
Retired Boston employees push for city to approve a cost of living increase to pension checks
Related
:
Advertisement
Officials with some of
the city's most prominent labor unions made their case for the increase before the Boston Retirement Board Friday morning. They were joined by Councilors Ed Flynn and Gigi Coletta Zapata, and council staff representing Councilors Ben Weber and Ruthzee Louijeune. Last year, the council unanimously approved a resolution calling for the COLA increase for retirees, which the board ultimately rejected.
Speaking before the board Friday, Coletta Zapata acknowledged that the members must make a fiscally responsible decision, but argued that the city's retirees 'deserve' the modest bump.
'Our Boston retirees have literally built the city, they've dug trenches, they've kept us safe, they've cleaned our schools,' Coletta Zapata said. 'What I would ask is just to consider what the systemic liability is for choosing to keep people in poverty.'
Advertisement
Annual COLA payments for retired city of Boston employees are based on a set figure called the 'COLA base,' which is currently $15,000 in Boston. State law dictates that municipalities can approve an annual COLA payment for pensioners of up to 3 percent of the COLA base. Last summer, the Boston Retirement Board voted to give pensioners a COLA payment of $450, which is 3 percent of $15,000, for the 2025 fiscal year.
Retirees, their labor unions, and city councilors are pushing the board to increase the COLA base from $15,000 to $18,000, which would amount to a $90 boost to annual COLA payments if the board approves the full 3 percent adjustment for the next fiscal year.
The city has not increased the COLA base since 2021, when the board raised it from $14,000 to $15,000, according to Janey Frank, a retired Boston Public Schools teacher, who's a leader of the Boston Teachers Union retired teachers chapter.
Retired city employees have only had three COLA base increases since 2010, and those increases combined have only raised pensioners annual cost of living payments from $360 to $450.
An extra $90 a year, which amounts to $7.50 more a month, would matter to struggling pensioners, said Erik Berg, president of the Boston Teachers Union, before the retirement board Friday.
'For most of us, maybe all of us in this room ... that's not a cost that we need to think about,' Berg said. 'We don't need to think about splitting pills in half, paying the light bills, being able to survive in the city after 20, even 30 years of retirement, after devoting your career to the city. But retirees do. A modest increase is affordable to this city.'
Advertisement
Wu previously said she would support increasing the COLA base from $15,000 to $18,000 in a candidate forum during the 2021 mayoral election, said Elissa Cadillic, cochair of the City of Boston United Retirees and president of AFSCME Local 1526, the local Boston public library employees union.
But when Cadillic and representatives of many of the city's most prominent labor unions met with Wu this week, she told them she couldn't 'in good conscience' advocate for that this year, Cadillic said.
Wu made the same argument speaking to the Globe earlier this month.
'I will always support making sure that our retirees and those who have served the city have the most that we can responsibly deliver,' Wu said. But 'as mayor, I have to make decisions that are based on real time information on what is fiscally sustainable, and I still hope that at some point when the larger economy becomes more stable and that our municipal finances can reliably sustain this as well, that we can keep having that conversation.'
