EXCLUSIVE Kevin Spacey returns to the spotlight to receive award and slams Hollywood 'blacklist' culture during speech at Cannes gala - as it's claimed he is 'not welcome at the Film Festival'
The controversial actor, 65, who was cleared of sexual assault on four men two years ago, took the opportunity to slam 'blacklisting' in Hollywood.
Spacey was honoured on Tuesday at a gala hosted by the Better World Fund as he continued his return to the public eye after a lengthy UK trial in 2023 which cleared him of the allegations.
Spacey, who is making his first visit to Cannes since 2016 to promote his new film, The Awakening, was 'recognised not only for his decades of artistic brilliance but also his enduring impact on cinema and the arts,' according to a statement.
The gala is not an official part of the French film festival but the Carlton Hotel plays host to much of the activities during the prestigious event in Cannes.
And now The Telegraph reports that the film festival had not extended an invitation to Spacey and organisers have denied any involvement with the actor.
A statement by the event's organisers said he was attending an event with 'no affiliation whatsoever to the festival'.
It said: 'The Festival de Cannes had no involvement in, and was not informed of, either the invitation extended to Mr Spacey or the award presented during this private event.'
As he took to the stage at the event to accept his award he blasted Hollywood's 'blacklisted culture' in his speech.
He thanked President and Founder of The Better World Fund Manuel Collas de La Roche in his speech.
He said: 'I want to thank Manuel, founder of the Better World Fund. What a great name. That an organization focused on doing good around the world is called a Better World. But they aren't just doing good in name alone. And tonight demonstrates that they are even willing to take risks in doing better.
'Since being here tonight is very personal to me, I would like to congratulate Manuel for the decision to invite me here tonight to accept this award. I mean, who would have ever thought that honoring someone who has been exonerated in every single courtroom he's ever walked into would be thought of as a brave idea?
'But here we are. I've been thinking about someone else who did what he could to make this a better world, and that was someone you saw earlier on the screen tonight, Kirk Douglas, a great American film star.
'Now, it was a long, long time ago, so we have to try to remember the pushback that he received after he made the brave decision to stand up for a fellow colleague, the two-time Oscar-winning screenwriter Dalton Trumbo, who had been blacklisted.
'From 1947 until 1960, he was blacklisted. Blacklisted, we know what that means, right?
'It means that he could not find work as a writer in Hollywood for 13 years. But even after he was warned that if he tried to hire Trumbo as the credited screenwriter for the film, Sparticus, in 1960, he would be called a commi-lover, and his career and professional status would be canceled.
'We get to fight the bad guys and stand up for justice. But in real life, the choices are not always so clear. There are times when one has to stand up for principle. I have learned a lot from history. It very often repeats itself. The blacklist was a terrible time in our industry, but we must learn from it so that it never happens again.
'Ye Kirk said those words in 2014 when he was 98 years old.
'And of course, people know about Dalton Trumbull and the Hollywood 10, but I suspect very few of you know or have ever heard of the 475 other industry professionals whose lives were damaged or destroyed by false allegations, and they, too, were unable to find work in Hollywood during that very lengthy dark period.
'And today, we find ourselves once again at the intersection of uncertainty and fear in the film business and beyond.'
Since 2017, more than 30 men have accused the two-time Oscar-winning actor of sexual assault or inappropriate behaviour, which led to Netflix axing his role on House of Cards.
In July 2023, the American Beauty star was found not guilty of assaulting four men after a four-week trial at Southwark Crown Court, in one of the UK's most high-profile #MeToo trials.
The decision to celebrate Spacey by Better World Fund, a charity which aims to make a 'positive impact on the world', has sparked outrage, with many calling it a 'disgrace' to the MeToo movement.
One person on X wrote: 'Abusive men in our society are never 'cancelled' - honestly losing my mind Cannes.'
Another added: 'Cannes sh**s the bed every year. Their commitment to being the worst festival and a safe haven for men who belong in hell is unmatched.'
While one person wrote: 'Kevin Spacey, Ezra Miller, Shia Labeouf and every other Hollywood abuser known to mankind prancing around Cannes but somehow nude and voluminous dresses were the real problem.'
