Man Tells Job Candidate to ‘Shut Up' During Interview After Being Repeatedly Interrupted
A man was pushed to his limits in a job interview and scolded the man he was interviewing
After being interrupted multiple times, the interviewer told the man to "shut up and listen"
People on the internet sided with the interviewer, saying that he told the man being interviewed what he really needed to hearA man revealed on Reddit that he told a job candidate he needed to "shut up and listen" after an exhausting interview.
In the post, the man explained that he and his colleague were "interviewing this guy for a very good software engineering position." The candidate passed the first round, and everyone agreed that he had a great "resume and experience."
"On paper, he had everything we were looking for, and honestly, this looked like a life-changing opportunity for him," the poster explains.
However, when the man showed up for the second interview, he was "very serious and not smiling at all."
After a round of introductions, the man immediately asked if he could tell them a bit about himself.
'He started talking and talking about his personal and professional background. After about three minutes, I jumped in to ask a follow-up question based on something he mentioned. He replied, 'I will answer, just give me a moment,' and continued talking,' the man recalls.
'A coworker jumped in with another question, and he said the same thing to her. But after more than five minutes, I jumped in again with another question. I had to talk over him to do it," the poster adds. "He finally paused and answered, but in such a long-winded way that he ended up veering into another topic."
His coworker then asked another question, and the same thing happened. At this point, the poster "was ready to end the interview," and "tried to politely wrap it up several times, but he was unable to read the room and just kept talking."
Finally, he "raised [his] voice slightly" and asked the man being interviewed if he had any questions for the team, and he did.
However, after each question, the candidate interrupted and found a way to bring the conversation back to himself
"I tried once more to interrupt politely, but he kept talking," the poster explains. "At that point, I was done. I said, 'John, you really have to shut up and listen.' He was surprised, as was my coworker, but he finally stopped talking."
"I continued, 'You walked into this room with a 99 percent chance of getting the job. Now that chance is zero. The only reason is because, in less than fifteen minutes, you've demonstrated that you don't have the capacity to listen at all. So I'm telling you now, you're not getting the job. But if you take anything away from this interview, let it be this: no matter how good you are technically, if you can't listen, you'll never excel in this career.' "
The man being interviewed apologized and asked if they could start again, to which the interviewer declined.
The poster wished the interviewee good luck in his job hunt and encouraged him to "listen" more in the future.
Looking back, he admits he "could have handled that differently," and "feels bad for the guy," but Reddit users suggested it was likely for the best.
'Honestly, he needed to hear it from someone in a position of hiring authority. Sure, his ego may be bruised, but that likely needed to happen,' one person commented.
Another person added, 'You actually gave him more feedback than many people would have.'
Read the original article on People
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman Backs Out of Group Trip. Now, Her Friends Want Her to Cover Everyone's Financial Loss
After pulling out of a group trip for personal reasons, a woman finds herself at odds with friends who now expect her to take on the entire financial loss A woman seeks advice from the Reddit community following a dispute with two friends over a canceled Airbnb trip. The original plan was simple: three friends would be splitting a $600 rental, each contributing $200, with one friend, referred to as Friend A, paying the full amount upfront. "Friend A was the one who made the reservation and paid in full so that me and friend B would give A our share ($200.00 each) later," the woman writes in her post. But plans changed when she decided not to go anymore, citing "personal and safety reasons." Although the rental host "would only give a 50% refund" if they canceled, "both friend A and friend B still wanted to go." Even though she backed out, the poster told her friends that she'd honor her part of the agreement. 'I said if they still wanted to go I would give my share ($200.00) since I took the responsibility of being part of it before,' she explains. However, things took a turn when Friend A demanded more than just her original share. "Friend A said that I should pay $300.00 because I was the one who didn't want to go, not them, and if they were to cancel it that would be the total loss," she explains. The poster didn't agree that she should be paying more than her portion, especially since the trip was still scheduled to move forward without her. 'Why would I pay for half of the trip when is not even canceled yet?' she questions, pushing back on what she saw as an unfair request. Friend A then mentioned they would try to invite someone else to take her spot. But they made it clear that if that person declined, the poster would be expected to cover the full $300 shortfall. The next day, Friend A messaged again with an update. 