Prison Authority Denies Omar Radi's Claims about Detention Conditions
Radi made his remarks in a new interview published last week, claiming he was subject to alleged psychological and physical issues.
DGAPT rejected Radi's 'baseless' claims, describing them as 'an allegation,' noting that Radi had personally requested to be put in a jingle cell, which they responded favorably to.
DGAPR further stressed that the cell met hygiene and dignity standards, denying that he was subject to 'Excessive surveillance.'
DGAPR said that the measures are standardized and apply to all detainees, particularly for phone communications and mail exchanges.
In his interview, Radi claimed his cell at Tifelt 2 was infested with insects. ButDGAPR has strongly refuted the allegations, noting that the journalist's cell was regularly maintained and that the transfer was made at his own request.
DGAPR also spoke of an incident that took place during Radi's imprisonment, recalling a time when he was fractured in his arm during an arm-wrestling match with a fellow inmate.
The prison authority said the former prisoner received medical care and a surgery, and that his family was informed immediately and were allowed to visit him at the prison hospital.
An investigation was launched into the altercation, DGAPR said, noting Radi also had access to the facility's scheduled activities and medication was provided to him, spending on medical prescriptions.
In July 2021, a Moroccan court sentenced Omar Radi to a six-year prison sentence for 'rape' and 'receiving funds from a foreign agent.'
Casablanca's Court of Appeal upheld the same sentence against the journalist in March 2020, but he was granted a royal pardon in July last year.
DGAPR also condemned recent claims made by journalist Soulaiman Raissouni, who was recently released from prison on a royal pardon.
In an interview with Spanish news agency El Independiente, Raissouni made strong remarks about Morocco's prison administration and judiciary, accusing them of 'unethical practices.'
'I knew what to expect: imprisonment and worse than prison,' the journalist claimed, alleging that his writing was confiscated during his time in detention.
In response, DGAPR said Raissouni's comments on Moroccan prisons' 'unethical practices' are fabricated allegations that are part of what the prison authority described as continued attempts to 'tarnish the reputation of the prison and reintegration sector' in Morocco.
Raissouni's allegations also seek to affect the reputation of Morocco's prison officials and staff, DGAPR said, denying his claims that he had a 'record-breaking' hunger strike.
It stressed that it had previously issued a statement revealing that the journalist was consuming various food and dietary supplements during the period he claimed to be on a hunger strike. Tags: #Free Omar Radiomar radi
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
2 hours ago
- Morocco World
Zuma Defies Pretoria As Documents Reveal South African Embassy's Role in Rabat Visit
Marrakech – Former South African President Jacob Zuma struck back forcefully against Pretoria's diplomatic objections regarding his recent Morocco visit, asserting that the national flag 'belongs to citizens, not the government.' Zuma's defiant response also comes with evidence confirming that his trip was fully coordinated with South Africa's embassy in Rabat, laying bare the African National Congress (ANC) government's perfidious, duplicitous posturing, double standards, and political hypocrisy on the international stage. 'The South African flag doesn't belong to the government. Is there anyone who doesn't know that the flag of any country belongs to the citizens of that country?' Zuma declared during a press briefing in Sandton on Friday, dismissing concerns raised by International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola. 'Every country has a flag. Every citizen owns the flag. It's not a government flag,' he added with palpable contempt for the diplomatic row manufactured by Pretoria. What Pretoria and its allies labeled a 'controversy' erupted after Zuma met with Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita on July 15 in Rabat, where both South African and Moroccan flags were prominently displayed. This visual diplomatic parity triggered immediate backlash from the ANC regime, which has long clung to its isolated stance of backing the Polisario Front's separatist claims in the Sahara – a position entrenched since 2004 under then-President Thabo Mbeki. A visit fully coordinated with South Africa's embassy in Rabat Official documentation obtained by journalists thoroughly dismantles Pretoria's protestations. A diplomatic note from the South African Embassy in Rabat to Morocco's Foreign Ministry, dated July 11, explicitly requested VIP treatment for Zuma's delegation. The embassy asked Moroccan authorities to 'facilitate passage through the honor salon of Rabat-Salé airport for a delegation led by former South African President H.E. Mr. Jacob Zuma.' The embassy not only arranged for Zuma's arrival on July 15 and departure on July 18, but also communicated passport details for his entire delegation and advance team, which arrived on July 12, three days before the former president. A diplomatic note from the South African Embassy in Rabat to Morocco's Foreign Ministry, dated July 11, explicitly requested VIP treatment for Zuma's delegation. The South African Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) spokesperson Chrispin Phiri claimed the flag display constituted 'an abuse of existing protocol and decorum and undermines official bilateral relations.' He claimed that national symbols such as the flag somehow convey official state endorsement. Their display in such contexts, he argued, 'elevates the perception of the encounter to that of a state-to-state engagement,' which he insisted was not the case. According to him, 'the government of the Republic of South Africa holds the firm view that the use of its national symbols in contexts implying official state endorsement of non-governmental engagements is inappropriate, irrespective of the setting.' Yet these assertions ring hollow, sounding more like political theatre than a serious diplomatic principle, given the embassy's active facilitation of the visit and its written requests for diplomatic courtesies. Morocco has maintained a dignified response to South Africa's diplomatic tantrum. According to sources cited by the media, the South African flag was displayed at Zuma's explicit request as a gesture of respect. The Moroccan government regularly hosts representatives from various political organizations across Africa, Europe, Asia, and the Americas. In October 2024, a delegation from South Africa's ruling ANC, led by Obed Bapela, was received at the Moroccan Foreign Ministry, in an indication of the North African country's openness to dialogue with all South African political actors. Pretoria's ideological rigidity During his Morocco visit, Zuma shattered the ANC's carefully cultivated illusion of South African unity on the Sahara question, a willfully long-perpetuated dispute. He declared that his Umkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party, which now holds seats in Parliament, supports Morocco's Autonomy Plan as it 'will allow meaningful local governance by the populations of the Sahara region, while guaranteeing Morocco its sovereignty over the Sahara.' The visit triggered a vitriolic response from ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula, who resorted to name-calling, branding Zuma a 'sellout' for supporting Morocco. 