SC seeks Centre, States responses on Presidential reference on timeline for assent to state bills
Supreme Court
on Tuesday sought response of the Centre and all States on a Presidential reference whether timelines could be imposed for dealing with bills passed by assembly.
A five-judge Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India BR Gavai sought the responses of the Centre and the States by next Tuesday, observing the issue concerns not only one state but the entire country.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Technology
Data Science
Cybersecurity
Product Management
MCA
Data Analytics
Leadership
Healthcare
MBA
Degree
others
Project Management
healthcare
PGDM
Digital Marketing
Artificial Intelligence
Finance
Design Thinking
Others
CXO
Public Policy
Data Science
Management
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
12 Weeks
MIT xPRO
CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
Skills you'll gain:
Duration:
12 Weeks
MIT xPRO
CERT-MIT XPRO Building AI Prod India
Starts on
undefined
Get Details
The bench also comprising Justices Surya Kant, Vikram Nath, PS Narasimha and AS Chandurkar said it will fix the schedule for hearing on July 29 and plans to start the hearing by mid-August.
In May, President
Droupadi Murmu
exercised her powers under Article 143(1) and posed 14 crucial questions to the Supreme Court over its April 8 verdict that fixed timelines for governors and the President to act on bills passed by state assemblies.
Article 143 (1) of the Constitution deals with the power of President to consult the Supreme Court "if at any time it appears to the President that a question of law or fact has arisen, or is likely to arise, which is of such a nature and of such public importance that it is expedient to obtain the opinion of the Supreme Court upon it, he may refer the question to that Court for consideration and the Court may, after such hearing as it thinks fit, report to the President its opinion thereon".
Live Events
The April 8 verdict, which was passed in a matter over the powers of the governor in dealing with bills questioned by the
Tamil Nadu government
, for the first time prescribed that the President should decide on the bills reserved for her consideration by the governor within three months from the date on which such reference is received.
In a five-page reference, President Murmu posed questions to the Supreme Court and sought to know its opinion on the powers of governors and the President under Articles 200 and 201 in dealing with bills passed by the state legislature.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
9 minutes ago
- Mint
Current agri loans over ₹28 lakh crore, but no waiver plan: Govt
The Centre has informed that agricultural loans worth over ₹ 28.5 lakh crore are outstanding but ruled out any plans for a waiver, minister of state in the ministry of finance Pankaj Chaudhary said in response to a question in Lok Sabha on Monday. Responding to Parliamentary questions by Lok Sabha MPs Supriya Sule (Nationalist Congress Party – Sharadchandra Pawar, Maharashtra), Hanuman Beniwal (Rashtriya Loktantrik Party, Rajasthan) and others, the Ministry of Finance informed Monday that outstanding agricultural loans stood at ₹ 28,50,779.43 crore as of March 31, 2025. These are due from 1,762.96 lakh accounts. 'No proposal to waive off the outstanding agricultural loans, is under consideration with Union Government,' the government said. Meanwhile, it is important to note that farmer loans are different from other categories of lending such as personal loans but lately the stance of cooperative banks to insist on credit score for approval of loans has rattled farmers no end. Read this Livemint for details on this. However, it added that several measures have been taken 'to provide relief and to improve the economic conditions of the farmers which inter-alia includes timely and adequate credit through Kisan Credit Card (KCC) under which crop loan up to ₹ 3 lakh is provided at subsidized interest rates under the Modified Interest Subvention Scheme (MISS) with additional incentives for timely repayment, fixation of progressively increased agricultural credit target, issuance of revised Priority Sector Lending guidelines to ensure improved credit flow to the agricultural sector etc.' The top five states in terms of outstanding agricultural loans are Tamil Nadu: ₹ 4,03,367 crore; Andhra Pradesh: ₹ 3,08,716 crore; Maharashtra: ₹ 2,60,799 crore; Uttar Pradesh: ₹ 2,28,560 crore; Karnataka: ₹ 2,22,301 crore. State Loans ( ₹ crore) Rajasthan 1,87,322 MP 1,62,385 Kerala 1,52,198 Telangana 1,44,346 Gujarat 1,44,330 Punjab 1,04,353 (Source: Other states with dues in excess of ₹ 1 lakh crore are Rajasthan: ₹ 1,87,322 crore; Madhya Pradesh: ₹ 1,62,385 crore; Kerala: ₹ 1,52,198 crore; Telangana: ₹ 1,44,346 crore; Gujarat: ₹ 1,44,330 crore; Punjab: ₹ 1,04,353 crore. Apart from Sule and Beniwal, the questions were put up by NCP-SP MPs from Maharashtra: Bhaskar Murlidhar Bhagare, Nilesh Dnyandev Lanke, Mohite Patil Dhairyasheel Rajsinh, Dr Amol Ramsing Kolhe, and Bajrang Manohar Sonwane, Shiv Sena (Uddhav Balasaheb Thackrey) MP from Maharashtra Sanjay Dina Patil, and Congress MP, Prof Varsha Eknath Gaikwad, also from Maharashtra. The MPs had also asked 'whether there is any correlation found between outstanding agricultural loans and incidence of farmer suicides in states like Maharashtra and if so, the data available with the Government on such cases during the last five years.' The government said that the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) publication 'Accidental Deaths and Suicides in India' is available till the year 2022 but that it does not specify separate reasons for farmer suicides. The MPs had also asked 'whether any specific categories of farmers marginal, small, tenant, SC/ST are more burdened with outstanding loans and if so, the details thereof' to which the government said that 'NABARD All India Rural Financial Inclusion Survey (NAFIS) for the period of 2021-2022 indicates a generally positive relationship between landholding size and household indebtedness, with the proportion of indebted households increasing as land size increases, up to 1 hectare. Beyond this threshold, a marginal decline in the incidence of indebtedness is observed among households with larger landholdings.' Disclaimer: Mint has a tie-up with fintechs for providing credit, you will need to share your information if you apply. These tie-ups do not influence our editorial content. This article only intends to educate and spread awareness about credit needs like loans, credit cards and credit score. Mint does not promote or encourage taking credit as it comes with a set of risks such as high interest rates, hidden charges, etc. We advise investors to discuss with certified experts before taking any credit.
