Man Tells Job Candidate to ‘Shut Up' During Interview After Being Repeatedly Interrupted
A man was pushed to his limits in a job interview and scolded the man he was interviewing
After being interrupted multiple times, the interviewer told the man to "shut up and listen"
People on the internet sided with the interviewer, saying that he told the man being interviewed what he really needed to hearA man revealed on Reddit that he told a job candidate he needed to "shut up and listen" after an exhausting interview.
In the post, the man explained that he and his colleague were "interviewing this guy for a very good software engineering position." The candidate passed the first round, and everyone agreed that he had a great "resume and experience."
"On paper, he had everything we were looking for, and honestly, this looked like a life-changing opportunity for him," the poster explains.
However, when the man showed up for the second interview, he was "very serious and not smiling at all."
After a round of introductions, the man immediately asked if he could tell them a bit about himself.
'He started talking and talking about his personal and professional background. After about three minutes, I jumped in to ask a follow-up question based on something he mentioned. He replied, 'I will answer, just give me a moment,' and continued talking,' the man recalls.
'A coworker jumped in with another question, and he said the same thing to her. But after more than five minutes, I jumped in again with another question. I had to talk over him to do it," the poster adds. "He finally paused and answered, but in such a long-winded way that he ended up veering into another topic."
His coworker then asked another question, and the same thing happened. At this point, the poster "was ready to end the interview," and "tried to politely wrap it up several times, but he was unable to read the room and just kept talking."
Finally, he "raised [his] voice slightly" and asked the man being interviewed if he had any questions for the team, and he did.
However, after each question, the candidate interrupted and found a way to bring the conversation back to himself
"I tried once more to interrupt politely, but he kept talking," the poster explains. "At that point, I was done. I said, 'John, you really have to shut up and listen.' He was surprised, as was my coworker, but he finally stopped talking."
"I continued, 'You walked into this room with a 99 percent chance of getting the job. Now that chance is zero. The only reason is because, in less than fifteen minutes, you've demonstrated that you don't have the capacity to listen at all. So I'm telling you now, you're not getting the job. But if you take anything away from this interview, let it be this: no matter how good you are technically, if you can't listen, you'll never excel in this career.' "
The man being interviewed apologized and asked if they could start again, to which the interviewer declined.
The poster wished the interviewee good luck in his job hunt and encouraged him to "listen" more in the future.
Looking back, he admits he "could have handled that differently," and "feels bad for the guy," but Reddit users suggested it was likely for the best.
'Honestly, he needed to hear it from someone in a position of hiring authority. Sure, his ego may be bruised, but that likely needed to happen,' one person commented.
Another person added, 'You actually gave him more feedback than many people would have.'
Read the original article on People
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Android Authority
5 hours ago
- Android Authority
Nest Aware is getting pricier, but users says the service isn't keeping up
Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority TL;DR Nest Aware users are unhappy about rising prices despite worsening service quality. Users are bringing up issues with broken video history playback, unreliable familiar face detection, and more. Many are switching to alternatives like Ubiquiti or Reolink that offer better reliability and local control without subscription fees. Google recently increased the prices of its Nest Aware and Nest Aware Plus subscriptions, but many users say the service isn't improving to match the higher cost. The standard Nest Aware plan has gone from $8 per month ($80 per year) to $10 per month ($100 per year), while Nest Aware Plus has jumped from $15 per month ($150 per year) to $20 per month ($200 per year). While price increases are very common in tech subscriptions, this one has struck a nerve. Users are frustrated that they're now paying more for a service they feel is becoming less reliable. Just yesterday, we covered growing complaints about the declining performance of Google's smart speakers and hubs. It's clear that Nest camera users are facing similar frustrations, especially judging by reactions in this Reddit thread. How do you feel about the Nest Aware price hike and current service quality? 