logo
What do restaurants in Greater Portland do when the competition is right next door?

What do restaurants in Greater Portland do when the competition is right next door?

Yahoo04-06-2025

Jun. 4—Donato Giovine recalls the "shock" he experienced in 2011 after learning that Brunswick-based Gelato Fiasco was opening a new location on Fore Street.
Giovine and his wife, Mariagrazia Zanardi, had opened their own gelateria, Gorgeous Gelato, at 434 Fore St. in late 2010. Gelato Fiasco's new space would be diagonally across the street, a mere cone's throw away.
"At the beginning, we couldn't believe our eyes," he said. "It didn't make any sense, given the amount of gelato customers, to have two places, one so close to the other. It was like suicide — we were splitting a small amount of customers at the time."
Giovine said he could understand two gelato shops located so closely in a major metropolitan city like New York or San Francisco. "But Portland, Maine, with 68,000 people? It was almost funny."
Today, Giovine and Zanardi may not look back and laugh, but they can certainly see the situation with better humor. This city turned out to be big enough for the both of them. Portland's reputation as a foodie destination — bolstered by national publicity starting in the mid-2010s — drew more and more visitors nearly every year. Both shops are currently thriving; since the pandemic, they've been busier than ever.
Local food industry insiders say Portland's volume of visitors makes the notion of business territory almost outdated.
"In the past, another restaurant opening nearby with even a remotely similar menu or style could be seen as an affront, like, 'They're coming for our business,'" said Peter Bissell, co-owner of Low Stakes Lodge, a western-style steakhouse located just up Exchange Street from chef-owner Harding Lee Smith's steakhouse, The Grill Room & Bar. "But Portland for decades now has been a major food destination. It's a small town with a big-city assortment of food and bev. And when you hit that point, there's enough to go around."
"There's too much competition to think that way, to isolate yourself and say, 'We're the only game in town,'" agreed Smith, who also owns The Front Room and The Corner Room. "When I started the Front Room, there were like 85 restaurants in town. There's over 300 now. You have to keep your head down and worry about what you're doing and keep your quality where it needs to be."
CLOSE COMPETITON
The local food and beverage scene has several other examples of neighbors who have been friendly competitors for years, like Saigon restaurant and Thanh Thanh 2 on Forest Avenue, or Coffee By Design on Diamond Street, just around the corner from Tandem Coffee Roasters on Anderson Street. Craft breweries and beverage businesses have clustered together on Industrial Way and in East Bayside, forming drinking districts that seem to benefit all the operations.
"We see lots of cross-pollination that happens, and it's really pretty positive for everybody involved," said Nathan Sanborn, founder of Rising Tide on Fox Street. "It doesn't feel like we're cannibalizing each other so much as supporting."
And in Old Orchard Beach, three pizza stands located within a couple blocks of each other — Bill's, Rocco's and Lisa's — have coexisted peacefully for decades, each attracting its share of the throngs of summer visitors.
"In a touristy area, it may not matter," said Chris Boucher, a marketing professor in the University of New England College of Business. "If there's a line at one place, tourists will go to the next place. There's going to be enough demand that, overall, I think it actually helps all the businesses."
Jason S. Entsminger, assistant professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the Maine Business School, notes that businesses in other sectors often group together, like car dealerships, gas stations and fast food restaurants. Still, some independent food business owners, especially in less tourist-based areas, feel the concept of territory still applies.
"Donuts aren't like car dealerships," said Shelby Omdal, co-owner of Frosty's Donuts in Brunswick, the town's go-to donut shop for 60 years. "Car dealerships can open right next door to each other and they can all be successful. This isn't that type of business, or town."
The Omdals were dismayed to learn in late 2023 that Holy Donut planned to open a Brunswick location less than a mile away from Frosty's, as the gull flies. "It was a bold move on their part," Shelby Omdal said. "We've opened other stores, and I wouldn't go to Wells next to Congdon's and think I'm going to open a shop and be as successful as they are."
Holy Donut launched in Brunswick last May, and the Omdals recently learned that two other donut shops are considering opening in town, including Portland's former HiFi Donuts. "I think maybe people see the lines coming out the door (at Frosty's) most days, and it's easy to say, 'If they can do that, we can too,'" Omdal said.
Entsminger said entrepreneurs may look at a "legacy competitor" like Frosty's and think, "We're going to be offering something that's just different enough that there are going to be people in that market that will want the new thing."
