Govt identifies 10 highway segments for zero-emission truck movement
India has identified 10 high-impact highway segments where only
zero-emission trucks
(ZETs) will be used for
freight movement
in the near future, as part of the country's broader goal to decarbonise the logistics sector, reduce air pollution, enhance energy security, and achieve the long-term climate target of 'net zero' by 2070.
These priority corridors, list of which was released by the office of the principal scientific adviser (PSA) to the govt early this month, will be used as pilots for early ZET deployment, laying the groundwork for a dedicated national infrastructure network focusing on
electric and hydrogen-based fuel
technologies across all highways in the country in due course.
Despite comprising only 3per cent of all vehicles, trucks are responsible for more than one-third of transport-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions in the country. This is particularly concerning given that road transportation accounts for a staggering 71per cent of overall freight movement in India.
According to
Niti Aayog estimates
, the number of trucks will be increased by more than four times - from four million in 2022 to around 17 million - by 2050. It is, therefore, important to move fast towards ZET deployment for long-term benefits and that's why the office of the PSA has undertaken the initiative to identify the top corridors for initial deployment of such trucks in India.
"These (10) corridors serve not only as the best candidates for ZET pilots, but as blueprints for the future of freight movement," said Ajay K Sood, PSA, in his foreword to the 56-page report on India's priority corridors for Zero-Emission Trucking. He said, "The adoption of ZET in India will play a crucial role in decarbonising the logistics sector, improving public health, enhancing energy independence, and showcasing the country's leadership in the global transition to a net-zero future."
"Establishing ZET corridors can help ensure the use of truck and infrastructure assets, demonstrate ZET operational and financial feasibility, help manage risks and lower costs, and unlock private capital for ZET projects," said the report.
Efforts are already under way to kick-start ZET adoption in India as the central govt has allocated 500 crore for the purchase of such trucks under the
Prime Minister Electric Drive Revolution
in Innovative Vehicle Enhancement (PM E-DRIVE) scheme.
The top 10 corridors were identified through a three-phase process: quantitative and qualitative assessment of an initial list of 230 corridors using parameters such as toll traffic data and mapping of supply/demand centres, stakeholder consultations and detailed field research.
Other factors such as high freight traffic, industrial activity, availability of ancillary services, grid infrastructure readiness, corridor length relative to battery range, and strategic stakeholder inputs for commercial and business viability were also taken into account while finalising the corridors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
an hour ago
- The Print
Don't count countries above India in per capita GDP. Look at the population instead
As we celebrate India's GDP reaching the fourth position, it is equally important to understand how this was made possible and how the Indian economy can be made stronger by learning from the contemporary world and history. For international comparison, another universally accepted figure is GDP in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms. On the PPP scale, India had become the third-largest economy much earlier, in 2011. This happened because the purchasing power of the Indian rupee in India is nearly four times the market value of the dollar. According to the World Bank, India's GDP (PPP) in 2014 was approximately $7.4 trillion, which has increased to $17.4 trillion in 2025. In 2014, India was the 10th largest economy in the world, with a GDP of $2.07 trillion. In 2025, it became the fourth-largest economy with a GDP of $4.18 trillion—in merely 11 years, according to NITI Aayog's CEO BV Subrahmanyam. India's per capita income—and the population It is argued in some circles that though India has surpassed Japan in GDP, the latter's per capita income is still 11.6 times more than India's. However, if we compare the per capita income of these two countries on a PPP basis, Japan's per capita income is only 4.16 times that of India's GDP per capita. There is yet another view that we need not celebrate this achievement because India still stands at 136th position in terms of per capita GDP in nominal terms, and even in purchasing power parity, it is placed at 119 in the list of 190 countries. But these numbers reveal less than they hide. Instead of counting the number of countries above India in terms of their per capita GDP, it would be more appropriate to look at the population of those countries, because poverty transcends national boundaries and our resolve should be to eradicate poverty for all. Most of those above India in per capita GDP are high-income and middle-income countries; their number is large, though the population residing in those countries is much less. There are 18 populous countries that have per capita GDP above India, with a total population of nearly 3.4 billion, while the remaining 100 countries have a total population of only 14 crore (0.14 billion)—that is, 3.54 billion, or just 43 percent of the world