logo
How to create rules for picking winning shares like Rolls-Royce before they take off: ED CROFT

How to create rules for picking winning shares like Rolls-Royce before they take off: ED CROFT

Daily Mail​18-07-2025
If you open an account using links which have an asterisk, This is Money will earn an affiliate commission. We do not allow this to affect our editorial independence.
In the second part of our series on how to pick shares, Ed Croft, the founder and chief executive of Stockopedia, explains how to establish rules that will help you pick winning companies and avoid those that turn out to be duds.
He runs through why he considers certain elements important and how the site built its StockRanks system that spotted opportunities such as Rolls-Royce, Jet2 and Games Workshop shares before they took off.
Flying high: Rolls-Royce shares have soared over recent years after their pandemic slump and Ed Croft says a rules-based stock-picking approach could have spotted the opportunity
In the first article of our share picking series, we tackled the problems many investors face – story-driven speculation, tip chasing, and the trap of seeking more and more information, which often brings overconfidence rather than better results.
One answer is using a rules-based approach, based around the characteristics of shares proven to identify winners.
When you know that there's a persistent pay-off to buying the highest quality, value and momentum shares, there can be a real mindset shift.
But for many, that's where the journey stalls.
Because once you realise that rules matter, the next step is to create your first set.
Price to Earnings Ratio of less than 12? Tick. Return on capital above 15 per cent? Tick. Debt under control? Tick. You build a rational set of logic, and it feels good.
Until you hit a wall.
Rules are essential - but they can be restrictive
I still remember the buzz of creating my first stock screen. Stock screens are essentially checklists of rules that can narrow a universe of thousands of stocks down to a manageable list.
My first was based on Jim Slater's criteria from his excellent Zulu Principle book. I had a whole list of 'must have' criteria which would find me reasonably priced, quality growth shares. But how many candidates did the screen produce?
Just three. Two were rather small and illiquid and the third was some obscure foreign-listed firm. It was quite disappointing. And it certainly wasn't an investable portfolio.
Checklists can be powerful – don't underestimate them. They add discipline to your investing and help filter out the noise. But they can be extremely restrictive.
If a stock has a P/E of 12.4 but you've screened for less than 12, should it really be cut out? Of course not. But a strict set of rules won't catch it.
So what do you do?
You start raising all your cutoffs – you find a broader set – but something feels amiss. You know your cutoffs are keeping out some of the best candidates in the market.
Scoring every stock in the market
The breakthrough for me came when I stopped thinking so binary – in pass/fail terms – and came across the idea of scoring. It was Joel Greenblatt, in his excellent 'The Little Book that Beats the Market', that sowed the seed.
What if, instead of demanding that a company have a P/E of less than 12, you scored every stock in the market for how low the price to earnings ratio was? And another for how profitable it was – using its 'return on capital'.
Rather than just having a hard cutoff for 'cheap' or 'good' shares, you could create a gradient – with 'cheap, highly profitable' stocks at one end, and 'expensive, unprofitable' shares at the other.
It's a fundamentally different approach. You're no longer left with just a few stocks, you have a score for every stock in the market. And what's even better, you can then compare any stock against any other.
Stockopedia
Stockopedia is an analysis site for share-picking investors that This is Money's team has used for many years.
Its share data and StockRanks provide exceptional insight.
There are also practical tips, Model Portfolios, and simple, consistent rules-based strategies.
As a special offer, This is Money readers can get 25 per cent off a Stockopedia membership *
How will you score stocks?
You can do this even if you are a stock picker, looking at stocks on a case by case basis. You can build a set of solid rules, which can even include qualitative assessments like 'how experienced and trustworthy is the management', and grade stocks between zero and ten for each rule.
I know some of the best investors in the UK that do this. It does require judgement, but it removes a lot of bias from your investing process, and helps you avoid getting too sucked into a story.
But a more data-first approach allows you to compare all the stocks in the market.
If you like doing your own work, you can do this yourself – you will need access to a financial database to export some data. Some are free on the web, though you do have to be careful with data quality. But it's really worth it.
Choose some key metrics across a few of the quality, value and momentum dimensions.
For example, as I've described, you might choose the P/E ratio and the return on capital (a key profitability measure). Score each one as a percentage from zero to 100, where 100 is 'best'.
Total the scores and rank again. You can then use this score to check your own stock ideas against. It's not hard. And it works.
> Check out the illustration in this spreadsheet
It uses institutional quality data from Stockopedia's database (correct at the time of publishing).
Take a look and see if you can find any of your shares within it – their scores might surprise you
While this is just a simple example, the benefit of this kind of gradient-based thinking is huge. It can add so much rigour to your process, but more than this – it really gets results.
Putting it all together to catch share price moves early
Scoring the market for a couple of financial ratios isn't really that robust.
Just scoring for 'value' based on the P/E ratio can leave opportunities on the table – what about companies that are cheap relative to their company sales, but are just turning profitable? When their sales grow, they can see huge profit expansion.
So at Stockopedia, we built a system that takes this further. Every stock gets a daily score – out of 100 – based on its quality, value, and momentum profile – but each of these scores is built from a range of financial ratios to give a more robust and rounded guide to their relative merit.
We call these measures the StockRanks and they have a terrific track record of finding stocks that perform.
Top ranked stocks through time have included many of the very best multibaggers in the UK market – stocks like Rolls Royce, Games Workshop, Jet2 and more – before they took off.
The top 10 per cent of ranked shares – those in the 90+ range – have on average returned 11.9 per cent annualised. And the lowest ranked 10 per cent? Well, more than 75 per cent of them end up losers – with an average annualised return of -17 per cent.
Now, this doesn't mean every 90+ ranked stock is going to be a winner. Of course not. A good score is not a buy recommendation. Individual stocks do their own thing, profit warnings happen and markets go down as well as up. But across groups of stocks, over the longer term, the odds weigh in your favour. That's what matters.
Building a portfolio that captures the 90+ effect
In the third article of this series, we'll explore how to move from understanding the pitfalls of emotional investing to applying a rules-based approach that works.
Avoiding behavioural mistakes such as poor stock selection, under-diversification, and reactive trading, we'll show how to construct and manage a rules-based portfolio that has a high chance of beating the market.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

