Nebraska commission approves emergency medical cannabis regulations
LINCOLN — The Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission on Thursday approved emergency regulations to begin accepting medical cannabis applications as soon as Gov. Jim Pillen gives his final green light.
State law requires him to do so by Tuesday.
The emergency regulations, unveiled for the first time minutes before the 10 a.m. meeting, largely mirror a legislative proposal that lawmakers stalled on last month. The regulations would take effect for up to 90 days, pending Pillen's approval. The two medical cannabis-related laws that voters approved mandate that applications must start being accepted no later than July 1.
Commissioner Lorelle Mueting of Gretna, an addiction prevention specialist through Heartland Family Service, affirmed that commissioners want public feedback on the emergency regulations through July 15, to inform future, formal regulations.
Public comments may be submitted to lcc.frontdesk@nebraska.gov, the repository for the Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, which will forward the messages onto the state's new Medical Cannabis Commission.
'The input that the public provides on these emergency regulations will help us immediately begin drafting the regular regulations,' Mueting said Thursday.
Dr. Monica Oldenburg, an anesthesiologist who chairs the commission, will send a letter to Pillen relaying the emergency regulations and stating that the 'failure' to adopt them by the deadline 'would force Nebraskans to seek medical cannabis or similar products from unregulated and potentially harmful sources.'
Pillen's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the emergency rules.
Licensing of new establishments must begin by Oct. 1, according to the laws. The emergency regulations would allow licenses for, at minimum, cultivators, product manufacturers, dispensaries and transporters, and someone could be awarded only one type of license.
Justification for emergency regulations under state law can include 'imminent peril' to public health, safety or welfare.
Mueting and Oldenburg will head up a subcommittee to work on the regulations in the meantime.
Commissioners also voted 4-0 to enter a legal partnership with the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services and Pillen's Policy Research Office, which allows the commission to contract with DHHS for 'legal services.'
Legislative Bill 677, which fell 10 votes short of the 33 votes needed to change a voter-approved law last month, 23-22, would have provided additional guardrails around the ballot measures that voters overwhelmingly approved in November. Up to 30 dispensaries would have been allowed under that bill, up to 10 in each congressional district.
Under the emergency regulations, no more than one dispensary would be allowed in each of the state's 12 District Court Judicial Districts. Douglas County (Omaha) and Lancaster County (Lincoln) are the only counties that occupy a single district. Multiple medical cannabis advocates asked the commission to reconsider that specific restriction.
No dispensary could located within 1,000 feet of any school, daycare, church or hospital. At least 51% of an applicant's business or organization would need to have resided in Nebraska and be a U.S. citizen for at least the past four years. Applicants also would need to pay to submit two legible sets of fingerprints to the FBI and the Nebraska State Patrol for a criminal background check.
Unlike LB 677, the emergency regulations do not specify qualifying medical conditions. LB 677 would have outlined 15 conditions eligible for the medicine. That list excluded post-traumatic stress disorder.
Nebraskans in November overwhelmingly legalized up to 5 ounces with the recommendation of a health care practitioner.
The emergency regulations would require that a recommendation (from any provider nationwide) specify the product being recommended, the recommended dosage and potency, the number of doses, the directions for use and the name of the patient.
The regulations would allow dispensaries to sell:
Oral tablets, capsules or tinctures.
Non-sugarcoated gelatinous cubes, gelatinous rectangular cuboids or lozenges in a cube or rectangular cuboid shape.
Gels, oils, creams or other topical preparations
Suppositories.
Transdermal patches.
Liquids or oils for administration using a nebulizer or inhaler.
Dispensaries could not sell raw plant or flower, food or drinks with cannabis infused into it (edibles), any products containing artificial or natural flavoring or coloring and any products administered by smoking, combustion or vaping.
LB 677 would have mandated testing of all products before they could be sold, one of the strictest testing regimes in the country. However, without a legislative change, the commission lacks the explicit authority to regulate testing under the medical cannabis laws. Instead, the emergency regulations say products 'may' be submitted for testing or research for development purposes.