0 votes I'm fine with the new prices. Nest cameras and Nest Aware still work well for me. NaN % I'm annoyed by the price hike, but I'll stick with Nest cameras and Nest Aware for now. NaN % I'm actively looking for alternatives like Ubiquiti or Reolink. NaN % I've already canceled or plan to cancel Nest Aware soon. NaN % In the r/googlehome community, long-time Nest users are voicing their frustration about Nest Aware features not working despite rising prices. A popular thread titled 'Please explain to me why you're raising my prices when 90% of the time this is what I get when I try to look at the history?' has sparked a chain of comments highlighting the ongoing service problems. One of the biggest complaints is that Nest Aware's video history feature, a major selling point of the subscription, has become very unreliable. Users frequently see 'couldn't load video' errors when trying to review footage. 'It's so bad. It can never load videos. The only supposed improvement since last time they raised prices is the AI stuff, and I still don't have access to it even though I've been in the Public Preview for months,' a user commented in the Reddit thread. Some users are also reporting problems with Google's familiar face detection feature. Nest cameras apparently misidentify people, showing alerts for individuals who haven't been near the house in years, or simply failing to detect anyone. 'The detection used to be good. Now it can't seem to tell who is who anymore. My house constantly has people that I haven't even spoken to in years walking around,' said a user. While Google's Nest services have received several new features, including Gemini smarts, in the recent past, many users say they haven't noticed meaningful improvements, especially to the Nest Aware service. Instead, there's a general feeling that the platform is stagnating and neglected. Rita El Khoury / Android Authority Many Nest camera users are looking elsewhere for their security camera needs. Brands like Ubiquiti, with its UniFi Protect surveillance system, and Reolink are gaining traction among former Nest customers. People are praising these Nest cam alternatives for their reliability and freedom from recurring subscription fees. Ubiquiti users especially appreciate the integration with Home Assistant, allowing for greater customization and privacy control. One such user who switched to Ubiquiti said, 'I didn't even bother to sell my Nest cameras. I just gave them away for free. I moved over to Ubiquiti Protect cameras. They are 100% reliable and 100% less headaches. Now I'm almost all on Home Assistant.' Meanwhile, some users who aren't ready to leave just yet say they are preparing to cancel their Nest Aware subscriptions before the next renewal cycle. How has your experience been with Nest Aware and Nest cameras in general? Take our poll and let us know in the comments section. Got a tip? Talk to us! Email our staff at Email our staff at news@ . You can stay anonymous or get credit for the info, it's your choice.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Krispy Kreme Rocketed Higher Today
Key Points Meme stock fever appears to have come back into the market over the past couple of days. Meme traders target heavily shorted stocks in hopes of generating a squeeze. The beaten-down Krispy Kreme appears to be a current meme stock favorite. 10 stocks we like better than Krispy Kreme › Shares of doughnut-slinger Krispy Kreme (NASDAQ: DNUT) rocketed 26.7% in Tuesday trading, after the stock appears to have been caught up in a new round of meme stock fever. Meme stocks are beaten-down stocks with a high short interest, which retail investors on message boards such as Reddit target for purchase in hopes of generating a short squeeze. Krispy Kreme, along with several other names, is soaring today as part of a current meme stock cohort, it seems. No news and a 26% gain is a dangerous combination There wasn't any new news to speak of regarding Krispy Kreme. In fact, the most recent news hasn't been good at all. Back in May, the company's first-quarter report was rather dismal, leading the company to cut its dividend and end its partnership with McDonald's, which proved to be unprofitable for Krispy Kreme. The company's debt has grown to $935 million, and the doughnut maker is unprofitable on a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis in the wake of softer-than-anticipated demand this year. As a result, Krispy Kreme's short interest had increased to 14.2% of shares outstanding, but a higher 26.4% of its publicly traded float, as of June 30. That's a high-enough short interest, especially in a lower-float stock, to cause a big move on a surge of unexpected buying. And it appears meme stock traders happened