SC stays Rajasthan HC order restraining rape accused's US-based wife from travelling abroad as ‘collateral'
A bench of Justices Sanjay Kumar and Satish Chandra Sharma issued notice to the Rajasthan government in the matter on the appeal filed by a software engineer, accused of raping a woman on the promise of marriage. The SC further directed the man to deposit Rs 2 lakh as surety for foreign travel.
According to the prosecution, the man was booked on rape charges by the Christianganj police station in Ajmer after it was alleged that he met a woman on a matrimonial website and maintained close acquaintance with her for four years on the promise of marriage.
Advocate Ashwani Dubey, appearing for the engineer, submitted that the wife was neither an accused nor a party to the case. He said no notice was issued by the Rajasthan HC and yet it passed an order restraining the petitioner.
'The wife, who is neither accused nor heard, is restrained from travelling abroad, purely to offset a hypothetical apprehension that the husband will abscond,' Dubey argued.
The plea said the high court, in a violation of the 'procedural impropriety' and without hearing or impleading his wife, who is currently employed in the US, and ignoring the fact that she was not a part of the criminal case, directed her to remain in India. It was also argued that the HC direction was 'erroneous' and violative of the fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
KGMU struggling to capitalize on cadaveric organ donation potential
1 2 Lucknow: For liver cirrhosis patient Ravi Prakash (name changed), the only chance of survival is a transplant within six months. Since his relatives are unfit for donation, the 43-year-old pins his hopes on the KGMU deceased donor transplant programme. Like him, officials said, at least 20 chronic liver patients on KGMU's waiting list need a transplant within the next 6 to 12 months. On the eve of World Organ Donation Day, TOI tracked the organ donation scenario at KGMU and found the institute has the capacity to facilitate 50 cadaveric multi-organ donations (CMOD) a year — potentially saving or improving over 240 lives annually. Recent achievements On April 22, after a gap of two years, KGMU conducted its 29th CMOD, which was also its 41st liver transplant and 9th cadaveric liver transplant — the last was done in Nov 2023. Since the programme began in Dec 2014, the varsity facilitated 29 cadaveric donations, 41 liver transplants and 12 kidney transplants, including both cadaveric and live donor procedures. Impact of hindered programmes "When life-saving programmes are hindered, people are compelled to look for unauthorised means," Prakash said, referring to a recent case in which a man was arrested in Pratapgarh for allegedly duping a Basti resident of Rs 5.75 lakh on the pretext of a kidney transplant. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Your Finger Shape Says a Lot About Your Personality, Read Now Tips and Tricks Undo Law, risks of illegal organ trade According to the law, only close blood relatives can donate organs. If they are found medically unfit, patients in urgent need sometimes fall prey to illegal organ traders. "An active deceased donor transplant programme could help curb such unlawful practices," said a senior official. Potential of CMOD Each CMOD offers the opportunity to retrieve multiple organs — including the heart, lungs, liver, small intestine, pancreas, kidneys, upper limbs and corneas. KGMU currently performs transplants for cornea, liver and kidney. Untapped donor potential suggests that 3-4 cases of brain death are reported annually in various departments. Even if half of these were utilised, it could save or improve around 125 lives every year. If fully exploited, it could rise to 240. At present, the donation rate is about 5%, which experts believe can be increased tenfold with better infrastructure, sensitised medical staff and community education. Challenges A patient is declared brain-dead after two positive 'apnoea tests' conducted six hours apart. Counsellors then approach the family for consent, but refusal is common due to religious beliefs, lack of awareness or absence of immediate family members to make a decision. Emotional distress and the desire for a traditional funeral also influence refusals. Another challenge is that a brain-dead patient must remain on a ventilator to keep organs viable. If life support is withdrawn, cardiac arrest occurs and organs become unsuitable for transplant. There is always a lack of ventilators. Steps towards improvement KGMU spokesperson Prof KK Singh said low donation rates are due to family refusal, absence of relatives at crucial moments, procedural delays and poor coordination between departments. To improve this, KGMU trains ICU and trauma staff, deploys two MOHAN Foundation-trained coordinators to counsel families and strengthens coordination between neurologists and intensive care teams. Public awareness drives are held to dispel myths and build trust. The university works with NOTTO and SOTTO to register patients, allocate organs as per guidelines and submit regular reports. Despite having the capacity and potential donors, the main challenge is ensuring a steady flow of transplants. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
CJI not superior to other SC judges, has same judicial powers: Justice Gavai
