logo
China reports 7,000 cases of chikungunya virus

China reports 7,000 cases of chikungunya virus

BBC News2 days ago
More than 7,000 cases of a mosquito-borne virus have been reported across China's Guangdong province since July, prompting measures similar to those taken during the Covid-19 pandemic.
In Foshan city, which has been hit the hardest, chikungunya patients must stay in hospital, where their beds will protected with mosquito nets. They can only be discharged after they test negative or at the end of a week-long stay.
Spread through the bite of an infected mosquito, the virus causes fever and severe joint pain, which sometimes can last for years.
Although rare in China, chikungunya outbreaks are common in South and South East Asia and parts of Africa.
How widespread are the infections in China?
Aside from Foshan, at least 12 other cities in the southern Guangdong province have reported infections. Nearly 3,000 cases were reported in the last week alone.
On Monday, Hong Kong reported its first case - a 12-year-old boy who developed fever, rash and joint pain after traveling to Foshan in July.
The virus is not contagious, and only spreads when an infected person is bitten by a mosquito that then goes on to bite others.
Officials say all the reported cases have been mild so far, with 95% of the patients discharged within seven days.
Still, the cases have led to some panic, given the virus is not widely known in the country.
"This is scary. The prolonged consequences sound very painful," one user wrote on Chinese social media platform Weibo.
The US has urged travellers to China to exercise "increased caution" following the outbreak.
What else is China doing to curb infections?
Authorities across Guangdong province have vowed to take "decisive and forceful measures" to stop the spread of the disease.
Those with symptoms, such as fever, joint pain or rashes, are being urged to visit the nearest hospital so they can be tested for the virus.
Authorities have instructed residents to remove stagnant water in their homes, such as in flowerpots, coffee machines or spare bottles - and warned of fines up to 10,000 yuan ($1,400) if they don't do this.
They are also releasing giant "elephant mosquitoes" that can devour smaller, chikungunya-spreading bugs; and an army of mosquito-eating fish.
Last week, officials in Foshan released 5,000 of these larvae-eating fish into the city's lakes. In parts of the city, they are even flying drones to detect sources of stagnant water.
Some neighbouring cities had ordered travellers from Foshan to undergo a 14-day home quarantine, but that has since been withdrawn.
Some people have compared these measures to those imposed during the pandemic, and questioned their necessity.
A user on Weibo wrote, "These feel so familiar... But are they really necessary?"
Another wrote: "What's the point of the quarantine? It's not as though an infected patient will then go around biting other people?"
China implemented severe restrictions during the pandemic, including forcing people into quarantine camps and sealing residential buildings and whole neighbourhoods on short notice for days or even weeks.
What is chikungunya?
Most people bitten by an infected mosquito will develop symptoms of chikungunya within three to seven days.
Apart from fever and joint pain, other symptoms include rash, headache, muscle pain and swollen joints.
In most cases, patients will feel better within a week. In severe cases however, the joint pain can last for months or even years.
Those at risk for more severe disease include newborns, the elderly, and people with underlying medical conditions, such as heart disease or diabetes.
There is no cure, but deaths from chikungunya are rare.
The virus was first identified in Tanzania in 1952. It then spread to other countries in sub-Saharan Africa and South East Asia.
To date, it has been reported in more than 110 countries.
The best way to prevent the virus from spreading is to reduce pools of stagnant water that allow the mosquitoes to breed, according to the World Health Organization.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

University puts up ‘bonkers' posters warning its students not to eat conkers
University puts up ‘bonkers' posters warning its students not to eat conkers

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

University puts up ‘bonkers' posters warning its students not to eat conkers

A UNIVERSITY launched a 'bonkers' campaign warning its students not to eat conkers. East Anglia University has put up posters showing a conker in a red circle with a cross through it. Above the image is written, 'Do not eat conkers!' and below, 'These are not chestnuts and eating them will make you unwell'. Bosses put up the posters in the international student study centre fearing a new intake of Chinese students might think they are edible. Around 1,000 of the 17,000 students at the Norwich university hail from China. It is feared some new arrivals could confuse conkers — known as horse chestnuts — with water chestnuts, which are prized in China for their crunchy texture and mild sweetness. Horse chestnuts, however, contain a toxin called aesculin which can cause abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting. A source said: 'The uni looks out for student welfare and thought this was an area they may need guidance on.' The university said: 'As far as we're aware, no students have attempted to eat conkers and we'd like to keep it that way. 'The posters were prompted by a member of staff who previously worked with Chinese students and recalled similar confusion elsewhere. 'It's part of our broader commitment to student wellbeing.'