India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
You are a child, know nothing: Nitish Kumar vs Tejashwi Yadav over poll revision
A debate over the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls ahead of the Bihar elections turned into an ugly face-off between Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar and Leader of the Opposition Tejashwi Yadav in the Assembly, with the former calling the RJD leader "a child" when it came to the conduct of the poll body's exercise."You are a child. You know nothing about matters like these. Only three days are left in this last session of the House. Let it conduct legislative business. Whatever rubbish you want to speak, you may do so to your heart's content during the elections," Nitish Kumar said on the floor of the Assembly Tejashwi Yadav was speaking about the central poll body's SIR drive, Nitish Kumar intervened and questioned his former ally about what they had done for the state. "When his (Yadav's) parents were chief ministers, they did nothing, neither for the women, nor for Muslims, nor any other section of society. The only woman who got something was his mother," the Bihar Chief Minister the impartiality of the poll body, Tejashwi was speaking about the timing of the while exercise, asking: "In 2003, it took one and a half years to complete a similar S.I.R. drive. This process could have been conducted after the Lok Sabha elections. It's the monsoon season in Bihar—how will people fill out the forms?"Stating that the Constitution granted everyone the equal right to vote, Tejashwi further asked why the Election Commission was not allowing voters to submit ration and aadhaar cards during the verification drive."Why isn't Aadhaar being linked? Why isn't the ration card being linked? The Election Commission's job is to conduct elections impartially," he is when the Chief Minister, visibly upset with the discussion being allowed on the issue, chose to butt the time Kumar got seated, several of the opposition members were on their feet, and those on the ruling side engaged in a shouting Bhai Virendra, an RJD MLA, used an unparliamentary expression, the Speaker looked told the leader of the opposition, "I have allowed you to make a statement. I am letting others on your side also speak, but you must first make Bhai Virendra apologise".Turning towards the ruling side, the Speaker reacted with horror when he saw Deputy Chief Minister Vijay Kumar Sinha, a senior BJP leader and a former Speaker himself, screaming at the top of his Speaker said, "It is disgusting that you are behaving in this fashion, despite being a deputy CM", before adjourning the proceedings till lunch.- EndsInputs from PTI
India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
The curious case of July jinx for India's Vice-Presidents
Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar resigned from his position citing health reasons on the first day of the Monsoon Session on July 21. A curious pattern seems to shadow India's Vice Presidency with instances of high-profile resignations and even a death, all curiously clustered in the month of July. Jagdeep Dhankar still had two years left for his term to complete. Unlike some of his predecessors who resigned to ascend to the presidency, he too exited in July citing health concerns, making his early exit first Vice-President to resign from his post was VV Giri, as Dr Zakir Hussain, the third President of India, suddenly passed away on May 3, 1969. Under Article 65(1) of the Constitution, the Vice-President VV Giri assumed office to act as President. However, VV Giri, resigned on July 20, 1969 as Vice-President and also as the acting President to contest the presidential election. Giri eventually won the elections to become the fourth President of 1987 Presidential election made a mid-term Vice Presidential election inevitable as the sitting Vice President R Venkataraman won the Presidency. R Venkataraman resigned as Vice President in July 1987 after being elected President. After R Venkataraman was elected as the President, Shankar Dayal Sharma was elected unopposed to the post of Vice-President and assumed office on September 3, 1987. However, he fought the presidential election of 1992 and resigned in July 1992 after being elected Tenth Presidential Election declared on July 16, 1992, made mid-term Vice Presidential elections inevitable. In the Vice Presidential elections held on August 19, 1992, KR Narayanan emerged as the winner. On July 17, 1997, KR Narayanan became the third Vice President in a row to win the Presidential elections. He resigned from the vice presidency in July 1997 after being elected as the Vice President Bhairon Singh Shekhawat resigned from the post on July 21, 2007, soon after being defeated by UPA-Left nominee Pratibha Patil in the Presidential election. He submitted his resignation to President APJ Abdul Kalam shortly after the results were declared. The office remained vacant for 21 days, until Mohammad Hamid Ansari was elected Vice to this string of July incidents, Krishan Kant, who served as Vice President from 1997 to 2002, became the only Vice President in Indian history to die in office. He passed away on July 27, 2002.- EndsTune InMust Watch