Holy Donut's CEO and co-owner Jeff Buckwalter said his company's customers had been requesting they open a Brunswick store for years, and the location they eventually found — a former Tim Horton's on Pleasant Street just off Interstate 295 — was ideal.
"For us, a lot of tourists coming to Maine are driving right past that location on Route 1 as they head up the coast, and so we also wanted to make sure we could get in front of them," he said. "It's a great location with high traffic. I don't think it's hit its full stride yet, but given the economic climate, it's meeting our expectations."
Meanwhile, Frosty's business is booming. "Our sales have never been so high," said co-owner Nels Omdal, Shelby's husband, noting that the store sold almost 150 dozen donuts in a little over five hours on Mother's Day. "The lines just don't stop."
Entsminger said just as customers are often drawn to a new product in a given market, they can also rally around a legacy brand. "The threat of a new competitor entering a marketplace where there's a really well-established brand can drive customer loyalty."
NOT A ZERO-SUM GAME
Buckwalter said he feels the Brunswick market is big enough to support both Frosty's and Holy Donut. "Provided you can differentiate yourself versus your competition, there's plenty of business to go around," he said.
While Frosty's prides itself on time-tested recipes and light, airy donuts baked fresh within hours of purchase, Holy Donut offers Maine potato donuts in a variety of creative flavors, with plenty of gluten-free and vegan options.
Other owners agreed that distinguishing their businesses from nearby competition is crucial. Giovine and Zanardi are natives of Italy who say Gorgeous Gelato offers an authentic, top-quality gelato experience.
"We have very simple, almost boring flavors — hazelnut, coconut, panna cotta," Giovine said. "When you go into the master gelaterias in Italy, they have 12, 16 flavors, and no more. Our gelato is more traditional, because it has centuries of culture behind it. And it's made using Italian taste buds. When it satisfies our taste buds, it's delicious for others. That may be reductive, but that is the key."
Gelato Fiasco's website includes a "flavor vault" of more than 1,500 flavors they've offered over the years. Gelato Fiasco co-owner Mitch Newlin said Gorgeous Gelato offers baked goods that his store doesn't have, while he feels Gelato Fiasco may have better vegan options.
When Gelato Fiasco was looking to expand in 2012 after five years in business in Brunswick, Newlin said a Portland location "seemed like the next logical step." While they looked at other locations in Old Port, the Fore Street space ticked all the right boxes.
"It was not that we wanted to be right across the street from the competition as much as we wanted to be in the Old Port with outdoor seating and a 1,200- to 1,500-square-foot space," Newlin said.
He believes there's plenty of overlap in the customer bases of the two gelato shops, and that they're not playing a zero-sum game.
"There are a lot of people who will try both of our stores," he said. "They may be here on a three-day weekend. The first day they go to Gorgeous Gelato, the second day they come try us, and they'll compare."
Coffee By Design owner and co-founder Mary Allen Lindemann said there's inherent separation between her business and Tandem. "We have different flavor profiles, we source our coffee differently, we have different histories and different stories to tell," she said.
Like Newlin, she doesn't feel being located nearby a competitor necessarily cuts into each other's business. "If anything, it brings people to the neighborhood," she said. "People will come and check us both out, and we each have our own loyal followings."
Harding noted that the Low Stakes Lodge space had previously hosted another another steakhouse, Timber, for eight years. "I don't think it really affected (The Grill Room) at all," he said. "I've always thought that the more people in the neighborhood the better."
"The only thing that Low Stakes and The Grill Room have in common is that there is a steak section on the menu," said Bissell. "There's a difference in ambience, and the other items on the menu." Smith agreed, pointing out that the Grill Room specializes in wood-grilled steaks and has a "clubby, old-school feel" to it, compared to the more casual, fun vibe at Low Stakes.
"If people crave a steak, and Low Stakes has a wait and they can get into the Grill Room, I'd expect them to do so, and vice-versa," Bissell said. "Having more options isn't necessarily bad for any one business. It just means that more people are coming to town every year, primarily for eating and drinking, and that's a good thing for everybody."
Of course, there's a limit. Boucher, the UNE professor, said if another gelato shop were to open in Old Port, for instance, it might saturate the market, causing one of the three to fail and close. And another donut shop or two opening in Brunswick would further stress-test Frosty's and Holy Donut.
"Competition is always good, because it makes you try harder to do better," said Shelby Omdal. "At the end of the day, if you have a superior product that people can't get anywhere else, you've got the magic."
Copy the Story Link

