Mexico slaps cruise passengers with new tourist tax, fee set to quadruple by 2027
New $5 Cruise Passenger Fee Begins This Week in Mexico
The $5-per-passenger fee, which applies every time a cruise ship docks at a Mexican port, is set to gradually rise to $21 by 2027, as reported by New York Post. The charge will be folded into the price of the cruise, similar to how airlines include Mexico's tourist tax in airfare, according to the report.
Rubén Olmos Rodríguez, who has participated in the tax talks and runs advisory firm Global Nexus, told the Wall Street Journal, 'The Mexican government's perspective is: 'OK, fine, you bring prosperity. But you need to pay accordingly, like other tourists pay when they come via an airplane,'' as quoted by New York Post.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Play War Thunder now for free
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
Florida-Caribbean Cruise Association analysed that the new tax will be in addition to the port fees that cruise lines have already paid for years, which is an average of $28.85 per passenger in Cozumel, as per the report. The Florida-Caribbean Cruise Association estimated that approximately 3,300 cruise ships are projected to stop in Mexican ports this year, bringing about 10 million passengers with them, as reported by the New York Post.
ALSO READ:
Oracle stock soars after revealing massive $30 billion annual cloud deal in filing
Live Events
Cruise Lines Push Back on the New Tax
While the tax has been reduced from the original $42 proposed by officials, major cruise operators
Royal Caribbean
and other cruise operators are pushing back by arguing that it drops off passengers who patronise Mexican businesses, as reported by New York Post.
Local Business Owners Worry About Impact
Meanwhile, the local business owners have voiced their concerns that the tax could discourage tourists from booking cruises that stop in Mexico, according to the report. Carmen Joaquín, who owns a duty-free shop and serves as president of Cozumel's business coordinating council told the New York Post, 'We, as business owners, were very concerned, because Cozumel lives on cruise tourism,' as quoted in the report.
ALSO READ:
Iran bans Elon Musk's Starlink, users now face prison, fines, even flogging
According to the report, the cruise operator for months had worked together with local officials over taxation, hiring and local investment requirements, as government officials pressured the company to employ more Mexican workers and use more Mexican products across its supply chain.
Tourist Tax To Help Avoid Social Program Cuts
However, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has highlighted that, the new tourist tax is a way to lower the nation's budget deficit without having to cut social programmes, as reported by the New York Post.
ALSO READ:
Peter Thiel faces backlash for backing Palantir — key facts Americans should be aware of
FAQs
How much is the new tourist tax in Mexico?
It starts at $5 per passenger this week and will rise to $21 by 2027.
Why is Mexico charging cruise passengers a new tax?
The government wants cruise tourists to pay the same kind of tax that aeroplane passengers already do, as part of broader efforts to boost public revenue, as per the New York Post report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Over 200,000 women in the US have left the workforce since January: Has the land of opportunity become 'gender selective'?
The United States has long upheld and cherished the sobriquet 'land of opportunity' as a badge of honour. Yet what if the opportunity server first checks the gender of the plate before serving it? Opportunity bends and breaks along lines of privilege, and the latest labour figures reveal a stark truth: Women are once again paying the price of policy choices. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), 212,000 women aged 20 and over have left the workforce since January 2025, while 44,000 men entered it. Numbers rarely lie, and here they raise a blunt question: Has America's promise of opportunity become gender selective? The fragile gains of flexibility The pandemic years have marked a turning point. Remote work and flexible schedules facilitated women, particularly mothers, to remain in jobs while navigating the unpaid burden of caregiving. By January 2025, labor-force participation among women aged 25 to 44 with a child under five had reached 69.7%, according to US data sources. But by June, the rate had plunged nearly three percentage points to 66.9%, a sharp reversal after years of progress. The culprit is the systemic rollback of flexibility. Mandates from corporate giants like Amazon, JP Morgan, and AT&T, coupled with President Donald Trump's January 2025 directive requiring federal employees to return to the office five days a week, dismantled arrangements that had allowed women to thrive. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Data from the Flex Index, which tracks corporate remote work policies, shows full-time office mandates in Fortune 500 companies rose from 13% at the end of 2024 to 24% in the second quarter of 2025. Care work is forcing women out of work At the heart of this crisis lies caregiving, still largely a female responsibility. 'Women still take on the lion's share of caregiving responsibilities,' notes Julie Vogtman, senior director at the National Women's Law Center, as reported by Time. Without workplace flexibility, women are the first to scale back or step out. The problem is mounted by the crumbling of the childcare infrastructure. Federal childcare subsidies ended in September 2024, forcing many centers to shut down or hike tuition. Immigrant workers who make up roughly 20% of childcare providers have been hit by mass deportations and heightened immigration fears, further reducing availability. As costs climb, many families cannot sustain dual-income households, forcing women out of paid employment. Productivity or patriarchy? Evidence does not support the narrative that in-office mandates enhance performance. A 2024 study examining resumes from Microsoft, SpaceX, and Apple found that return-to-office requirements triggered an exodus of senior employees, weakening long-term competitiveness. Similarly, a survey by Walr on behalf of Upwork and Workplace Intelligence revealed nearly two-thirds of C-suite executives admitted return-to-office mandates led to a 'disproportionate' number of women resigning. Policy contradictions and economic fallout The paradox is brimming. While the Trump administration signals concern over declining birth rates and promotes marriage and family incentives, its employment policies create the very conditions that discourage women from combining work and motherhood. Federal jobs once perceived as family-friendly, are shedding flexibility