logo
Mass protests during Trump's military parade shows a US more divided than ever

Mass protests during Trump's military parade shows a US more divided than ever

ITV News17 hours ago

A military parade celebrated the 250th anniversary of the US Army, and coincided with the President Trump's 79th birthday – but with protests raging in cities across the country, many feel there isn't much to celebrate, ITV News' Stacey Foster reports
It has been a week in America.When I arrived in Downtown Los Angeles, there was tension and unrest as protests against ICE immigration raids in the city had turned violent. The very next evening, we witnessed aggression on both sides. Police lines forcing crowds back, fireworks thrown, rubber bullets being fired, tear gas, pepper spray.Our back-watcher pointed out a man, in the city alone, with a hammer in his backpack.
President Trump had expressed alarm that some protesters were using hammers to smash the road and create rocks to use as projectiles against the police.
We didn't see the man with the back pack do this and it wasn't clear whether he was planning to.
We also saw the US military in LA. The national guard standing in front of Federal buildings. We did not see the US Marines, but President Trump had controversially deployed them to the area against the wishes of Gavin Newsom, California's Governor.
But then, on the East coast there was a show of American strength that was very different. For the first time in its history, the US held a military parade with tanks seen only in times of war, rolling down the streets of Washington DC, 7000 marching soldiers and hundreds of aircraft rocket launchers and military machinery.
All this on display in front of thousands of on-lookers including the President of the United States who said it was about time that America celebrated its military victories. Despite long political speeches on Saturday evening in the lead up to the US Army's 250th anniversary celebration, the President stayed on-script, addressing the crowds for around ten minutes before a rather muted rendition of 'Happy Birthday' as this was also his 79th birthday.
There are also many challenges for the Trump administration… as protests against his policies rippled across America, not just in LA but in Vermont, New York, San Francisco, even in deep 'red' Republican Idaho.
So-called 'No Kings' protesters took to the streets in numbers, they say, rejecting Trump's authoritarianism.The on-going escalation in the Middle East is also a moment in history for a President who promised to bring peace to that region as part of his second term in office. President Trump has wanted a military parade since attending the Bastille Day celebrations in France in 2017.He got his birthday wish this year, but at a time when many in this country feel there is little to celebrate.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Macron's blunt message to Trump from Greenland pre-G7
Macron's blunt message to Trump from Greenland pre-G7

Daily Mail​

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Macron's blunt message to Trump from Greenland pre-G7

French President Emmanuel Macron delivered a blunt message to Donald Trump by stopping in Greenland Sunday en route to the G7 – a massive territory the U.S. president says the nation 'needs.' Macron stopped in Nuuk, the same city visited by Donald Trump, Jr. and Vice President JD Vance in separate stops that alarmed some locals who favor moves toward independence or continued association with Denmark. And the French president, eager to flex his own as a European leader as Trump pulls back rhetorically from European allies and pivots away from Ukraine, did not hold back in his public comments. 'I don't think that´s something to be done between allies,' Macron said on a brief visit where he met Danish PM Mette Frederiksen and Greenland's PM Jens-Frederik Nielsen. 'It´s important to show that Denmark and Europe are committed to this territory, which has very high strategic stakes and whose territorial integrity must be respected,' Marcon added. Macron's visit comes as Trump prepares to land in a country where locals are equally adamant against his call to make Canada the 51st U.S. state. 'I don't think he's playing around. I think he has intent around it. I think I think he's smart enough to know that we need them more than they need us, and he's willing to do whatever it takes,' local electrical contractor Curtis Reynard told the Daily Mail. With great powers scrambling for influence in the Arctic, Macron has also said the deep seas are not 'up for grabs.' Trump has been blunt in his claims about the need to obtain Greenland, which has stores of rare earth minerals under its permafrost and a strategic location between North America and Europe. 'We need Greenland for national security and international security,' Trump said in late March as the situation escalated. 'So we'll, I think, we'll go as far as we have to go,' Trump added. 'We need Greenland. And the world needs us to have Greenland, including Denmark. Denmark has to have us have Greenland. And, you know, we'll see what happens. But if we don't have Greenland, we can't have great international security. I view it from a security standpoint, we have to be there,' said Trump. Last week Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers the U.S. had plans to invade Greenland or Panama if necessary. 'Our job at the Defense Department is to have plans for any particular contingency,' Hegseth said under questioning at a hearing. 'I think the American people would want the Pentagon to have plans for any particular contingency,' Hegseth added.