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Factbox-Breakdown of U.S. tariffs on China since Trump's first term
Factbox-Breakdown of U.S. tariffs on China since Trump's first term

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Factbox-Breakdown of U.S. tariffs on China since Trump's first term

BEIJING (Reuters) -Billions of dollars of Chinese goods have been impacted by additional U.S. tariffs since 2018, initially under the first Donald Trump presidency and later under the Biden administration. Returning to the White House this year, Trump has imposed even more duties on China. The U.S. tariffs range from those imposed under Section 301 of its trade act due to what Washington claims are unfair Chinese trade practices, to duties under Section 232 levied for national security reasons. This year, Trump has imposed another 20% levies on all Chinese goods, saying Beijing has not done enough to stop the flow of fentanyl into the United States. So-called reciprocal tariffs, under which the U.S. will match duties imposed by other countries, have also been levied in a bid to rebalance trade flows. Below are the U.S. tariffs on China effective as of June 12, 2025: Tariff Rate Products Effective date Reciprocal 10% All Paused for 90 days until Aug 10, 2025 Fentanyl 20% All Mar 4, 2025 Section Up to List 1: Pharmaceuticals, July 6, 2018 301 25% iron and steel, aluminium, vehicles and aircraft, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus and more. List 2: Vehicles, Aug 23, 2018 railway or tramway locomotives, aircraft and their parts, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus and more. List 3: Prepared May 10, 2019 foodstuffs, beverages, mineral products, fertilizers, wood products, textiles, precious and base metals, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, machinery and mechanical appliances and more. List 4A: Prepared Feb 14, 2020 foodstuffs, beverages, mineral products, fertilizers, footwear, wood products, ceramic products, glass, textiles, precious and base metals, machinery and mechanical appliances, vehicles, aircraft, vessels, art, antiques and more. In September 2019, the U.S. imposed 15% tariffs on more than $120 billion of Chinese goods under Section 301, which it then halved to 7.5% less than six months later. The 25% U.S. tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods under the earlier List 1-3 remain unchanged. In September 2024, the U.S. Trade Representative under the Biden administration announced additional tariffs of 25-100% on 14 product groups following a four-year review of the Section 301 tariff actions. The levies were imposed on strategic Chinese sectors or sectors where the United States has made significant domestic investments. Additional tariffs on goods under Section 301: Effective date EVs 100% Sep 27, 2024 Solar cells, syringes and 50% needles Non-lithium-ion battery parts, 25% lithium-ion electrical vehicle batteries, other critical minerals, ship-to-shore cranes, steel and aluminium products, facemasks Semiconductors 50% Jan 1, 2025 Lithium-ion non-electrical 25% Jan 1, 2026 vehicle batteries, medical gloves, natural graphite, permanent magnets In addition to the above duties, the first Trump administration in 2018 imposed a range of tariffs under Section 232 aimed at restricting goods deemed a threat to national security, including all aluminium and steel imports, shutting most Chinese suppliers out of the U.S. market. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

XRP Consolidates Near $2.28 Amid Slew of Wins for Ripple, XRPL
XRP Consolidates Near $2.28 Amid Slew of Wins for Ripple, XRPL

