logo
Some concerned after second gunfire incident at DeLand bar

Some concerned after second gunfire incident at DeLand bar

Yahoo27-05-2025
Deland police are planning to give an update on the gunfire outside McCabe's Bar over the weekend that they say was all over a $5 beer. It's the second shooting incident to happen there in less than a month.
People are taking to social media sharing their concerns over a second shooting incident within three weeks at McCabe's Bar. One post said, 'McCabe's needs to hire their own security and buy a metal detector.'
Calvin Gilbert, 55, was captured after being on the run after allegedly shooting at a man he got into an argument with over a beer. The victim was able to duck and miss being hit by the gunfire.
Weeks earlier, a fight broke out inside the bar, where Keshod Harris was shot and killed.
'Two completely separate incidents, but this could happen anywhere,' said Paul Jones.
WFTV talked with friends and family of Harris. They didn't want to go on camera but say it's a sad situation.
His cousin shared online 'after what happened to my cousin, this bar hasn't taken action to make sure the customers are safe inside or outside.'
One McCabe's regular said DeLand police have increased patrols.
'Chief Umberger has had people here doing drive-bys, police officers doing drive-bys. They make sure no one's in the back parking lot and everything. It's just unfortunate,' said Jones.
WFTV has reached out to the bar and was told a manager would have to answer any questions.
Gilbert is in jail without bail.
Click here to download our free news, weather and smart TV apps. And click here to stream Channel 9 Eyewitness News live.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jim Harbaugh refuses to comment on NCAA penalizing University of Michigan for sign-stealing
Jim Harbaugh refuses to comment on NCAA penalizing University of Michigan for sign-stealing

CBS News

timea minute ago

  • CBS News

Jim Harbaugh refuses to comment on NCAA penalizing University of Michigan for sign-stealing

Jim Harbaugh is refusing to comment on the NCAA's decision to fine the University of Michigan tens of millions of dollars and to suspend head coach Sherrone Moore for three games due to the sign-stealing scandal that occurred during Harbaugh's tenure at his alma mater. Harbaugh stayed mum on the Wolverines when he stepped to the podium at SoFi Stadium on Saturday night following his Los Angeles Chargers' 23-22 preseason loss to the Los Angeles Rams for his first interaction with the media since the NCAA's rulings were announced Friday. "Like I said to you last year, not engaging," Harbaugh said. "Not engaging." The NCAA sharply criticized Harbaugh's stewardship over the winningest program in college football when it announced the sanctions, saying it had "overwhelming" evidence of a cover-up by the Michigan staff. Harbaugh has always claimed he didn't know about the sign-stealing and scouting operation run by Connor Stalions. Stalions was given an eight-year show-cause order, restricting him from all athletically related activities during the show-cause period. He was on Harbaugh's staff until he resigned amid the scandal in November 2023. In the Netflix documentary "Untold: Sign Stealer," Stalions said he did not break any NCAA rules. Michigan only avoided a multi-year postseason ban because the NCAA decided it wasn't fair to the Wolverines' current student-athletes to penalize them for the misdeeds during Harbaugh's tenure, which culminated in a national championship in January 2024. He jumped back to the NFL two weeks later with the Chargers, and the NCAA hit him in August 2024 with a four-year show-cause order for recruiting violations. Harbaugh now faces a 10-year show-cause order following the conclusion of the four-year order, which effectively serves as a 14-year ban from college football. Moore said in a statement on Friday after the NCAA's announcement that he's "glad that this part of the process has been completed. I greatly respect the rules governing collegiate athletics and it is my intent to have our program comply with those rules at all times." Michigan has said it will appeal the NCAA's decision, claiming the body has made errors in interpreting its own bylaws while drawing conclusions that are contrary to evidence. Moore was Harbaugh's assistant for six years before getting the top job upon Harbaugh's departure. Moore will be suspended for two games this September and for the Wolverines' 2026 season opener in Germany. Note: The above video first aired on Aug. 15, 2025.

Rural Colorado county faces deadly trend in traffic crashes, implements zero tolerance policy
Rural Colorado county faces deadly trend in traffic crashes, implements zero tolerance policy

CBS News

time31 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Rural Colorado county faces deadly trend in traffic crashes, implements zero tolerance policy