What locals in Balloch think of Flamingo Land
What locals in Balloch think of Flamingo Land

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

What locals in Balloch think of Flamingo Land

A 10-year battle has raged over what this idyllic spot on one of the world's most storied waterways should come to look like in the future. An English leisure company called Flamingo Land specialising in leisure resorts has fought hard to build a hotel and log cabins and, ahem … a monorail here. The very notion of a leisure complex annexing one of the few remaining accessible spots on what the legendary Scottish naturalist, Tom Weir had called 'a lung for Glasgow' immediately seemed an anathema to the Scottish public and to those across the world who had experienced Loch Lomond's wild beauty. More than 155,000 signatures were collected expressing opposition to what they regarded as an environmental sacrilege. No other grassroots campaign had ever come anywhere near gathering so many responses. Read More Fake liberals wage war on Scotland's poorest and most vulnerable folk How new Pope and Catholic Church have mesmerised our Godless societies Pope Leo is the first American pontiff, but Trump should not celebrate It forced the developers and their partners, Scottish Enterprise and the Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park authority to retreat and re-consider an arrangement they'd all thought could be steered through with a minimum of public engagement and scrutiny. Along the way, a pattern of civic and private relationships has been exposed in which an exclusivity agreement with the developers was uncovered as well as a nexus of interlocking relationships in which undeclared interests and quiet land transfers have occurred. Featuring heavily throughout the saga has been the SNP's favoured weapon of mass obstruction: the redacted official document. The latest twists in a decade-long series of convulsions have occurred in the last few weeks. In May, the Scottish Government's Planning and Environmental Appeals Division intimated that the Reporter assigned to the case was minded to allow the appeal for the Flamingo Land development after it had been unanimously rejected by the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs Planning Authority last September Seasoned campaigners though, who had observed the behaviour of Scottish Enterprise and the tactics of the developers up close were wary of breaking open the champagne just yet. Scotland's planning laws allow developers unlimited scope for appeal while denying the same to community groups. It was inevitable that Flamingo Land bosses would return. Yet, there would be one more turn of the cards. It came when Jackie Baillie, the formidable Labour MSP for the area, succeeded in having the issue debated last Wednesday. The Scottish Government, fearing a vote it would lose, moved suddenly to re-call the plans. One local campaigner told me: 'When Jackie gets going on an issue she becomes a force of nature. It's clear she'd stacked enough votes among all opposition parties to cause the Government problems.' Loch Lomond plans (Image: Loch Lomond planning portal) In the Balloch House Inn, local people were keen to dismantle some of the mythology of this struggle for what they regard as the soul of their community. 'It now looks like the plans won't be going forward any time soon,' said Peter Broughan, long-time resident of this neighbourhood. 'And let's be honest: it would be insanity to do this before the 2026 election. It's not a vote winner. The problem of course is parity of planning. The developers can come back any time they want. Objectors can't.' Last week, Scotland's MSPs all received a clumsy letter from a lobbying firm acting on behalf of the developers. It attempted to dispel what it described as myths in the objectors' narrative. Within hours the decision to recall the plans was made: surely one of the fastest times on record a lobbyist's claims were dumped. The firm described as 'myth' that more than 155,000 people had objected to the Lomond Banks development. Here's what they claimed was the truth: 'While an online petition claimed to gather more than 155,000 signatures, these figures are not independently verifiable. In contrast, the official planning process received just 760 formal objections, a small number given the scale and reach of the project.' Local campaigner, Alannah Maurer is familiar with this type of claim and dismantles it. 'This is desperate stuff,' she said. 