Packaging would need to be able to show it had been tampered with, child-resistant, resealable and protected from contamination.
Similar to 2024 restrictions on vaping products, cannabis products could not depict cartoon-like fictional characters or mimic characters primarily aimed at entertaining minors, trademarks or trade dress or products that imitate or mimic products primarily marketed to minors, symbols primarily used to market products to minors or the images and likenesses of celebrities.
Shari Lawlor of Valley told the commission that her 32-year-old daughter, Brooke, has faced severe seizures for the past 31 years but 'nothing in modern medicine has helped her,' including brain surgery in 2024.
Shari Lawlor said her daughter has 11 bottles of medications and takes 'handfuls' of pills.
'They're going to kill her. If it's not one organ, it's another,' Lawlor said. 'I would just like the option to have complete access for the patients, and that's only by letting all different products on the market.'
Jim Wilson, a clinical pharmacist speaking on behalf of the Nebraska Pharmacists Association, said he has seen positives and negatives of cannabis. He asked the commission to seek input from pharmacists because of possible side effects with other drug interactions.
Wilson advocated for adding medical cannabis to the state's prescription drug monitoring program used for other medications, which LB 677 would have done, too.
'We are not interested in the politics or any particular party or any of that,' Wilson told the commission. 'We're interested in the patient and what might happen to them.'
State Sen. John Cavanaugh of Omaha, who helped advocate for LB 677 in the most recent legislative session, said the commission has no legal authority to restrict the forms of cannabis available to patients.
'To disallow by regulation what is clearly allowed by statute is a slap in the face to the patients and families who need this medicine and the voters of Nebraska who approved it by an overwhelming majority,' he said in a text.
State Sen. Ben Hansen of Blair, who introduced LB 677, had no immediate reaction.
Crista Eggers, executive director of Nebraskans for Medical Marijuana, the campaign that ushered the laws through the 2024 election, said the ballot measures clearly legalized medical cannabis in all forms, including flower. She said it's also unclear where completed applications should be sent.
Speaking with reporters after the meeting, Eggers said there are good components to the regulations and that she viewed Thursday's meeting as productive, while it had some drawbacks. She said that includes the commission voicing an intention to listen to the public and seek feedback.
'Today was a positive day, and I believe that we are moving in a forward direction,' Eggers said. 'We're not there. There's a long ways to go. But a good foundation today.'
Bailey, who chairs the Liquor Control Commission, told Eggers that he and other commissioners had seen the regulations about 12 hours before Thursday's meeting and hope to tie down and clear up the regulations more about the regulations over the next month.
'We're asking for public feedback such that these things could be made whole,' Bailey said. 'The best we have right now is what's in here.'
The eventual formal regulations the commission advances this summer must include at least 30 days notice of what's being considered before a public hearing.
The commission set its next meeting for 1 p.m. Aug. 4, with a location to be determined. If there are no meetings before then, the likely public hearing on the more lasting regulations would be in September.
Gov. Jim Pillen appointed Lorelle Mueting of Gretna and Dr. Monica Oldenburg of Lincoln as the at-large members of the Nebraska Medical Cannabis Commission. They join the three governor-appointed members of the Liquor Control Commission: Bruce Bailey of Lincoln, retired District Court Judge J. Michael Coffey of Omaha and Kim Lowe of Kearney.
This was the first meeting for Mueting and Coffey, whom Pillen appointed last week. Pillen did not reappoint Commissioner Harry Hoch, Jr., to Coffey's seat, even though he applied for reappointment Feb. 2. Three other people applied for the seat.
Hoch withdrew his reappointment application May 20 at the Governor's Office's request for more 'cannabis experience,' he told the Nebraska Examiner.
State law requires commissions to publish rules or regulations on a commission website, but the Medical Cannabis Commission does not yet have one.
It costs $70,000 to create a website through a specific state vendor, but commissioners can't collect fees or levy any taxes on medical cannabis and thus have no funds available, unless they 'borrow' funds from the Liquor Control Commission.