'Zuma is no messiah. He is a sellout of note,' Mbalula fumed, in a display of the ANC's chronic inability to confront substantive diplomatic differences without resorting to personal attacks. Floyd Shivambu, former MK Party secretary-general, also criticized Zuma's recognition of Moroccan sovereignty, labeling it 'opportunistic' and contrary to South Africa's historical support for 'oppressed peoples.' These objections reveal the rigid ideological dogma that shackles South Africa's foreign policy, even as the vast majority of African nations pivot toward pragmatic and mutually beneficial engagement with Morocco. Zuma was accompanied during the visit by the MK Party's Head of Presidency, Magasela Mzobe, further legitimizing the diplomatic nature of the engagement. The former president's four-day trip has exposed deep fractures in South Africa's political landscape, as the ruling ANC grips desperately to its Cold War-era positions, much like the Algerian regime that incessantly bellows about self-determination as a cover for its internal crises – knowing that an end to the dispute would mean the end of its manufactured relevance. More than two-thirds of African countries now recognize Morocco's territorial integrity or maintain constructive positions on the Sahara dispute. This growing continental consensus leaves the South African government increasingly isolated as it stubbornly adheres to outdated ideological stances while the rest of Africa pursues realistic solutions for regional stability and development. The diplomatic spat over flag protocol serves as a transparent attempt to divert attention from the substantive issue: South Africa's fading influence in continental affairs and the crumbling of its position on the Sahara. While Pretoria fumes over symbolic matters, Morocco continues to gather international support for its autonomy initiative as the viable path forward for regional peace and development. Read also: Morocco and South Africa: Twisting Toward a Common Ground Tags: Jacob ZumaMorocco and South Africa
Ya Biladi
3 hours ago
- Ya Biladi
Violence in Torre-Pacheco : Pedro Sanchez and Morocco condemn racism and call for calm
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez has responded to the recent violence targeting the Moroccan community in Torre-Pacheco, near Murcia, which erupted last Wednesday. In a tweet, he declared: «Racism is incompatible with democracy. What is happening in Torre-Pacheco is a challenge for all of us». He added, «We must speak out, act firmly, and uphold the values that unite us. Spain is a country of rights, not hate». El racismo es incompatible con la democracia. Lo que estamos viendo en Torre-Pacheco nos interpela a todos. Debemos alzar la voz, actuar con firmeza y defender los valores que nos unen. España es un país de derechos, no de odio. — Pedro Sánchez (@sanchezcastejon) July 14, 2025 For its part, the Consulate General of Morocco in Murcia issued a statement saying it is closely monitoring «these unfortunate events marked by violence, incitement, and hatred against members of the Moroccan community living in the municipality of Torre-Pacheco». The consulate condemned the attacks in the strongest terms and expressed full solidarity with the community, while maintaining ongoing communication with Spanish authorities to ensure the necessary protection for those who are experiencing genuine fear and distress. The consulate also praised «the considerable efforts made by security forces and other local authorities to contain the crisis and restore calm», while urging members of the Moroccan community to exercise restraint and follow instructions from local authorities during these difficult times. The Council of the Moroccan Community Abroad (CCME) also reacted via a tweet on X (formerly Twitter), condemning «all forms of violence, racism, and stigmatization». It stressed that «mutual respect, human dignity, and social cohesion must remain the fundamental principles uniting our communities». Vox Party Accused of Fueling the Violence Le Conseil de la communauté marocaine à l'étranger suit de près les événements survenus à Torre Pacheco en Espagne. Il dénonce fermement toute forme de violence, de racisme et de stigmatisation. Le respect mutuel, la dignité humaine et la cohésion sociale doivent rester les… — Conseil de la communauté marocaine à l'étranger (@CCMEOfficiel) July 14, 2025 Spanish Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska directly blamed the far-right Vox party, stating that «organized groups» were behind the unrest. He criticized Vox's rhetoric around «criminal immigration», describing it as an incitement to «illegal behavior and calls to action». The minister emphasized that «there is no connection between crime and immigration». Pedro Ángel Roca, the mayor of Torre-Pacheco, said on public broadcaster TVE that the situation has been «under control» since Sunday evening thanks to increased security reinforcements. He stressed the need to tackle crime in all its forms but warned of the risks posed by extremist groups from outside the city attempting to exploit the situation. According to authorities, several far-right groups were involved in the disturbances, including one called «Expel Them Now», which used Telegram to call for Moroccans to be driven out of town. The violence erupted last Wednesday after the circulation of a video showing an elderly man being violently attacked by three young men of North African origin, according to the victim's own account to local media. The footage sparked outrage, which far-right groups—both local and external—used to organize anti-immigrant rallies targeting people of Maghrebi origin. Con la detención en Gipuzkoa del presunto agresor del vecino de Torre Pacheco, ya son 10 los arrestados por este suceso y los posteriores incidentes. Gracias a las FCSE por su labor de investigación, prevención y contención. Seguimos trabajando por la seguridad y la convivencia. — Mariola Guevara Cava (@mariolaguevara) July 14, 2025 Mariola Guevara, the central government's delegate in the Murcia region, announced Monday via X that «ten people have been arrested so far». Among those arrested were two undocumented young Moroccan men, aged 21 and 22, who were allegedly present during the assault on the elderly man. They are being prosecuted for complicity and failure to assist a person in danger. The main perpetrator, a 19-year-old Moroccan man with legal residency, was arrested while attempting to flee to France through the town of Rentería. He has been placed in pretrial detention and faces charges of aggravated assault.
