First shoes, now carry-on liquids: Airline security rule could soon be updated
"The liquids I'm questioning, so that may be the next big announcement is what size your liquids need to be," DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said at an event in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday. "We're looking at our scanners, what we have put in place in TSA, multi-layered screening process that allows us to change some of how we do security and screening so it still is safe."
Noem didn't indicate when the updated policy announcement might be made.
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) in 2006 implemented a policy limiting liquids, gels and aerosols in passenger carry-on luggage to 3.4-ounce containers or smaller, to lessen the chances of liquid explosives being brought onboard commercial aircraft.
MORE: Homeland Security ends mandatory shoe removal at airport screening
Noem announced on July 8 that DHS was ending the nearly 20-year requirement that passengers remove their shoes for inspection before boarding commercial aircraft. The policy was implemented in 2006 after the so-called "shoe bomber," Richard Reid, unsuccessfully attempted to detonate plastic explosives concealed in his shoes onboard a flight from Paris, France to Miami, Fla. On Dec. 22, 2001.
Noem said during last week's announcement that DHS was able to terminate the shoe removal policy due to the 'layered security' by the TSA now place. These layers include additional officers at security checkpoints, new scanners and technology and the recently enforced REAL ID requirement, Noem said.
Secretary Noem was also asked about the current threat environment in the United States.
"We have the threat from terrorists that are in our country today that we need to remove," she said. "We also have the crimes that are happening on our streets by those individuals that are murderers and rapists that affect families immediately."
Noem said the U.S. critical infrastructure is also vulnerable to attack and pointed to various cyber incidents that have occurred in the past year.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
Ohio man charged with bringing gun in carry-on at Pittsburgh International Airport
An Ohio man has been charged after TSA officers say they found a handgun in his carry-on at Pittsburgh International Airport on Sunday morning. Police say Justin Stanley, 47, did not have a valid concealed carry permit when the gun was found at a security checkpoint. The TSA reminds flyers that bringing firearms into an airport security checkpoint can result in federal civil fines up to $10,000. Repeat offenders can be fined up to $13,910. Stanley is facing a misdemeanor charge for carrying a firearm without a license plus associated civil fines. The Federal Bureau of Investigation was also notified.
Forbes
4 hours ago
- Forbes
CISA Cannot Drift: Will Sean Plankey Be The Captain To Lock The Wheel?
UNITED STATES - JULY 24: Sean Plankey, nominee to be director of the Cybersecurity and ... More Infrastructure Security Agency, testifies during his Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee confirmation hearing in Dirksen building on Thursday, July 24, 2025. America's top cyber defense agency is flying without a captain and time is running out. On July 24 President Trump's nominee to lead the agency, Sean Plankey, appeared before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee in a well-received confirmation hearing. After months of delays, paperwork issues and a procedural hold by Sen. Ron Wyden the panel appears ready to advance his nomination to the full Senate. Plankey has in recent months been working as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's senior adviser overseeing the Coast Guard, where he also served for years including as a cyber leader. Plankey brought a steady hand and deep operational experience to the confirmation hearing. He cited the significant Coast Guard funding increase in the latest Congressional budget as proof of Noem's willingness to go to bat for cyber and infrastructure security. The Clock Is Ticking On CISA Leadership The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency is the nation's digital sentry. It guards civilian federal networks, supports the defense industrial base and shares threat intelligence with private companies that operate essential systems. Yet the agency has been operating with significantly reduced senior leadership and dealing with budget pressures. Since the departure of former CISA Director Jen Easterly earlier this year the agency has lacked steady leadership. Easterly, nominated by President Biden, advanced his administration's agenda by adding misinformation and election security to the CISA mandate. Every week without a confirmed director represents opportunity for adversaries like China and Russia as well as criminal syndicates that constantly probe for vulnerabilities. House Homeland Security Chairman Mark Garbarino warned that every minute without CISA's top