to target Krispy Kreme today. In addition to Krispy Kreme, it appears beaten-down, scandal-plagued retailer Kohl's (NYSE: KSS) was also a meme trade target, with that stock up 38% on the day as well. Meme stock trading isn't for the faint of heart For those tantalized by the massive gains in a short amount of time, please realize that meme stock trading is highly risky, and that the quick gains of today can fade just as quickly. At the Motley Fool, we preach long-term investing in high-quality companies, a strategy that has shown long-term outperformance without the risks, headaches, and taxes inherent in trying to time volatile short-term trades on lower-quality stocks. So unless you are a meme investor by trade, I'd recommend staying away from Krispy Kreme unless you think a genuine turnaround at the business level is within sight. As of now, that turnaround isn't anywhere to be seen. Should you invest $1,000 in Krispy Kreme right now? Before you buy stock in Krispy Kreme, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Krispy Kreme wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $665,092!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,050,477!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,055% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Billy Duberstein and/or his clients has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Krispy Kreme Rocketed Higher Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Forbes
11 hours ago
- Forbes
Meme Stocks Are Back And Retail Is About To Get Burned Again
CHINA - 2023/08/31: In this photo illustration, the Reddit logo is displayed in the Apple App Store ... More on an iPhone. (Photo Illustration by Sheldon Cooper/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) They're back. It's not the businesses making a comeback; it's the same reckless behavior wrapped in new tickers. Meme stocks are ripping on no news, no turnaround, just vibes, and short interest déjà vu from 2021. Kohl's surged nearly 40%, not because of earnings, not because of strategy, but because some folks online decided it should. That's all it takes now. Retail's lit again. But scroll the forums, and it's all heat, no floor, no fundamentals. If this feels familiar, it should. GameStop. AMC. Bed Bath & Beyond. We've seen how this plays out. The move looks smart, until it isn't. And the fall is usually as sharp as the rise. But this isn't about Kohl's. It's not even about stocks. It's about memory. Or lack of it. The meme resurgence tells us less about opportunity and more about the refusal to learn. Investors aren't just repeating a trade; they're repeating a mistake. This isn't a rerun of a trade. It's a rerun of a train wreck and if you know where to look, the signs are everywhere. What Meme Stocks Did To Retail Last Time We don't need to guess how this plays out. We've already lived it. Back in August 2023, I laid it bare in Why You're Almost Guaranteed to Lose Money Trading GameStop, AMC & Other Meme Stocks. The pattern was clear: online hype caught fire, retail flooded in late, and institutional money used the wave to cash out. Social chatter turned into FOMO flows. Stocks surged. Then came the rug pull. Most retail traders weren't early; they were ammunition. They bought the highs and sold the pain. Meanwhile, professionals, armed with liquidity and exit plans, let the frenzy work for them. GameStop soared above $480 at its peak. Today, it trades under $30. AMC touched $72. It now limps below $5. That's not 'hold the line' loyalty. That's capital destruction. And yet, with the same names trending again, the crowd looks ready to walk into the fire a second time. The Real Lessons From The Meme Stock Bubble The meme stock bubble wasn't just a wild moment—it was a classroom. And in my January 2024 piece, What We Learned From The Stock Market Meme Bubble, the takeaways were clear. First: narrative is not strategy. A good story might move price in the short term, but it doesn't anchor value. Second: short interest, while flashy, is not a catalyst. It's a setup, not a reason to buy. Third, and maybe most crucial: community isn't capital. Online unity might create a movement, but it doesn't replace liquidity or discipline. And finally, behavioral traps ruled the day, confirmation bias, herd mentality, and the illusion of control all played leading roles. As I wrote then: 'Retail got a taste of power—and then a dose of reality.' The lessons were there in plain sight. Anyone willing to step back from the noise could see the cracks forming. But in every mania, reason is the first casualty. And now, as the same trades cycle back into fashion, we're finding out just how few people were paying attention. AMC What's Happening Now We're seeing the signs again. This time it's Kohl's. The stock jumped nearly 40% in a single session on absolutely nothing. No earnings release. No new strategic plan. No operational inflection. Just movement. And in 2024, that's all it takes to light up Reddit threads and X timelines with déjà vu-level energy: 'Squeeze coming.' 