Kuwaiti Muslim Brotherhood Leader Tareq Al-Suwaidan – Banned From U.S. For Terror Links – Urges Muslims In The West: We Watch Your Demonstrations On 'Blessed Al-Jazeera TV' And Expect You To Continue; Peace With The Enemies Of Allah Nullifies Jihad
Al-Suwaidan emphasized that he does not expect Muslims in Europe to change their regimes or implement Islamic rule. However, he described as "wonderful" the Muslim activism in Western countries, including Europe, America, and Australia. He highlighted the demonstrations in the West on behalf of Palestinians that are broadcast on the "blessed" Al-Jazeera TV, lamenting the lack of such demonstrations in Muslim countries. He added that he expects Muslims to continue demonstrating, pressuring their governments, and providing direct support to their counterparts in Palestine.
Al-Suwaidan was dismissed as the director of the Saudi Al-Risala TV in 2013 after publicly declaring his affiliation with the Muslim Brotherhood. Notably, Al-Suwaidan was an unindicted co-conspirator in the case against the Holy Land Foundation for funding Hamas terrorism and has been banned from entering multiple countries, including the United States and Belgium, due to his ties to terrorism and antisemitic views.
Tareq Al-Suwaidan: "Check any book talking about Jihad, and you will see that it is prohibited to make permanent peace with the enemies of Allah. All Islamic scholars are in agreement that such a thing nullifies the [validity] of Jihad, which must continue until Judgment Day. These treacherous peace and normalization agreements are close to heresy – if not full on heresy – according to Islam.
[...]
"We do not expect from our brothers and sisters, the Muslims in Europe – with all the wonderful things that they are doing... We do not expect them to change the regimes in those countries, and instill an Islamic rule there. This is a delusion. We should start with ourselves. But the truth is that what we are seeing of this movement in the West – in Europe, America, Australia, and other Western countries – is a wonderful thing. We watch the blessed Al-Jazeera TV, and we see that all the demonstrations are in Europe, Australian, and America. Our own countries are silent. That movement is exceptional.
[...]
"We expect them to continue to demonstrate, to exert pressure on their regimes, to make people aware [of the situation], and to provide direct support to your brothers and sisters in Palestine. Continue to deliver aid to Palestine, because most of our routes have been blocked. We expect you to continue. There are wonderful organizations among the Islamic minorities in the West. You should support these organizations."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Memri
11 hours ago
- Memri
Hundreds Of Iranian University Lecturers In Declaration Of Iran's 'Victory': 'We Are In An Era Of "A Historic Turning Point," "The Twilight Of Western Civilization," "Orientalization Of Global Power,"
Introduction Contrary to views in the West that the severe damage caused to Iran's military-nuclear infrastructure and leadership during the June 2025 12-day war has caused the regime to abandon its Islamic Revolution ideology and instead unite the Iranian public around Persian nationalism and culture, many in Iran's intellectual elite have stressed the messages of the Islamic Revolution and praised the leadership of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. On July 22, 2025, Iranian regime mouthpiece outlet Kayhan published on its front page a declaration signed by 313 Iranian university lecturers in which they declared "Iran's victory" against Israel and the United States in the June 2025 12-day war. In the declaration, the lecturers explained that Iran emerged from the Israeli surprise attack victorious and empowered. They echoed the regime's messages regarding the righteousness and superiority of the Islamic Revolutionary regime and the resistance, and the centrality of Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, in the face of the disbelieving and secular West, which they predicted will be defeated by Islam, led by Shiite Iran. According to the declaration, for years Israel and the United States have acted and continue to act together in order to topple the Islamic Revolutionary regime, and this is why they targeted its military commanders and its top scientists, with the goal of toppling Iranian society. The declaration explained that Islam is embedded in Iranian society such that the Islamic spirit is so deeply rooted that talk about secularism in Iranian society is false, and they said that the only path that has proven itself has been the resistance – the military-political manifestation of Islamic Iran's opposition to the West – while the path of negotiations has been false and has been used to deceive Iran. It underlined that today, Iran's participation in the negotiations is only a tactic being used to foil the enemy's plots. It also upheld the centrality of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei as the leader of the Islamic nation in accordance with the ideology of the Rule of the Jurisprudent, and it said that