leadership benefits nation state actors like Salt Typhoon. In today's threat environment leadership vacuums translate directly into risk. Plankey Brings A Mission First Reset Sean Plankey has been serving as senior adviser for the U.S. Coast Guard to Homeland Security ... More Secretary Kristi Noem. A cyber veteran who served on the National Security Council and as the Department of Energy's most senior cybersecurity official in the first Trump administration, Plankey brings a rare combination of federal experience and operational credibility. Plankey told senators that he would refocus CISA on its congressional mandate which means defending federal systems critical infrastructure and supporting states. He drew a clear line on one of the most politically charged questions facing the agency: content moderation. 'CISA will not do any of that work,' Plankey said when asked about speech policing. His position reflects an effort to keep CISA grounded in its core mission rather than drifting into broader debates over online content. When pressed on election disputes Plankey stayed neutral. He stated simply that elections are run by the states and CISA's role is to provide support not to referee politics. He also signaled strong support for reauthorization of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, a foundational law that enables threat intelligence sharing between private companies and government. Why Narrowing The Mandate Matters Over the years CISA's mission has grown into areas like disinformation and pandemic messaging. That expansion diluted focus and triggered political backlash. Plankey and his supporters in Congress are signaling that it is time to strip away distractions and return to core tasks. This approach does not weaken cyber defense. It strengthens it. When agencies chase every new issue, specially politicized ones, they risk losing sight of the fundamentals. With CISA's responsibilities increasingly tied to civilian infrastructure from pipelines to hospitals clear priorities are essential. Plankey also highlighted two critical programs that expire on September 30. Plankey signaled he is prepared to fight for both programs and stated that he knows how to go to Secretary Noem to request more funding if needed. Congress will need to deliver as well. Civilian Infrastructure Is Now Mission Critical Much of the responsibility for cyber defense is shifting to the networks, utilities and companies that power daily life. The private sector now sits on the front lines and its actions will determine how resilient the nation is in the face of escalating cyber threats. Standards like the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework and modern supply chain security protocols are no longer optional checklists. They are becoming the foundation of national defense. Critical infrastructure operators and the defense industrial base must go beyond compliance and embed these standards into everyday operations. That means segmenting networks, conducting regular threat hunting, hardening endpoints and practicing incident response as rigorously as fire drills. If state and local systems are not hardened, if telecom carriers are not meeting baseline expectations, if airlines, airports, railways, shipping ports, financial institutions and hospitals are not securing critical systems then the entire security structure is at risk. Every weak link becomes an opening for adversaries. Every delay in upgrading defenses becomes a window for attackers. The nation's ability to defend itself now depends as much on the vigilance of power companies, water authorities, transportation hubs, manufacturers, defense suppliers, banks and healthcare networks as it does on any federal agency. This means investing in modern security architectures, implementing continuous monitoring and ensuring that every sector has clear response plans that are tested and updated. Without that collective effort, the country's cyber defense will always be one breach away from failure. CISA Cannot Remain Leaderless. The mission is too important. Sean Plankey brings the right pedigree, a Coast Guard foundation in operational security, a focused mission plan and the credibility to guide the agency forward. He has received broad bipartisan and cybersecurity endorsements. Now is the time to set aside political posturing and focus on the shared goal of securing the nation's digital front lines. The damage from delaying his confirmation is greater than the debate surrounding it. Other agencies can address the issues where consensus does not exist. The hope is that the Senate would move swiftly to confirm him. Every day without leadership at CISA is a day when adversaries gain ground, vulnerabilities deepen and the nation's critical systems face greater risk. The threats are real and accelerating. The country cannot afford hesitation when decisive action is required.
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
What will it cost to renovate the ‘free' Air Force One? Don't ask.