The medical cannabis commissioners also don't have separate state emails or a set state address or phone number.
Asked by commissioners how to remedy that situation, or if they would violate state law without a website, Assistant Attorney General Benjamin Swanson said: 'I understand that that's the position that you're in. I unfortunately can't — I don't have any information for you on how to fix that problem.'
The commission entered closed session multiple times Thursday, often to discuss regulations and/or pending and potential litigation against the commission.
Commissioners did not state whether a closed session was 'clearly necessary' for 'the protection of the public interest' or 'prevention of needless injury to an individual, if such individual has not requested a public meting' before any of the three times, as required under the Open Meetings Act.
Asked by the Nebraska Examiner whether it was for either of those overarching reasons, Bo Botelho, chief legal officer of the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services, who is now working with the Medical Cannabis Commission, said, 'No.'
— Zach Wendling, Nebraska Examiner reporter
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
06-08-2025
- Buzz Feed
Republican Booed At Nebraska Town Hall Over Healthcare
Republican lawmaker Mike Flood was recently booed and heckled at a town hall in Nebraska, and the video is GLORIOUS. Over two million people have watched this TikTok that began with Mike asking, "Do you think people who are 28 years old, who can work and refuse to work, should get free healthcare?" As the crowd screamed a resounding "YESSSS," Mike looked like he was thinking, "Oh no." The face of someone who did not receive the answer they expected: "I don't think that the majority of Nebraskans agree with you," he finally said. When he asked for the next slide of the presentation, people began chanting, "Tax the rich!" Visibly frustrated, Mike tried again: "If you choose not to work. You. Do. Not. Get. Free. Healthcare." But the crowd wasn't having it and screamed, "BOOOOOO!" Mike continued, "Money does not fall out of the sky. It does not grow on trees. It comes from all of you. I wish there was a world we could live in where everything came from the government, and it was free. But that will never, ever, ever happen." Notably, he did not offer the obvious solution of, IDK, making the ultra-wealthy pay their fair share??? Naturally, folks in the comments had a lot to say. This person pointed out, "even if you work healthcare isn't free!!!!" Many people said what we're all thinking: "Healthcare should be a basic human right." "i love that you can hear the whole crowd say 'YES' it restored my faith in American society." "'Should people in the richest society in history have access to life saving care' isn't the gotcha he thinks it is." "Forgive me Nebraska, I wasn't familiar with yalls game DAMN." "*the majority screams yes* 'the majority doesn't agree with you.'" And finally, "'it comes from all of you' SIR YOU FORGOT TO TAX THE BILLIONAIRES." What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below!

05-08-2025
'Vote him out!': Town hall erupts in anger at Nebraska GOP congressman over Trump megabill, policies
House Republican Rep. Mike Flood faced what appeared to be a hostile crowd during a rowdy town hall on Monday night in Lincoln, Nebraska. The crowd erupted within just minutes of the start of the forum, shouting and heckling at the congressman as he touted President Donald Trump's massive policy and tax bill that was signed into law in July. Flood said there were about 750 members in the audience at Kimball Hall. "I know this is probably going to be met with some resistance ... I want the opportunity to tell you and talk to you about health care in the bill we just passed. I want to go right into this bill, because I know this is something a lot of people have questions about. And quite frankly, from where I sit, there's been a lot of misinformation out there about the bill," Flood told the crowd, which received loud boos from the audience. He tried to walk the audience through key health care provisions of the megabill but was continuously drowned out by the raucous crowd. "The only way we're going to get through tonight is if I get a chance to tell you why I voted, because ultimately I represent you, and you will have your say," he said. The megabill's impact on Medicaid was a main topic brought up at the town hall, which angered the audience. "So, here's a question. Do you think that people who are 28 years old that can work and refuse to work, should get free health care?" Flood asked, which received an unfriendly response from the crowd. "I don't think that a majority of Nebraskans agree with you." The congressman argued that while Medicaid benefits were not cut, the changes to the program don't "involve anybody that's disabled, that is of senior age and unable to