population. Thanks to the higher rate of growth of per capita income, both in nominal terms as well as in PPP terms, India is rising fast on the ladder. In 2014, India ranked 147th out of 190 countries in per capita GDP in nominal terms; by 2025, its position has improved to 136th. And in per capita GDP in PPP terms, India has moved up from 126th position in 2014 to 119th now. Also read: India's GDP victory over Japan is still a year away. Here's why India's success in poverty reduction Another point we need to elaborate is the well-being of Indians in absolute terms, and also the well-being of those with much higher GDP per capita. In this context, there is yet another bright spot of the Indian economy in terms of its achievement in eliminating extreme poverty. The most notable improvement we see is in terms of the stark reduction in multidimensional poverty, as per the definition of UNDP. According to the Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) 2015 (based on 2005-06 and 2011-12 data), around 41.3 percent of India's population was multidimensionally poor in 2005-06. Major deprivations were manifested in nutrition, child mortality, years of schooling, sanitation, and cooking fuel. With rural poverty significantly higher than urban poverty, India accounted for over 30 percent of the world's multidimensionally poor. UNDP reports that between 2005–2006 and 2019–2021, India's Multidimensional Poverty Index (on a scale of 1.000) plummeted from 0.283 to just 0.069—perhaps the fastest reduction among countries facing acute multidimensional poverty. Interestingly, the UNDP has praised India for this achievement. As per NITI Aayog's Multidimensional Poverty Index Report (2023) and the UNDP Global MPI 2023, the headcount ratio was reduced to 11.28 percent (as of 2022–23), and 24.82 crore people exited multidimensional poverty between 2013–14 and 2022–23. Deprivations fell significantly in terms of access to electricity and clean cooking fuel, sanitation, housing, school attendance, maternal and child health. Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan saw the highest reduction in multidimensional poverty. If we look at extreme poverty (people with a daily income of $2.15), according to the World Bank's latest report (2025), India has virtually eliminated extreme poverty by global standards. In 2011, an estimated 27.12 percent of India's population lived in extreme poverty—approximately 34.45 crore people. Extreme poverty has come down to around 5.3 percent by 2022-23, that is, an estimated 7.52 crore people live in extreme poverty in the country. But this is the scenario of extreme poverty in India at a time when the World Bank has raised the threshold for extreme poverty from $2.15 to $3 per day. This implies that if we retain the earlier threshold of $2.15, the proportion of people living in extreme poverty would be hardly 2.3 percent of the population—about 3.36 crore people. This reduction has been made possible due to direct benefit transfers (DBT), free food distribution, and access to basic services—namely sanitation, health, banking, and electricity. Some argue that GDP numbers showing India becoming the fourth-largest economy are at odds with the government distributing free rations to more than 80 crore people. But we have to understand that the distribution of free food is not unique to India. Even in developed countries like the US and the UK, a significant proportion of the population enjoys free rations. In fiscal year 2023, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), commonly known as food stamps, served an average of 4.21 crore people per month in the US, representing 12.6 percent of the population. In the UK, during 2022-23, around 23 lakh people (approximately 3 percent of the population) lived in households that had used a food bank in the previous 12 months. This included 6 percent of children, 3 percent of working-age adults, and about 1 percent of pensioners. Also read: GDP data revisions—why India still struggles with sharp variations Global poverty trends and India's achievement in context An interesting trend is emerging in present-day developed countries: poverty has been increasing over the years, and this trend has accelerated since the 2008 economic crisis. According to the US definition of the poverty line, nearly 18 percent of the population lives in poverty—and the situation is not much different in many European countries. UNICEF reports that between 2014 and 2021, child poverty increased sharply in some of the world's richest nations. Notably, the UK saw a 20 percent rise in child poverty, while France, Iceland, Norway, and Switzerland reported increases of around 10 percent. When it comes to relative poverty and inequality, OECD data show significant variation across countries. For example, the US has a relative poverty rate of 18 percent, whereas countries like Denmark and Finland report much lower rates, between 5 and 7 percent. Women and the elderly are especially vulnerable, with disproportionately higher poverty rates observed in these groups. In Norway, despite generally low overall poverty, the rate increased from 7.7 percent to 9.7 percent between 2013 and 2017. In Australia, as of 2019–2020, 13.4 percent of the population lived below the relative poverty threshold, including 16.6 percent of children under 15. While it is certainly a reason to celebrate that India has become the world's fourth-largest economy—and is poised to become the third-largest within the next 2–3 years—this economic milestone is only part of the story. India's progress in reducing both multidimensional and extreme poverty is equally, if not more, significant. These reductions have occurred at a much faster pace than in many peer countries. Although the road ahead is long, the journey so far has been remarkable. It is important to acknowledge these facts so that we may continue on the right path with clarity and purpose. Ashwani Mahajan is a professor at PGDAV College, University of Delhi. He tweets @ashwani_mahajan. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Relax production-linked incentive, PM e-drive schemes, say auto companies
