Universal Music CEO Slams Drake's Lawsuit Over ‘Not Like Us' As ‘Farcical'
Drake filed a defamation lawsuit against Universal Music Group in January. (Photo byfor ABA) Getty Images
In a letter filed in New York federal court Thursday night, Grainge said Drake's allegation he was behind the promotion of 'Not Like Us' is 'groundless and indeed ridiculous,' stating he never heard the song or saw its music video until they were released.
Grainge said Drake's 'farcical' defamation lawsuit against UMG 'makes no sense whatsoever' considering Drake is also signed to the label, and Grainge accused Drake of an 'attempt to waste my and UMG's time and resources' by requesting communications from Grainge and UMG as part of discovery.
The letter comes days after Drake's lawyers filed a host of documents requesting evidence as the rapper pushes ahead with his lawsuit accusing UMG of promoting the 'false and malicious narrative' that he is a pedophile through Lamar's song 'Not Like Us.'
Among dozens of other requests, Drake demanded Lamar's contracts with UMG, documents concerning UMG's efforts to promote 'Not Like Us' and UMG's communications with Spotify, YouTube and other streaming services, after Drake accused the label of using bots to inflate the song's streams.
Drake's lawyers accused UMG of refusing to provide communications involving Grainge, whom Drake accused of being 'personally involved' in the marketing and promotion of 'Not Like Us,' though UMG previously said Grainge had 'no meaningful involvement' in the marketing of the song.
In another request, Drake demanded communications concerning 'allegations of domestic violence, violence against women, and/or other forms of violence committed by Kendrick Lamar,' following an allegation Drake made against in his diss track 'Family Matters' that Lamar was abusive to his partner (Lamar has previously denied he was abusive, but he hasn't responded to the allegation since Drake's diss track or lawsuit).
Drake sued UMG in January, accusing the label of knowingly promoting false narratives about him by releasing and promoting 'Not Like Us,' a track Lamar released last year at the height of a widely publicized feud between the two rappers. In 'Not Like Us,' Lamar implies Drake is a pedophile, rapping lyrics like: ''Certified Lover Boy'? Certified pedophiles,' and, 'Tryna strike a chord and it's probably A-Minor.' Drake has repeatedly denied the pedophilia allegations. He alleged the song has contributed to public belief he is a pedophile, citing a May 2024 incident in which a security guard was shot outside his Toronto home. Is Drake Suing Kendrick Lamar?
No. In Drake's lawsuit, and an amended complaint filed in April, UMG is listed as the only defendant. Drake's complaint states the 'lawsuit is not about the artist who created 'Not Like Us'' and is 'instead, entirely about UMG, the music company that decided to publish, promote, exploit, and monetize allegations that it understood were not only false, but dangerous.'
Between March 2024 and May 2024, Drake and Lamar traded diss tracks in quick succession in what became a highly publicized rap feud. 'Not Like Us' became a chart-topping, Grammy-winning hit that was considered Lamar's 'victory lap,' as many observers and media outlets declared him to be the winner. Across all the tracks, the rappers traded wild allegations, including Lamar's allegation Drake fathered a secret child, which he denied, and Drake's allegation that he had planted false information in hopes Lamar would use it against him in a diss track. Further Reading
Drake Sues Universal Music Group For Defamation Over Kendrick Lamar's 'Not Like Us' (Forbes)
Drake Says Label Defamed Him By Promoting Kendrick Lamar's 'Not Like Us' At Super Bowl In Court Filing (Forbes)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Matthew Perry's ‘Ketamine Queen' Drug Dealer to Plead Guilty in Accidental Overdose Case
Jasveen Sangha's plea agreement comes as the fifth and final of those charged in the "Friends" actor's death Jasveen Sangha, an alleged Los Angeles-area drug dealer widely known as 'Ketamine Queen,' pled guilty Monday to selling the drugs that killed Matthew Perry. Sangha is the fifth defendant charged in the overdose that led to the 'Friends' alum's death in October 2023. She pled guilty to five counts, including one for distributing the ketamine that led to Perry's death. Sangha is looking at a possible 45 years in prison for the charges. More from TheWrap Matthew Perry's 'Ketamine Queen' Drug Dealer to Plead Guilty in Accidental Overdose Case 'The Truth About Jussie Smollett?' Netflix Trailer Revisits the 'Empire' Actor's Infamous Hate Crime Scandal Kid Cudi Says He Knows He Did 'The Right Thing' Testifying Against Diddy: 'That's All That Matters' | Video Diddy Demands $100 Million in Refiled Defamation Lawsuit Over Claims of Sex With Minors Along with the count of distributing ketamine that resulted in death, Sangha also pleaded guilty to three counts of distributing ketamine and one count of maintaining a drug-involved premises. In exchange for the guilty plea, prosecutors agreed to drop three counts of distributing ketamine and one count of distributing methamphetamine that was unrelated to Perry. She is the final defendant to agree to a guilty plea. The others who already pled guilty include Dr. Salvador Plasencia, the physician who provided Perry with a lethal dose of ketamine, Dr. Mark Chavez, the actor's personal assistant Kenneth Iwamasa and 'street dealer' Erik Fleming. Following Plasencia's guilty plea in June, the physician released a statement saying he was 'profoundly remorseful' for the role he played in Perry's death. 'While Dr. Plasencia was not treating Mr. Perry at the time of his death, he hopes his case serves as a warning to other medical professionals and leads to stricter oversight and clear protocols for the rapidly growing at-home ketamine industry in order to prevent future tragedies like this one,' Plasencia's lawyer, Karen L. Goldstein, said in a statement to the Los Angeles Times. Perry was found dead in his hot tub on Oct. 28, 2023. His cause of death was ruled a ketamine overdose with drowning as a factor. He was 54. More to come… The post Matthew Perry's 'Ketamine Queen' Drug Dealer to Plead Guilty in Accidental Overdose Case appeared first on TheWrap.
