Subsurface exploration authorized for third phase of F-48 West project
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
May 7—Before construction crews even begin working on the third phase of F-48 West — which won't be until fiscal year 2027 at the very least — the Jasper County Board of Supervisors ordered soil borings be conducted for the twin box culverts that will be installed along the heavily traveled county highway.
County Engineer Michael Frietsch said the twin box culverts would be located near the first curve east of Polk County. Currently, the plan is to replace Bridge O10 with culverts. To determine what the underlying substructure is like, soil borings must be collected. TEAM Services of Des Moines will carry out the work.
Altogether, the soil borings will cost the county $4,980.
According to the contract included in the supervisors agenda, the two soil borings will be drilled to a depth of about 25 feet below the existing grades. The borings cannot be drilled within the stream area with a geotechnical drilling rig. Instead, they will be drilled alongside the nearby stream.
The third and final phase of the F-48 West resurfacing project extends from Colfax to Mitchellville. In addition to the road work and the bridge being replaced, a curve will also be relocated. The curve will be moved northwest, making the final product even wider. Design services have already been approved.
The county will have to acquire 6.3 acres of right-of-way easement and vacate about 9.2 acres to relocate the curve.
When the county vacates the old curve, Frietsch said the road surface will be taken out during the construction phase and then crews will restore the ground back to agriculture land. The concrete will likely be hauled off by the contractor to a landfill or reuse it as riprap provided there isn't any rebar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former rivals Baker Tilly and Moss Adams just merged as private equity reshapes accounting. Their CEOs explain why they did the deal.
Baker Tilly and Moss Adams have merged to create the sixth-largest advisory CPA firm in the US. "We just added a bunch of arrows into our quiver," Jeff Ferro, CEO of Baker Tilly, told Business Insider. The deal marks a major shift for the mid-market landscape, which is being heavily influenced by private equity. Baker Tilly and Moss Adams merged this week in a deal that marks another shake-up for mid-market consulting firms and emphasizes the role being played by private equity in US accounting. The two firms, which are both in the tier below the Big Four, have a combined annual revenue of over $3 billion. By joining forces, they've catapulted themselves above BDO, Grant Thornton US, and CLA to become the 6th largest accounting firm by revenue in the US. The move brings together 11,500 employees into one firm that will keep the Baker Tilly name and be an independent member firm in the Baker Tilly International network. In a joint interview, the two CEOs of the merged firms told Business Insider that the move is mutually strategic and will help them navigate the challenges facing the mid-market. "We just added a bunch of arrows into our quiver," said Jeff Ferro, CEO of Baker Tilly. The deal also offers an insight into how private equity is reshaping the industry in the US. In 2024, Baker Tilly sold a stake to the private investment groups Hellman & Friedman (H&F) and Valeas, in the second-largest deal in the sector at the time. Baker Tilly is now, thanks to the merger, the largest firm in the industry to be partly owned by private-equity investors. It's a trend that is redefining the culture and business model of traditional accounting firms. Firms have typically paid out profits to equity partners, who also get a vote on how they are run. Private equity offers an influx of capital to help firms evolve their technology and data, but requires firms to divest the control historically promised to partners, shaking up their culture. Ferro told BI that Baker Tilly's strategic plan had been to grow through acquisition, and was a key part of what H&F bought into when they signed the deal. H&F will also make a "meaningful additional strategic investment in the business" as part of this transaction. "Our chances of executing our strategy were good, and now I think they're great," said Ferro. Combining firms also created strategic advances in geographic reach — Moss Adams is West Coast-focused, while Baker Tilly mostly covers the East, central, and has some international clients. The two firms bring specific industry strengths to the table and different tools and service capabilities to offer clients, Ferro said. "I see us being a $6 billion revenue organization in five years," Ferro said, which would mean doubling their current combined revenues. "It's quite a win," agreed Eric Miles, the former CEO of Moss Adams, who will take over from Ferro as CEO of Baker Tilly when Ferro retires at the end of the year. The needs of the mid-market client base are changing, and they require more scale and breadth of services than they used to, he said. At the same time, the firms themselves are seeing increasing demand for true fixed costs like training and development, and AI. Those kinds of pressures require large organizations to scale to be competitive, he said. Neither firm had to do the merger, Miles said, "But we had this strategic lens on it, saying, 'how can we be stronger? What's going to be required to be a leading competitive firm in the future?'" "The partnership with Baker-Tilly helped us meet all those long-term strategic objectives, which helps us not only deal with these forces, but get out in front and lead in the market," Miles said. Have a tip? Contact this reporter via email at pthompson@ or Signal at Polly_Thompson.89. Use a personal email address and a nonwork device; here's our guide to sharing information securely. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Did Mark Cuban Get Rich by ‘Scamming' Other Billionaires?
