Global South must lead world economy as US retreats, Boao Forum told
Boao Forum for Asia in south China's Hainan province on Wednesday.
Advertisement
The assessment came amid rising uncertainty emanating from the White House as US President Donald Trump's actions, including tariffs, threatened to fracture the international trade system.
Kirill Babaev , director of the Institute of China and Contemporary Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences, said it was important for developing economies to unite and 'have the moral authority to lead the global economy'.
He noted that the
Global South had always been described in opposition to developed countries, or the Global North, but 'the reality has changed'. The Global North was 'no longer a united whole', with deep differences among countries, he said.
Babaev said the Global South, which encompassed most of the world's countries, shared similar economic and social views, including an opposition to trade barriers such as tariffs and a respect for the political systems of other nations.
Advertisement
'We are consistent in the values of globalisation and the principles we uphold. Based on these principles, most countries in the world must … build a new economic system. Such a system has gradually emerged on the world stage,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
2 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Brazil seeks China's support to salvage maritime emissions pact opposed by Trump
Brazil is banking on China to support a landmark UN effort to cut greenhouse gas emissions generated by international shipping as governments prepare for a decisive October vote on the plan. One of the staunchest supporters of the International Maritime Organisation's proposed Net-Zero Framework, Brasilia is waiting for China to clarify its position on implementation of the plan, Ports and Airports Minister Sílvio Filho told reporters on Wednesday. The situation is setting up a stand-off with the administration of US President Donald Trump, which generally opposes any environmental mandates. The framework will require large ocean-going vessels that do not meet fuel-efficiency standards to pay for their carbon emissions starting in 2027. Ships over the base-level target will be charged US$380 per tonne of greenhouse gases, measured in carbon dioxide equivalent, while those missing the stricter Direct Compliance target will pay US$100 per tonne. Revenue from the system will be used to reward the application of cleaner fuels and support a 'just transition', helping developing countries adopt new green technologies. It still needs formal adoption at an extraordinary IMO session set for October. If approved, companies would have to meet the full emissions requirements starting in 2028.
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Trump's US$100 million bond purchases while in office spark conflict-of-interest concerns
President Donald Trump has bought hundreds of bonds since he returned to office, including those sold by US companies affected by the sweeping changes to federal policies he's championed. The 690 transactions, the first of which was made the day after his inauguration, total at least US$103.7 million, according to a document released by the White House on Tuesday that disclosed the billionaire's investing activity this year through early August. In addition to municipal bonds issued by local governments, school boards, airport authorities and gas districts, Trump bought corporate debt in tranches of at least US$500,000 each from Qualcomm, Home Depot and T-Mobile on February 10. He also bought at least US$250,000 of debt from Facebook owner Meta Platforms later that month. The report, which all federal elected officials and appointees who trade must submit, does not provide exact amounts or prices, since only broad ranges of transactions involving stocks, bonds, commodity futures and other securities are required. Trump reported no sales. The investments provide another example of how the president, whose net worth is pegged at US$6.4 billion by the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, continues to pursue wealth accumulation while in office. Unlike his predecessors, Trump did not divest or move his assets into a blind trust with an independent overseer. His sprawling business empire is managed by two of his sons and operates in several areas that intersect with presidential policy. His annual disclosure form filed in June showed his income from various sources still ultimately accrues to the president – something that has opened him to accusations of conflicts of interest.
South China Morning Post
8 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
A new European security landscape is emerging after Alaska summit
The Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin was a test balloon for Trump to find out, as he said, what Putin had in mind. The subsequent meeting in the White House between Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders was another test balloon – for Europe – to find out what Trump had in mind. Both were useful yet not really productive. Advertisement To start with, Putin has emerged as a clear winner. The red-carpet welcome on American soil with a historical connection with Russia could not have been more gratifying. If well begun is half done, Putin has capitalised on the occasion by springing an invitation on Trump to travel to Moscow for the next talk. If successful, Russia's isolation in the West would be gradually lifted. Even better if Trump wants to talk about anything else that could help to turn the West-sanctioned country into a normal one. And Putin most certainly knows how to flatter. As he said: 'Today, when President Trump [said] that if he was the president back then, there would be no war. And I'm quite sure that it would indeed be so.' How can Trump not nod to this? It is easy to understand why the war, which has gone on for 3½ years, shows no sign of ending soon. What one cannot achieve on the battlefield can hardly be gained at the negotiation table. It is also easy to understand why Russia wants to talk about a peace agreement rather than a ceasefire. Advertisement
