Health and Disability Commission says operating budget $1.9m less than previous years
The Health and Disability Commission lost nearly 10 percent of its funding in this year's Budget.
Photo:
RNZ / Samuel Rillstone
The Health and Disability Commission cannot yet confirm whether it will have to make any staff redundant after losing nearly 10 percent of its funding in this year's Budget.
A spokesperson for the consumer health watchdog said the total operating budget was $1.9 million less than in previous years.
"This is due to the end of time-limited funding ($2.9m) that was provided in 2021 and extended for 2024/25."
That has been "partly offset" by an extra one-off $1m for the 2025/26 year to help the HDC clear a backlog of complaints.
When asked whether any jobs would be lost as a result, the commission said no decisions had been made.
"We are not in a position to comment any further until we have completed engagement with our staff.
"We remain committed to fulfilling our critical function to uphold people's rights and manage complaints."
The $2.9m in time-limited funding was introduced by the Labour Government in 2021, to ensure the HDC had capacity to protect the rights of patients using assisted dying services.
The new government axed the funding in its 2024 Budget, but subsequently extended it for another year.
According to its 2024 annual report, the number of complaints to the HDC increased 52 percent over five years.
The 3628 complaints received by HDC in 2023/24 was the highest number of complaints ever received in a single year, which placed significant pressure and led to delays in resolving some of them.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
34 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Judge reserves decision on injunction on Jevon McSkimming investigation
Former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming. Photo: Getty Images A High Court judge has reserved her decision on whether the media should be allowed to report the nature of the allegedly objectionable material found on former deputy commissioner Jevon McSkimming's work computer. McSkimming resigned as the country's second most powerful cop last month amid a four-month investigation by the Independent Police Conduct Authority and police. His resignation came after Police Minister Mark Mitchell said he was recently informed of allegations of a "very serious nature", separate to the investigation that led to him being suspended. RNZ earlier revealed pornography found on McSkimming's work computer is being investigated as alleged objectionable material. He declined to comment on the allegations through his lawyer. His lawyer Linda Clark was earlier granted a rare "superinjunction" by Justice Grau that prohibited reporting the nature of the allegedly objectionable material, as well as the existence of the injunction itself. A teleconference was then held by Justice Gwyn from the High Court at Wellington to discuss the injunction with Clark, the police, and legal counsel for RNZ, Stuff and NZME. Following the conference, the order prohibiting publication of the nature of the allegedly objectionable material was continued, but the order prohibiting the existence of the injunction was not continued, meaning RNZ could report the fact of McSkimming's application and the interim result. On Tuesday, a hearing was held in the High Court at Wellington before Justice Karen Grau in relation to the injunction. RNZ, NZME and Stuff were jointly represented by Robert Stewart KC. McSkimming's lawyer, Linda Clark, began proceedings by telling the court she was seeking orders extending the current interim orders prohibiting media from disclosing the nature of the allegedly objectionable material reportedly found on his work device or devices. The order was sought until further orders of the court. Clark alleged information deemed "essential" to the investigation had been leaked to the media who were intending to publish the information. She said the orders sought were necessary to protect the rights of someone who is subject of an ongoing police investigation and who may yet be charged with a criminal offence. The information gathered during the police investigation was "confidential", she said. In relation to public interest, she said there was already information in the media about McSkimming. She said the public interest would be served in the event he was charged and stood trial. McSkimming was on notice that the police investigation was into material purportedly found on his devices. He had been told he would be invited to a formal interview, however, no request has been received to date. A police document, classified as "confidential", would be "the centrepiece of any criminal prosecution," Clark said. "It's on the basis of that information that the police can decide whether to continue the investigation, whether to look further and whether to charge, and what to charge." She said there was also an issue in terms of privacy, and said a person under criminal investigation, prior to being charged, has a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of information relating to the investigation. Clark said she was trying to "preserve Mr McSkimming's rights to engage the Criminal Procedure act if and when he's charged". She said that every time police had provided some substantive piece of information to McSkimming it had appeared within the media "in a day or two days without exception". Clark said there was public interest in McSkimming's situation. She said public interest had been served to date. "If he is charged... there will be further opportunity for media to publish more information on charges themselves and during and after any trial," she said. "But publication now of any more information about the nature of the objectionable material found on his computer will cause serious and irreversible harm." It would harm his reputation, curtail his ordinary rights under the Criminal Procedure Act, and in the event he was charged and elected trial by trial, it could impact his chance of trial by jury. "At this time he's still an innocent man who is entitled to all of the protections of a fair trial and the right to seek suppression orders." Stewart KC said a memorandum from police said they were still investigating, and no charging decision had been made. He said there was two sorts of harm that could be considered, one of which was harm to the police investigation. He said the police had no concern that further disclosure of the material would impact their investigation, or impact their decision whether or not to charge. In relation to right to a fair jury trial, Stewart KC said juries can be trusted to obey judicial directions about only dealing with the charges based solely on the evidence and to ignore pre-trial publicity. In relation to privacy, Stewart KC said McSkimming was "quite clearly" a public figure. "There is a huge public interest in these investigations into Mr McSkimming's abrupt resignation from office, first working day after he had been provided with the material by the Public Service Commission." In an affidavit, McSkimming said he resigned because he didn't want the Prime Minister or anyone else having to see what was in the reports. "The only fair way of summarising it is he jumped before he was pushed," Stewart KC said. "The public have a right to understand a little bit more about the nature of the material that led to that." Stewart KC said his clients submitted that if the interim restraint should be continued, then "matters should be left to take their course, if there is to be any restraining at all, it should be as limited as possible for as short as possible." Crown prosecutor Stephanie Bishop, appearing for police, told the court that police did not oppose the application.
