases in value when interest rates rise because higher rates reduce mortgage prepayment activity. This dynamic allows Annaly to offset the typical decline in agency MBS valuations that occurs during periods of rising rates. Residential credit includes non-agency mortgages and securitized loans that are more credit-sensitive than rate-sensitive, offering higher yields and different risk profiles than agency MBS.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for AGNC's 2025 and 2026 earnings implies year-over-year declines of 11.2% and 3.9%, respectively.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for NLY's 2025 and 2026 earnings implies year-over-year increases of 5.6% and 1.2%, respectively. (See the Zacks Earnings Calendar to stay ahead of market-making news.)
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Over the past year, both AGNC and NLY outperformed the industry. AGNC Investment has gained 11.2% and Annaly has risen 16.6% against the industry's decline of 0.2%.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
From a valuation standpoint, AGNC and NLY appear expensive relative to the industry.
AGNC Investment is currently trading at a premium with a forward 12-month price-to-tangible book (P/TB) multiple of 1.07X, while Annaly is trading at a forward 12-month (P/TB) multiple of 0.98X. Both are above the industry average of 0.90X. Nonetheless, NLY is trading at a discount to AGNC.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
AGNC Investment and Annaly have a record of reducing dividends during stressful times, but NLY's recent payouts have been more stable than AGNC's. Also, Annaly has recently hiked its dividend, reflecting the company's confidence in its earnings and liquidity position.
Further, AGNC has mainly exposure to the agency MBS sector, positioning it to have more exposure to rate-driven volatility. Alternatively, NLY provides diversification and balance, which are better suited to offset interest rate fluctuations and capitalize on opportunities.
Annaly's 2025 and 2026 earnings growth trajectories are impressive. Also, in terms of price performance and valuation, NLY appears more attractive.
Hence, investors looking for long-term stability with a higher dividend yield can consider parking their cash in the Annaly stock at current levels.
Both AGNC and NLY currently carry a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.
Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report
AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) : Free Stock Analysis Report
Annaly Capital Management Inc (NLY) : Free Stock Analysis Report
This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research (zacks.com).
Zacks Investment Research

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to EFMT 2025-NQM2
KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to EFMT 2025-NQM2

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to EFMT 2025-NQM2

NEW YORK, June 10, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--KBRA assigns preliminary ratings to seven classes of mortgage pass-through certificates from EFMT 2025-NQM2, a $282.8 million non-prime RMBS transaction. The underlying collateral, comprising 656 residential mortgages, is characterized by a notable concentration of alternative income documentation, with 83.9% of the loans underwritten using bank statements, DSCR, and asset underwriting documentation types. The majority of loans are either classified as non-qualified mortgages (56.9%) or exempt (40.1%) from the Ability-to-Repay/Qualified Mortgage rule due to being originated for non-consumer loan purposes. LendSure Mortgage Corp. (LendSure), an affiliated originator of Ellington Management Group ("Ellington") originated 36.6% of the pool. KBRA's rating approach incorporated loan-level analysis of the mortgage pool through its Residential Asset Loss Model (REALM), an examination of the results from third-party loan file due diligence, cash flow modeling analysis of the transaction's payment structure, reviews of key transaction parties and an assessment of the transaction's legal structure and documentation. This analysis is further described in our U.S. RMBS Rating Methodology. To access ratings and relevant documents, click here. Click here to view the report. Related Publications EFMT 2025-NQM2 Tear Sheet RMBS KCAT Methodologies RMBS: U.S. RMBS Rating Methodology Structured Finance: Global Structured Finance Counterparty Methodology ESG Global Rating Methodology Disclosures Further information on key credit considerations, sensitivity analyses that consider what factors can affect these credit ratings and how they could lead to an upgrade or a downgrade, and ESG factors (where they are a key driver behind the change to the credit rating or rating outlook) can be found in the full rating report referenced above. A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here. Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here. Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at About KBRA Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S. Doc ID: 1009865 View source version on Contacts Analytical Contacts Edward DeVito, Senior Managing Director (Lead Analyst)+1 Liam Vauk, Associate+1 Sharif Mahdavian, Managing Director (Rating Committee Chair)+1 Business Development Contact Daniel Stallone, Managing Director+1 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to EFMT 2025-NQM2
KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to EFMT 2025-NQM2

