
Why China isn't as worried about Trump's trade war as in 2018
Since returning to the White House in January, Trump has already imposed a 20 percent tariff on Chinese imports, citing Beijing's alleged failure to curb the export of the deadly opioid fentanyl to the US.
The tariff comes on top of previous duties imposed by Trump and former US President Joe Biden on more than $400bn worth of Chinese goods.
After condemning the latest US tariffs as 'bullying' and 'intimidation,' Beijing hit back last week by announcing tariffs of 10-15 percent on numerous US agricultural goods, including corn, beef, pork, dairy and soybeans.
The tariffs, which went into effect on Monday, followed Beijing's announcement last month of a 10 percent tariff on crude oil, agricultural machinery, pick-up trucks, and some cars, and a 15 percent tariff on coal and liquefied natural gas.
'If war is what the US wants, be it a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we're ready to fight till the end,' Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Lin Jiang told reporters last week.
While the tit-for-tat measures recall Trump's first trade war in 2018, both Washington and Beijing are facing very different conditions today than seven years ago.
The world's two biggest economies have steadily decoupled in recent years, reducing their mutual dependency and blunting the impact of tariffs, according to analysts.
Christopher Beddor, a deputy China research director at the Beijing-based Gavekal Dragonomics, said the latest tariffs should be 'pretty manageable' for China, and noted that they are significantly below the 60 percent rate threatened by Trump during his election campaign.
'I don't want to understate the impact – that's almost a tripling of the effective tariff rates for Chinese goods that are coming into the United States, so it's big,' Beddor told Al Jazeera.
'But Chinese exports into the United States are a pretty modest share of its overall economy,' Beddor said.
Declining trade share
China's share of total US trade – measured as the sum of exports and imports – dropped from 15.7 percent to 10.9 percent between 2018 and 2024, according to Bloomberg.
Over the same period, the US's share of China's total trade fell from 13.7 percent to 11.2 percent.
Lynn Song, chief Economist for Greater China at ING, said Beijing is not likely to be panicking over the tariffs – at least for now.
'While avoiding this sort of trade friction would've been preferable, it's something that's been planned for, so I wouldn't say there's a feeling of panic,' Song told Al Jazeera.
'With that said, with every tariff escalation, there inevitably will be parts of trade which become unviable and companies that will be impacted.'
Another factor mitigating the impact of tariffs, Lynn said, is that Chinese exporters such as Shein and Temu have found success selling low-cost goods directly to customers by taking advantage of a tariff exemption on shipments worth less than $800.
Beijing has continually rolled out measures to insulate the economy from any trade shocks.
At the 'Two Sessions' meetings last week in Beijing, the National People's Congress – the highest body of state power in China – announced several fiscal stimulus measures, including raising the debt level for local governments and issuing 1.3 trillion yuan ($179bn) in long-term treasury bonds.
Carsten Holz, an expert on the Chinese economy at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, said Beijing's domestic policy moves have given it a significant buffer against US demands.
'Even the effect of a complete Trump ban on imports from China – hardly realistic in an age when, for example, the bulk of iPhones are produced in China – may not make a dent larger than a fraction of a percentage point in China's GDP,' Holz told Al Jazeera.
'For an authoritarian leadership determined to project strength, this is unlikely to be enough to join what may look to the Chinese public like 'peace talks' with a foreign aggressor.'
Some analysts believe that despite its stronger position compared with 2018, Beijing still wishes to negotiate with Trump – at least for the moment.
'Avoiding escalation'
One of the strongest signals that Chinese officials are open to talking is that their opening round of tariffs was relatively mild and restricted to a limited number of goods, suggesting a strategy of 'avoiding escalation,' said Even Rogers Pay, a food and agricultural analyst at the Beijing-based research group Trivium China.
'The retaliation demonstrates that while China's government doesn't intend to take trade pressure lying down, they are also not going to be baited into an escalatory trade conflict where early overreaction could make striking a deal more difficult,' Pay told Al Jazeera.
'Instead, by applying moderate tariffs to a short list of key industries, Beijing is ramping up political pressure in the red states that are major exporters of corn, soybeans, sorghum and other farm products that they hope will bring Trump to the table.'
Beijing may be angling for a 'phase two' deal along the lines of the 'phase one' deal struck with Trump in 2020 to bring an end to the first trade war, Pay said.
