As parliament returns, Albanese is buoyed by Newspoll as Ley confronts depth of Coalition's defeat
Just six Liberal women will be in the lower house.
Six.
And because women usually wear more colour than their male colleagues, the scarce numbers will be hard to miss. There will be no ambiguity about the problem.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, on the other hand, is likely to be feeling confident as parliament returns with Newspoll delivering strong results for Labor and a second honeymoon narrative for the party.
The Liberals will hope that the optics of having their first woman leader sitting opposite the prime minister at the dispatch box will neutralise just how shocking a number this is in 2025 — but one leader, reluctantly backed and still being quietly undermined by some of her colleagues, does not disappear an issue so deeply rooted.
Ahead of the return to parliament, Sussan Ley has let television program 60 Minutes into her life to introduce herself to the nation.
It says a lot about the country's engagement in politics that a woman who has been in the parliament since 2001 and has served in many frontbench roles from as far back as the Howard government era still has to introduce herself.
Previous Liberal leader Peter Dutton also appeared on 60 Minutes, but his task was less about an introduction — his name was more well-known around the country — and more about softening his image, something it's fair to say he failed spectacularly to achieve.
Ley doesn't need to soften her image. She needs to establish an image and identity of her own.
Ley showed the 60 Minutes audience her impressive skills, including flying planes, and her beautiful grandchildren. It is a way of using what is a good personal story of female empowerment to signal that the Liberal Party under her leadership has changed.
But it will take more than some soft media pieces to shift the deep perception of a party out of touch.
All eyes this week will be on the first Question Time. Politics is as much a mind game as it is an ideas and strategy game between leaders. Ley and Albanese will be working out how to tackle each other across the dispatch box.
They share one indisputable trait. Both have been underestimated their entire careers, and both talk about this as one of the elements of their success.
The PM has consistently outperformed when his critics have suggested he isn't capable. Ley is much the same. She is using that doubt to power herself through.
One of the most stinging and damaging criticisms of the Liberals under Peter Dutton was a penchant for saying no to Labor ideas.
In fact, the Liberals became so addicted to saying no that they even said no to policies that fit squarely into their historical world view, including personal income tax cuts before the last election.
This week will be the party's first parliamentary chance to show that they are done with that hyper-oppositional behaviour.
On the two key pieces of legislation Labor will introduce this week — reducing HECS debts and tougher regulation of childcare in the wake of the abuse scandals — the Liberals have now indicated they are a yes.
They have even walked away from the policy of slashing 80,000 international students from higher education institutions, with the opposition's education spokesperson yesterday promising a more "sensitive" approach.
Dutton had claimed that cutting foreign student numbers would free up more housing and rental opportunities. He said students were "taking up accommodation that should be occupied by Australian citizens".
The opposition's new education spokesperson, Jonathon Duniam, conceded the policy under Dutton wasn't "as constructive as it could have otherwise been".
"Obviously, those numbers were part of a discussion that occurred before an election we lost," the new education spokesperson told Insiders.
"I don't think that any university should, as some have, use international students as a cash cow. That's not appropriate because it's not a good business model, but we need to recognise that a large part of the funding, for especially regional universities, comes from international students.
A more sensitive conversation needs to be had, Duniam said, and added the Liberal Party "will work with the sector and the government about that."
Before the last election, Labor also vowed to crack down on this, saying it would reduce international student numbers to a maximum of 270,000 in 2025.
The shadow education minister also said the Coalition had softened its position on other education policies, including past opposition to the Albanese government's plan to wipe 20 per cent off student HECS debts.
Newly elected Labor members and senators will also begin delivering their first speeches to the House of Representatives and the Senate this week.
First speeches in the House will be led by the member for Dickson, Ali France, and the member for Melbourne, Sarah Witty.
It's not a mistake that they have been chosen to lead the many, many speeches that will be delivered.
These two new MPs vanquished the political leader of the right, Dutton, and the left, Greens leader Adam Bandt.
Their speeches will make the point that their communities voted for Labor because they wanted a government that wanted to get things done.
And Labor will seek to highlight that its new caucus is composed of 56 per cent women. They will sing it from the rooftops all week, but the truth is they don't need to.
It will be on full display in the chamber as the MPs take their positions on the green leather seats.
The ABC has projected that the Liberals will win the most seats in the new Tasmanian state parliament, with the Labor Party seeing its worst vote in Tasmania ever.
This is the fourth election the state has held in seven years, after a no-confidence vote tabled by Opposition Leader Dean Winter during his budget reply speech.
I am a big fan of democracy, but I can see why Tasmanians may be fatigued by the never-ending elections they are forced to engage in.
It's kind of staggering, really, and tells you everything you need to know about the volatility of politics that nearly 40 per cent of Tasmanians voted Liberal at the state election over the weekend.