Business Wire

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to EFMT 2025-NQM2

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--KBRA assigns preliminary ratings to seven classes of mortgage pass-through certificates from EFMT 2025-NQM2, a $282.8 million non-prime RMBS transaction. The underlying collateral, comprising 656 residential mortgages, is characterized by a notable concentration of alternative income documentation, with 83.9% of the loans underwritten using bank statements, DSCR, and asset underwriting documentation types. The majority of loans are either classified as non-qualified mortgages (56.9%) or exempt (40.1%) from the Ability-to-Repay/Qualified Mortgage rule due to being originated for non-consumer loan purposes. LendSure Mortgage Corp. (LendSure), an affiliated originator of Ellington Management Group ('Ellington') originated 36.6% of the pool. KBRA's rating approach incorporated loan-level analysis of the mortgage pool through its Residential Asset Loss Model (REALM), an examination of the results from third-party loan file due diligence, cash flow modeling analysis of the transaction's payment structure, reviews of key transaction parties and an assessment of the transaction's legal structure and documentation. This analysis is further described in our U.S. RMBS Rating Methodology. To access ratings and relevant documents, click here. Click here to view the report. Related Publications Methodologies Disclosures Further information on key credit considerations, sensitivity analyses that consider what factors can affect these credit ratings and how they could lead to an upgrade or a downgrade, and ESG factors (where they are a key driver behind the change to the credit rating or rating outlook) can be found in the full rating report referenced above. A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here. Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here. Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at About KBRA Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S. Doc ID: 1009865

KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to Progress Residential 2025-SFR3
KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to Progress Residential 2025-SFR3

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

KBRA Assigns Preliminary Ratings to Progress Residential 2025-SFR3

NEW YORK, June 09, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--KBRA assigns preliminary ratings to eight classes of Progress Residential 2025-SFR3 (Progress 2025-SFR3) single family rental (SFR) pass-through certificates. Progress 2025-SFR3 is the first ever single-borrower, SFR securitization consisting entirely of Build-to-Rent (BTR) communities. The transaction will be collateralized by a $778.5 million five-year fixed-rate interest-only loan secured by mortgages on 2,020 income-producing single-family homes. All of the homes are located in 21 newly built, amenity-light BTR communities that were purchased by the sponsor between June 2023 and May 2024 from the original builder. The properties serving as collateral comprise 100% of the homes in 20 communities and 51% of the homes in the remaining community, with each home on an individual tax parcel. The subject transaction will be the 31st KBRA-rated SFR securitization issued by Progress Residential. The communities are located in 18 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) across 10 states. The top three CBSAs represent 34.0% of the portfolio and include Lakeland-Winter Haven (13.1%), Sacramento (10.8%), and Atlanta (10.2%). The single largest community accounts for 10.8% of the collateral portfolio and the top three communities account for 30.0% of the portfolio. The aggregate BPO value of the underlying homes is $782.4 million, yielding an LTV of 99.5%. KBRA adjusted the BPOs, which yielded an aggregate value of $751.1 million, which represents a 4.0% haircut to the nominal BPO value. The resulting LTV based on KBRA's adjusted BPO value was 103.6%. KBRA uses a hybrid analysis to evaluate SFR transactions, which incorporates elements of both KBRA's CMBS and RMBS methodologies, as the underlying real estate contains commercial and residential characteristics. As the properties generate a cash flow stream from tenant rental payments, elements of CMBS methodologies are used to determine the loan's probability of default (PD). To determine loss given default (LGD), KBRA assumes the underlying properties would be liquidated in the residential property market. In determining LGD, KBRA subjects the real estate properties to home price stress scenarios using elements of RMBS methodologies. This hybrid analysis is described in more in KBRA's U.S. Single-Family Rental Securitization Methodology. To access ratings and relevant documents, click here. Click here to view the report. Methodologies CMBS/RMBS: U.S. Single-Family Rental Securitization Methodology Structured Finance: Global Structured Finance Counterparty Methodology ESG Global Rating Methodology Disclosures Further information on key credit considerations, sensitivity analyses that consider what factors can affect these credit ratings and how they could lead to an upgrade or a downgrade, and ESG factors (where they are a key driver behind the change to the credit rating or rating outlook) can be found in the full rating report referenced above. A description of all substantially material sources that were used to prepare the credit rating and information on the methodology(ies) (inclusive of any material models and sensitivity analyses of the relevant key rating assumptions, as applicable) used in determining the credit rating is available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) located here. Information on the meaning of each rating category can be located here. Further disclosures relating to this rating action are available in the Information Disclosure Form(s) referenced above. Additional information regarding KBRA policies, methodologies, rating scales and disclosures are available at About KBRA Kroll Bond Rating Agency, LLC (KBRA), one of the major credit rating agencies (CRA), is a full-service CRA registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an NRSRO. Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited is registered as a CRA with the European Securities and Markets Authority. Kroll Bond Rating Agency UK Limited is registered as a CRA with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. In addition, KBRA is designated as a Designated Rating Organization (DRO) by the Ontario Securities Commission for issuers of asset-backed securities to file a short form prospectus or shelf prospectus. KBRA is also recognized as a Qualified Rating Agency by Taiwan's Financial Supervisory Commission and is recognized by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners as a Credit Rating Provider (CRP) in the U.S. Doc ID: 1009753 View source version on Contacts Analytical Contacts Maulik Pareliya, Associate (Lead Analyst)+1 Fred Perreten, Managing Director+1 Akshay Maheshwari, Managing Director+1 Nitin Bhasin, Senior Managing Director, Global Head of CMBS (Rating Committee Chair)+1 Business Development Contact Andrew Foster, Director+1

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store