Niki Griswold can be reached at
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Smartest Growth Stock to Buy With $1,000 Right Now
Consumer staples makers have long been able to grow their businesses through good and bad economic times. Some of the best consumer staples stocks are Dividend Kings. One consumer staple Dividend King has a good yield and attractive valuation. 10 stocks we like better than Coca-Cola › Quick, think about soda companies. What brand comes to mind? Probably Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO). That makes sense, given that Coca-Cola is one of the largest and best-known consumer staples brands in the world. But is it the smartest growth stock to buy if you have $1,000 to invest right now? Don't hit the buy button until you read about this high-yield alternative. From a big-picture perspective, Coca-Cola makes food, even though its products get their own category with the consumer staples space. Beverages are still a life necessity, even if its eponymous product is more for pleasure than need. The company is an industry powerhouse. Not only is Coke one of the best known, and most beloved, beverage brands, but Coca-Cola happens to have a massive distribution network, impressive marketing skills, and powerful research and development chops. The company's scale, meanwhile, gives it the wherewithal to act as an industry consolidator, buying up smaller brands and beverage concepts to round out its product portfolio. That, in turn, helps to keep Coca-Cola's brands relevant with consumers. The company's business is so strong that it has been a longtime holding of Warren Buffett within Berkshire Hathaway's stock portfolio. If Buffett has put billions into Coca-Cola, why shouldn't you put in $1,000? There's one notable reason: Investors have fully priced Coca-Cola's shares. The stock's price-to-sales ratio and its price-to-earnings ratio are both above their five-year averages, and the dividend yield is near 10-year lows. The business is doing relatively well right now, but virtually everyone seems to know it. One of the other factors that sets Coca-Cola apart is its status as a Dividend King. But it isn't the only Dividend King beverage company. Direct competitor PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) has increased its dividend annually for 53 years and counting. Meanwhile, PepsiCo's price-to-sales and price-to-earnings ratios are below their five-year averages, and its yield is toward the high end of its historical range. So, unlike Coca-Cola, PepsiCo looks cheap. PepsiCo stands out on the valuation front, but it also stands out on the diversification front. Like Coca-Cola, it has a globally diversified business. But PepsiCo operates in the salty snack and packaged foods spaces, too. That gives it more levers to pull to support long-term growth and more businesses to lean on when one of its divisions is facing difficulty. And make no mistake, every company, no matter how good, eventually faces hard times. The best companies, which include Dividend Kings, are the ones that successfully manage through the hard times. While Coca-Cola is performing quite well today, PepsiCo isn't. That's why its yield is a historically high 4.3% and its stock price has lost a third of its value since early 2023. But PepsiCo isn't giving up. In fact, it is leaning on its successful playbook and buying smaller brands (Siete and Poppi) that are more relevant with consumers right now. That should, in time, help PepsiCo to get back on the growth track. If you're looking at Coca-Cola today, you should probably give PepsiCo a closer look. But don't just think about how each business is performing this very second. Think about their valuations in relation to their performance and, just as important, what each company is doing to ensure they succeed. They both have solid businesses and are working on a bright future, but PepsiCo isn't getting any credit for it because it is facing some near-term headwinds. If you can think long term, putting $1,000 into PepsiCo today could end up being a huge win for your future wealth. Note that one of the keys to Buffett's investment approach is buying good companies when they look attractively priced. Between Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, it is PepsiCo that passes that simple screen. Before you buy stock in Coca-Cola, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Coca-Cola wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $660,341!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $874,192!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has positions in PepsiCo. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Berkshire Hathaway. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Smartest Growth Stock to Buy With $1,000 Right Now was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mayor Wu seeks transparency on ICE arrests, ‘secret police tactics'
As widespread reports of immigration enforcement officers making arrests wearing masks and refusing to provide information about detainees spread fear in immigrant communities, Boston is trying to get more transparency from the federal government about these operations. In an executive order signed Tuesday morning, Mayor Michelle Wu committed to sending regular Freedom of Information Act requests to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security seeking information on who Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers are arresting, why and where they are being taken. At a news conference Tuesday, Wu accused ICE of using 'secret police tactics,' wearing masks, not identifying themselves and refusing to share information about people who have been detained. Read more: Why do ICE agents wear masks? 'In Boston, our officers wear badges. They do not routinely wear masks. ... It is our responsibility to make sure that communication between our residents and the city of Boston in every manner is designed to boost trust and boost collaboration,' Wu said. 