'It's a verifiable fact that 155,000 objected, whether by email or through an online portal platformed by the Scottish Green MSP Ross Greer. It shows the strength of feeling – and to an unprecedented extent – that the Scottish are opposed to the planning application. If the developer claims these figures are not independently verifiable, is he suggesting that our MSPs are misrepresenting figures in statements they have made in Parliament? 'Are they suggesting that 155,000 objections, including campaign groups representing 6,000 members are not to be considered? How arrogant and insidious.' Willie Hutchison, an engineer who has worked all over the world, said: 'Loch Lomond is an area of outstanding natural beauty and it is recognised both at home and internationally as such. Commercial real estate developments like the Flamingo Land proposal are utterly at odds with the objects of retaining an area of natural beauty. Their proposal comprising two hotels, restaurants, bars, shops, a brewery, over a hundred chalets, and a monorail tells you that. 'Las Vegas on the Loch may be a quip but in truth it reflects how such commercial developments are the antithesis of the natural environment. In my opinion, this is a Trojan Horse with more development to come. 'And why has this deal proceeded with such secrecy? What justifies a near ten-year 'exclusivity agreement'? Why can't people know what public land is being sold for? And how much is the running bill, including working hours spent by highly-paid public officials? Are we expected to believe that 10 years and huge public and private expense is all merely for this development?' Local resident, Elaine Telfer said: 'You wonder why Flamingo Land is so determined to keep fighting, and at what cost? Could it be a Land Grab, of a world famous prime location: the gateway to Loch Lomond? Looking at their financial position, from Companies House, they are asset-rich only, so who are their backers? From the first sod being cut to the opening of the resort will take something like seven years. The disruption caused is beyond comprehension.' Enter Peter Haining, the world-renowned Scottish rower who won three world Sculling titles. He is founding Director of the Scottish Institute of Sport and remains a globally-respected rowing coach. He was born in nearby Dumbarton and first honed his skills on this stretch of water as a member of the Loch Lomond Rowing Club. Mr Haining has been in quiet discussions with some local campaigners and politicians about a much more ambitious and sustainable project which would unlock the full cultural and economic potential of this historic region. 'The scope of what can be achieved here, without disturbing the natural beauty and the natural order of this place is vast,' he said. 'I'd propose a Loch Lomond watersports centre. And from that you could develop ideas around on what this area really needs. I'd like to expand it to the University of Loch Lomond which would provide a natural link in an educational chain which has Stirling at one end and Glasgow at the other. 'This place is a natural environment for providing degrees in a broad spectrum of environment specialisms, including energy conservation and the study of algae and solar energy. Loch Lomond and the surrounding lands are intrinsic to a true appreciation of both ancient and modern Scotland, stretching back to the Neolithic age. The heartbeat of Scotland can be felt here. 'Spain has benefitted greatly from the tens of thousands who visit to walk the ancient pilgrimage routes that lead to the tomb of St James in Santiago de Compostela. We have our own sacred highways around here which tell the story of how the first Christian monks came here and where St Columba walked and which helped give birth to western Christianity. The geographical and historical timelines around this part of Scotland are vast end endless. 'You could have a Gaelic-speaking centre and foster trades and skills in kilt-making, acrylics, fabric-dying. In commercial terms, you could attract investment from global partners owing to the opportunities in world-class fishing, fine dining and whisky. It would be a four-phase plan, fully costed and researched, starting with a watersports centre, the university and training camps for international rowers. 'America's Ivy League universities have vast alumni wealth under management and these places absolutely adore the Scottish Highlands and the west coast.' Peter Haining's vision is significantly more valid and purposeful than anything that the government agencies and their favoured business partners have produced in a decade of wasted endeavour.

