Christopher Luxon won't discuss poor polls with caucus, Labour not saying anything about tax policy
Luxon confirmed caucus was still receiving internal polls.
'New Zealanders understand we've gone through the biggest recession in the last 30 years. We've got a big Covid hangover as we've seen from the Treasury report last week, we've had some difficult challenging circumstances particularly since April with respect to the tariff situation.
'I think you're seeing across New Zealand - get out of Wellington, you go to the South Island, the primary industries, go to Hawke's Bay, you are seeing good recovery in those parts, but I acknowledge in places like Auckland and Wellington and urban environments it is still pretty tough,' Luxon said.
He said things like the InvestmentBoost tax credit and the infrastructure pipeline would lead to a recovery.
Chris Bishop said talk of a leadership change was silly. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Talk of leadership change 'just silly' - Chris Bishop
Senior Minister Chris Bishop said despite the grim polling there was 'no talk' of changing the leader.
'That's just silly. What we're doing as a Government - New Zealand's first three-way coalition government - is working hard to get the economy growing again after years of high inflation, high government spending and high debt,' Bishop said.
He said he would 'not even entertain' the idea of a polling threshold at which point National would need to roll its leader. Bishop was one of the National MPs at the heart of a bid to replace then-leader Simon Bridges with Todd Muller in 2020.
Like Luxon, Bishop said that the economy had struggled to lift off since US President Donald Trump's announcement of tariffs on Liberation Day in April. Treasury had been forecasting a decent economic recovery before April, but since then, it revised its growth forecasts downwards. The economy is still set to grow, but not as fast.
Live GDP estimates from the Reserve Bank suggest the next GDP print will show a quarter of contraction.
The threat of tariffs had caused businesses to hold back investment.
Bishop said the Government would not make 'reactionary one-off decisions' to pump the polls.
'What we need to do is stick to the course of a long-term economic plan that would set New Zealand up for growth,' he said.
He suggested that some of the polling slump was because Labour had no real policy, beyond a promise to repeal things like Three Strikes, the reinstatement of oil and gas exploration, and the future Regulatory Standards Bill.
'It's all easy for Chris Hipkins and the Labour Party to sit off to the side and say life should be better, [but] in their own words, they do not have any policy.
'Life's easy in opposition when you have the luxury of not having any policy... they do not have any policy and they are not planning to release any any time soon,' Bishop said, referring to an admission from Labour finance spokeswoman Barbara Edmonds that the party did not have any substantive cost of living policy.
Labour leader Chris Hipkins on his way into his weekly caucus meeting. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Hipkins keeps mum on tax policy
Labour leader Chris Hipkins was happy with the polls, saying Labour's numbers had 'grown significantly since the last election.
'We were at 26% at the last election, we're now polling comfortably across the polls in the mid-30s,' Hipkins said.
Asked about Labour's lack of policy, Hipkins said, 'they [National] would definitely like more things to attack us on - that's true'.
Hipkins said policy would be announced before the election, but he wanted to make sure he could deliver on it.
A column by Vernon Small, a former staffer for Labour Revenue Minister David Parker, in the Sunday Star-Times reported Labour's policy council had resolved to support a Capital Gains Tax as the preferred policy for the next election, beating out the other favoured tax, a wealth tax.
It now rests with Labour's governing council and the Parliamentary side of the party to decide what to do with the decision as the party puts its 2026 election policy together.
Hipkins has committed to campaigning on progressive tax reform, but said the tax policy was 'not yet resolved'.
He said he 'would not discuss the internal machinations of the Labour Party', but said a 'consensus is emerging'.
He said a wealth tax and a capital gains tax were 'on the table', but would not commit to Labour's traditional policy of excluding taxing any capital gains accrued on the family home.
'When we have a tax policy to announce we will announce it,' Hipkins said.
When asked again he said, 'I'm not getting into that because we haven't announced a tax policy'.
Eventually, Hipkins said, 'I've always said taxing the family home shouldn't be taxed, but I'm not announcing a policy that we haven't announced'.