'We expect the same standards from law enforcement operating in the city, no matter what agency they are from.' The mayor said she did not know how many people had been arrested by ICE in Boston since President Donald Trump took office in January. Though the federal government has made claims about how many people have been arrested, Wu said she had no way to verify those numbers, who is included in the count and how many are from Boston versus other communities. The executive order also requires city officials to be in close communication with consular offices of other countries in Boston, which are frequently a source of information for immigrant residents. Community activists who spoke at Tuesday's news conference said the executive order would help families of people who have been arrested by ICE. Lenita Reason, executive director of the Brazilian Worker Center, shared the story of a father who was arrested by ICE and brought to Texas two weeks ago, saying his wife only knew where her husband was being held because the community worked together to help her hire an attorney. While Wu had said the executive order was one small thing the city was doing to help immigrants, Reason said that for her community, it was 'huge.' 'We don't want to be waiting two weeks, three weeks, to find out where our fathers and mothers, members of our community, are,' she said. Because the city does not have power over the federal government, the executive order does not necessarily mean that ICE will cooperate with the city's requests. However, under the Freedom of Information Act, a federal law, government agencies are required to provide public records that are requested. If they ignore or refuse the request, the requester can appeal or sue to potentially have the court force the agency to fulfill the request. There are exemptions to records that must be provided under FOIA, including law enforcement records that could jeopardize an investigation if they are made public. 'The city government cannot overrule what they're doing, but it's still important to tell the truth, and it's still important to be clear about what we expect from our federal government,' Wu said. Last week, the mayor faced blowback from U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Leah Foley, who accused Wu of spreading 'false narratives' when she referred to ICE agents as 'secret police' at another event. Wu also announced Tuesday that Boston had won a victory over the Trump administration in court last week. The city sued the federal government last month after Trump officials cancelled $48 million in previously awarded funding to combat homelessness, and on Friday, Wu said, a judge sided with the city, saying Boston was entitled to the grants. Can Trump deploy the National Guard to stop protests? Here's what the law says What Gov. Newsom said after an Ala. senator called LA 'a third world country' Mass. labor groups rally against ICE arrest of California union leader 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
2 companies with Ohio ties land on 'Most Patriotic Brands in America' list. See full list
Two companies with Ohio ties were just named some of the "Most Patriotic Brands in America" for 2025, with one of them snagging the No. 1 top spot. An annual consumer survey performed by research firm Brand Keys found 50 American companies deemed the "most patriotic" by customers. This year's list includes Ford, Coca-Cola and Apple as well as newcomers like Trader Joe's and Dick's Sporting Goods. Here's who represented Ohio in this year's Most Patriotic Brands list. Jeep, which was founded in Toledo and still operates an assembly plant there, was ranked as the No. 1 most patriotic brand by consumers, surpassing Ford, Coca-Cola, Apple, and Walmart. Since 1941, Jeep has prided itself on American automotive history and patriotism, having been used by the U.S. Army during World War II. The automaker currently offers discounts to military personnel toward the purchase of a Jeep. Jeep leaned into its patriotic reputation with a commercial starring Harrison Ford that aired during the 2025 Super Bowl. Once headquartered in Cincinnati, Macy's moved up six spots and took the No. 35 spot on the list of the "Most Patriotic Brands in America." The chain continues shuttering underproductive stores nationwide, but there are currently 18 Macy's Stores left in Ohio, including four in Cincinnati, two in Columbus, one in Canton, and one in Akron. Here's how each company ranked among the Top 50 Most Patriotic Brands in America for 2025 and their movement from the 2024 list: Jeep (--) Ford (--) Coca-Cola (+1) Levi Strauss (-1) Apple (+3) Walmart (--) Disney (-2) Harley Davidson (-1) Amazon (+1) Ralph Lauren (+2) Jack Daniels (-2) . Nike (+10) Hershey's (-2) Dunkin' (--) McDonald's (+10) Wrangler (-3) American Express (-2) Colgate (-2) Pepsi Cola (+3) NFL (+9) NBA (+9) Home Depot (+27) John Deere (+15) Weather Tech (+2) AT&T (+12) FOX News (-3) Kellogg's (-6) Gillette (+4) Wilson's Sporting Goods (+7) L.L. Bean (+3) MSNBC (-13) Gatorade (+3) Kraft Heinz (+7) KFC (+5) Macy's (+6) USAA (+10) Target (-3) Jersey Mike's Subs (new) MLB (-9) New Balance (-13) Ball Park Franks (Tyson, new) Converse (+3) Costco (--) Trader Joe's (new) Revlon (+4) Weber Grills (+2) Campbell's (new) GM (new) Whirlpool (new) Dick's Sporting Goods (new) 'With consumers viewing everything through a political lens, the value of patriotism is more important than ever,' Brand Keys President Robert Passikoff said. 'A brand that truly resonates the value 'patriotism' taps into a deep well of shared identity, cultural pride, and collective values that significantly strengthen consumer loyalty and positive brand behavior.' This article originally appeared on The Columbus Dispatch: The 'Most Patriotic Brands' of 2025 names 2 Ohio companies. See full list