Cop got Rs 35L salary in 12 years without training and never reporting to work
A native of central MP's Vidisha district, Abhishek was among those recruited as constables in the state police in 2011-12. He appeared at the Bhopal District Lines for joining much later than other constables of his batch. He was subsequently sent for mandatory training at the Police Training School in Sagar district after induction into the police force.
However, instead of going for training, Abhishek went to his home in the neighbouring Vidisha district and neither underwent training nor reported for duty for 12 long years.
During his entire period of undue absence from duty, he neither informed the department about it nor did he ever apply for leave, yet he managed to get the monthly salary for 12 long years.
Abhishek then sent his service file through the speed post to Bhopal, citing ill health. Surprisingly, his service file was accepted by the department concerned in Bhopal without any verification, resulting in Abhishek receiving Rs 35 lakh as salary over the next 12 years.
The shocking irregularity came to light in 2023, when service records were being reviewed as part of the mandatory exercise for the 10-year-time scale pay grade of the 2011-12 batch constables.
'The service record check revealed no rewards, no punishments and no duty records, which was outlandish. He (Abhishek) was summoned by the department's establishment branch, after which he finally appeared, making it clear he had not served the police even a single day,' said ACP-Bhopal Ankita Khaterkar, who is probing the matter.
He has already returned Rs 1 lakh to the department and promised to pay back in instalments the salary drawn in 12 years. A departmental probe is underway.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
39 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Anil Ambani summoned by ED in ₹17,000 crore loan fraud investigation
The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has summoned Anil Ambani, chairman and managing director of Reliance Group, for questioning in connection with its ongoing investigation into an alleged `17,000-crore loan fraud case. He's been asked to appear on August 5 at ED headquarters in the Capital, people in the know told ET. ED last week carried out searches at multiple entities and individuals linked to Anil Ambani's Reliance Group across 35 locations in Mumbai, covering 50 companies and 25 individuals under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). In a related development, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) shared with ED and two other agencies the findings of a separate probe, launched by it into alleged diversion of `10,000 crore by Reliance Infrastructure (R Infra). Sebi's report, accessed by ET, alleged R Infra diverted a large amount of money disguised as intercorporate deposits (ICDs) to Reliance Group units through CLE Pvt Ltd, an undisclosed related party company. CLE is said to be the 'C' company that had cropped up during investigation and was the subject of much speculation. The engineering, procurement and construction firm has its office at Nehru Road, Vakola, Santacruz (East), Mumbai.A person close to Reliance Group questioned the findings. 'Reliance Infrastructure publicly disclosed this matter on February 9, and Sebi did not make any independent discovery. Reliance Infra had an exposure of Rs 6,500 crore. The allegation that the diverted amount is Rs 10,000 crore only serves to sensationalise the magnitude and is not based on facts,' the person told ET. 'When the exposure was Rs 6,500 crore, how can the diversion be Rs 10,000 crore? Reliance Infra diligently pursued recovery of its dues in this matter. Reliance Infra arrived at a settlement to recover its entire exposure of Rs 6,500 crore through mandatory mediation proceedings conducted by a retired Supreme Court Judge and filed before the Bombay High Court, the person said.'Odisha distribution companies contemplated in the settlement are operational, and their recovery is pending before the courts,' he added. 'This amount is fully recoverable, contrary to the allegations.' The person also denied receipt of any notice from Sebi on the matter. In the second week of May, Sebi sent a formal communication to ED, the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) to look into the matter independently. The market regulator's investigation found alleged non-compliance with approval and disclosure norms on related party transactions. 'This camouflaged the material diversion of funds to the undisclosed related part as genuine business transactions,' according to the Sebi regulator said non-compliance with statutory provisions resulted in R Infra 'withholding crucial information in its financial statements with respect to diversion of funds for the ultimate benefit of its promoter and related entities.' It added that 'by considering CLE as a third party company, R Infra avoided accurate and meaningful disclosures of specific fair value adjustments… and thereby misstated the financial statements… the misstatement continues till date.'Company dealings According to the Sebi report, R Infra had various financial dealings with CLE in the form of ICDs, investments in equity and corporate guarantees. As of March 31, 2022, this amounted to Rs 8,302 crore. Sebi's investigations are for the period between FY16 and FY23. The report said that from FY17 to FY21, R Infra had written off Rs 10,110 crore on account of fair value adjustment, provisions, impairment added that R Infra 'continued to provide advances to CLE despite recognising incapacity of CLE to repay the loans, that is, even after creating provision of doubtful debts in one year, they continued to extend loans in the same or subsequent years.' The Sebi report said that from FY13 to FY23, total outstanding annual expenditure on CLE by R Infra was 25-90% of the latter's total assets. The markets regulator said R Infra allegedly did not disclose CLE as its related party in order to avoid having to obtain approval from the shareholder and audit committees, and the checks and balances imposed on related-party transactions as per law. Sebi found CLE to be a related party of R Infra on the basis of documentation. These included submissions made by CLE to Yes Bank in order to avail of loans acknowledging Reliance Infra is one of its promoters. Reliance Infra audit committee meeting minutes mention CLE as a group company. Signatories of CLE's bank accounts were all having email IDs from the Reliance ADA group domain, that is, @ Other supporting data include statements of key management personnel (KMPs) recorded during the Sebi investigation. Also, directors and KMPs appointed in CLE were directors and executives of Reliance Group. Sebi's report alleged that Anil Ambani, by virtue of his position as chairman of Reliance Group (formerly Reliance ADAG), held over 40% shareholding in Reliance Infrastructure entities in which he had significant control and influence till March 2019. He was also nonexecutive chairman and director in R Infra till March 25, 2022.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Anil Ambani summoned by ED in ₹17,000 crore loan fraud investigation