'They informed me that the other person they invited did not want to go and that they had cancelled the house,' the woman writes, adding that Friend A also sent proof of a refund. Now, with the Airbnb officially canceled, Friend A insisted she should be held fully responsible for the loss. 'They expected that I paid the full amount of $300.00 because I backed out first,' she explains, even though both friends ultimately decided not to go. What made the situation even more frustrating was Friend A's refusal to ask Friend B for their share "because they too wanted to go." "I told them that if they ask for person's B share or not is not my problem, my only responsibility now is paying my part," the woman replied. To her, the fair thing would be for everyone to pay based on the final outcome. 'Now that the refund was made I believe that the correct amount for each person to pay is $100.00,' she argues, since the Airbnb host only refunded 50% of the $600 total. She reiterates that she never asked the group to cancel. 'I never forced them to not go but actually said I would still pay MY part in full and they chose not to go,' she writes. From her perspective, she upheld her end of the plan, and what they did afterward was out of her hands. Despite the pushback from Friend A, she decided to settle what she believed was fair. 'I refused and sent $105.00 for my share and told them that was my share and that it would be all I was going to pay,' she shares, sticking firmly to her decision. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. In an edit to the post, the woman shared that Friend A's "reasoning for not going through with the trip was because they didn't want to split food and gas into 2, but 3." Adding yet another layer of tension to the story, the poster revealed that the friend initially "wanted a bigger and prettier house that could fit 4-5 people, but I didn't want that one because it was too expensive (about $850)." The situation left her feeling stuck, unsure if setting boundaries over what she owes makes her selfish or simply fair. But one thing she's certain of is this: 'My only responsibility now is paying my part.' Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
CNET
2 hours ago
- CNET
New Speed Test Results Reveal the Fastest Internet Service Provider in the US
There's been a lot of talk about internet speed lately. From various company taglines -- "Don't take slow for an answer" -- to the latest news about Japan's internet data transmission record, it's all about the speed. This week, Ookla released its Speedtest Connectivity Report for the first six months of 2025, and AT&T Fiber topped the list as the country's fastest fixed internet service provider. (Ookla is owned by the same parent company as CNET, Ziff Davis.) What does that mean? Does it tell us that AT&T offers the fastest internet plan available to customers nationwide? No. This report doesn't look at an ISP's top speed (the fastest plan the company offers), but instead considers the average internet speed that subscribers experience across all levels of the provider's plans. Many variables exist (including the internet connection type), so when you sign up for internet service, you shouldn't assume AT&T will always be your fastest option. That said, Ookla's report shows AT&T Fiber at the top of its charts, registering a median download speed of just over 363 megabits per second in tests collected by Ookla from January through June 2025. It's the third Ookla speedtest report in a row (going back to the first half of 2024) in which AT&T Fiber has claimed the pole position. Overall, AT&T Fiber led Ookla's report with a 78.33 Speed Score, a unique metric the company uses to consider a provider's download and upload speeds and latency. Frontier Fiber, which is in the process of being purchased by Verizon, came close to nudging AT&T out of first place, recording a median download speed of 359Mbps and notching a Speed Score of 78.30. Third place was held by Verizon Fios, the company's own fiber internet service, while the cable internet providers Cox, Xfinity and Spectrum rounded out the rest of Ookla's list. Ookla Ookla is an internet speed-test company that collects data via its tool, which gathers insights from millions of daily customer uses. CNET frequently uses those findings to help inform our internet service provider reviews, as well as our city and state geo pages. Locating local internet providers Why do we care about speed tests? In CNET's ISP reviews, we stress that speed test data can be a helpful diagnostic tool -- a snapshot of your internet connection performance at any given moment. For example, it can help you pinpoint when and where your connection may be laggy. But it's not an exact science. Many things can affect a speed test, including whether or not you're using Wi-Fi or a hardwired Ethernet connection, the time of day you're running the test and so on. To be included in Ookla's Speedtest Connectivity Report, an ISP must appear in 3% or more of the data collected during the six-month window. That means some fiber-optic internet providers across the country might perform especially well, but if they're more regional and unable to hit that 3% minimum share of the national market, they won't appear in the top. Google Fiber is a good example. It was the fastest provider in nine of the country's top 100 cities (second only to AT&T Fiber), but it didn't reach enough households to meet Ookla's mark for national inclusion. Yes, nabbing the top spot is certainly something a company like AT&T can brag about. Last year, after the first of its three wins in a row, CEO John Stankey said in a press release, "The Ookla results confirm what we already knew in the