he has succeeded by his might and intellect to fend off the hostile Western power of the U.S. and Israel. In addition, it said that he is the individual representing the values of the Islamic Revolution, which is destined to become global. The declaration stated: "We are in an era of 'a historic turning point,' 'the twilight of Western civilization,' 'orientalization of global power [i.e. the shifting of influence to Russia, China, and Iran],' and the 'birth of a strong Iran,' and currently society is ready and eager, more than ever, to jump ahead towards the original ideals of the revolution and to make an Iranian-Islamic plan for independent and original progress." The declaration said that the vision of the global Islamic Revolution is currently being realized: "Today a 'global resistance front' has been created that transcends religion, sects, and territory… This historic situation is the same promise made by [Ayatollah Ruhollah] Khomeini in the first years of the victory of the Islamic Revolution, and today we are clearly witnessing its birth and realization." The following is a translation of the key points of the declaration: "The Joint Goal Of The Zionist Regime And America In The War Was To 'Topple The Islamic Republic [Of Iran]' And Afterwards 'Dismantle Iran', Not Just To Destroy The Nuclear And Missile Infrastructure" "The war that was recently forced [upon Iran] ended in disappointment and helplessness for the Zionist regime and America, and even though a clear opinion cannot be stated regarding the near future and we cannot forget the treachery and violation of promises by the vicious enemy [America] or trust their words, we can at least look at what has happened to us... "The joint goal of the Zionist regime and America in the war was to 'topple the Islamic Republic [of Iran]' and afterwards 'dismantle Iran', not just to destroy the nuclear and missile infrastructure. They wanted to end the Islamic revolution in less than a week and get this 'civilizational obstacle' out of their way forever, by surprise and cleverly. The plan for this war was a plan for 'political collapse' and 'foundational destruction', and it was never limited to [certain] elements. Today everyone knows that the nuclear agreement and the missile deals and the region were just an excuse for dismantling the foundations and essence of the Islamic revolution, but this hidden goal required early preparations such as this. "[America and the Zionist regime] wanted, first and foremost, to empty Iran of its elements of power so that it will be possible to destroy and shatter also the Islamic revolutionary [regime] and Iran [as a state]. The tyrants of the world of Western modernization will never be satisfied with less than that. But because achieving this goal suddenly became difficult and even impossible, they needed to take measures in order to 'dilute Iran's power' and eliminate its resources. Since political bartering in the form of processes and periods of negotiations did not lead to this possibility, the reins of the matter were handed to the Zionist regime in order to kill the [Islamic] revolution in an immediate, crazy, and vicious manner. The war that was recently forced upon [Iran] has no meaning other than [having been a] 'civilizational and identity conflict.' Hence, reductionist and superficial outlooks must be avoided, and reality must be interpreted for what it is. "This attempt showed that there is a distribution of work between America and the Zionist regime, and that there is no gap or difference between the two, and that America will not adopt any policy in the Middle East region that is not coordinated with this [Zionist] regime and that contradicts its interests. "The dichotomy [regarding Israel and America] that was discussed by [Western] secular intellectuals is an illusion and imaginary, and reality has exposed that the Zionist regime is one of the objective expressions and forms of Western civilization, and this civilization and its governments will not stop supporting this regime. The two should be viewed as equal and the distinction between them should be eliminated. America on the one hand insisted on negotiations while on the other hand supported the military aggression of the Zionist regime, and after it saw the defeat of this regime, it put aside its 'false diplomacy' and openly attacked Iran. Hence, the American negotiations table cannot be [now] approached under pretext of preventing war. The recent war resulted from [Iran's] trust in the negotiations table, while a different game was being planned behind the scenes. "Iranian Society Is Mixed And United With Islam In All The Domains And Layers Of Its Personal And Social Lives, And A Deep And Historic Tie Has Been Created Between The Islamic Spirit And The Iranian Body... [This] Is A Separate Identity... [Which Protected Iranians] From Being Swallowed Up And Dissolved By Western Civilization... This War Made It Clear That Iranian Society Has A 'Tight Bond' And 'Internal Tie' With The Revolution And The Regime And That It Sees The Supreme Leader As Its 'Spiritual Father' And 'Source' Of Its Identity" "The citizens