Gizmodo
18 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
All-In Podcast Boys Poke Fun at Uber Founder's ‘AI Psychosis' (Which They Encouraged)
Remember when the guys over at the All-In podcast talked with Uber founder Travis Kalanick about 'vibe physics'? Kalanick told viewers that he was on the verge of discovering new kinds of science by pushing his AI chatbots into previously undiscovered territory. It was ridiculous, of course, since that's not how an AI chatbot or science works. And Kalanick's ideas got ridiculed to no end by folks on social media. But the gentlemen of All-In now seem to be distancing themselves from Kalanick's ideas, even suggesting it could be related to the rise of 'AI psychosis,' despite the fact that they were more than happy to entertain the Uber founder's rambling nonsense when he was on the show. Kalanick appeared as a guest on the July 11 episode of All-In, explaining very earnestly how he was on the cusp of discovering exciting new things about quantum physics, previously unknown to science. 'I'll go down this thread with [Chat]GPT or Grok and I'll start to get to the edge of what's known in quantum physics and then I'm doing the equivalent of vibe coding, except it's vibe physics,' Kalanick explained. 'And we're approaching what's known. And I'm trying to poke and see if there's breakthroughs to be had. And I've gotten pretty damn close to some interesting breakthroughs just doing that.' The reality is that AI chatbots like Grok and ChatGPT are not capable of delivering new discoveries in quantum physics because that's beyond their capabilities. They spit out sentences by remixing and rehashing their training data, not by testing hypotheses. But All-In co-host Chamath Palihapitiya thought Kalanick was on to something, taking it a step further by insisting that AI chatbots could just figure out the answer to any problem you posed. 'When these models are fully divorced from having to learn on the known world and instead can just learn synthetically, then everything gets flipped upside down to what is the best hypothesis you have or what is the best question? You could just give it some problem and it would just figure it out,' said Palihapitiya. This kind of insistence that AI chatbots can solve any problem is central to their marketing, but it also sets up users for failure. Tools like Grok and ChatGPT still struggle with basic tasks like counting the number of U.S. state names that contain the letter R because that's not what large language models are good at. But that hasn't stopped folks like OpenAI CEO Sam Altman from making grandiose promises. Co-host Jason Calacanis was the only one to suggest that perhaps Kalanick was misunderstanding his own experience during the July 11 episode. Calacanis asked Kalanick if he was 'kind of reading into it and it's just trying random stuff at the margins.' The Uber founder acknowledged that it can't really come up with a new idea, but said it was only because 'these things are so wedded to what is known.' Kalanick compared it to pulling a stubborn donkey, suggesting it was indeed capable of new discoveries if you just worked hard enough at it. You'd expect that to be the last word on the topic, given the fact that the All-In guys like to avoid controversy. They infamously failed to produce an episode of the podcast the week that Elon Musk and President Trump had their blowout. (The podcast hosts are all friends with Musk, and co-host David Sacks is Trump's crypto czar.) So listeners of the new episode may have been a bit surprised to hear Kalanick's weird ideas discussed again, especially if it was to poke fun at him. The latest episode of All-In, uploaded on Aug. 15, opened with a discussion of so-called 'AI psychosis,' a term that hasn't been defined in medical literature but has emerged in popular media to discuss how people who are struggling with their mental health might see their symptoms exacerbated by engaging too much with AI. Gizmodo reported last week about complaints filed with the FTC about users experiencing hallucinations, egged on by ChatGPT. One complaint even told of how one user stopped taking his medication because ChatGPT told him not to at the same time as he was experiencing a delusional breakdown. AI psychosis isn't a clinical term, and it's hard to determine the precise number of people who are experiencing severe strains on their mental health from the use of AI chatbots. But ChatGPT's creator, OpenAI, has acknowledged that it's a problem. And Calacanis opened the show talking about how people can get 'one-shotted,' the new slang co-opted from video games and used for people who fall too deep into the AI rabbit hole. They anthropomorphize AI and fail to understand it's just a computer program, sending themselves into a delusional spiral. 