It comes months after the actor was hit with another sexual abuse claim, court records show, 18 months after he was cleared of a series of criminal charges.
Ruari Cannon is suing Mr Spacey at the High Court, as well as two organisations connected to the Old Vic Theatre in London.
Dushal Mehta, of law firm Fieldfisher, confirmed that he had issued a claim on behalf of Mr Cannon, and also said that he had waived his anonymity in the claim.
No details of the allegations involved are currently available.
Spacey was previously acquitted in criminal proceedings of several sexual offences alleged by four men between 2001 and 2013.
One of the men, who cannot be identified, has also sued Mr Spacey over his claims he was sexually assaulted by the actor and suffered 'psychiatric damage', which the actor denies.
The actor has denied all allegations of inappropriate behaviour and criminal wrongdoing.
Spacey's Academy Awards were for best supporting actor for The Usual Suspects in 1996 and best actor in 2000 for American Beauty, which also secured him a Bafta for leading actor.
Last April, the actor appeared to dismiss claims of inappropriate behaviour in Channel 4's documentary as he praised the men in the show for their 'great acting'.
Channel 4's two-part series came nine months after Mr Spacey was cleared of nine sexual assault charges and looked at fresh claims against him made by several men, 'almost all of whom have never spoken before'.
It is said to take a 'forensic look at a man who was once one of the most admired and respected actors in the world'.
But Mr Spacey seemed to disregard the show as a work of fiction in a statement given to entertainment magazine Variety.
He said: 'I'm honoured to be starring in my first film with Warner Brothers in many years.
'I hope the Academy takes note of some of the great acting by the lesser-known cast.'
In May 2024, he thanked his fellow actors for defending him amidst the sexual abuse allegations.
A raft of A-listers - including Liam Neeson and Sharon Stone - rallied around the Oscar-winning star to call for an end to his 'seven-year exile'.
The American Beauty actor went on NewsNation with Chris Cuomo to express his gratitude for the support he received from colleagues.
'I'm enormously gratified that friends of mine who reached out to me and that I've been speaking to for your years now have been motivated by this documentary that was put out.'
Fresh allegations were made against him in a new Channel 4 bombshell documentary - and Mr Spacey accused the broadcaster of 'having an agenda' in deciding to go ahead with airing its two-part film, Spacey Unmasked.
Channel 4's two-part series came nine months after he was cleared of nine sexual assault charges and looked at fresh claims against him made by several men
The documentary featured previously unheard testimonies about the actor's alleged inappropriate behaviour.
In an interview with former GB News presenter Dan Wootton, he commented on claims made in an upcoming Channel 4 documentary.
While accepting he may at times have behaved inappropriately in the past, he denied his behaviour was illegal.
Mr Spacey has been cleared of sexual assault in trials in the US and UK.
'I take full responsibility for my past behaviour and my actions. But I cannot and will not take responsibility or apologise to anyone who's made up stuff about me or exaggerated stories about me.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Gregg Wallace's replacement for final MasterChef episodes revealed
Gregg Wallace is set to be replaced by Irish chef Anna Haugh towards the end of the new MasterChef 2025 series. This decision follows an independent report substantiating 45 allegations against Wallace, including inappropriate sexual language and unwelcome physical contact. Co-host John Torode also had an allegation of racist language upheld against him, which he denies recalling. The BBC controversially decided to broadcast the 2025 series, stating it was to recognise the efforts of the amateur cooks involved. Anna Haugh will take over from Wallace after the semi-finals, while Grace Dent has already replaced him on the next series of Celebrity MasterChef.