and security, leaving women to choose between paychecks and parenthood. The economic implications are profound. Fewer dual-income households mean diminished consumer spending, precarious healthcare coverage, and a drag on national growth. BLS data already indicates slowed economic momentum in the first half of 2025. In the long term, excluding women from the workforce corrodes both competitiveness and living standards. A selective promise Some women have redressed their exit as liberation- freelancing, starting businesses, or reclaiming time with children. Yet for most, departure is not empowerment; it is compulsion. The pandemic had briefly suggested a different future—one where workplaces acknowledged that workers are also caregivers, and where productivity could coexist with empathy. That fragile revolution has now been rolled back. If opportunity in America now requires outsourcing childcare, sacrificing flexibility, and conforming to rigid schedules dictated from above, then it is no longer universal; it is selective. And when 212,000 women leave the workforce in six months, the question is no longer whether the 'land of opportunity' is failing women, but whether it was ever truly built for them. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
GST rate rejig to give Rs 1.98 lakh cr consumption boost, yearly revenue loss seen at Rs 85,000 cr: Report
The proposed GST reforms through a two-tier tax structure and lower tax rates on household goods will lead to an estimated average revenue loss of Rs 85,000 crore a year, but will boost consumption by Rs 1.98 lakh crore, SBI Research Report said on Tuesday. The Centre has proposed a ' next-gen GST ' under which the Goods and Services Tax (GST) will be a two-rate structure of 5 and 18 per cent based of classification of items as 'merit' and 'standard'. Also, a 40 per cent tax will be levied on 5-7 select goods, including demerit goods like pan masala and tobacco. SBI Research Report estimated that the effective weighted average GST rate has come down from 14.4 per cent at the time of inception to 11.6 per cent in September 2019. Given the current rationalisation of rates, we believe that effective weighted average GST rate may come down to 9.5 per cent. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Empty Alaska Cruises Departing From Ontario That Seniors Can Book For Dirt Cheap FavoriteSearches | Search Ads Learn More Undo However, the consumption boost , which totals for a 0.6 per cent increase in GDP, would not stoke inflation as taxes on mass consumption items are going to go down in the proposed GST regime. Overall, we believe CPI (consumer price index) inflation may be moderated in the range of 20 to 25 basis points. Live Events Since the GST rate of essential items (food, cloth, etc.) is expected to decline from 12 per cent to 5 per cent, the CPI inflation in this category may also come down by 10-15 basis points after considering a 60 per cent pass through effect on food items. Apart from this, the rationalisation of GST rates of services also leads to another 5-10 bps reduction in CPI inflation on other goods and service items, considering a 25 per cent pass through effect. "The GST 2.0 regime, while also involving an average revenue loss of Rs 85,000 crore, is estimated to have boosted consumption by Rs 1.98 lakh crore," SBI Research said. For the current fiscal, the loss to revenue is estimated at Rs 45,000 crore assuming the period of new tax rates as October-March. Taking together the benefits of income tax tax rate cuts announced in Budget for current fiscal, the combined impact of both measures amounts to an additional Rs 5.31 lakh crore of consumption expenditure in the economy. This translates into approximately 1.6 per cent of GDP, as per its estimates. The Centre's proposal will be discussed by a panel of state finance ministers on Wednesday and Thursday. Once approved, it would be placed before the GST Council in its meeting next month. The current GST structure (GST 1.0) consists of four main rate slabs: 5, 12, 18 and 28 per cent. These rates apply to most goods and services. In addition to the main slabs, there are three special rates: 3 per cent on gold, silver, diamond and jewellery, 1.5 per cent on cut and polished diamonds, and 0.25 per cent on rough diamonds. A GST Compensation cess is also levied on select goods such as tobacco products, aerated drinks and motor vehicles at varying rates. This cess is used to compensate states for any revenue loss resulting from the transition to the GST system. During the 79th Independence Day speech on August 15, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the next-generation reform in GST in the form of rate rationalisation (GST 2.0). He said that the GST reforms would be announced by Diwali.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
Fed succession race: US Treasury chief Scott Bessent says interviews for new chair to begin September 1, 11 candidates in fray
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday said that interviews for Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell's replacement are expected to start around September 1, with 11 candidates under consideration. President Donald Trump's choice of the next Fed chief is being closely tracked, especially after his repeated criticism of the central bank for holding back on interest rate cuts this year. Powell's term ends in May 2026, AP reported. Speaking to CNBC, Bessent said, 'I'm going to be meeting with them, probably right before, right after Labor Day, and to start bringing down the list to present to President Trump.' He described the pool as 'an incredible group' of candidates from within the Fed, former Fed members, and private sector professionals. While he did not specify the names, media reports have listed Fed governors Michelle Bowman and Christopher Waller, former Fed governor Kevin Warsh, and National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett as being in the running. Also mentioned are former regional Fed president James Bullard and Marc Sumerlin, a former economic adviser to President George W Bush. Bessent himself was previously seen as a contender but was ruled out earlier this month after Trump said he would remain Treasury chief. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Trump has made no secret of his disdain for Powell, calling him a 'numbskull' and 'moron' in recent months. Fed policymakers, meanwhile, have been cautious with rate cuts as they assess the impact of Trump's tariffs on global trade. Markets are also awaiting Powell's address on Friday at the annual Jackson Hole gathering of central bankers, which could provide signals on whether further rate cuts are likely at the Fed's mid-September policy meeting. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