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has summoned Anil Ambani , chairman and managing director of Reliance Group , for questioning in connection with its ongoing investigation into an alleged `17,000-crore loan fraud case . He's been asked to appear on August 5 at ED headquarters in the Capital, people in the know told last week carried out searches at multiple entities and individuals linked to Anil Ambani's Reliance Group across 35 locations in Mumbai, covering 50 companies and 25 individuals under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act ( PMLA ).In a related development, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) shared with ED and two other agencies the findings of a separate probe, launched by it into alleged diversion of `10,000 crore by Reliance Infrastructure (R Infra). Sebi's report, accessed by ET, alleged R Infra diverted a large amount of money disguised as intercorporate deposits (ICDs) to Reliance Group units through CLE Pvt Ltd, an undisclosed related party is said to be the 'C' company that had cropped up during investigation and was the subject of much engineering, procurement and construction firm has its office at Nehru Road, Vakola, Santacruz (East), Mumbai.A person close to Reliance Group questioned the findings. 'Reliance Infrastructure publicly disclosed this matter on February 9, and Sebi did not make any independent discovery. Reliance Infra had an exposure of Rs 6,500 crore. The allegation that the diverted amount is Rs 10,000 crore only serves to sensationalise the magnitude and is not based on facts,' the person told ET. 'When the exposure was Rs 6,500 crore, how can the diversion be Rs 10,000 crore? Reliance Infra diligently pursued recovery of its dues in this Infra arrived at a settlement to recover its entire exposure of Rs 6,500 crore through mandatory mediation proceedings conducted by a retired Supreme Court Judge and filed before the Bombay High Court, the person said.'Odisha distribution companies contemplated in the settlement are operational, and their recovery is pending before the courts,' he added. 'This amount is fully recoverable, contrary to the allegations.' The person also denied receipt of any notice from Sebi on the the second week of May, Sebi sent a formal communication to ED, the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) and the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) to look into the matter independently. The market regulator's investigation found alleged non-compliance with approval and disclosure norms on related party transactions. 'This camouflaged the material diversion of funds to the undisclosed related part as genuine business transactions,' according to the Sebi regulator said non-compliance with statutory provisions resulted in R Infra 'withholding crucial information in its financial statements with respect to diversion of funds for the ultimate benefit of its promoter and related entities.'It added that 'by considering CLE as a third party company, R Infra avoided accurate and meaningful disclosures of specific fair value adjustments… and thereby misstated the financial statements… the misstatement continues till date.'Company dealingsAccording to the Sebi report, R Infra had various financial dealings with CLE in the form of ICDs, investments in equity and corporate guarantees. As of March 31, 2022, this amounted to Rs 8,302 crore. Sebi's investigations are for the period between FY16 and report said that from FY17 to FY21, R Infra had written off Rs 10,110 crore on account of fair value adjustment, provisions, impairment added that R Infra 'continued to provide advances to CLE despite recognising incapacity of CLE to repay the loans, that is, even after creating provision of doubtful debts in one year, they continued to extend loans in the same or subsequent years.'The Sebi report said that from FY13 to FY23, total outstanding annual expenditure on CLE by R Infra was 25-90% of the latter's total markets regulator said R Infra allegedly did not disclose CLE as its related party in order to avoid having to obtain approval from the shareholder and audit committees, and the checks and balances imposed on related-party transactions as per found CLE to be a related party of R Infra on the basis of documentation. These included submissions made by CLE to Yes Bank in order to avail of loans acknowledging Reliance Infra is one of its promoters. Reliance Infra audit committee meeting minutes mention CLE as a group company. Signatories of CLE's bank accounts were all having email IDs from the Reliance ADA group domain, that is, @ supporting data include statements of key management personnel (KMPs) recorded during the Sebi investigation . Also, directors and KMPs appointed in CLE were directors and executives of Reliance report alleged that Anil Ambani, by virtue of his position as chairman of Reliance Group (formerly Reliance ADAG), held over 40% shareholding in Reliance Infrastructure entities in which he had significant control and influence till March 2019. He was also nonexecutive chairman and director in R Infra till March 25, 2022.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
For 1st time, ED enters Port Blairon bank scam trail
NEW DELHI: In its first-ever enforcement action in Andaman & Nicobar Islands, the ED on Thursday conducted searches at nine locations in Port Blair and two in Kolkata in a money laundering case against a former Congress MP from the island and officials of the Andaman Nicobar State Cooperative (ANSC) Bank for alleged fraud of over Rs 200 crore. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Former MP Kuldeep Rai Sharma, who was arrested by the Island police on July 18, is the prime accused in the case for alleged misappropriation of bank funds by issuing loans to shell entities and laundering the proceeds. Sharma is the vice-chairman of ANSC Bank. The police FIR too has alleged large-scale irregularities in grant of loans and overdraft facilities by ANSC Bank. At least eight persons have been arrested in the case, including Sharma and other bank officials, by the local police. On July 29, a special court granted the police Sharma's custody for further interrogation. The ED may seek his custody after the police investigation to identify properties purchased using the "proceeds of crime" and attach them. "Evidence collected so far indicates that loan facilities were extended to various shell companies/firms, with 15 of them created by suspects for the benefit of Kuldeep Rai Sharma, a former MP of Andaman & Nicobar Islands," a source alleged. The agency has found that loans of more than Rs 200 crore were fraudulently taken by these entities from ANSC Bank. "A substantial portion of these loans was withdrawn in cash and paid to the beneficiaries, including Kuldeep Rai Sharma," sources said.