Ya Biladi
3 hours ago
- Ya Biladi
Spain : Murcia town takes Islamophobic turn, bans Muslim celebrations
Municipal facilities in Jumilla, a town of 27,000 residents in Spain's southern Murcia region, will no longer be available for Muslim religious celebrations, including Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha. The decision, approved by representatives of the conservative People's Party (PP), was originally proposed by the local councillor from the far-right Vox party, who notably abstained from the vote, according to El Pais. Spanish media have described the move as an act of «institutional Islamophobia», pointing to the PP's support for what they see as Vox's discriminatory rhetoric within public institutions. The ban affects approximately 1,500 Muslims in Jumilla, a minority in a region home to many Moroccan immigrants. Nationwide, Spain's Muslim population is estimated at 2.5 million, of which just over one million hold Spanish citizenship, according to the Andalusian Observatory of the Union of Islamic Communities of the Iberian Peninsula. While the final version of the approved motion was watered down, stripped of much of its original language, it still marks a fresh expression of xenophobia, especially in the wake of recent politically charged violence in Murcia. In previous years, Muslim communities used municipal sports facilities to gather for prayers during the two major religious holidays. Locally, the ban is seen as a clear violation of freedom of religion and worship, a right protected under Article 16 of the Spanish Constitution. Critics also highlight a double standard: public and municipal spaces across Spain regularly host Christian religious events tied to cultural traditions, such as Holy Week processions. Yet the motion to ban Muslim festivals justifies itself by pledging to «preserve the values and traditional expressions» of local «cultural identity», ignoring the region's deep-rooted Arab-Muslim and Jewish heritage. Sabah Yacoubi, president of the Association of Moroccan Immigrant Workers (ATIM) in Murcia and national vice president, called the vote «unacceptable» in comments to Yabiladi. She emphasized that the measure contradicts Spain's constitutional framework and the agreements the Spanish state signed with the Islamic Commission in 1992. «Banning Muslim religious celebrations in public spaces is not just an administrative decision, it's outright discrimination», Yacoubi stated. «This idea that Muslim holidays are 'foreign' to local identity is both false and dangerous». Cuando el espacio público deja de ser de todos: Jumilla y la libertad de culto Lo que ha pasado en Jumilla me parece inaceptable. Prohibir las fiestas religiosas islámicas en espacios públicos no es una simple decisión administrativa, ??? — Sabah صباح (@Sabah_Yacoubi) August 6, 2025 In a post on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), Yacoubi asked: «Since when are Holy Week processions in the streets questioned? Who decides what counts as 'the identity of the people'?» She pointed out that the 1,500 Muslims in Jumilla pay taxes and are part of the community, with the same right to access public spaces for their celebrations. «Islam is part of Spain. Denying that is denying nearly eight centuries of history», she argued. Yacoubi also reminded that Andalusian heritage lives on in Spain's culture, language, architecture, and traditions. «It is not foreign, it is ours. Erasing it is historical revisionism meant to spread hatred». She referenced a 2013 ruling from Spain's Supreme Court, which made it clear that local councils cannot legislate against the constitutional right to religious freedom. In line with that decision, the court previously overturned local ordinances banning the burqa in Lleida and other municipalities. In a broader context, Yacoubi sees the Jumilla ban as part of a pattern of escalating far-right rhetoric, especially following the racially charged incidents in Torre Pacheco, also in Murcia. «Islamophobic policies are being tested under the pretext of defending 'what belongs to us'. It's a political experiment in exclusion—a laboratory for institutional racism», she warned. She concluded with a call for vigilance: «This is a prelude to a dangerous trend. We must stop it before it spreads to other Spanish municipalities».