Under the phase one deal, China pledged to buy $200bn in US goods and services, including agricultural products, over two years.
Beijing, however, only fulfilled about 58 percent of this amount after trade was derailed by the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the Peterson Institute for Economic Research.
John Gong, a professor of economics at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing, agreed that China can withstand the pressure but is also ready to negotiate.
'The government in China is, of course, worried, but won't back down in a humiliating way. They would love to negotiate a deal, but if it can't, they would have a 'so-be it attitude',' Gong told Al Jazeera.
Meanwhile, some analysts believe Trump is at risk of overplaying his hand.
During the last trade war, Trump directed his focus solely on China, but since returning to office he has set his sights on other countries, too, including Mexico and Canada, in a bid to reduce the US trade deficit.
The US president has also moved at lightning speed.
In the span of about a month, Trump rolled out tariffs on goods worth $1.4 trillion, compared with tariffs on imports worth $380bn in 2018 and 2019, according to an analysis by Erica York, the vice president of federal tax policy at the Tax Foundation, a Washington-based think tank.
It is unclear, though, to what extent Trump's tariffs will stick.
Just two days after imposing sweeping tariffs on Canada and Mexico on March 4, Trump announced that he would delay duties on many imports until April 2.
'There are a lot of things that could go wrong for Trump now, and to be honest, there's some reasonable possibility that he is forced to retreat from a lot of these tariffs because the domestic economic consequences of the US are just so bad,' Gavekal Dragonomics' Beddor said.
'[China's] approach is: let's wait and see, apply more fiscal stimulus to mitigate the impact.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Qatar Tribune
5 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Oil falls $2 on worries about OPEC+ supply, US jobs data
Oil prices fell $2 a barrel on Friday around concerns of a possible increase in production by OPEC and its allies, while a weaker-than-expected US jobs report fed worries about demand. Brent crude futures settled at $69.67 a barrel, down $2.03, or 2.83%. US West Texas Intermediate crude finished at $67.33 a barrel, down $1.93, or 2.79%. Brent finished the week with a gain near 6%, while WTI rose 6.29%. Analysts said that OPEC members and allied producers known as OPEC+ may reach an agreement as early as Sunday to boost production by 548,000 barrels per day in September. Meanwhile, the US Labor Department said the country added 73,000 jobs in July, lower than economists had forecast, raising the national unemployment rate to 4.2% from 4.1%. Analysts suggests recent economic issues could be due to either US tariffs or the Federal Reserve's decision not to raise interest rates. On Wednesday, the Fed voted to keep interest rates unchanged, drawing criticism from Trump and a chorus of Republican legislators. Oil traders have focused for much of the week on the potential impact of US tariffs, with tariff rates on US trading partners largely set to take effect from next Friday. Trump signed an executive order on Thursday imposing tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on US imports from dozens of countries and foreign territories that failed to reach trade deals by his Aug. 1 deadline, including Canada, India and Taiwan. Asian spot prices inch up on geopolitical, supply concerns Asian spot LNG prices inched up after two previous weeks of declines as geopolitical risk factors including US threats of sanctions on energy producer Russia, and supply concerns lent support. The average LNG price for September delivery into Northeast Asia was at $12.10 per million British thermal units (mmBtu), up from $11.90 per mmBtu last week, industry sources estimated. Geopolitics was back on stage with the threat of sanctions on offtakers of Russian oil and gas, potentially tightening the market if LNG is purchased elsewhere, but it remains unclear how things will turn out, analysts said. US President Donald Trump has threatened sanctions on both Russia and buyers of its exports unless Moscow makes progress toward ending the war in Ukraine by August 8. Meanwhile, the trade agreement the US struck with the European Union remained supportive, as the EU pledged to buy $250 billion of US energy supplies per year. Additionally boosting prices, last week's earthquake in eastern Russia triggering tsunami alerts and a slower than expected ramp-up at LNG Canada added to supply concerns, said analysts. In Europe, the futures price at the Dutch TTF hub rose to $11.54 per mmBtu. Continued strong pipeline gas flows and high German wind generation will suppress bullish impulses. However, LNG supply tightness from Italy's Rovigo maintenance and intensified Egyptian procurement activity may introduce upward risk. — By The Al-Attiyah Foundation


Qatar Tribune
5 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
China summons Nvidia over ‘serious security issues' with AI chips