RNZ News
35 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Chris Bishop frustrated by 'politicised' Stan Walker Aotearoa Music Awards performance
Paul Goldsmith (left) and Chris Bishop at the 2025 Aotearoa Music Awards in Auckland, on 29 May, 2025. Photo: Supplied/ Stijl - James Ensing-Trussell Senior government Minister Chris Bishop says he was frustrated by the politicisation of Stan Walker's performance at the Aotearoa Music Awards, when he said "what a load of crap" . During Stan Walker's performance of Māori Ki te Ao, performers took to the stage with flags displaying Toitū Te Tiriti, a movement borne out of opposition to the Treaty Principles Bill and other government legislation. Bishop, who was in attendance, was seen criticising the performance, and has since said he should have kept the comments to himself. On Tuesday, Bishop told reporters his comments were not directed specifically at Walker. "I was frustrated and annoyed by the sort of overt politicking around it," he said. "It's not about Stan Walker, I actually quite like Stan Walker, actually quite liked his performance. It was just the sort of politicisation of it that frustrated me," he said. Bishop singled out the Toitū Te Tiriti "banners and paraphernalia" as the source of his frustration, not the performance itself. He said he would not be apologising to Walker. "It's not clear what I'd be apologising for." Stan Walker performing at the Aotearoa Music Awards 2025. Photo: Emma Cooper His comments led to backlash from other performers , including Don McGlashan, who was seen on video confronting Bishop. The minister said the irony was he was a "huge" Don McGlashan fan. "I love the Mutton Birds. But Don McGlashan is a noteworthy non-supporter of the National Party. People might remember the 2008 election, in which he expressed some frustration at 'Anchor Me', which is a great Mutton Birds tune, being used by TVNZ on the election night coverage," Bishop said. "His political views are quite well-known, but look it is what it is, he's entitled to his views in the same way I'm entitled to mine." Arts, culture and heritage minister Paul Goldsmith, who was also at the event, brushed off whether the performance was controversial. "There's always controversy at music awards. It goes without saying," he said. Māori Crown relations minister Tama Potaka said he disagreed with Bishop's comments, but they were for Bishop to respond to. "I absolutely love Stan Walker and his commitment to te reo, and the mahi that he does particularly in his engagement with Ratana, the hāhi. I don't agree with minister Bishop's comments, however those are a matter for him to comment on," Potaka said. Labour's Māori Development spokesperson Willie Jackson said Bishop, as a music fan, should know that music had always been political. "He should know music better than anyone. Look around the world, people have been doing that for years. Whether it's Bob Marley, Bono, whatever, it's been happening, it's not like something new. He should talk to his Shihad heroes, cos the lead singer there's got pretty good politics too." Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi The Prime Minister told Morning Report he was comfortable with Bishop's response , and had spoken to him over the weekend. "I just got his side of the story about what he said and it was exactly as reported. He corrected it well before I got to him... he just acknowledged he should have kept his thoughts to himself," Christopher Luxon said. "The bottom line is your listeners aren't losing a lot of sleep over what a politician sharing his opinion on some music was about." Labour leader Chris Hipkins said Bishop's behaviour was disappointing, but it was for the Prime Minister to bring his ministers in line. "You've got to remember when you're a government minister that you're on public display all of the time." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Smoking rates plateau bucking downward trend, latest survey figures show
The latest data indicates the daily smoking rate has plateaued at 6.9 percent, only a very slight change from the previous year's 6.8 percent. Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King Healthcare professionals are worried that for the first time in a decade, daily smoking rates have plateaued rather than fallen. The stagnation follows last year's repeal of groundbreaking smokefree legislation , prompting urgent calls for re-evaluation and renewed action. The latest New Zealand Health Survey (2023/24) data indicates the daily smoking rate has plateaued at 6.9 percent, a negligible change from the previous year's 6.8 percent. Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand (TSANZ) chief executive Vincent So said it marked a "sharp deviation" from the consistent downward trend observed since 2011 when rates were at 16.4 percent. "This data is a stark warning that New Zealand's progress in reducing smoking is faltering," So said. "When effective strategies are abandoned, we risk losing the momentum gained through years of hard work and investment. "It's imperative that we re-examine the current policy settings and ensure that the health and well-being of all New Zealanders remain a top priority." Royal Australasian College of Physicians Dr Hamish McCay said only a few years ago New Zealand's approach was world-leading. "Now, government policy is setting new generations up for smoking addiction and life-threatening health issues," he said. "The repeal of the previous government's tobacco laws went against all the evidence and all the health advice. "We are losing the profound health benefits these laws offered for people of all ages and future generations, particularly for our Māori communities." Asthma and Respiratory Foundation chief executive Letitia Harding said the government's strategy seems to now be "to just add vapes to the mix". Photo: Unsplash The Smokefree 2025 goal aimed to reduce daily smoking prevalence to less than 5 percent across all population groups by the end of 2025. It was part of a broader initiative to reduce the impact of tobacco on public health. Dr Stuart Jones, a respiratory medicine specialist, told Morning Report the repealed legislation included world-leading measures such as de-nicotinisation of tobacco, a drastic reduction in tobacco retailers, and a "smokefree generation" policy. Jones said vaping was a double-edged sword because while some smokers had moved to vaping, others who never smoked had taken up vaping and quickly become addicted to nicotine. TSANZ's New Zealand president Dr Paul Dawkins said the repealed legislation was designed to deliver rapid and equitable reductions in smoking. "To see the overall smoking rate reduction showing evidence of beginning to stall so soon after these crucial public health protections were dismantled is deeply troubling," Dawkins said. "The Smokefree 2025 goal, which is now only months away, is now in serious jeopardy." Asthma and Respiratory Foundation chief executive Letitia Harding said the government was derailing years of public health progress. "We were on track to lead the world in tobacco control, now we appear to be leading the world in vaping. "Our previous Smokefree laws were bold, evidence-based, and targeted at protecting future generations, but the repeal of those measures blindsided everyone." She said the new approach simply shifted the problem to vapes. "The government's strategy seems to be 'let's just add vapes to the mix', which is just another product that has harmful health effects and ensures future generations are nicotine dependent," Harding said. "We're not breaking the cycle of nicotine dependency - we're just redirecting it," she said. "Let's free Aotearoa from the shackles of big tobacco, who make money on the back of nicotine dependency." The goal should not just be a smokefree New Zealand - it should be vape-free too, Harding said. "Otherwise, we're just chasing a new kind of addiction - and calling it progress." Casey Costello said the survey period was not impacted by any activity by the coalition government, as the provisions that were repealed had not come into effect. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Last year Associate Health Minister Casey Costello slashed excise tax by 50 percent on heated tobacco products (HTPs) to encourage smokers to switch to the product as an alternative to smoking. The government set aside $216 million contingency to cover the estimated lost revenue. Costello said the government was committed to the Smokefree 2025 target and had "continued and accelerated the initiatives, programmes and services that has contributed to our quit-smoking successes". "We are undoubtedly seeing smoking rates decline as an overall trend and we have one of the lowest smoking rates across the world. "We also remain focused on doing all we can to prevent youth vaping - more restrictions are coming into force on 17 June. This follows a period where New Zealand was initially slow to regulate against vaping before we came into government." Costello said the survey period was not impacted by any activity by the coalition government, as the provisions repealed had not come into effect. "The positive news is that smoking rates for young people are well below the 5 percent target. "We are also working to support the core, key groups of smokers who have been smoking for a long time. We are doing this through consent, not coercion."
