Should we all be taking vitamin supplements?
The market for vitamin and mineral supplements is estimated to be worth $32.7bn (£24.2bn), and over 74% of Americans and two-thirds of Britons admit to using them in an effort to improve their health.
However, the pills are mired in controversy, with some studies suggesting they have no discernible health benefits, and others finding they could even harm you. So what does the evidence really say? Should we all be taking vitamin supplements, or just some of us? Does anyone even need to take them?
Vitamins and minerals are compounds that our bodies do not make, but which are nevertheless essential for our health. As we cannot make them, we must get them from our food. Examples include vitamin A; which is vital for good eyesight and maintaining healthy skin; vitamin C, which is essential for a healthy immune system, and vitamin K; which is necessary for blood clotting. Essential minerals, meanwhile, include calcium, magnesium, selenium, potassium, and others. Vitamins and minerals are classed as micronutrients because we only need them in small amounts compared to macronutrients such as carbohydrates, proteins, and fats.
It's fair to say that no supplement will ever replace a healthy and balanced diet. The best way, therefore, of meeting the body's requirement for vitamins is through eating plenty of leafy green vegetables, fruits, grains, nuts, dairy, and fish. However, research also shows that many of us are not managing to adhere to this practice. The rise of fast food, along with ultra-processed products, means convenience often triumphs over a fresh home-cooked meal.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Men can't cope under pressure! Married blokes are more likely to CHEAT than women when they're stressed, study finds
Whether it's a new job, a house move or having children, there are plenty of things that can trigger nerves or anxiety. But ladies, beware – as a new study reveals men are more likely than women to have an affair during high–stress life events. Researchers from Indiana University Bloomington surveyed more than 1,000 adults who were in committed heterosexual relationships during the first year of the Covid pandemic. Participants were asked about whether they had engaged in any actions that their partner would consider to be infidelity. Overall, 19 per cent of people said they had engaged in some form of infidelity during the pandemic – either online or in–person. Analysis revealed that men were more likely than women to say their desire to be unfaithful increased during the pandemic. They were also more likely to report having cheated on their significant other. Experts said men may be 'especially vulnerable' to stressful events – and that these individuals may benefit from targeted support. The results, published in the journal Plos One, also showed that parents were more likely to have affairs than couples who did not have children. However in this group, both mothers and fathers were just as likely as each other to cheat. 'Our recent research found that parents, compared to non–parents, reported higher desire for and engagement in infidelity during periods of significant external stress, such as the COVID–19 pandemic,' they said. 'Men also reported greater desire and behaviour than women in general. 'These findings suggest that parents, and men in particular, may be especially susceptible to infidelity–related risk factors during high–stress life events. 'Targeted support for these individuals and their relationships may be especially important when navigating periods of collective or personal strain.' Further analysis revealed that older participants reported a greater inclination towards cheating than younger participants. This could suggest that longer–term relationships or accumulated life stress might impact relationship satisfaction, the team said. Previous research has already suggested that the Covid pandemic strained many romantic and sexual relationships. And other studies suggest that high stress and relationship dissatisfaction may prompt some people to consider engaging in romantic or sexual infidelity. According to the General Social Survey, which has tracked the social behaviours of people in the US for more than 50 years, approximately 10 per cent of married people engage in cheating in any given year. Of these, 12 per cent are men and 7 per cent are women. In the UK, around a third of marriages end in divorce and infidelity is one of the most commonly cited reasons. ARE MEN WITH SHORT AND WIDE FACES MORE LIKELY TO CHEAT? Researchers from Nipissing University in Canada looked at how different facial features affect sexual behaviours. The study involved 314 undergraduate students who were in romantic relationships. Each student completed a questionnaire about their behaviour, sex drive, sexual orientation, the chances they'd consider cheating, and how comfortable they were with the concept of casual sex. The researchers also took a picture of each student to analyse their facial width-to-height ratios (FWHR). The results showed that men and women with a high FWHR – square and wide faces – reported a greater sex drive than others. Men with a larger FWHR were also more easy-going when it comes to casual sex and would consider being unfaithful to their partners. The researchers hope the findings will shed light on the role that facial features play in sexual relationships and mate selection. Their research builds upon previous studies that have shown that certain psychological and behavioural traits are associated with particular facial width-to-height ratios (FWHR). Square-faced men tend to be perceived as more aggressive, more dominant, more unethical, and more attractive as short-term sexual partners than men with thinner and longer faces.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Not all ultra-processed foods are bad for you... study reveals the eight that actually make you healthier