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
With TWO disgraced presenters, BBC decision to air MasterChef is an insult to all of us and a slap in the face to everyone who has been belittled and abused on the show, says CHRISTOPHER STEVENS
How bad do things have to get before the BBC does the right thing and bins MasterChef? The return of the long-running culinary contest, after the sacking of its disgraced presenters Gregg Wallace and John Torode, is an insult to licence-payers and a slap in the face for all the participants and crew who have been belittled and abused over the years. Series 21 is to air in full, supposedly because cancelling it would be unfair to this year's 60 contestants – even though one of them, Sarah Shafi, called for it to be axed. Instead, she was edited out of the show, a move that left her 'flabbergasted'. After watching the first episode, I'm flabbergasted too. It's as though the production company, Banijay, has watched the playbacks and thought: 'Don't panic! There's at least an hour of footage where Gregg has his trousers on and John says nothing racist. We're good to go!' If you've sidestepped the furore leading up to this broadcast, you might suppose I'm being facetious. But the extraordinary truth is that, following multiple complaints, Banijay carried out an investigation into Wallace's behaviour. The majority of the 83 allegations against him related to 'inappropriate' sexual language and humour – though that raises another question of whether the producers think sexual remarks and jokes are ever appropriate on a TV set. Perhaps they don't understand that 'food porn' has nothing to do with nudity. Wallace certainly didn't. Of the 45 complaints against him upheld, one related to 'unwelcome physical contact' and three to being 'in a state of undress'. In the course of their enquiries, Banijay also learned that Torode had used a racist slur. Despite protesting their innocence, both men were dropped from the show... and yet, here we are, with Wallace and Torode once again the judges. I do not believe for a second that BBC executives feel compelled to air the series as a favour to contestants, as the Corporation has suggested. The TV industry is not that sentimental. It's much more likely to be about money. The Beeb has paid for MasterChef and now it wants its pound of flesh, lightly seared and served on a bed of herby potatoes with a scatter of grated walnuts. Even now, it is entirely within the BBC's power to cancel the series. The Government would certainly support that, as would its union paymasters. Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy says she won't be watching. Downing Street has welcomed the BBC's decision to 'sever ties' with Wallace. And the broadcasting union Bectu has said the presenters 'should not be rewarded with prime-time coverage'. There is strong precedent, too. BBC One removed episodes of The Repair Shop from its schedule last year after presenter Jay Blades was charged with coercive and controlling behaviour against his estranged wife. Series 21 is to air in full, supposedly because cancelling it would be unfair to this year's 60 contestants – even though one of them called for it to be axed The majority of the 83 allegations against Wallace related to 'inappropriate' sexual language and humour – though that raises another question of whether the producers think sexual remarks and jokes are ever appropriate on a TV set Yet dozens remain on iPlayer, even though Blades faced two much more serious charges of rape this week. Whether he will be edited out of old episodes if found guilty, the BBC has not said. It has to be emphasised, of course, that neither Wallace nor Torode has faced a police investigation, much less criminal charges. Yet, strict action has been taken over other controversies. In 2020, Sky chiefs were horrified to realise a heavily tattooed contestant on a forthcoming reality show was actually flaunting neo-Nazi symbols. It was only when trailers for woodworking competition, The Chop, featured contestant Darren Lumsden that social media users pointed out that elements of his body art were coded displays of support for Adolf Hitler and white supremacy. Sky could have fudged the issue. Instead, they did the right thing. The Chop got the chop. The BBC lacks the common sense to follow suit. Its solution is to sieve out all but the blandest moments featuring Wallace and Torode. We see them asking innocuous questions about dishes and then grinning silently at the answers. Almost all his cheesy banter has gone. As a result, the hour is as tepid and flavourless as the water strained from a pan of spaghetti. The judges might as well be a pair of AI robots. And if MasterChef is to continue, perhaps that would be the Beeb's safest option.
The Sun
21 minutes ago
- The Sun
As 2 high street giants are rapped for using ‘unhealthily thin' models… are fat jabs to blame for return of heroin chic?