of Iran, who are motivated by their identity and semantic ideas, have stood against the incitement to war and their social resistance, and their national character had a deep and religious character. Iran is not a secular social unit, and at least 1,400 years of brilliant and solid history of Iran's post-Islamic period clearly show that Iranian society is mixed and united with Islam in all the domains and layers of its personal and social lives, and a deep and historic tie has been created between the Islamic spirit and the Iranian body. Without these spirit, meaning, and truth, Iran is like a lifeless and rootless body. This holy semantic horizon has granted Iran and the Iranians a separate identity and protected them from being swallowed up and dissolved by Western civilization. "Liberal intellectuals who present a secular narrative about Iran speak about their desires and aspirations, and not about the continuing and clear reality of Iranian society. This war made it clear that Iranian society has a 'tight bond' and 'internal tie' with the revolution and the regime, and that it sees the Supreme Leader as its 'spiritual father' and 'source' of its identity. In these difficult moments, the inner and deep heart of society exposes its belonging and relationship, and Iranian society has also shown that it is not going according to the twisted narratives of the secular intellectuals, and it is not separate from its Islamic and revolutionary identity. These feelings of honor and respect that were now created in the context of Iranian society are a result of the brave resistance of the revolution to foreign invasion, and this glorious victory can be attributed to the world of the revolution and to the wise activism of its wise leader [Khamenei]. "Regarding 'occupations and tragedies,' our view is that in this war a costly base was given, in an outstanding fashion, to reestablishing and rehabilitating the 'social capital,' and the divisions that were forced [upon us] have been removed, and Iran's Islamic society has become united...[1] "It is clear that the structure of our security [institutions] is infested and full of holes and requires serious and comprehensive reconsideration. It requires widespread fixes, holes and breaches need to be identified, and borders and safety boundaries need to be recreated. The extent of the security infiltration during this war is an indication of certain recklessness and shortcomings, and it shows that the matter of fixing this must be placed on the agenda... "The reckless relationship that we have created with Western cyberspace has created the conditions for the infiltration and for insecure and lethal networks, and if we continue with this abandonment and weak-handedness, we will again be met with surprise and the presence of the enemy deep inside [Iran]. "Negotiations Are Pointless... [And] Constitute Self-Deception... Only 'The Resistance' Creates Real Deterrence And Can Cause The Enemy Of Civilization And Identity [America] To Despair And Retreat... The Resistance Is 'The Main And Basic Plan Of Iran' For Advancing And For Confronting Difficulties" "In the domain of 'solutions and means,' our stance is as follows: The recent experience, together with the bitter and damaging experiences of recent decades, have shown that negotiations are pointless and do not solve economic problems, and even constitute part of 'the trap of the aggression' and an 'extortion scheme.' Negotiations should no longer be viewed as a 'solution' to be insisted upon. Negotiations with such an enemy constitute self-deception… "In the recent experience, we have also seen that on the other side of the negotiations table, the plan for war actions was on their agenda, and the negotiations were used as a false cover for this main and hidden goal. Thus, the negotiations have been emptied of their real meaning and have become a theatre of the politics of control. Negotiations in the narrative of the Western governments is surrender of the other side [Iran] to the West, and not an equal and logical deal. But if the other side [Iran] does not choose the path of surrender and humiliation [before the West] and does not want to give up on its natural and inalienable rights… the language turns into threats, and in fact a military war and wave of terror is launched. "On this basis, now, only the 'methodology of the resistance' is effective and solves the problems in all the domains: the political, the cultural, and the economic. Even those who did not support the resistance [i.e. the reformists] have understood now that this approach is a historic must, and that pacification, compromise, or problem-solving must not be used against a civilization that adds fire to war in such a reckless and shameless fashion, and that wages military aggression with cowardice. "Only 'the resistance' creates real deterrence and can cause the enemy of civilization and identity [America] to despair and retreat. A dialogue with these wild and merciless wolves will lead to surrender, kneeling, and humiliation, or to the revealing of the poison dagger that they have hidden under the negotiations