The Chief Justice of India is not superior to other judges of the Supreme Court and exercises the same judicial powers as the rest, Chief Justice B R Gavai said on Tuesday. The CJI made the observation as a three-judge bench, presided by him and comprising Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria, took up an application by the Enforcement Directorate for recall of the court's April 26, 2023 judgment in Ritu Chhabaria vs. Union of India & Ors case. A two-judge bench of Justices (retired) Krishna Murari and C T Ravikumar it its 2023 judgment deprecated the 'practice' of investigating agencies filing chargesheet in court even before completion of probe so as to deny default bail to accused, and said that even in such cases the right of the accused to default bail will not be extinguished. As per the law, the chargesheet has to be filed within 60 days from the date of arrest of the accused in cases triable by lower courts and 90 days in cases triable by a sessions court. Failure to file the chargesheet within this period entitles an accused to default bail. Days after the April 26 ruling, the ED approached the SC and told a bench presided by then CJI D Y Chandrachud that the Delhi High Court had granted bail to the accused in a case probed by it based on the SC judgment in the Ritu Chhabaria case. The agency pointed out that the decision will have nationwide repercussions. By order dated May 12, 2023, the SC suspended the operation of the April 26 judgment. On Tuesday, CJI Gavai expressed his displeasure over the one-judge bench, even if that be the CJI-headed bench, hearing appeals against judgements of any other bench of the SC. 'When a bench of two learned judges of this court grants any relief, can another bench, merely because it sits in court number 1, of the same strength, sit in appeal over that judgment,' asked CJI Gavai. He said, 'We believe in adherence to the judicial propriety, judicial discipline. If we go on permitting this, then one bench merely because it does not like an order, will go on interfering with the orders of the other bench.' 'The Chief Justice of India is not superior to the other judges. He is the first among the others. The CJI exercises the same judicial powers as all other judges of this court,' the CJI said. Appearing for ED, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the three-judge bench that the petitioner in the matter in which the April 26 judgment was delivered had 'misused' the court's jurisdiction. He said initially, a person filed a petition saying her husband was in jail and sought permission to allow her to send him home-cooked food. 'Thereafter the petitioner (in the April 26 matter) filed a similar petition that 'my husband is also in jail, so permit me to serve him home-cooked food'. The petitioner further pointed out that a similar petition (the first petition) is pending before a particular bench… Both matters are listed together. Then first (petition) pales into insignificance. Subsequently, an Interlocutory Application (IA) is filed…in the second petition where the main prayer is home-cooked food. It says the chargesheet is filed with Section 173(8) CrPC, which says that further investigation is going on…' 'The SC (two-judge) bench takes the view that once you file a chargesheet with 173(8), you will get default bail because it is an incomplete chargesheet,' the SG said, adding that this was contrary to multiple larger-bench judgements. 'Thereafter all-across India, people started filing default bail applications once chargesheet was filed (with section 173(8)).' The counsel for the respondents sought to clarify that in the writ petition for allowing home-cooked food, the IA for default bail was filed before the first hearing of the case. On the first hearing, IA was allowed, and notice was issued in the writ petition. The SG said if the court did not want to look at the recall request, it can still consider the ED's SLP filed against the Delhi High Court order and settle the law. The court finally agreed to list it before a three-judge bench.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
SC seeks to curb open dumping on premises to curb stray dogs' presence
The Supreme Court administration on Tuesday instructed that all food waste within its premises be discarded only in covered bins, aiming to curb the growing presence of stray dogs inside court corridors and even lifts. The circular noted that uncovered food scraps were attracting the animals, undermining hygiene and safety. The court had issued a similar circular in September 2024 after consultations with civic authorities. (HT Photo) 'All leftover food items must be disposed of exclusively in properly covered dustbins… This measure is crucial to prevent animals from scavenging for food, thereby reducing the risk of bites and maintaining hygiene standards,' it said. To be sure, the court had issued a similar circular in September 2024 after consultations with civic authorities. The renewed instructions came a day after a bench of justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan ordered civic bodies in Delhi and the National Capital Region (NCR) to round up all stray dogs within eight weeks and house them in dedicated shelters. No captured animal is to be released back on the streets. Hearing a suo motu case on the 'alarming and disturbing' rise in stray dog attacks, the court also directed authorities in Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad and Gurugram to set up a helpline for dog-bite complaints, with offending animals to be picked up within four hours. It ordered contempt proceedings against anyone obstructing the capture drive and criticised the Animal Birth Control Rules requiring sterilised dogs to be released in the same locality, calling the rule 'unreasonable and absurd.' 'Whether sterilised or not, society must feel free and safe. You should not have any stray dog roaming around,' the bench said. Authorities have been told to create shelter space for at least 5,000 dogs in the next eight weeks and, if necessary, deploy a special force to execute the removal operation.