work, anybody that is pregnant or the vulnerable." When asked by an audience member how the congressman can justify taking away health care from Nebraskans, Flood brushed off the concern. "We have a state where our infrastructure is going to be supported, is going to be funded, and is going to be available for the people that need it. If you are able to work, and you're 28 years old and you choose not to work, you don't get free health care in America. If you are in this country illegally, you do not get free health care in America." Audience members repeatedly shouted, "Tax the Rich! Tax the Rich! Tax the Rich!" as Rep. Flood discussed tax provisions of the megabill like no tax on tips and no tax on overtime. The congressman pushed back, saying, "If we adopted the Democrats' plan in the last Congress to tax the rich, it would generate $50 billion, which does not take us close to where we're going. And it cuts job creation. It cuts business creation. It cuts the ability for employers to invest in their businesses." "This bill is a middle-class tax cut," Rep. Flood said at one point, which received strong pushback and boos from the audience. "I read the bill," the congressman added when pressed by a constituent. "Is every bill perfect? No. But I supported this bill." Rep. Flood took several questions on a wide range of topics but the audience was remained not satisfied, yelling, "vote him out!" as the hour-and-a-half event came to a close.

USA Today
05-08-2025
- USA Today
Rep. Mike Flood booed at Nebraska town hall after defending Trump policies
The event in Lincoln, Nebraska, attracted a rowdy crowd that continuously yelled and booed as GOP Rep. Mike Flood defended Trump administration policies. Congressman Mike Flood said he wanted to talk about President Donald Trump's signature legislation and declared there was "a lot of misinformation" surrounding it. That's when the shouting started, continuing for more than an hour as the Republican lawmaker faced a rowdy town hall crowd in Lincoln, Nebraska, on Aug. 4, full of people irate about Trump's new bill and other policies coming from his administration. Audience members in the University of Nebraska-Lincoln's Kimball Recital Hall pressed Flood on releasing the Jeffrey Epstein files, accused Trump of "fascism," and raised concerns about cuts to government programs. They yelled and booed continuously as Flood spoke. Trump carried Nebraska by 20 percentage points in 2024, and Flood won his district, which includes Lincoln and other communities in the eastern part of the state, by the same margin in 2024. But the town hall reflected an energized opposition to the new administration. Trump's top legislative priority, a package that includes sweeping tax cuts and deep reductions to spending on programs such as Medicaid, was a frequent target. One woman called the measure a "monstrosity." The president signed the new law on July 4. With the House in recess until September, lawmakers are now home in their districts, hearing directly from voters about the legislation. Polls indicate the measure is unpopular. Trump and the GOP have been gearing up to sell voters on it ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The town hall highlighted the challenges they face. The crowd unloaded on Flood, who tried to preempt some of the criticism by opening the event with a defense of the law, lauding the tax reductions and focusing on Medicaid work requirements and a fund to help rural hospitals. "More than anything, I truly believe this bill protects Medicaid for the future," Flood said. The crowd booed, and the criticism kept coming. The law is projected to cut $1 trillion mostly from Medicaid and Affordable Care Act insurance plans and eliminate insurance coverage for 11.8 million people over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. A person raised concerns about thousands of Nebraskans losing health insurance coverage. Other constituents focused on the CBO projection that the law will increase the national debt by $3.4 trillion over a decade. With the Trump administration embroiled in a controversy over releasing government records about Epstein, a wealthy financier who died in jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex-trafficking charges, one question posed to Flood: "Why are you covering up the Epstein files?" Flood said he favors releasing the records. The congressman was also pressed about how to ensure the accuracy of the nation's economic data after Trump decided to fire Erika McEntarfer, the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, following the agency's release of a report showing weak job creation. Flood said he didn't know the details, but that "if all that person did was get the data out there… and I don't know that's the case, but if that's all they did, I would not have fired her." "But I don't know because things are complicated," Flood added. Contributing: Ken Alltucker