One in eight high earners with no inheritance ‘trapped by financial outgoings'
One in eight high earners with no inheritance ‘trapped by financial outgoings'

The Independent

time3 minutes ago

  • The Independent

One in eight high earners with no inheritance ‘trapped by financial outgoings'

One in eight (12%) people with a salary over £100,000, but with no parental wealth to fall back on, feel 'trapped' by their current financial commitments, a survey has found. More than two-fifths (44%) do not feel that they are able to comfortably meet their financial commitments each month, according to the research commissioned by wealth manager Killik & Co. Despite their high salaries, nearly a fifth (18%) of high earners in this group admit that their financial commitments are causing them stress and anxiety. Over a quarter (28%) said that the cost of supporting loved ones is reducing their financial savings while 26% said their own personal financial commitments are impacting their financial cushion. The most common monthly financial commitment, aside from household expenses and utility bills, was insurance (66%), including health, home and car cover. Nearly half (47%) of those surveyed have commuting costs, and 45% have private healthcare or other medical expenses. Over a third (36%) have credit card debt to pay. This group is also largely focused on the short term, the research indicated, with the majority (56%) thinking only a year ahead when planning finances and only 3% planning more than five years in advance. Will Stevens, head of wealth planning, Killik & Co said: 'A high tax burden, loss of free childcare, family dependants and mortgage costs all stack up and make it difficult for even those on the highest salaries to build up financial resilience. 'If they are not due an inheritance, it's clear even those on six figures and above are struggling to build up savings to ensure longer-term financial stability for their family. 'Provided money is managed carefully, this doesn't need to be the case. Upweighting pension contributions, managing salary increases and childcare support, and seeking financial advice to ensure your estate is well structured from a tax perspective, can all help high earners avoid the common traps which block them from accumulating wealth.' More than 2,000 people across the UK who are earning £100,000 or more and do not stand to inherit money from parents and whose parents cannot support them financially were surveyed by Censuswide for the research carried out in April and May.

Typical price of some popular home improvements ‘has reduced in recent months'
Typical price of some popular home improvements ‘has reduced in recent months'

The Independent

time3 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Typical price of some popular home improvements ‘has reduced in recent months'