Hipkins has been reluctant to shape his party's tax discussions by ruling various things in or out. Labour's 2017 commitment to kick its tax policy to a tax working group was guided by the fact that any capital gains tax would exclude the family home.
In an earlier press conference, Hipkins would not rule out the Greens' inheritance tax proposal, although he conceded it would be very unlikely Labour would agree to it.
Hipkins got into trouble with his party in 2023 and 2024 for his 'captain's call' to kill the wealth tax proposal, a call some members believed was against party rules - although Hipkins and the party leadership dispute this.
Hipkins denied his reluctance to personally shape the tax discussion this time around is because he is being extra scrupulous in light of his previous troubles over captain's calls.
'No,' he said, when asked.
'We'll announce a tax policy when we're ready to announce it, not because you keep asking questions about it,' Hipkins said.
Minister of Defence Judith Collins said this is the best Cabinet she has served in. Photo / Sylvie Whinray (file)
The most enjoyable Cabinet - Judith Collins
Former National leader Judith Collins said she 'didn't even see' the polls.
'I'm just too busy doing my job,' she said.
Collins said this was 'a really good coalition Government, I love being part of it'.
'I've been in a few Cabinets, let me tell you, and this is the most enjoyable for me,' she said.
'I find the Prime Minister's leadership excellent, he just lets me get on and do the job,' she said.
Collins said Luxon was 'absolutely' the right person to lead the Government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
18 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Will axing petrol tax be a game-changer?
Scrapping petrol tax may, or many not, be transformative, Angela Curl and Caroline Shaw write. The way we get around is unfair, and unhealthy. Some people travel a lot, creating disproportionate harms on people and the planet, such as pollution, injury risk and physical inactivity. Others cannot afford to travel enough, missing out on things that are important, such as catching up with loved ones or healthcare appointments, or end up having to forego expenditure on other important things, such as food. Replacing fuel excise duty (or petrol tax) with electronic road user charges for all vehicles — as announced by Transport Minister Chris Bishop last week — offers an opportunity to transform the way we fund and pay for our transport system in a way that works for people and the planet by reflecting the true costs imposed when we use the roads. Bishop said "it isn't fair to have Kiwis who drive less and can't afford a fuel-efficient car paying more than people who can afford one and drive more often." On the whole, we agree. We know that those households with the lowest income drive far less (about 100km a week less) but also have to spend a much greater proportion of their income on getting around (16% of income compared with 9% for higher-income households). Those on lower incomes are also far less likely to be able to afford an electric vehicle with cheaper running costs, instead paying the relatively more expensive petrol tax. However, Bishop's proposal represents a narrow view of the harms, or wider costs, of driving to society. It is largely based on the assumption all vehicles should contribute "fairly" (based on weight and distance travelled) towards road maintenance, operations and improvements. But a pricing structure that also accounts for the costs to our health system of injuries, pollution and physical inactivity caused by the transport system, might also include differential charging for different types of vehicles. For example, we know that SUVs cause more severe injuries to those outside of the vehicle, and while EVs reduce tailpipe emissions, they still contribute to congestion and injury risk. The proposal does suggest that weight, as well as distance travelled, will be factored into pricing; however, it should also consider the damage that heavier and larger vehicles do to people and the environment. A change in the way we are charged for using the roads offers a real opportunity to design a progressive charge that alleviates costs pressures for those already struggling to pay for the driving they need to do, while reducing levels of driving overall. One way to achieve this would be through increasing the rate per km, above a certain amount of kilometres driven. Given the costs involved in running and operating the scheme, and that this needs to be revenue-generating for government, it seems unlikely there will be a reduction in the cost of travel in real terms for everyone. However, if the government is committed to fairness, it needs to ensure costs do not escalate for those who can least afford it and who have few alternatives. The proposed changes to road user charges are most likely to be successful and acceptable if they are accompanied by investment in public transport, walking and cycling and alongside strategic urban planning that supports local access to the things we all need such as shops, schools and sports grounds. The most straightforward way to ensure that charging for using the roads does not force people into situations where they have to forego other essentials is to ensure that it is easy and safe to get around in other ways, or that we do not need to travel as much. For both fairness and health and wellbeing we need to continue to improve travel options other than driving. Bishop presented this as a new way to fund our roads, but we should be taking a more holistic view — this is an opportunity to think about how we fund our transport system. Using revenue raised to reduce the need to drive can make charging for driving more acceptable. Bishop said: "This is a once-in-a-generation change. It's the right thing to do, it's the fair thing to do, and it will future-proof how we fund our roads for decades to come." This policy has the potential to be truly transformative and be part of creating a transport system (not just roads) that is fairer, and healthier for everyone. It can be done. The question is, will it? — Newsroom • Dr Angela Curl is a senior lecturer in the University of Otago department of population health, Christchurch; Caroline Shaw is a lecturer and researcher in the department of public health, University of Otago, Wellington.