'You may have even witnessed a little bit of this when Travis [Kalanick] was on the program a couple weeks ago and he said he was like spending his time on the fringes or the edges of… physics,' Calacanis said. 'It really can take you down the rabbit hole.' 'Are you saying Travis is suffering from AI psychosis?' co-host David Friedberg asked. 'I'm saying we may need to do a health check. We may need to do a health check because smart people can get involved with these AI. So we may have to do a little welfare check on our boy TK,' Calacanis said, seemingly in earnest. Palihapitiya seemed to think the underlying problem with AI psychosis was just a product of the so-called loneliness epidemic, but he ignored his own role in feeding Kalanick's narrative that AI chatbots were truly capable of new discoveries in science. David Sacks wasn't having it, insisting that AI psychosis was just a moral panic similar to fears 20 years ago over social media. 'This whole idea of AI psychosis, I think I gotta call bullshit on the whole concept. I mean, what are we talking about here? People doing too much research?' Sacks said, trying to downplay the news reports. 'This feels like the moral panic that was created over social media, but updated for AI.' Sacks admitted there was a mental health crisis in the U.S., but didn't believe it was AI's fault. And there's probably some truth to what Sacks is saying. All new technologies include some form of social upheaval and worries about what a given invention might mean for the future. But there's also no denying that people are much lonelier and isolated since the advent of social media. And that may not all be social media's fault. But revolutionary technologies will inevitably have both positive and negative impacts on society. The question is always whether the positives outweigh the negatives. And the jury is arguably still out on both social media and AI chatbots.
Gizmodo
18 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Britt Lower's ‘Severance' Audition Tape Proves Her Helly R. Was Meant to Be
Long before Severance became a TV obsession, when the Apple TV+ series was still being cast, an actor taped an audition scene for one of the show's most complex and crucial roles. That clip has been released, and it's incredible to see how the performer's initial instincts for and interpretation of the character carried over almost note-perfectly into the show itself. Though viewers were first lured in by big names like Adam Scott, Christopher Walken, Patricia Arquette, and John Turturro, Severance's lesser-known stars soon established their talents. That includes Britt Lower, an instant fan favorite for her turn as the wry, intelligent, desperately unhappy Helly R. across season one—and in season two, for which she's now Emmy-nominated, her expansion of that role with the other side of the character's brain, the slippery enigma Helena Eagan. The Hollywood Reporter shared Lower's Severance audition tape from 2019. The self-made clip features a searing performance of the series' very first scene, in which we're introduced to not just the very confused, freshly awakened consciousness of Helly R., but also the very odd onboarding process at Lumon—a company we'll soon learn does everything very weirdly and mysteriously. Helly R. doesn't know where she is, why she's there, or even who she really is, for that matter. Even at this very early stage, Lower plays the mix of confusion, fear, and hostility perfectly. Lower told THR the Severance script was 'the best one I'd ever read,' and even though her agent said she was a 'long shot' for the part, she dug in, enlisted a friend to read the offscreen Mark S. dialogue in the scene, and determined the bathroom in her house had the best lighting. It was also a confined space—much smaller than what Severance ended up showing us with that conference room when Helly R. wakes up on the table, but suitable for creating that feeling of being trapped in a strange environment. 'My approach to making self-tapes is like, this is a chance for me to show them what I would do if they chose me to play this role,' Lower explained. 'And almost like you've shown up to set early, and the director and the DP, and everybody's late, and they just want you to film it on your own. Like, show us what you would do.' Clearly, it worked out, and the rest is history; after watching the scene, you'll have even more difficulty than you already would have picturing anyone else playing Helly R. Head to THR to watch the embedded video, and join us in appealing to the TV gods to unearth Tramell Tillman's audition tape for Mr. Milchick, if such a thing exists. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