Officially, and conveniently, the price tag has been classified. But even by Washington standards, where 'black budgets' are often used as an excuse to avoid revealing the cost of outdated spy satellites and lavish end-of-year parties, the techniques being used to hide the cost of Trump's pet project are inventive. Which may explain why no one wants to discuss a mysterious, $934 million transfer of funds from one of the Pentagon's most over-budget, out-of-control projects — the modernization of America's aging, ground-based nuclear missiles. Advertisement In recent weeks, congressional budget sleuths have come to think that amount, slipped into an obscure Pentagon document sent to Capitol Hill as a 'transfer' to an unnamed classified project, almost certainly includes the renovation of the new, gold-adorned Air Force One that Trump desperately wants in the air before his term is over. (It is not clear if the entire transfer will be devoted to stripping the new Air Force One back to its airframe, but Air Force officials privately acknowledge dipping into nuclear modernization funds for the complex project.) Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Qatar's defense minister and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth signed the final memorandum of understanding a few weeks ago, paving the way for the renovation to begin soon at a Texas facility known for secret technology projects. The document was reported earlier by The Washington Post. Advertisement Trump's plane probably won't fly for long: It will take a year or two to get the work done, and then the Qatari gift — improved with the latest communications and in-flight protective technology — will be transferred to the yet-to-be-created Trump presidential library after he leaves office in 2029, the president has said. Concerns over the many apparent conflicts of interests involved in the transaction, given Trump's government dealings and business ties with the Qataris, have swirled since reports of the gift emerged this spring. But Trump said he was unconcerned, casting the decision as a no-brainer for taxpayers. 'I would never be one to turn down that kind of an offer,' the president said in May. 'I mean, I could be a stupid person and say, 'No, we don't want a free, very expensive airplane.'' It is free in the sense that a used car handed over by a neighbor looking to get it out of his driveway is free. In this case, among the many modifications will be hardened communications, antimissile systems, and engine capabilities to take the president quickly to safety as one of the older Air Force Ones did Sept. 11, 2001, when Al Qaeda attacked the United States. And there is the delicate matter of ridding the jet of any hidden electronic listening devices that US officials suspect may be embedded in the walls. Then, of course, it has to be stuffed with the luxuries — and gold trim — with which the 47th president surrounds himself, whether he is in the Oval Office or in the air. The jet's upper deck has a lounge and a communications center, while the main bedroom can be converted into a flying sick bay in a medical emergency. Advertisement So it's no surprise that one of Washington's biggest guessing games these days is assessing just where the price tag will end up, on top of the $4 billion already being spent on the wildly behind-schedule presidential planes that Boeing was supposed to deliver last year. It was those delays that led Trump to look for a gift. Air Force officials privately concede that they are paying for renovations of the Qatari Air Force One with the transfer from another massively over-budget, behind-schedule program, called the Sentinel. That is named for the missile at the heart of Washington's long-running effort to rebuild America's aging, leaky, ground-launched nuclear missile system. The project was first sold to Congress as a $77.7 billion program to replace all 400 Minuteman III missiles, complete with launch facilities and communications built to withstand both nuclear and cyber attack. By the time Trump came back into office, that figure had ballooned by 81 percent, to $140 billion and climbing, all to reconstruct what nuclear strategists agree is the most vulnerable, impossible-to-hide element of America's nuclear deterrent. In testimony before Congress in June, Troy E. Meink, the Air Force secretary, said that he thought the cost of the Air Force One renovations would be manageable. 'I think there has been a number thrown around on the order of $1 billion,' he said. 'But a lot of those costs associated with that are costs that we'd have experienced anyway, we will just experience them early,' before Boeing delivers its two Air Force Ones. 'So it wouldn't be anywhere near that.' Advertisement 'We believe the actual retrofit of that aircraft is probably less than $400 million,' he said. If so, that would be a bargain. But engineers and Air Force experts who have been through similar projects have their doubts that it can be accomplished for anything like that price. Members of Congress express concern that Trump will pressure the Air Force to do the work so fast that sufficient security measures are not built into the plane. When asked last week, the Air Force said it simply could not discuss the cost — or anything else about the plane — because it's classified. This article originally appeared in