The typical cost of some popular home renovations has fallen in recent months, analysis of job inquiries indicates. The Checkatrade Home Improvement Index found that prices for bathroom fittings have dropped significantly, with the average cost at £5,525 in the second quarter of this year, down from £5,758 in the first quarter and £6,062 in the final quarter of 2024. In the second quarter of 2025, the average kitchen fitting job was £6,803, down from £7,337 in the fourth quarter of 2024. Typical bedroom fitting costs fell to £3,631 in the second quarter of this year, down from £4,016 in the first quarter. Average prices for painting and decorating, window and door fitting and plastering have also fallen during this year, the analysis indicates. Some price falls have also been seen for bigger-scale building jobs, from £15,358 on average in the third quarter of last year to £12,369 in the second quarter of this year. Checkatrade said typical costs for groundworks and for patios and driveways have also seen some reductions. The second quarter of the year is often a popular time for outdoor work to take place ahead of summer. The website, which has a job estimate calculator, said that, just as rising costs of materials led to price increases last year, some costs falling back are likely to be a key reason behind some declining prices for work. Checkatrade also said that, with the UK having already seen a hot summer, air conditioning prices have also recently been falling. Recent data from Zoopla, which has announced a strategic partnership with Checkatrade, indicated that, if sold in summer, air conditioning could potentially add £4,925 to a property's value typically. Jambu Palaniappan, CEO at Checkatrade, said: 'The latest figures are brilliant news for homeowners. Last year we saw rising costs in the industry, propelled by high material and labour costs. 'A reduction in material costs in particular now appears to be having an impact on reducing the wider cost of work and we are starting to see a return to more normal levels.'

Nine million Britons can afford to invest but lack 'emotional capacity' for risk
Nine million Britons can afford to invest but lack 'emotional capacity' for risk

Daily Mail​

time4 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Nine million Britons can afford to invest but lack 'emotional capacity' for risk

Britain has a problem. Millions of people are holding money in cash savings, and as a result are losing out on the potential long-term returns from investing. More than half of adults, 58 per cent, and equivalent to some 31.4million people are unwilling to face short-term losses on investments because they have low 'emotional' capacity for risk, new data from Interactive Investor reveals. Of course, watching your hard-earned cash fall in value when invested is tough to take, and for many this money is needed in case of emergencies, or simply to pay for day-to-day expenses. However, a third of those who said they didn't have the emotional capacity to take investment risk, as many as nine million people, do have the financial resilience to do so. Interactive Investor said this leads to these people 'under-investing', with 71 per cent of the 3,000 people surveyed owning no investments outside of their pension. Data from the Bank of England reveals that in May an eye-watering £280billion worth of cash was sitting in UK bank accounts earning no interest Richard Wilson, chief executive of Interactive Investor, said: 'Our research has unearthed a safety-first instinct among savers that presents a serious challenge for the UK. 'Millions of people have the financial capacity to invest, but don't believe it's worth the risk - over a lifetime that's likely to have a serious impact on their financial resilience. 'The dangers of not taking any risk are fast climbing up the political and regulatory agenda, and analysis shows that Britain has the lowest levels of equity ownership outside of pensions of any G7 country, with a disproportionate amount in cash and property.' In fact, as few as 12 per cent of people have a high emotional capacity for risk. A slightly higher proportion, 19 per cent, had a high risk tolerance. That phrase refers to how willing people are to accept the possibility of losses in favour of higher returns in the long term. Still, around 57 per cent of people still scored low for risk tolerance, meaning that they aren't willing to take risks for rewards in the long term, even when financially stable. Greg Davies, head of behavioural finance at Oxford Risk, said: 'Most people invest too little and take less risk than they could safely afford. This isn't about logic - it's about emotion. Emotional discomfort with short-term market ups and downs leads even financially resilient investors to underinvest. 'For those with high financial capacity, the emotional gap is often greatest: they could afford to aim higher, but their feelings hold them back.' Data from the Bank of England reveals that in May an eye-watering £280billion worth of cash was sitting in UK bank accounts earning no interest. The Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, has launched a campaign to promote retail investing among ordinary people, promoting investing over holding large sums of money in cash. Meanwhile, 'targeted support' reforms will come into play next year, offering tailored recommendations based on what people in similar financial circumstances are doing with their money. Along with this came fears that the Chancellor would scrap the cash Isa in a bid to push more towards investing. On the news that this wouldn't be the case - for now at least - savers breathed an audible sigh of relief. At the same time though, many resigned themselves to continuing to miss out on much higher returns. Interestingly, just three per cent said they would have a higher tolerance for investing if cash Isa tax benefits were slashed. Meanwhile, 41 per cent said they would invest if they had more money, while 16 per cent said they would do so if they understood investments better. While it Is recommended that savers only invest cash that they can afford to lose, as well as making sure that they build up an emergency pot and cash savings before doing so, many are sitting on cash pots earning no interest. Even when held in high interest accounts like cash Isas, the value of cash savings is gradually eroded as inflation outpaces the rates paid out by banks. Craig Rickman, personal finance expert at Interactive Investor, added: 'While people should only take on as much risk as is right for them, short-term emotional barriers often mean we don't take the risk that's right for our long-term needs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store