In the May federal election, the Liberal vote in Tasmania sat just below 25 per cent. It's a monumental difference. The Liberals see it as a sign that their brand is not entirely damaged, and perhaps that is part of the story. But it's not all of it.
It's worth looking at how wild the swings were towards the Liberals and how that has changed the fortunes of Bridget Archer, who lost her federal seat during the obliteration of the party in Tasmania at the federal election.
Archer contested the seat of Bass in this weekend's Tasmanian state election and has now managed to not only win, but she got 1.53 quotas on Saturday night.
Archer may be a minister in the Tasmanian government. This was something that wasn't possible for her in the federal Liberals.
The predicted Labor loss would be one of the great tactical miscalculations of recent Australian political history. There does remain an outside chance that Tasmania's Labor leader, Dean Winter, can form government with a large and mostly progressive crossbench.
It is understood that Winter believed Premier Jeremy Rockcliff would step down after the no-confidence motion rather than call another election.
Labor was again left unprepared at the state level to fight.
But the swing to the Liberals does show that perhaps the anti-incumbents mood appears to be in decline off the back of elections in WA, the federal election, and now the Tasmanian election. All three have given the two major parties some hope that they may have arrested the decline.
Patricia Karvelas is the host of ABC News Afternoon Briefing at 4pm weekdays on ABC News Channel, co-host of the weekly Party Room podcast with Fran Kelly, and host of politics and news podcast Politics Now.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
20 minutes ago
- ABC News
Conservationists say they have been shut out of plans for Queensland state forests as government consults industry
Conservationists say they have been shut out of planning for the future of Queensland state forests, as the government develops a 25-year plan for the timber industry. The LNP made a pre-election pledge to deliver a Queensland Future Timber Plan (QFTP) in its first year in government, which will be up in October. Premier David Crisafulli has promised to give the forestry industry consistency in order to build one million homes by 2044. The Timber Supply Chain Ministerial Roundtable made up of forestry, housing and agricultural industry bodies met for the first time in May. In contrast, the previous government's advisory panel had scientists, First Nations leaders and conservationists, in addition to industry representatives. Andrew Picone from Pew Charitable Trusts, who was a member of that group, said conservationists were miffed by their exclusion. "At the moment the decision is being made between the timber industry and Queensland government, and we don't feel that is the right approach, it's certainly not transparent," he said. "We're talking about three million hectares of public native forests." Minister for Primary Industries Tony Perrett said QFTP was "future-proofing the forest sector after the former Labor government plan was never delivered". 'This industry roundtable is contributing to a draft of the Queensland Future Timber Plan which will be released for wide-ranging and open public consultation," he said. Mr Picone said Queensland had a history of collaboration between conservationists and the forestry industry. The South-East Queensland Forestry Agreement, made in 1999 by the Beatty Labor government, is an example of that collaboration, with all sides agreeing native hardwood forestry would end in most state forests south of Gladstone by the end of 2024. That agreement was altered in 2019 by Annastacia Palaszczuk to only cease native hardwood logging in forests south of Noosa in 2024, and to extend logging north to Gladstone until at least 2026. Mr Picone said he worried the new government's process left the door open to further water down the 1999 agreement. "The Queensland government isn't ruling out opening up areas we thought they were finished with — opening them back up to logging. So we're quite concerned about that," he said. The chief executive of Queensland's oldest conservation group, National Parks Association Queensland, Chris Thomas, said "changing positions and backflips" by consecutive state governments had "created animosity" between conservationists and the logging industry. "I think the relationship is getting harder and more adversarial the longer this goes on," he said. The state's peak body for forestry and logging, Timber Queensland, which is part of the government's roundtable, declined to comment, instead pointing to a press release from May. The release said the QFTP would "remove barriers and pave the way for sustained growth" of the industry. "We look forward to working on a bold plan that delivers policy certainty to increase sustainable production while at the same time safeguarding the environment," chief executive Mick Stephens said at the time. "The assumption that harvesting timber from native forests is necessarily harmful to biodiversity is not correct." Mr Picone said 50,000 hectares of state forest, south of Noosa, where logging ceased in 2024 is "in limbo" while the government makes a decision on its future. The Pew Charitable Trust and other groups are calling for those forests to receive various levels of protected land status to ensure logging cannot resume there in the future. "If it's not going to be part of the logging schedule — which it shouldn't be, it's close to population bases, there are a lot of recreational uses for these areas — then we think there ought to be a public process to determine the best use for those areas," he said.