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more It's no surprise that ultra-processed foods (UPF) are best eaten sparingly. They undergo multiple rounds of manufacturing, with factories infusing cheeses, cured meat, potato chips and more with additives that would never be found in the average household kitchen. A CDC report recently revealed that Americans get more than 50 percent of their daily calories on average from highly processed foods. Kids and teens got about two-thirds of their calories from these foods from 2021 to 2023. UPF-heavy diets have been linked to a laundry list of maladies, including obesity, heart disease, colorectal and breast cancers, diabetes and depression. Researchers also determined in April that for every 10 percent more ultra-processed food added to a person's diet, the risk of dying early from any cause jumped by three percent. They further found that one in seven of nearly 1 million premature deaths in the US could be tied directly to ultra-processed foods like meats, candy, ice cream, and even some seemingly healthy salads and breads. But not all ultra-processed foods are the same. Some UPFs, like frozen veggies, canned tomatoes, whole-grain bread, and Greek yogurt, are healthy swaps because their processing, including freezing and canning, preserves nutrients while avoiding risky additives. Part of the appeal of UPFs is their accessibility. They are generally cheaper than unprocessed chicken, fresh fruit, and organic vegetables. They help families keep their grocery costs down and get dinner on the table quickly. But experts argue that families do not have to sacrifice quality and nutrition for convenience. Canned low-sodium beans, frozen vegetables, and breads with a short ingredients label can be swapped out for some less-than-healthy pantry and freezer staples packed with sodium and preservatives. UPFs are difficult to avoid in the average American grocery store. They make up about 70 percent of the inventories. The American Heart Association said in a study out last week: 'Most of the foods containing industrial additives are also high in unhealthy fats, added sugars, and salt. 'Although the additives are part of the issue, the main problem is that children and adults in the United States eat excessive amounts of nutritionally poor UPFs.' The term 'ultra-processed foods' is an umbrella term that encompasses those items that have been pumped with preservatives, artificial colors, filler ingredients, emulsifiers, sweeteners, and flavoring. 'However, not all UPFs are harmful,' the AHA added. 'Certain whole grain breads, low-sugar yogurts, tomato sauces, and nut or bean-based spreads are of better diet quality, have been associated with improved health outcomes, and are affordable, allowing possible inclusion in diets.' Despite being ultra-processed, some of the best swaps for what most would consider 'junk food' contain fewer additives, including preservatives and colors, less added sugar, and lower sodium. Frozen veggies and berries, canned tomatoes, whole grain bread, and unsweetened Greek yogurt all qualify as processed foods because they undergo innocuous, and in some cases beneficial, processes. These include flash-freezing, canning, mechanical straining in the case of yogurt, and enrichment with vitamins in whole grain bread. The above CDC graph shows percentages of calories consumed from ultra-processed foods Still, most UPFs on store shelves also contain more saturated fat, sodium, and sugar, all red flag ingredients. Cured and processed meats such as pepperoni and chicken nuggets, canned fruits in syrup, frozen meals, candies and some breads, potato chips, ice cream, and more, are examples of 'red flag' foods. 'Identifying high-risk UPF subgroups is essential to balancing nutritional goals with the need for accessible and appealing food options,' the study said. Nutritionists recommend people swap out red flag foods with UPFs that include beneficial ingredients like whole grains, beans, yogurt, or nuts, as well as fortified cereals, whole-grain breads, or plain yogurts. These have been linked to better heart health compared to UPFs loaded with synthetic additives. Whole grain breads are full of fiber that reduces the risk of colorectal cancer. Beans and nuts serve as the ideal protein-packed snacks, and unsweetened yogurt balances the body's gut microbiome and improves overall gastrointestinal health. Grace Derocha, a registered dietitian nutritionist and spokesperson for the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics told Real Simple: 'The science recognizes the complexity—UPF is a broad category, and context matters. We should differentiate between 'unhealthy UPFs' and more wholesome packaged items.' Over a dozen countries have officially advised against letting UPFs dominate one's diet. Some, like cities in Brazil have eliminated UPFs from foods served in schools while others, such as Colombia, tax them. The EU, UK, Canada, and several Asian countries have outright banned certain ingredients that were recently prohibited in California. The US has not established a formal definition of UPFs for regulatory purposes. And experts at the AHA worry that establishing one that is overly broad could backfire, leading to the vast majority of foods in grocery stores being slapped with a label that warns they are highly-processed, confusing customers to the point of ignoring the warnings. 'Food policy reform must consider the broader goals of the food system, including nutrition security, safety, and sustainability,' the AHA said. 'Although transformation of the food system is complex, it is achievable.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Anti-vax conspiracy theorist mother repeatedly interrupted paramedics as they tried to save her cancer-stricken daughter's life, inquest hears