Agencies Chinese authorities summoned Nvidia representatives on Thursday to discuss 'serious security issues' over some of its artificial intelligence chips, as the US tech giant finds itself entangled in trade tensions between Beijing and Washington. Nvidia is a world-leading producer of AI semiconductors, but the United States effectively restricts which chips it can export to China on national security grounds. A key issue has been Chinese access to the 'H20', a less powerful version of Nvidia's AI processing units that the company developed specifically for export to China. The California-based firm said this month it would resume H20 sales to China after Washington pledged to remove licensing curbs that had halted exports. But the firm still faces obstacles—US lawmakers have proposed plans to require Nvidia and other manufacturers of advanced AI chips to include built-in location tracking capabilities. And Beijing's top internet regulator said Thursday it had summoned Nvidia representatives to discuss recently discovered 'serious security issues' involving the H20. The Cyberspace Administration of China said it had asked Nvidia to 'explain the security risks of vulnerabilities and backdoors in its H20 chips sold to China and submit relevant supporting materials'. The statement posted on social media noted that, according to US experts, location tracking and remote shutdown technologies for Nvidia chips 'are already matured'. The announcement marked the latest complication for Nvidia in selling its advanced products in the key Chinese market, where it is in increasingly fierce competition with homegrown technology firms. CEO Jensen Huang said during a closely watched visit to Beijing this month that his firm remained committed to serving local customers. Huang said he had been assured during talks with top Chinese officials during the trip that the country was 'open and stable'. 'They want to know that Nvidia continues to invest here, that we are still doing our best to serve the market here,' he said. Nvidia this month became the first company to hit $4 trillion in market value—a new milestone in Wall Street's bet that AI will transform the global economy. Jost Wubbeke of the Sinolytics consultancy told AFP the move by China to summon Nvidia was 'not surprising in the sense that targeting individual US companies has become a common tool in the context of US-China tensions'. 'What is surprising, however, is the timing,' he noted, after the two countries agreed to further talks to extend their trade truce. 'China's action may signal a shift toward a more assertive stance,' Wubbeke said. Beijing is also aiming to reduce reliance on foreign tech by promoting Huawei's domestically developed 910C chip as an alternative to the H20, he added. 'From that perspective, the US decision to allow renewed exports of the H20 to China could be seen as counterproductive, as it might tempt Chinese hyperscalers to revert to the H20, potentially undermining momentum behind the 910C and other domestic alternatives.' New hurdles to Nvidia's operation in China come as the country's economy wavers, beset by a years-long property sector crisis and heightened trade headwinds under US President Donald Trump. Chinese President Xi Jinping has called for the country to enhance self-reliance in certain areas deemed vital for national security—including AI and semiconductors—as tensions with Washington mount.


Qatar Tribune
5 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Kremlin allies downplay Trump's deployment of nuclear submarines
DPA Moscow Politicians and experts close to the Kremlin have downplayed the deployment of two US nuclear submarines near Russia, a move announced on Friday by President Donald Trump. The two submarines were 'not a new threat' to Russia's national security, former air force general and current Duma deputy Leonid Ivlev told the state-run news agency TASS on Saturday, adding that Russia is fully aware of such US military manoeuvres. Viktor Vodolatsky, another lawmaker, echoed that called any attempt to intimidate Russia pointless, noting the country's large fleet of nuclear submarines. Trump said ordered the deployment in response to comments made by former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev. This is being done 'just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump wrote on his platform Truth Social. Where the submarines will be sent is unclear. In his post, Trump only referred to 'appropriate regions.' Trump and Medvedev have been clashing for days. The dispute began last week after Trump gave Russia a new ultimatum for a ceasefire in Ukraine, or face tough new sanctions. In response, Medvedev on Monday said that 'each new ultimatum' that Trump makes 'is a threat and a step towards war.' The Kremlin, along with Medvedev, has remained silent on Trump's submarine deployment. The Foreign Ministry and other senior Russian bodies, which typically respond quickly to perceived threats, have withheld comment. Vodolatsky said that no official response was needed, asserting that 'everyone knows' Trump frequently changes his stance. However, he questioned why a US president would respond so strongly to comments from a deputy chair of a security council. What mattered more, he said, was the need for a renewed agreement between Moscow and Washington to end speculation about a potential World War Three.