'Institutions are scared.' 'This is the next GameStop.' According to Barron's, it's meme traders driving the action, again using short interest as a battle cry, not a risk signal. And that's the issue. The crowd sees a high short float and mistakes it for an opportunity, not a warning. The irony? The very setup they're piling into is the one institution are often waiting to sell into. What's changed since 2021? Not much, except now there's no stimulus check liquidity, no novelty in zero commissions, and far less of a surprise factor. What's left? Noise with no fuel. Urgency built on fumes. As I warned in my May 2024 piece, The Risk Of Losing Big On GameStop And Other Meme Stocks: 'Retail investors often confuse movement with meaning. Just because a stock moves doesn't mean it's moving for you.' This time may look familiar, but the backdrop is very different. And when the music stops, it won't be the short sellers left standing without a chair. The Psychology Driving Meme Stock FOMO This latest meme stock wave isn't driven by analysis; it's driven by psychology. Recency bias leads traders to believe that because a squeeze happened once, it will happen again. Survivorship bias keeps them focused on the few who struck it rich last time, not the thousands who got burned. Add in community bias where being part of the crowd feels like validation and you've got a cocktail for poor decision-making. What's really fueling this is social reinforcement. TikTok clips showing fake P&L gains. X posts hyping charts with no context. The illusion of credibility from anonymous accounts shouting conviction. It's all theater. And with every like, share, and comment, that group think spreads. What's missing? Due diligence. Valuation. Anything resembling a thesis beyond 'shorts will cover.' This isn't investing. It's a TikTok trend with margin calls. The danger isn't just that these trades unravel. It's that the behavior behind them keeps getting rewarded by attention, not outcome. And when the feedback loop breaks, the fallout is real. The Structural Problem Even when meme stocks spike, most traders don't win. The reason isn't just timing; it's structure. Liquidity vanishes at the top. Platforms freeze. Bid-ask spreads widen. Right when you should sell, conviction freezes. Hesitation takes over. Emotion takes over. No plan, no discipline, just the hope it'll go higher. Nail the entry? Great. Now try getting out before the bid vanishes. These trades sell the illusion of repeatability. But the structure doesn't support the outcome. Most retail investors are playing a game where the rules shift mid-trade. The system isn't built for fast exits or disciplined decision-making at scale. And that's the catch: meme stocks promise outsized gains but offer little in terms of practical execution. By the time you hear the alarm, the exits are already jammed. That's the meme stock playbook. It's hard to win when the game isn't designed for you to leave with chips. What's Next For Meme Stocks: A Familiar Trap We've seen this script before and it doesn't end well. Here's what's likely next. One or two meme names pop, and Kohl's is already on that path. Maybe Bed Bath & Beyond will return from the dead via some illiquid microcaps. Social media does the rest. Reddit threads light up. TikTok gets flooded with charts and rocket emojis. 'The squeeze is on.' Retail starts piling in. FOMO kicks in hard. Flows accelerate. Then the air starts thinning. Liquidity evaporates. The same volatility that attracted traders begins to repel them. Without fundamentals or fresh capital, prices collapse under their own weight. Retail holds the bag, again. The difference this time? The players who won last time weren't even on the field. Institutions aren't surprised. Market makers are prepared. There's no novelty here, just a rerun. But it's a rerun with worse odds. No stimulus tailwind. No surprise factor. No second wave of liquidity. This isn't momentum. It's old muscle twitching in a dead trade. And those hoping for a different ending are ignoring the script. The Meme Stock Sequel Will End the Same Way Meme stocks aren't back because the fundamentals changed. They're back because memory faded and the crowd got bored. That's not opportunity; it's risk in disguise. In any greater fool game, the last one is the one who loses most. So, take this as a warning, not a headline to chase. Just because stocks are moving doesn't mean they're moving toward profit. Ask anyone who is still holding AMC. You've seen this movie before, and the ending didn't change. And like every sequel, this one's got the same ending, just fewer people left to cheer.