Yahoo

time8 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

XRP Consolidates Near $2.28 Amid Slew of Wins for Ripple, XRPL

XRP XRP traded in a narrow range over the past 24 hours, consolidating between $2.27 and $2.32 as global trade tensions and diverging central bank policies weighed on investor sentiment. The digital asset demonstrated resilience amid broader market volatility, with strong buying interest emerging at key support levels. News Background Ripple's regulatory wins in Dubai and progress on stablecoin initiatives, such as RLUSD, provide a fundamental tailwind, though traders remain wary amid volatile global conditions. Ondo Finance's Ondo Short-Term U.S. Government Treasuries (OUSG) is now live on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), expanding institutional access to the institutional-grade RWA product onchain. Digital Commercial Paper (DCP), secured by U.S. Treasuries, is now live on the XRP Ledger, enhancing efficiency and accessibility. Administered by Guggenheim Treasury Services, DCP is tokenized and managed through the Zeconomy platform, offering custom maturities up to 397 days. Price Action XRP's price fluctuated between $2.264 and $2.319, representing a 2.37% range that highlights ongoing uncertainty. The token established a high-volume support zone at $2.273-$2.280, where buyers consistently emerged, stabilizing price action despite repeated tests of lower levels. Resistance formed at $2.315, where price rejections occurred during the 11th and 22nd hours, accompanied by above-average volume. In the final hour of trading, XRP experienced a sharp 2.17% decline at 01:55, dropping from $2.285 to $2.280. However, substantial buying volume of 3.9 million units emerged, reinforcing the $2.280 floor. The 01:32 candle showed the highest volume of the session at 1.8 million, confirming buyer interest at lower levels. An ascending support trendline suggests short-term stabilization, with traders eyeing potential breakout scenarios if resistance at $2.315 can be breached. Technical Analysis Recap XRP traded between $2.264 and $2.319, a 2.37% range. High-volume support zone established at $2.273-$2.280, with consistent buyer interest. Resistance formed at $2.315, with multiple price rejections and above-average volume. XRP closed at $2.284, signaling consolidation near the middle of the range. Sharp 2.17% decline at 01:55 (from $2.285 to $2.280) on increased volume. Highest volume observed at 01:32 (1.8M), confirming buyer support at lower levels. Ascending support trendline suggests short-term stabilization and potential breakout if resistance is breached.

Residential solar installer Sunnova files for bankruptcy, plans to sell and wind down operations
Residential solar installer Sunnova files for bankruptcy, plans to sell and wind down operations

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Residential solar installer Sunnova files for bankruptcy, plans to sell and wind down operations

This story was originally published on Utility Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Utility Dive newsletter. Sunnova, the second-largest installer of third-party owned residential solar installations by market share, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy on Sunday. Although the company's customer base and revenue continued to grow, rising interest rates, inflation, tariffs and other factors had eroded the company's profit margins, rendering it unable to pay its debts, President and CEO Paul Mathews said in the bankruptcy filings. Sunnova plans to sell off 'substantially all' of the company's assets and wind-down any remaining operations following the sale, Mathews said. Sunnova said in a Monday announcement following the filing that it will accept bids on its assets and business operations for the next 45 days; after the sale, the company plans to wind-down any remaining operations and close, Mathews said in court filings. The company has already agreed to sell some assets to a holding company that has received $15 million in financing from global investment firm ATLAS SP Partners, and has also agreed to sell other assets from its new homes business unit to builder Lennar Homes for $16 million, according to the company announcement. 'Today's actions mark a critical step towards securing a value-maximizing outcome for Sunnova's stakeholders,' Mathews said in a statement Monday. 'Throughout this process, maintaining continuity of service for our customers is our top priority as we work to secure a long-term solution for our business operations under new ownership.' Matthews said he was 'incredibly grateful to our dedicated Sunnova team for their hard work and commitment. We have built an innovative power provider, and I continue to believe deeply in the future of our industry and the promise of residential solar and storage.' According to the chapter 11 bankruptcy filings, Sunnova faced 'critically tight liquidity' and expected to run out of cash this April or May if it was unable to secure additional financing. However, the company's efforts to find new lenders earlier this year were unsuccessful, a failure Mathews partially attributed in court documents to uncertainty created by Trump's executive order to freeze spending authorized by the Inflation Reduction Act. Although the courts have paused the implementation of that executive order and restored payouts under the act, the uncertainty it created meant lenders were unwilling to provide Sunnova with additional financing, Mathews said. He also said that although Sunnova grew its revenues and quadrupled its customer count between 2020-2024, market factors such as above-target inflation, prolonged high interest rates and tariffs had diminished the company's profitability. The company attempted to cut costs and free up funds to make its growing debt service payments by focusing on lower-risk installations, and by 2025 had shrunk year-over-year net losses by more than 10%, Mathews said. The company also installed new leadership, including Mathews, and laid off 50% of its workforce earlier this year. However, the new strategy was unable to make up for its previous policy of aggressive spending and borrowing in pursuit of rapid growth. By early 2025 the company was unable to pay its dealer network, which caused its contractors to stop work on projects that were in process and further curtailed the company's incoming cash flows, Mathews said. Recommended Reading Utilities' misguided opposition to community solar in California Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store