market: the fiber experience wins by a mile. Pair our award-winning fiber with the largest wireless network in North America, and AT&T is the clear choice to connect customers anytime, anywhere.' But just because a company wins kudos as the fastest ISP in the country -- or a particular state or city -- doesn't automatically make it the best internet provider for you. Though AT&T Fiber places highly in CNET's overall ISP rankings (and is tied with T-Mobile 5G Home Internet for the highest score among all internet providers in the most recent American Customer Satisfaction Index report), it might not be available in your area. There may also be a smaller or more regional provider that might make more sense for you. Speed test results can be important factors when choosing a broadband provider, but they shouldn't be your only consideration.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
This Bitcoin Millionaire Says 25 BTC Is The Magic Number For Early Retirement—But The Math Tells A Different Story
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. A growing movement of crypto holders believes 25 Bitcoin could fund early retirement, but the psychology behind this thinking reveals something deeper about work, money, and financial independence. Forget the traditional 401(k) and decades-long career ladder. A new generation of investors is betting that 25 Bitcoin—currently worth around $2.5 million—represents their ticket to financial freedom. But dig deeper into online Bitcoin communities, and you'll discover this isn't really about retirement at all. The New Definition of 'Enough' 'There is no universal answer to how much Bitcoin is enough to retire,' explains one longtime Bitcoin holder. The magic number varies wildly based on geography, lifestyle, and age. While some claim 1 Bitcoin suffices in lower-cost countries, others insist even 25 Bitcoin wouldn't make them stop working entirely. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . The disconnect reveals a fundamental shift in how younger investors think about money and work. Traditional retirement planning focuses on replacing 70%-80% of working income through savings and pensions. But the Bitcoin retirement movement has coined new terms like FINE, or Financially Independent, Next Endeavor, and FISIAD, or Financially Independent, Sleep In As Desired, that prioritize choice over complete work cessation. Beyond the Numbers Game What's fascinating isn't the specific Bitcoin targets—which range from optimistic an 1 BTC to an astronomical 1,000 BTC but the underlying philosophy. Many Bitcoin advocates describe their goal not as traditional retirement, but as freedom to pursue meaningful work without financial pressure. 'Work is awesome and can be very fulfilling IF you are doing what you love to do,' notes one community member. Others fantasize about everything from becoming a 'Costco greeter' who can 'screw around with people all day' to buying elephants and tigers (quickly realizing the upkeep costs might exceed expectations). This playful approach masks serious frustrations with traditional employment. The desire to 'rage quit in front of everyone' or develop a 'complete [don't give a f*ck] attitude' at work reflects broader dissatisfaction with modern work culture. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. The Fiat Dilemma Here's where Bitcoin retirement gets complicated. Many holders face what communities call the 'fiat brain' dilemma—after years of believing Bitcoin represents the future of money, why would you sell it for traditional currencies or assets? This creates a psychological trap. Capital gains taxes make spending Bitcoin directly impractical in many jurisdictions, forcing holders to convert to fiat currencies they philosophically distrust. The solution for many involves careful withdrawal strategies: 'slow bleed selling no more than 0.01 [Bitcoin] every 2 weeks or so,' as one investor describes their approach. Reality Check for Investors Financial advisors watching this trend note several concerns. The 4% withdrawal rule—a cornerstone of traditional retirement planning—assumes diversified portfolios, not concentrated cryptocurrency positions. Bitcoin's volatility makes it unsuitable as a sole retirement vehicle for most investors. Moreover, the social and psychological aspects of early retirement often go unconsidered. 'Quitting your job will make you age fast,' warns one Bitcoin holder, while others worry about losing professional connections and Deeper Truth Perhaps the Bitcoin retirement movement's real value isn't in the specific dollar amounts or withdrawal strategies, but in forcing a broader conversation about work-life balance and financial priorities. When 23-year-olds seriously plan for financial independence, it suggests something broken in traditional career paths. The '25 Bitcoin dream' functions less like a practical retirement plan and more like a compass pointing toward alternative life arrangements. Whether that compass leads to actual financial freedom—or just expensive fantasies about elephant ownership—depends largely on understanding the difference between wishful thinking and sound financial planning. For most investors, the lesson isn't about accumulating specific Bitcoin amounts, but about clearly defining what financial independence actually means beyond the numbers. Read Next: 7,000+ investors have joined Timeplast's mission to eliminate microplastics— Image: Imagn Images This article This Bitcoin Millionaire Says 25 BTC Is The Magic Number For Early Retirement—But The Math Tells A Different Story originally appeared on
