Napier pharmacy owner considers closing after being raided three times in 10 weeks
Life Pharmacy in Napier.
Photo:
Google Maps Street View
A Napier pharmacy owner says he's contemplating shutting up shop after his store was
raided
for the third time in just 10 weeks.
Police say they responded to a burglary at Life Pharmacy in Napier at 2.30 am on Monday, where thieves had smashed through the stores front door in search of expensive perfumes.
Pharmacy owner Peter Bailey has worked at the store for 45 years.
He said the stores front door had to be replaced three times since the break-ins started 10 weeks ago, costing him an estimated $30,000.
"Our insurance company isn't going to be very happy, I can see our premiums going through the roof - it just makes it tougher in a tough environment."
He said the thefts left him "a bit stressed and emotional", but was thankful for the Napier community that had supported him and other staff members.
"We've got some amazing customers who have been into see us in the last couple days," Bailey said.
"We had a gentleman drop in a $50 coffee voucher for the staff."
He said pharmacies were already a struggling businesses, and he had already seen them start to disappear from the city.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Press secretary sex scandal: Investigation to conclude in August
Michael Forbes had audio recordings of multiple sessions with sex workers, as well as zoomed-in photos of women in public and footage of women getting changed for a night out. Photo: LinkedIn/Michael Forbes The government says it will "consider what information can be made public" about the sex scandal surrounding the prime minister's former deputy chief press secretary, after the investigation ends in August. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has ordered Ministerial Services - run by the Department of Internal Affairs - to carry out a "deep dive" investigation after it was revealed Michael Forbes had audio recordings of multiple sessions with sex workers, as well as zoomed-in photos of women in public and footage of women getting changed for a night out, filmed through a window. Forbes resigned as Luxon's deputy chief press secretary this month after the Stuff investigation looking into the matter contacted him for comment. The recordings, photos and footage was discovered by a Wellington sex worker in July last year. In a statement, the Department of Internal Affairs said its investigation would look into "employment and device policies, procedures and information sharing practices". "The deep dive is expected to conclude in August 2025, at which point DIA will determine what information can be shared and when. "We will not be commenting further as the deep dive is in progress." The statement follows a report by the NZ Herald quoting DIA chief executive Paul James, who said he did not have terms of reference "per se", but that he expected to release the investigation's findings publicly in August. James told the Herald officials were checking the range of security clearances Parliamentary staff had, and with police and the Security Intelligence Service would assess information sharing practices - likely in July. James also told the paper he did not expect the inquiry would prompt wide-ranging changes but he wanted to remain open minded, including around whether employees were expected to raise concerns about a change in their circumstances, or whether departments should check in about that regularly. In statements after the scandal was revealed, Forbes said he had sought therapy over the past year, and should have apologised to the women affected at the time. Police investigated the same month the recordings were discovered and seized two phones in a search warrant, but said the available evidence did not meet the threshold for criminal prosecution. After the scandal broke, the DIA said all Ministerial Services staff were subject to standard pre-employment checks including reference checks, serious misconduct checks and a criminal conviction check when first employed - but this was not required when Forbes was temporarily assigned to the PM's office. Luxon himself told reporters it was Forbes' responsibility "to actually declare those issues or those incidents to us - that didn't happen which is why his employment would have been terminated, obviously". Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Du Val directors Kenyon and Charlotte Clarke want assets unfrozen and passports back