AN unwelcome fashion trend has reared its ugly head again this season – heroin chic. With weight-loss drugs such as Ozempic becoming more popular, two major high street retailers have recently had images of models banned for being ' unhealthily thin '. 8 8 This week Zara was rapped by the Advertising Standards Authority for using a model in a white silk top and trousers who appeared to be 'gaunt' and showing 'protruding' collarbones. It came after Marks & Spencer was branded 'irresponsible' by the regulator for photographing a model in a white top and black jeans, emphasising the 'slenderness of her legs'. In fairness to M&S, and in my professional opinion, the model was shot at a bizarre angle from above, giving her alien-like skinny pins and a big head. But where are the bigwigs at Marks & Spencer who should be saying, 'Erm, she looks a bit thin — let's ditch that pic'? Retailers, their owners and employers have a responsibility to make sure their models are not being misrepresented and seen to be promoting aspirational fashion in a bad way. Sadly, models' figures that were once out of reach for us normal folk are now more attainable than ever, thanks to Ozempic and other fat jab treatments. For me, it is sickening to recall the Nineties and Noughties era of skeletal celebrities, such as that god-awful image of Nicole Richie running down the beach looking emaciated, or even a young Kate Moss with her hip bones barely holding up her Calvin Klein underwear. But the tide turned around 2012 when the stick-thin look was no longer considered ideal — and one woman who doesn't get enough praise for that is Kim Kardashian. With her thighs, boobs and bum, Kim alongside her sisters brought a new body image to the forefront of popular culture which embraced curves. Her extreme dieting to fit into Marilyn Monroe 's clothes may have landed her in hot water for setting a bad example, but she did a lot for making a curvy body sexy and aspirational. Lizzo shows off her amazing Ozempic weight loss as she poses in swimsuit after finally revealing truth Fast forward to today and its bye-bye booty, with Kim, Khloe and Kylie Jenner wasting away before our very eyes with their ultra-toned arms and tiny waists. The body positivity movement peaked around 2015 when curvy models Felicity Hayward, Ashley Graham and Paloma Elsesser graced catwalks and ad campaigns to represent the majority of women (for context, the UK's average dress size is 16). But the box-ticking and virtue-signalling didn't last long. 8 8 8 According to fashion data analysts TagWalk, only four of the top 20 brands featured during fashion week for Spring/Summer this year used curvy models. Even fashion bible Vogue is becoming wary of how slim catwalk stars are looking, stating: 'We are facing a worrying return to using extremely thin models.' Since the fat jab boom began, celebrities and influencers have been glamourising the need to be thin. 'It is a widespread shift and it is depressing' A-list celebrities that were the first lot to get their mitts on Ozempic and Mounjaro suddenly shrank and conveniently put it down to that age-old line 'a healthy lifestyle'. Even singer Lizzo, who was known for embracing her curves, has been discussing her weight loss with Women's Health magazine this week. The 37-year-old Juice hitmaker has previously admitted she tried Ozempic but now credits working out to being the reason for dropping a few dress sizes. She says: 'Body positivity is the radical act of daring to exist loudly and proudly' but adds, 'I like how I look now.' Fair enough. You do whatever you want to do, Lizzo. But it is ironic that despite being proud of her curvier self before, she prefers how she looks now. In 2023, US actress Mindy Kaling dramatically slimmed down, saying she had a new commitment to health and fitness. Pull the other one Mindy. We're not stupid. But at least she isn't a loud and proud spokesperson for body positivity — curvy influencers are. Women who have built an entire following, reputation and career around not being stick thin and celebrating loving every part of themselves — whilst insisting that you should do so too — are now turning their backs on all the female fans who have built them up. The same famous women who claimed that their curvy body was normal and have maintained a healthy lifestyle their whole career are now putting their slim new look down to — you guessed it — a balanced diet and an extra-long dog walk. And those of us who are committed to following these women then look at themselves and think, am I not good enough anymore? It sort of feels like a betrayal or abandonment. Jameela Jamil agrees. She revealed on Instagram that she had unfollowed many body positive ambassadors who 'are now going full diet culture'. The podcaster added: 'Don't perpetuate the culture that you rose to prominence trying to take down. It is a widespread shift we are all seeing everywhere and it's depressing.' The hashtag #thinspo, which promotes extreme thinness and disordered eating, has been banned on TikTok and Instagram. But it still exists elsewhere on social media, and the similar tag #SkinnyTok surpassed 2.4billion views in June. The terrifying amount of views reflects how women are scouring the internet looking for ways to get thin. From celebs to influencers to fashion, the whole situation is a low-fat recipe for disaster — but sadly women and young girls are falling for it. As someone who grew up and lived through the trend the first time around, I know it should not be repeated. We've already said goodbye to low-slung jeans, pedal pushers, Uggs and other unlamented fashions of that era. Like them, heroin chic should also remain firmly in the past. 8 8