Food linked to rise of colon cancer now believed to be behind lung cancer, study finds
Food linked to rise of colon cancer now believed to be behind lung cancer, study finds

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Food linked to rise of colon cancer now believed to be behind lung cancer, study finds

A pile of foods linked to the rise of colon cancer are also believed to increase the risk of lung cancer, a study suggests. A group of Chinese researchers have found that consuming ultra-processed foods (UPFs) such as packaged snacks, chips, sweetened beverages, soda and processed meats can raise your risk of being diagnosed with lung cancer by 41 percent. The study found that eating UPFs can increase the risk of non-small cell lung cancer, the most common type of lung cancer, by 37 percent, and small cell lung cancer by 44 percent. Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women in the US and about 230,000 people are expected to be affected this year. The American Cancer Society estimates that about 125,000 people will die from the disease in 2025. While lung cancer rates overall are decreasing in the US, there's a concerning trend of increasing cases among women and in young adults who have never smoked. While UPFs have been previously linked to increasing the risk of colorectal cancer due to cell DNA damage, the researchers said it was surprising to find links to lung cancer. Based on the discovery, the scientists said that while additional research was required, it was important to limit consumption of UPFs. The study, which was published in the medical journal Thorax, analyzed data from nearly 102,000 people who were cancer-free from 1998 to 2010. Participants were asked to answer questionnaires about their overall health and the food they ate 24 hours prior to the beginning of the trial. Based on their UPF intake, the volunteers were divided into four groups to measure their likelihood of developing lung cancer. Foods classed as UPFs included sour cream, cream cheese, ice cream, frozen yogurt, fried foods, bread, cookies, cakes, pastries, salty snacks, breakfast cereals, instant noodles and soups, sauces, margarine, candy, soft drinks, artificially sweetened fruit drinks, restaurant/industrial hamburgers, hot dogs and pizza. The researchers found that people in the lowest risk group had about 0.5 servings of UPFs a day while those who were most likely to develop lung cancer had six servings a day. On average, most participants ate about 2.8 servings of ultra-processed foods each day. The researchers also found that lunch meat comprised 11 percent of the participants' overall diets, caffeinated soft drinks were 7.3 percent and decaffeinated soft drinks were 6.6 percent. During the 12-year study period, participants self-reported lung cancer diagnoses through annual questionnaires and X-ray reports. By the end, a total of 1,706 cases of lung cancer were identified, out of which 1,273 were cases of non-small cell lung cancer and 233 cases of small cell lung cancer. Non-small cell lung cancer occurs when normal cells in your lungs change and grow uncontrollably over a period of time. This is the most common type of lung cancer, making up about 85 percent of all lung cancer cases and can quickly spread to other organs. Small cell lung cancer is a highly aggressive and fast-growing type of cancer that is known for its tendency to spread quickly to other parts of the body. After a thorough statistical analysis, they found that participants who ate the most UPFs had an overall 41 percent higher chance of of lung cancer compared with those in the lowest group. Additionally, low consumption of minimally processed foods such as fruits, vegetables, fish and whole grains was also linked to increased lung cancer risk. In particular, they noted that carrageenan, a food additive used as a thickening agent, can cause intestinal inflammation in cells, leading to gastrointestinal issues and an imbalance in the gut microbiome which may contribute to lung cancer. Examples of foods containing carrageenan include dairy products like ice cream and yogurt, non-dairy alternatives such as almond milk and soy milk, processed meats like deli meat and chicken sausage, and even some infant formulas. They also found that acrolein - a toxic component of cigarette smoke found in various foods, particularly those that have been cooked at high temperatures - can contribute to lung cancer by damaging basic call DNA. The formation of acrolein is primarily linked to the breakdown of fats, carbohydrates, and amino acids during processes like frying, roasting, and baking. Lastly, the scientists noted that UPFs may be contaminated by packaging materials, such polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) used in fatty fish, meat and dairy products, which can increase affect lung cancer risk. PCBs were largely mass produced by agricultural giant Monsanto until they were banned in 1979 amid concerns that they harmed humans and the environment. According to the EPA, conclusive evidence has found that PCBs can cause cancer in animals, as well as harm their immune, reproductive, nervous, and endocrine systems. The agency classifies these chemicals as 'probably carcinogenic' to humans. According to the CDC, exposure to PCBs can lead to increased enzymes linked to liver damage, skin lesions, and respiratory issues. Animal studies have shown effects such as weight loss, fatty liver, thyroid damage, and cancer. While PCBs are banned and not intentionally used in new food packaging, they can still be present due to historical uses and accidental contamination. Specifically, PCBs can leach from recycled paper products or contaminated machinery used in manufacturing. Commenting on cancer-causing potential of UPFs Dr Matthew Schabath, an epidemiologist at Moffitt Cancer Center who was not involved in the study, told Prevention: 'Although ultra-processed foods are not—yet—classified as carcinogens, both epidemiological and laboratory data suggest they may be a potential cancer risk factor. 'Laboratory studies have shown that components of ultra-processed foods can alter gut microbiota, increase inflammation, damage DNA, and modify gene expression, among other effects. 'Diets high in ultra-processed foods also promote systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, both of which contribute to cancer development.'