Mark Cuban has offered business advice to millions of people through his 'Shark Tank' appearances and has a partial stake in the Dallas Mavericks. However, some people — especially on Reddit — questioned his path to wealth, accusing the billionaire of scamming people to achieve his fortune. Cuban's initial riches didn't come from 'Shark Tank' or owning a basketball team. You need a lot of money to have those types of opportunities. The entrepreneur's big payday came in 1999 when Yahoo acquired his internet radio startup for $5.7 billion. Read Next: Check Out: The startup went out of business in just three years, but Cuban already made his money. It's regarded as one of the worst internet acquisitions during the dot-com bubble and some people view it as Cuban scamming people on the way to success. Although didn't live up to its price tag, it's hard to call it a scam — below is some important context to keep in mind. Also here's more on how Cuban became a billionaire. Cuban knew that his startup and most of the dot-com companies were overpriced. That's part of the reason he was eager to sell his company to Yahoo for $5.7 billion. Yahoo was making acquisitions left and right and lost a lot of money on a lot of deals. just happens to be a stand-out that is connected with Cuban. It's similar to when an investor sells a stock before it drops by 80%. It's not a scam, but the investor wanted to part ways with an asset before it lost significant value. Cuban knew this risk and used options to hedge his position in Yahoo stock. He received $1.4 billion in shares that he couldn't sell right away, so he bought Yahoo stock puts and sold calls leading up to the crash. See Next: Furthermore, was only started in 1995, so a $5.7 billion selling price is phenomenal after just two years of work. Financial markets rarely present those types of opportunities and Cuban was quick to pounce on it. It's not like Cuban forced Yahoo to buy his company for $5.7 billion. The company's executives had plenty of time to conduct due diligence and if they rushed the process, then that's on them. Not every business investment pans out and doing some due diligence can minimize the chances of making a mistake. Yahoo made several acquisitions during the dot-com bubble. It was a period of great irrationality that hurt many investors, but a few investors made out of that environment with a lot of money, including Cuban. It's well known that Yahoo executives also had the opportunity to buy Google for $1 million in 1998 but turned it down. They also had another chance to acquire Google for $5 billion in 2002. You can't miss out on more money than Yahoo did, even if you tried. The same management team that refused to buy Google at $5 billion in 2022 gave Cuban and his team $5.7 billion to acquire It's hard to call Cuban a scammer when the executives didn't do sufficient due diligence. There's nothing wrong with Cuban accepting a favorable deal if a company provided it to him after doing their research. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban Warns of 'Red Rural Recession' -- 4 States That Could Get Hit Hard 7 Luxury SUVs That Will Become Affordable in 2025 I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money This article originally appeared on Did Mark Cuban Get Rich by 'Scamming' Other Billionaires? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Letters to the Editor: Trump's looming cuts to high-speed rail project represent a 'backward vision'
To the editor: The Pentagon is projected to spend a staggering $2.1 trillion on the F-35 fighter jet program. This weapons system has been plagued by cost overruns, technical failures and delays. Many military analysts now consider the F-35 already obsolete, a Cold War relic in a world facing very different threats. Yet, the Trump administration has raised no concerns. In fact, it's proposed increasing the Pentagon's budget by $150 billion this year, funneling even more money into machines of war. Now contrast that with California's high-speed rail project: a first-of-its-kind system in the U.S. that's projected to create tens of thousands of jobs, stimulate billions in economic activity and drastically reduce carbon emissions. Instead of supporting this vision of a cleaner, more connected America, the Trump administration has actively undermined it ('Trump administration sees 'no viable path' forward to finish high-speed rail project, moves to pull federal funding,' June 4). It's a backward vision: We pour trillions into fighter jets designed to kill, while blocking a transportation system designed to move people, strengthen our economy and protect our planet. Imagine if we invested that $2.1 trillion into a nationwide high-speed rail network, connecting major cities, revitalizing regional economies and leading the world in sustainable infrastructure. It's time to rethink our priorities. The California high-speed rail project deserves more support, not less. Donald Flaherty, Burbank .. To the editor: The fight over high-speed rail is ridiculous. I just returned from three weeks in Japan, a place where bullet trains run the length and breadth of the country and ordinary trains that connect with them go to places the bullet trains don't. When someone wants to go from Tokyo to Kyoto, they don't think about flying or driving, they hop on a train. Compared to Japan, it's as if we're in the Stone Age when it comes to transportation. Plus, these trains run clean on electricity and don't spew harmful exhaust fumes. Murray Zichlinsky, Long Beach This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
