logo
Review – Poison Ivy #35: Blood in the Garden

Review – Poison Ivy #35: Blood in the Garden

Geek Dad4 days ago
Poison Ivy #36 cover, via DC Comics.
Ray: One of the most impressive things that G. Willow Wilson has done over this extended run is how she's expanded Ivy's world. She's gone from a criminal with a minimal supporting cast to a cosmic antihero with deep ties to the Green, several key friends and frenemies around Gotham, and several lovers and ex-lovers. But now, it's all crashing down. The authorities have captured Killer Croc, her old flame Bella Garten is leading the Order of the Green Knight and perverting her message, and Janet is dying of a mysterious illness. The Gardener is by far the most pressing threat, and Ivy knows she has to confront her directly – but first she seeks out help from Harley, who is busy with her own business in Throatcutter Hill. I'm not quite a fan of the whole open relationship thing Ivy and Harley have going on, but every time they're on screen together it's clear why these two are one of DC's most dynamic couples. Desperate measures. Via DC Comics.
And speaking of dynamic, Pamela and Bella are just as interesting – because whatever the two of them have has curdled into hate over the years. Ivy will never forgive Bella for manipulating her and altering her against her will back in the first major story they shared, and Bella resents Ivy for abandoning her and abandoning their cause. The face-off between the two of them almost feels Shakespearean at times, as they try to sort out if there can ever be a partnership between them again – but then Ivy does something truly shocking that pretty much reminds us that she truly is a villain at her core when she needs to be. Wilson has always gone back and forth with just how far Ivy is willing to go, and that ambiguity is part of why this series works so well. Its Ivy is deeply unpredictable, and her enemies truly have something to fear from her. Very interested to see what the next act looks like.
To find reviews of all the DC issues, visit DC This Week.
GeekDad received this comic for review purposes. Liked it? Take a second to support GeekDad and GeekMom on Patreon!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Colby Cosh: The atomic bomb through Oppenheimer's eyes
Colby Cosh: The atomic bomb through Oppenheimer's eyes

National Post

time5 hours ago

  • National Post

Colby Cosh: The atomic bomb through Oppenheimer's eyes

Can it really be two years since Christopher Nolan's film 'Oppenheimer' became the old-school box-office sensation of summer 2023? Well, there you go, it must have been two years: even a journalist can do that much math. 'Oppenheimer,' which is reasonably scrupulous in its accuracy by cinema standards, continues to be fertile ground for discussion and memes. People will go on talking about the war and the command decision to bomb, but the drama of Los Alamos, N.M., is a distinctive, important historical phenomenon, a little nugget of uncanny magic rearranging human history at the outset of the Jet Age. Article content Article content A cult of wizards was assembled (on a mountaintop, loosely speaking) by a great empire: it was told to come up with a method to drop a sun on its enemies, and they succeeded. As Nolan's movie implies, almost every other thing that happened in the 20th century, including the actual use of the weapon, might be a footnote. Article content Article content Article content If you are suitably mesmerized by these events, one thing to remember is that the record of them is still incomplete. 'Oppenheimer' was made even though documentary material about, and by, J. Robert Oppenheimer is still becoming available to the public, as a new National Security Archive (NSA) release reminded us on Tuesday. The NSA maintains a 'briefing book' of primary sources on the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and it makes periodic updates with newly declassified or rediscovered materials. The briefing book itself, built up over 20 years, is extensive enough to fertilize graduate-level papers on the decisions surrounding construction and use of the bomb. Article content Article content There are some fascinating new declassified documents in the 2025 update. One is a letter written in September 1944 by William S. Parsons, the navy officer who headed the ordnance group at Los Alamos. Parsons led the creation of the 'gun' design used for Little Boy, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, and he would fly on the mission that delivered it. But he also had an administrative role as a voice of, and pair of eyes for, the professional military among the civilian boffins at Los Alamos. Article content Article content Parsons' letter is addressed to Maj.-Gen. Leslie Groves, overall boss of the Manhattan Project, and was delivered by Oppenheimer, which is why it sits in a file folder among the Oppenheimer Papers at the Library of Congress. Article content The letter is Parsons' rambling argument, extraordinary in historical retrospect, against any mere testing of a nuclear weapon. Plans for what became the Trinity test in the New Mexico desert were already coming into view, and the American high command was then still wondering whether to invite representatives of the Axis governments. Parsons points out morbidly that the most impressive test, the most convincing demonstration, would be to detonate the bomb 'one thousand feet over Times Square.' Short of that, he did not see the point of setting one off in the desert amid a few unoccupied temporary structures when it could just be dropped on an enemy. 'Even the crater would be disappointing.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store