table, which they will bury suddenly in Iran's body. "The assumption of these extreme national experiences, going back to the mistakes and the immaturity of the past, and starting from zero[2] will challenge our national security and have a harsh impact on sovereignty and society. Thus, resistance thought must be viewed as groundbreaking and advancing, and it must be seen as 'the main and basic plan of Iran' for advancing and for confronting difficulties. The matter of negotiations must be viewed as a tactic and it must be adopted in accordance with the considerations of the central decisionmakers in the regime, in order to disarm the enemy, remove its excuses, and foil its adventures… "[Iran's Islamic] society has understood clearly that Western civilization wants our soul, our foundations, our power, and our resilience, and if it succeeds it will realize the myth of collapsing [the Iranian regime]. Hence, revealing the harmful aims and goals of this great other [the West] has brought [Iranian] society to a harmony and internal alignment, and it has united it against foreign aggression. This unification is also the result of the 'shining power of the regime of the Islamic Republic' against the [Western] aggression, and the [Islamic] revolution has shown that it has the ability to resist, and that it can respond in time against a multi-faceted, complex, and combined surprise attack, and be the defender of honor and the authority of the people of Iran. Now, after the recent war, our society is full of a feeling of 'pride', 'respect', and 'greatness', and it does not show any signs of defeat, humiliation, or surrender. This social possibility – which stems from 'the intelligent planning of the Leader,' from the 'socialization of revolutionary thought,' and from the 'reliance on the internal technology' – will be the basis for rebuilding social capital in Iran. To this end, [we] must make permanent the elements that were all manifested in the world of the Islamic revolution, the elements that create and shape it. Among these, theories like 'the Rule of the Jurisprudent,' 'the resistance,' 'strengthening the internal structure,' and 'the religious identity of the Iranians,' which belong to the Islamic religious terminologies, must increasingly become part of the social dialogue. "Outlooks that are 'outward-facing,' 'negotiations-oriented,' 'begging,' and 'alienating' have been experienced, and their failure and practical inability has been proven. Thus, they must be overcome, and instead we must place on the agenda that strengthening of the internal infrastructure and resources of Iran. Objective evidence shows that a large part of Iranian society has come to this strategic and historic conclusion, as the Leader [Khamenei] has insisted and demanded for decades, but the forces and movements lacking national confidence [i.e. the reformists] did not aspire to achieve it and chose the path of negotiations and unilateral interaction with the West. "[Iranian] Society… Needs To View [Khamenei] As The Center Of Social Cohesion And Unity And Implement His Demands As The One Who Represents The Hidden And Holy [Imam]" "This experience must become a national principle, and any angle and gap against it constitute a search for conflict with experienced reality and with national unity. The territory and geography of total cohesion [of Iranian-Islamic society] have such characteristics, and those who are subject to the analyses [of foreign media outlets] must unify with the demands of this new national situation and not cause division [in society]. Just as during this war the leader of the revolution [Khamenei] trapped the Zionist regime in a swamp of 'misery' and sent America to the desert of 'regret' by immediately appointing [commanders to replace those who were assassinated] and planning the field, and this way society understood his central and crucial role more than ever, now, too, it needs to view [Khamenei] as the center of social cohesion and unity and implement his demands as the one who represents the hidden and holy [Imam]. "The mentality of Iranian society has for decades been in the context of 'cognitive warfare,' and the enemy is trying to cause society to deteriorate, to become alienated [from the regime], and to decline by means of its narratives. In the face of this wave, silence and conservatism are never acceptable. Rather, we must open, more than ever, our mouths to 'social enlightenment' and 'public explanation,' and tell the truth of the [Islamic] revolution and the [Iranian] regime. "Silence and passivity help the enemy's intellectual and media front, and they create doubt among parts of society. Of course, like in past decades, Western civilization also has an internal to and fro that repeats its statements and narratives, in a certain way, parallel to the enemy's narrative. We must confront the Iranian liberals who are at the mental and intellectual level carrying out the enemy's war actions, and we must not give them an opportunity to raise incitement and doubt. We must find, at least, internal resilience and not allow society to be affected by cognitive shocks