Otago Daily Times
18 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Courier firm goes bust
A Christchurch courier company has buckled under financial pressure, owing creditors more than $1.2 million and leaving staff out of pocket. NJ & MS Holdings Ltd owes about $586,000 to Inland Revenue (IRD) and just over $632,000 to unsecured creditors, while staff claims are nearly $35,000. The company, trading as Point to Point, was placed in liquidation on the application of IRD in the High Court at Greymouth on June 30. An official assignee from Insolvency & Trustee Service was appointed liquidator and released an initial report last week. Previously registered under an office in Greymouth, the company's sole shareholder and director is listed as Taipua Feast at the NZ Companies Office. The business was closed after the company was assessed as being unable to be sold or generate enough income to continue trading. Secured creditors have advised they will repossess company assets. In the report the official assignee said the director advised the reasons for liquidation were a lack of funds to finance legal action, economic conditions, lack of business activity, excessive overheads, inability to collect debts and lack of sufficient working capital. A failure to provide for taxation and Covid and a breakdown in communication with a client also played against the company. Money owed by clients is estimated at $38,000 with $6500 remaining in bank accounts and the value of vehicles and plant and equipment yet to be determined. Among the listed creditors are about 17 staff and nearly 20 companies providing finance, banking, IT, fuel, mobile and vehicle repair and other services. On Point to Point's website, the business offered urgent courier services in Canterbury and across the South Island, same-day truck deliveries and out-of-town runs.
Otago Daily Times
18 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mining company gets $70m boost
A mining company hunting for gold in Central Otago has received nearly $70 million in backing from an Australian investment firm it says could accelerate the project. Santana Minerals announced to the stock market this week Canaccord Genuity Australia, an Australian financial services firm, had presented it with commitments from investors worth $65.8m. The company said this was driven by international resources funds, including those from New Zealand, that desired participation in its Bendigo-Ophir gold project — a proposed $5 billion gold mine in Central Otago. This was "strongly supported" by existing domestic and high net-worth holders. "The support and interest in the project endorses its significance and it is pleasing that a New Zealand resource project can once again attract significant investment capital for projects that can assist in the rebuild of the country's economic base," chief executive Damian Spring said in a statement. "It was most pleasing to also see strong participation from New Zealand investors who understand the long-term economic output impacts the project development can bring our community, region and country as we advance through consenting and a final investment decision." Mr Spring told the Otago Daily Times the company had long signalled it was prepared to commit funds ahead of any approvals under the fast-track legislation. It had proposed in non-notified applications lodged under the Resource Management Act to construct buildings and roadways on its recently acquired Ardgour Station land, to have an office and a couple of sheds established so they were "poised and ready to go" ahead of any further approvals. About 20% of the company's shares on issue were held by New Zealanders and was indicative of a growing level of interest in the project, Mr Spring said. Its job register had also grown to more than 1000 inquiries. The company had drafts for all of its reports and was on track to submit its application under the fast-track legislation "very soon", he said. "We're definitely into the home straight now." The company also intended to complete a share purchase plan capped at $3.3m. It proposed to use the proceeds from both this and the $65.8m investment — together with the company's existing cash balance of about $52m — to "accelerate" the project's development, begin early infrastructure civil works, potentially acquire freehold lands directly impacted by the proposed mining and completed access agreements and for further exploration of high-priority targets, including drilling.