G7 leaders ready for Trump in bear-proofed Canada
G7 leaders ready for Trump in bear-proofed Canada

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

G7 leaders ready for Trump in bear-proofed Canada

The last time world leaders gathered in Kananaskis, a bear tried to make its way into the 2002 meeting of the world's top eight economies and met an untimely end. This time, members of the G7 are developing strategies to handle a different formidable figure: President Donald Trump. It will be Trump's first time setting foot on Canadian soil since saying Canada was 'meant to be' the 51st U.S. state and slapping 25 percent tariffs on Canada's steel. U.S. statehood polls abysmally here, and the issue sets up a gathering that is anything but typical. 'He's not acting like an ally right now when he's trying to disrupt our economy and threatening to take us over. Even if he says it's a joke, it's not a joke. You don't treat another sovereign country like that,' Robert Mallach, a law professor at the University of Calgary told the Daily Mail. Mallach said other leaders should 'ignore' Trump at the summit, and said Canada's new Prime Minister Mark Carney took the best posture: 'Let's start protecting Canada by spending some money on defense. And let's realize we need allies other than America to do that.' Trump 'comes to the G7 running into allies who are quite frankly tired of the kind of threats and the kind of taunts that Trump has been engaged in,' said Brett Bruen, a former White House National Security Council official during the Obama administration. 'I think he's going to get a firsthand dose and dousing of reality, which is that these comments have consequences,' he said. 'I think this is one of those situations where Trump's bluster and bulldozing is going to run into some pretty hard, harsh realities on the international scene.' Still to be determined is whether Trump arrives ready for compromise, or feeling emboldened after watching a parade of MI Abrams tanks and Bradley Fighting Vehicles during the Army 250th military parade on his birthday in D.C. 'It certainly is going to put him in jingoistic mindset where he will feel, if not regal, at least replenished in his splendor, and that, as we've seen in the past, can lead to some really strange outbursts and sense of self-importance,' Bruen added. It is also unclear how much pre-planning fellow leaders have done. They could try to seek an 'intervention' on trade, although that could backfire. Canadian PM Mark Carney appears to have managed the situation deftly when he met with Trump in the Oval Office and declared his country not for sale while also pushing cooperation with Canada's more powerful neighbor. Now, he is holding out hope of a deal with the U.S. on trade and security. 'We're having intensive discussions in real time,' he said this week. Any agreement would progress compared to Trump's 2018 meeting with then-PM Justin Trudeau. That meeting ended in angry outbursts from Air Force One, with Trump calling Trudeau 'very dishonest and weak' and threatening to impose new auto tariffs. Russia's President Vladimir Putin attended the 2002 meeting, also in Kananaskis, during George W. Bush's presidency but got kicked out of the group after his 2014 annexation of Ukraine. This time, Putin's militarism will be a topic for other leaders to analyze, a day after Trump touted a forthcoming talk with him after Putin called with birthday greetings and the two talked about the war between Israel and Iran. A senior administration official previewing the summit sketched out the topics of discussion: 'trade in the global economy, critical minerals, migrant and drug smuggling, wildfires, international security, artificial intelligence and energy security.' The topic the official didn't mention are the deep tensions set off by Trump's repeated call to absorb the host country. The official did say that 'we appreciate Canada's cooperation in the planning of the summit and their choice of a great location in Canada for these important conversations.' Middle East security, with Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear program and military leadership and Iran firing missiles at Israel, is certain to soak up attention. French President Emmanuel Macron set the tone Sunday with a pointed visit to Greenland – a sprawling Arctic territory that Trump said the U.S. needed to obtain. 'I don´t think that´s something to be done between allies,' Macron said as he met with Danish PM Mette Frederiksen and Greenland's PM Jens-Frederik Nielsen. 'It´s important to show that Denmark and Europe are committed to this territory, which has very high strategic stakes and whose territorial integrity must be respected,' said Macron. As far as the actual bears roaming the G7 meeting spot in Kananaskis next to the Canadian Rockies, local officials have taken steps to avoid further mishaps. Among the security gear they trotted out early this month in advance of the event was a large bear trap. Local students were enlisted to pluck thousands of berries from area bushes so as to lower the temptations that might lure bears to try to crash the confab. That's what happened at the 2002 summit, when security officials used a bear-banger device to try to scare away a bear who got near delegates. It ended up falling out of a tree and dying.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store