An anti-vax conspiracy theorist accused of persuading her cancer-stricken daughter to reject conventional medicine interrupted paramedics who were trying to give her emergency care as she lay dying, an inquest heard. Cambridge graduate Paloma Shemirani, 23, died at the Royal Sussex County Hospital in July last year after declining assistance for non-Hodgkin lymphoma which doctors say was treatable. Her mother, Kay 'Kate' Shemirani – who attracted a large social media following after sharing Covid-19 conspiracy theories – claims the real responsibility for her daughter's death lies with medical staff who 'administered drugs without her consent' and was given an 'overdose' by the 999 crew who attended her. However, the first paramedic on the scene told the inquest at Kent and Medway Coroner's Court Mrs Shemirani 'presented a challenge' to the ambulance crew who were trying to save Paloma's life. Robin Bass, of the South-East Coast Ambulance Service, said: 'The patient's mother presented a challenge. 'She kept interrupting while the crew were carrying out care.' Mr Bass, an experienced paramedic for the South-East Coast Ambulance Service, told how Mrs Shemirani told him that Paloma had a 'lymphoma' or growth in her chest but denied that she was suffering from cancer. He said: 'The patient's mother reported that the patient had been discharged from hospital and was not receiving active treatment and was receiving alternative treatment. Her mother, Kay 'Kate' Shemirani claims the real responsibility for her daughter's death lies with medical staff who 'administered drugs without her consent' and was given an 'overdose' by the 999 crew who attended her 'When I stated to the ambulance crew that this could be cancer, the mother said it was not and that it was a recent event. 'She was focused on the choking from food. 'I gave reassurance that the patient was being given the best possible care.' Mr Bass told the inquest that following the incident he had completed a safeguarding report due to Mrs Shemirani He told the court: 'There was concern over refusal of treatment and possible influence of the patient's mother.' During almost two hours of ferocious and at times bad tempered cross questioning from Mrs Shemirani the wrong-sized medical equipment to administer emergency care to 'slim' Paloma. A second paramedic, Karen Clark, told the inquest that she administered three doses of adrenaline to Paloma who did not have a pulse or a heartbeat, despite frantic medical attention. However, Mrs Shemirani accused her of killing her daughter with an overdose of the powerful revival drug. She asked Karen Clark: 'Are you aware that adrenaline can kill?' Miss Clark replied: 'I did not overdose the patient. 'At no point did Paloma have a pulse or a heartbeat. 'If a patient is in cardiac arrest, it's not possible for me to kill them.' Kate Shemirani claimed that her daughter Paloma was killed by an overdose of adrenaline and that medical services had conspired to cover up their involvement in her death. She also challenged South-East Coast Ambulance paramedic Daniel Cody about a report he wrote that initially reported that Paloma had been given four doses of adrenaline by the 999 crews – in contravention with good practice. Previously the inquest has heard from Paloma's twin brother Gabriel (pictured) who claimed that his sister had died because their mother had 'obstructed' her from receiving cancer treatment Paramedic Daniel Cody told the court that he had made an 'error' in this report and that his colleagues had not given the patient a fourth dose of adrenaline, but that a different drug had been administered by the Helicopter Emergency Service Medical Service [HEMS] team. A fourth dose of adrenaline was given later by the HEMS team. In an emotional outburst Mrs Shemirani told the court: 'If one could be a conspiracy theorist, I could say there has been a big conspiracy cover up. 'That would be my opinion.' The inquest also heard from Dr David Bentley who was also scrambled to Uckfield to help treat Paloma after she collapsed at home while eating. Dr Bentley told the court that he believed that the 23-year-old suffered breathing difficulties due to a cancer tumour blocking her airway. He said: 'I suspected that her breathing difficulty was caused by the tumour.' Dr Bentley was questioned intensively by Mrs Shemirani about his use of adrenaline to resuscitate Paloma. She said: 'I'm going to ask this question as the mother of my daughter. 'In all of the [medical] literature, it's very clear that an overdose of adrenaline causes the symptoms [that Paloma suffered en route to hospital] - pink frothy mucus pouring from her nose and pulmonary oedema.' Dr Bentley replied: 'I'm disagreeing that an overdose of adrenaline did cause the incidents in the ambulance.' Previously the inquest has heard from Paloma's twin brother Gabriel who claimed that his sister had died because their mother had 'obstructed' her from receiving cancer treatment. He said: 'I blame my mother entirely for my sister's death. 'In short I believe that she sacrificed Paloma's life for her own principles, I believe that she should be held accountable for Paloma's death.' Yesterday Gabriel asked each of the paramedics whether his mother's decision to call a friend before dialling 999 after Paloma had collapsed while eating had affected her chance of survival. Both replied that it was impossible to say. He also thanked each of them for trying to save his sister's life. He told each of them: 'Thank you from the bottom of my heart for your efforts trying to save my sister's life.' Paloma's brother Gabriel thanked Dr Bentley 'greatly' for his efforts trying to save his sister's life. He added: 'I would like to apologise for the moronic questions put to you by my parents.' At the time of Paloma's initial cancer diagnosis in autumn 2023, she was estranged from her mother, but then came under her influence, the inquest has heard. The inquest was adjourned until 27th August. Coroner Catherine Wood told the court she is expected to give her findings on the 3rd September. Ms Shemirani was struck off as a nurse in 2021, and a Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) committee found she had spread Covid-19 misinformation that 'put the public at a significant risk of harm'.