One Colorado county has seen a tragic uptick in fatal traffic accidents in recent weeks, including a head-on crash on Highway 40 that killed one person and injured three others last Thursday. Just days earlier, a family of five, including three children, was killed in a crash on Highway 9 near Kremmling after a truck crossed into their lane. In response to these fatalities, the Grand County Sheriff's Office has introduced a zero-tolerance enforcement for reckless driving, focusing on speeding and aggressive driving behaviors. Grand County Sheriff Brett Schroetlin said the policy is aimed at addressing the surge in dangerous driving behaviors, including excessive speeding, illegal passing, and aggressive maneuvers. "We've noticed progressively worse issues with driving behaviors here in the county," Schroetlin said. "This initiative is a direct response to the recent fatalities, including the one that claimed the lives of an entire family." As of mid-2025, Grand County has already experienced five fatal crashes, a stark contrast to zero fatalities in 2023. The Sheriff warned that drivers caught engaging in aggressive behaviors or extreme speeding could face jail time. "We've seen speeds approaching 130 mph -- that's nearly double the posted speed limit," he said. "This isn't just about tickets; it's about saving lives." The sheriff also emphasized the need for legislative action to hold reckless drivers accountable. The Colorado Department of Transportation is ramping up efforts to address impaired driving as well, particularly ahead of the Labor Day weekend, a traditionally busy travel time. July was the deadliest month for impaired driving-related crashes in Colorado, with 26 lives lost. So far this year, 124 people have died in crashes involving impaired drivers. From Aug. 15 to Sept. 3, CDOT will support law enforcement agencies statewide during "The Heat Is On" DUI crackdown. The campaign aims to reduce impaired driving fatalities, which often spike during the "100 Deadliest Days of Summer" between Memorial Day and Labor Day. "Impaired driving-related crashes are tragic and completely avoidable," Col. Matthew C. Packard, chief of the Colorado State Patrol, said in a press release. "Don't make excuses. If you've been drinking, put down the keys and find a safe ride home." A DUI in Colorado can cost drivers an average of $13,530, factoring in fines, legal fees, increased insurance costs, and lost wages. Furthermore, a DUI conviction can result in job loss, particularly for those in driving-dependent careers such as law enforcement and trucking. CDOT has also launched a campaign to educate the public about the consequences of refusing a DUI test under Colorado's Expressed Consent Law, which mandates that drivers consent to a toxicology test after a DUI arrest. The next DUI enforcement period will run from Sept. 11 to Oct. 22, focusing on Fall Festivals. A graph detailing impaired driving-related fatalities in July from 2019 to 2024 shows a persistent pattern of deaths, with July 2024 seeing 28 fatalities, up from 24 in 2023.

Twenty years ago, my research exposed one of the biggest corporate scandals in U.S. history: It taught me that fraud is everywhere, just waiting to be revealed
Twenty years ago, my research exposed one of the biggest corporate scandals in U.S. history: It taught me that fraud is everywhere, just waiting to be revealed

Yahoo

time42 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Twenty years ago, my research exposed one of the biggest corporate scandals in U.S. history: It taught me that fraud is everywhere, just waiting to be revealed

Twenty years ago, I published a paper that helped uncover one of the largest corporate scandals in U.S. history. More than 100 public companies were implicated, dozens of executives resigned or faced criminal charges, and billions in earnings had to be restated. I never intended to be a whistleblower. I was simply doing what academics are trained to do: ask questions, follow the data, and let the evidence speak. But what the evidence revealed was staggering: executives at hundreds of companies were manipulating stock option grant dates to enrich their executives at the expense of shareholders. The practice became known as backdating. Now, on the 20th anniversary of that research, I see troubling parallels emerging in other corners of the financial world. A pattern too precise to be chance My journey into this murky corner of corporate behavior began with a desire to understand how executive compensation influenced firm decisions. While analyzing large datasets of compensation and stock prices, I noticed something peculiar: stock option grants often coincided with recent dips in the company's share price. Too often. The pattern was statistically improbable. It was as if executives had a crystal ball, repeatedly receiving options at the most opportune moment. But the truth was more mundane—and more troubling. Companies were retroactively selecting grant dates that coincided with low stock prices, effectively locking in instant, unearned gains. This allowed executives to buy shares at a discount while maintaining the illusion that they had to earn the discount by lifting the stock price. The simplicity of the scheme What made the fraud so insidious was its simplicity. Backdating didn't require complex financial engineering or elaborate cover-ups. It was a quiet manipulation of paperwork—choosing a date in the past when the stock price was low and pretending that was the day the options were granted. That simplicity likely contributed to its spread. There's evidence that individuals on multiple boards passed along the practice. But even isolated executives and directors could easily conceive the scheme, much like someone backdating a check to make it appear they paid a bill on time. Hidden in plain sight What struck me most was that backdating went unnoticed for at least a decade. It was a silent epidemic of opportunism. The option grant data was public. Thousands of participants were involved. Surely some auditors must have seen isolated traces of the fraud. But no one connected the dots. My research, combined with a timely nudge, eventually prompted the SEC to launch targeted investigations. Journalists followed, including a team at The Wall Street Journal with the time, resources, and incentives to pursue the story. Their work earned the paper its first Pulitzer Prize for Public Service. Parallels in other scandals I've since seen parallels of backdating in other financial scandals. For example, backdating is not the only fraud that depends on simply picking prices from the past. Bernie Madoff's infamous Ponzi scheme used fabricated trades based on stale prices. Remarkably, Madoff's investors accepted these reports for years, despite the implausibility of the returns. Similarly, the mutual fund late-trading scandal allowed favored clients to illegally trade mutual funds late in the evening at stale prices from the end of the trading day. These cases show how much easier it is to perform well when you can reach back in time and choose a favorable moment to act. Today, I worry that similar dynamics may be unfolding in private equity. Many funds report valuations based on internal or third-party estimates shortly after acquiring assets. These valuations often appear inflated—sometimes even acknowledged as such by the firms themselves. Yet these funds are increasingly included in pension portfolios, exposing everyday investors to risks—and potentially fraud—they may not fully understand. The paradox of corporate fraud That's the paradox of corporate fraud: it's both obvious and invisible. The data is often there. The patterns are detectable. But with silent perpetrators, the deception persists. What gives me hope is that our tools for detecting fraud are more powerful than ever. We have better data, sharper analytical methods, and a growing community of skeptical citizen watchdogs. Because the next scandal won't be stopped by regulators alone. It will be stopped by someone who notices a pattern, asks a question, and refuses to look away. The opinions expressed in commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune. This story was originally featured on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store