that come from their twisted assessments. The statement published in recent days by some elements in the secular intellectual movement that are affiliated with ideas from modern religious studies are an example of an attempt to normalize negotiations, compromise, and giving up, which are entrenched in society as a science and as an expert opinion. The national broadcast authority must provide as much opportunity and space as possible for the dismantlement of liberal errors and shed light on their unpleasant outcomes… "Society Is Ready And Eager, More Than Ever, To Jump Ahead Towards The Original Ideals Of The Revolution And To Make An Iranian-Islamic Plan For Independent And Original Progress… Today A 'Global Resistance Front' Has Been Created That Transcends Religion, Sects, And Territory" "We must ensure that our eyes remain focused on 'Iranian and Islamic possibilities,' and reveal the mechanisms for manifesting internal capabilities. We are in an era of 'a historic turning point,' 'the twilight of Western civilization,' 'orientalization of global power,' and the 'birth of a strong Iran,' and currently society is ready and eager, more than ever, to jump ahead towards the original ideals of the revolution and to make an Iranian-Islamic plan for independent and original progress. "Moreover, today a 'global resistance front' has been created that transcends religion, sects, and territory, since many societies and groups believe in confronting the Zionist regime and America and pushing them back. This historic situation is the same promise made by [Ayatollah Ruhollah] Khomeini in the first years of the victory of the Islamic Revolution, and today we are clearly witnessing its birth and realization. "Most of the world identifies with the Palestinians in Gaza and cannot tolerate the unprecedented wildness and barbarity of the Zionist regime, and harshly criticize its support by the governments of America and Europe. This historic and global front must take intellectual and theoretical shape and experience semantic and epistemological presence in the face of the other [front], which is the front of renewed tyranny and arrogance [led by America]. Signed: [313 lecturers and intellectuals]"[3]
Shafaq News
11 hours ago
- Shafaq News
SDF calls for formal talks on Syria's oil
Shafaq News - Al-Hasakah On Monday, Mazloum Abdi, commander of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), called for formal negotiations to create a clear framework for managing Syria's oil resources, urging all relevant parties to come together in agreement. 'In practice, integration means a partnership —among all Syrians, all communities, and the administrations currently in place,' he stressed, emphasizing the need for inclusive governance structures rather than centralized control. Abdi noted that the region continues to face a range of political and administrative challenges, highlighting that addressing each of them requires distinct approaches rather than one overarching solution. His remarks come amid growing pressure in northeast Syria and a deadlock in dialogue with Damascus. A political agreement reached in March —intended to lay the groundwork for integrating SDF forces into state institutions—has yet to produce concrete steps. The absence of follow-through has raised concerns among observers monitoring the fragile political landscape. Marwan Hassan, a researcher on Syrian affairs, warned Shafaq News that while the March deal marked a symbolic shift, its implementation remains uncertain. 'Without a clear mechanism for integration and redistribution of authority, tensions will persist—and disputed areas could quickly turn into new flashpoints,' he cautioned. Meanwhile, Elham Ahmed, co-chair of the Foreign Relations Department of the Autonomous Administration in North and East Syria, urged the transitional government to prioritize the return of displaced populations, describing it as an essential element of any political settlement. She also rejected accusations that the Administration is seeking separation from Syria, reaffirming that decentralization continues to form the basis of its political vision. 'A stalled or incomplete transition may open the door to civil war and unravel the fabric of social stability,' she warned.
Shafaq News
11 hours ago
- Shafaq News
Bahrain to open consulate in Erbil
Shafaq News – Erbil Bahrain expressed on Monday its intention to open a consulate in Erbil, the capital of the Kurdistan Region, and launch direct flights between Manama and Erbil. According to a statement from Kurdish leader Masoud Barzani's office, Barzani met with Bahrain's ambassador to Iraq, Khalid Ahmed Al-Mansour. The two discussed political developments in Iraq and the region, as well as relations between the Kurdistan Region and the federal government. The statement added that Ambassador Al-Mansour praised Barzani's leadership and wisdom in managing the Kurdistan Region, highlighting its strong standing in the region. Al-Mansour reaffirmed Bahrain's support for the Kurdistan Region and revealed that Bahraini Airlines will soon begin operating direct flights between Manama and Erbil.