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Lower company tax rate, Productivity Commission advises treasurer ahead of roundtable
Small companies would pay less tax but the largest could pay more under a new reform proposal from the independent agency tasked with helping to shape Labor's economic reform agenda. In the first of several reports requested by Treasurer Jim Chalmers and slated for release in the lead-up to this month's reform roundtable, the Productivity Commission has called for a 20 per cent tax rate on profits for companies with revenue of up to $1 billion. That would represent a significant cut for all but the largest companies from the current rate, which is 25 per cent for companies with turnover under $50 million and 30 per cent for all others. At the same time, the commission has called for a new 5 per cent tax on net cashflow rather than profits, which could see some large companies pay a higher rate but would provide immediate tax relief for smaller companies seeking to build their capital. The overall package would be revenue-neutral but would boost investment by $7.4 billion, economic output by $14.6 billion, and productivity by 0.4 per cent, according to modelling undertaken by the commission. The proposal is one of several to reform company tax ahead of a roundtable, which Mr Chalmers has signalled he will use to seek new economic reforms to build on Labor's political agenda. Prioritising "consensus" among unions, business, and economists, the three-day roundtable will start with a focus on Australia's "resilience" amid global uncertainty, and will then consider productivity and regulation, followed by the budget and tax. The tax session will be the last and the longest, a scheduling decision that will fuel further speculation that the treasurer has an appetite to champion controversial tax reforms. Titled "a better tax system", it will begin with a presentation by Grattan Institute CEO Aruna Sathanapally, who said last week Australia needed higher taxes. "If we want to find a magic way to have Australia-level service expectations and remain being a low-taxing country, I'd love to know what it looks like," she told a pre-roundtable conference convened by independent MP Allegra Spender. "But my starting proposition is we're going to have to think about higher taxes or we're going to have to think about taking chunks out of our service expectations." Mr Chalmers has said he wants any reform proposals brought to the roundtable to be budget neutral or budget positive — that is, to raise money overall. While that could be achieved by holding taxes steady and reducing spending, which is also on the roundtable agenda, the treasurer has left the door open to tax reform and said he wants all options on the table. On Thursday, Shadow Treasurer Ted O'Brien, who will also attend the roundtable, said the Coalition would not support any package that raised taxes overall. Coalition sources have consistently emphasised this does not mean it would automatically oppose any single tax increase in isolation, leaving the door open to support for a package that raised some taxes but lowered others in equal measure. Mr O'Brien accused Mr Chalmers of "looking for more taxes to feed his spending spree" and said he would scrutinise roundtable proposals "on the principle that they be at most budget neutral; in other words, higher taxes will not be accepted". Under the Productivity Commission proposal, large companies that earn their profits from "rents", making profits using land and capital they already own, could pay more tax with a 5 per cent imposition on their cashflows on top of the existing profit tax. On the other hand, businesses seeking to acquire new capital could deduct that cost and lower their tax bill immediately, as opposed to the current system, where they can only deduct the cost over time using a deduction for depreciation. The commission says this would support innovation and investment because it would particularly benefit new businesses seeking to displace incumbents, as they tend to spend more on capital. It would also give companies some insurance against the risk of unsuccessful investments. The Productivity Commission's recommendations are regarded as influential ahead of the roundtable, where chair Danielle Wood is one of four presenters alongside Ms Sathanapally, RBA governor Michele Bullock, and Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson. Mr Chalmers did not indicate a view on the company tax proposal but said he welcomed its release. "We've already got a substantial productivity agenda underway, but we're ambitious to do more where we can … The PC's work is an important input into our economic reform roundtable," he said. The commission's report also recommended measures to shift the culture of government regulators to better consider the impact of regulations on business. Mr Chalmers said "reducing regulatory burden" was an "important part of our productivity effort and we're working with regulators on potential reforms to be considered as part of the roundtable process".

Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Albanese's allies work to kill off anti-AUKUS push before Labor conference
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's allies are scrambling to put a lid on an anti-AUKUS grassroots Labor move that threatens to complicate a US probe into the submarine pact. The party's Victorian Left faction, led by minister Andrew Giles and who back the prime minister, are lobbying behind the scenes to water down a motion submitted by the anti-US Labor Against War to Labor's state conference on Saturday that slams US President Donald Trump and demands the government 'withdraw' from AUKUS. The push comes at a time when the Pentagon is reviewing the $360 billion nuclear deal and the US Navy is concerned the country is not building enough nuclear submarines to sell any to Australia in the 2030s without a dramatic increase in production. Australian officials are emphasising to the US that AUKUS gives it a more powerful military position in the Indo-Pacific to persuade it to stay committed to the deal, but the push from rank-and-file Labor members highlights discomfort in the party about closer ties with the US military. Loading Powerbrokers loyal to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles in the Victoria Right faction are trying to kill off debate on AUKUS entirely, according to sources in both factions who asked to remain anonymous because talks about the Left faction-dominated Victorian Labor conference were private. 'There is a general view in the membership that AUKUS is a crock of shit,' one senior party figure said, 'but we're all going along with it because it's like a federal version of the Suburban Rail Loop that we can't ditch.' The loop is an expensive Victorian infrastructure project announced with little scrutiny. Since 2018, it has provoked fierce criticism from transport academics and Labor's political opponents, but the state Labor government attributes its thumping election wins to the project.