What do we know about the Covid-19 virus five years on?
What do we know about the Covid-19 virus five years on?

The Guardian

time4 hours ago

  • The Guardian

What do we know about the Covid-19 virus five years on?

It's been five years since the start of the Covid pandemic. Although most of the government mandates, from social distancing to face masks, have been consigned to the past, the virus is still prevalent – and capable of causing real harm. Although it was initially forecast to become a seasonal illness, the virus is on the rise in the US – making it far from the common-cold-style winter illness that was expected. Experts told the Guardian a lot of predictions made about how Covid-19 would evolve have turned out to be wrong. Five years on, what do we know about the virus? Although news of a summer wave in the US has sparked fears it could be replicated in the UK, the latest data from the UK Health Security Agency shows that cases dropped by 28% over the past week to reach 1,046. Since most people don't test any more, this is unlikely to reflect the true prevalence. The data for the past year shows levels have remained consistent, with a large spike last October. Experts assumed that as Covid became endemic, it would change into a winter bug, like the common cold or flu. UKHSA stats show this is not the case. 'It is absolutely true that you are as likely to get Covid in summer as in winter,' said Danny Altmann, an immunologist at Imperial College London. He added: 'It's been a shifting discussion – when do we calm down and say it's become an endemic coronavirus like the common cold. I think we're still so far off that place. There's a kind of optimism that it's just a winter sniffle, but it's not a sniffle; it's quite symptomatic, especially in vulnerable people and in the excess death figures, and also it is absolutely not seasonal.' Altmann said that, although there is a perception that, as a coronavirus, Covid-19 is akin to a common cold, in reality it is closer to the flu in terms of the death rate, its impact on the NHS and the potential severity of symptoms. Simon Williams, a sociologist at Swansea University who has researched public views on the pandemic, said: 'We're getting to the point where there's a legitimate question about whether it will ever be [a winter virus]. It's not a typical respiratory virus in terms of seasonality.' Adam Kucharski, a professor at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, said that because Covid-19 evolves quickly – twice as fast as the fastest flu – it is less constrained by season. 'Whereas a small change in transmissibility conditions is enough to stop flu in summer, Sars-CoV-2 can basically evolve its way over this barrier,' he said. The main Covid viruses in circulation are the Omicron subvariants. These are 'obviously milder than Wuhan or Delta', Altmann said, adding it's not the case that they are becoming progressively milder, but rather population immunity is higher due to vaccines and prior infections. The newest variant, NB.1.8.1, has been detected in the UK and international data suggests it is growing as a proportion of all Covid cases. World Health Organization analysis found the new strain is more contagious, but vaccination gives significant protection. Williams said we can expect to keep seeing the virus evolve, similar to how there are new flu virus combinations each year. The experts agreed the main problem is the low take-up of the free vaccine, which is available to people at greatest risk from Covid infection, including those aged 75 and over and those who are immunocompromised. Altmann said anyone who could afford it may wish to pay for the vaccine – not least because he hears regularly from new long Covid sufferers: 'Who wouldn't feel safer with boosted neutralising antibodies and T-cells?' He noted there is a spectrum of suffering, with people who are infected occasionally and mildly or non-symptomatically on one end, and on the other, those living with long Covid. There is also a third, under-researched, group in the middle of young or middle-aged people who get four to six reinfections per year, and may have to take several days off work each time. 'It's non-trivial and makes it quite hard to do your work,' he said. Although there is still hybrid immunity in the population because most people received several vaccines during the pandemic, there is a growing population of children who would have been too young to have received them at the time. The experts feared that growing vaccine hesitancy, which Williams described as 'one of the most pressing concerns' in public health, could have an impact on whether these children receive a jab or people turn up for their boosters. Another consideration, when it comes to building immunity, is the growing body of research suggesting that for several months after a Covid infection, people become more vulnerable to other infections and there can be lingering effects on the heart, cardiovascular system and the brain. 'We're only five years into this virus, there's a lot of question marks and unknowns,' said Williams.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store