Du Val director Kenyon Clarke. Photo: The Financial Markets Authority has hit back at claims by Du Val directors that it is to blame for the "train wreck" collapse of the property group. Lawyers for the authority and for Du Val's directors Kenyon and Charlotte Clarke have been in the High Court at Auckland this week, arguing about whether receivership should continue for the couple and the handful of Du Val companies not in statutory management. The Clarkes want to be out of receivership, their assets unfrozen and their passports returned from the control of the High Court. Their lawyer Ron Mansfield said receivership orders were "excessively broad" and oppressive and should end. The FMA had had months to investigate but had not come up with any solid evidence - and the Clarkes claim it was the FMA action that cause the train wreck, he said. However, FMA lawyer Jenny Cooper said that claim could not go unanswered. "It is assertion without substance," she said. The FMA had good grounds to step in and to keep investigating because the investigation was a complex one that would take time, she said. The Clarkes could speed it up by being more open with receivers and investigators, she said. A court directive to force the Clarkes to be interviewed by receivers under oath about their assets was currently being heard by the Court of Appeal. Cooper noted the very complex and large company structure of about 70 entities. "The Clarkes are not people who have straightforward accounting arrangements," she said. The receivership and associated orders were still needed because there was an ongoing investigation into the group, Cooper said The FMA presented evidence about why that should continue but much of it was suppressed so it would not prejudice any civil or criminal action that could follow. Justice Jane Anderson also noted the FMA was still in an investigation phase and the Clarkes had not had a chance to respond - and were not in a position to because of a lack of information. The FMA did not have to prove any wrongdoing at this hearing, just that there was enough evidence to show more investigation was needed and the receivership should stay. Most of the arguments about why the Clarkes should or should not get their passports back were also suppressed. Justice Anderson had initially allowed the argument to be reported, but Mansfield was seeking leave to appeal. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
MSD criticised by Family Court Judge for legal appeal ‘distraction'
Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver A judge has chastised a government agency for wasting public money and the court's time trying to recall her judgement criticising the living conditions of an autistic man held at Auckland's Mason Clinic. The man, who has been detained in near-isolation for 19 years, lives in noisy conditions despite his extreme sensitivity to loud sounds and a belief he should be moved. The man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, last year became so distressed by construction noise next door he twice stuffed paper into his ears , requiring doctors to remove it. In a September judgement, Family Court Judge Penelope Matalavea (formerly Ginnen) criticised the man's "untenable" situation, stating the Health Ministry's inadequate funding hindered his quality of life. The man has been detained under the Intellectual Disability Compulsory Care and Rehabilitation Act since 2006. His care order has been extended 11 times as experts have repeatedly assessed him as being too dangerous to release, and he has spent the past five years mostly in seclusion at the Mason Clinic. The Supreme Court heard an appeal from the man's mother in August arguing his detention is unlawful. Ten months on, the court has yet to issue its decision. Auckland's Mason Clinic, where the man at the centre of the legal argument is held. Photo: RNZ / Cole Eastham-Farrelly In November, the Ministry of Social Development made an application to recall Judge Matalavea's September decision, saying the court had been "misinformed". It said there had been 14 "notifiable incidents" that had occurred regarding the man's behaviour that had not been reported to the ministry by the Mason Clinic until weeks after they had occurred. The ministry said the failure to include these incidents at the hearing may have led to Judge Matalavea misunderstanding the constraints and limitations around the care provided to the man. In a decision released today, Judge Matalavea called the recall application a "distraction" and questioned the amount of public resource being put into it. "I noted public funds are constrained, and it is all public funds that would be applied to the two-day hearing. Everybody, from me as the Judge, to the litigants and the lawyers and the district inspector is publicly funded." In May, the ministry proposed an alternative, seeking permission to withdraw its recall application and instead file affidavits with the court to ensure its evidence sat on the file. In her decision, Judge Matalavea supported that idea, giving the ministry leave to file the evidence, though she conceded such action was unlikely to have any impact because her decision had already been issued. "This is an unorthodox approach, but a pragmatic resolution to a complex situation." Given the complexity of the case and the fact that all parties were publicly-funded, Judge Matalavea gave no order for costs. Human rights lawyer Tony Ellis, who was counsel for the man's mother, told RNZ he would be appealing the no costs ruling. "I'm not publicly funded, I've been doing this work for eight years for free." Ellis said he had told the court several times that he received no fee at all. He was also disappointed that while this legal stoush had been going on, there had been no change in the man's living situation. "And ten months after the Supreme Court hearing we are still waiting for the decision. It's not a very satisfactory result for the man or his mother," Ellis said.