NEW DELHI: With supply chains crippled due to the severe curbs on shipments of rare earth magnets by China, the auto industry raised an SOS and sought relaxation from the govt in meeting the all-crucial domestic value addition (DVA) norms towards the production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme and the phased manufacturing programme (PMP) in the PM e-Drive programme. Sources said the companies, which include top manufacturers such as Maruti Suzuki, Hyundai, Mahindra & Mahindra, Bajaj Auto, Hero Moto, TVS, and Tata Motors, also petitioned the govt for permission to import complete assemblies of components from China in the short term to ensure that production schedules are not disturbed. 'DVA requirement in PLI and PMP in PM e-Drive schemes may have to be relaxed to allow for imports of completed assemblies,' the industry – which is currently not getting supplies from China and is banking only on existing inventory – said in a representation to the central govt, the sources told TOI. 'In the eventuality of the challenge not being resolved, the industry will be constrained to import complete assemblies of components from China in the short term,' the companies said, adding that the measure may result in a loss of business for local manufacturers of motors, sensors, and other components who use rare earth magnets. They also said that despite the import of full assemblies, there may still be challenges in production plans. '… this will not resolve the immediate problem of disruption in manufacturing, as the new components are not designed/compatible with the requirement of the vehicles being produced in India.' The companies also said that local value add-on in the vehicles will also be impacted as companies import complete assemblies from China, leading to cost escalations. 'The imports in the auto sector will rise as complete assemblies will have much higher cost.' The industry requested the govt to take measures so that India becomes self-reliant in the production of rare earth permanent magnets by establishing a complete domestic value chain. 'Financial incentives linked to production and policy support may be extended to promising manufacturers. Encourage local mining and production of magnets for reducing dependence on China through incentives. Financial and policy support may be provided to encourage public-private partnerships in setting up rare earth processing facilities and magnet production clusters across India,' the companies said. As magnet supplies stopped following new procurement procedures mandated by China to control any diversion towards defence and weapons production, auto companies raised an alarm over the impending challenges. They said that the matter will lead to the stoppage of production of certain models in June, while heading to a complete shutdown of production by the middle of July if new supplies were not forthcoming. The industry said that the shortage will impact the planned launch of many new models, apart from disturbing the entire value chain across passenger vehicles, two-wheelers, and commercial vehicles. The rare earth magnets are used for components like speedometers, electric motors, e-axles, electric water pumps, automatic transmission kits, speakers, sensors, and ignition coils in engines. Companies say a multi-layered approval process has to be followed before the magnets can be procured, and a final approval from China's Ministry of Commerce is also required. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
India Gazette
18 hours ago
- India Gazette
Tariff reduction on farm products is risky, should be debated under proposed India-US trade deal: GTRI
New Delhi [India] June 10 (ANI): Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) is cautious about tariff reductions on farm products under the proposed India-US trade deal and emphasised that the potential impact of opening India's markets to subsidised American farm products needs careful consideration and thorough debate. GTRI argued, once tariffs are cut in such agreements, it becomes nearly impossible to raise them again, even if prices crash, global trade is disrupted, or local farmers face sudden losses. It said this would expose India, especially as rich countries like the US and EU subsidise their agriculture heavily. Niti Aayog's May 2025 working paper, 'Promoting India-US Agricultural Trade Under The New US Trade Regime,' recommends that India open its market to a wide range of U.S. farm products, including rice, pepper, soybean oil, shrimp, tea, coffee, dairy, poultry, apples, almonds, pistachios, corn, and genetically modified (GM) soy products, under the proposed India-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. The government advisory body argues for eliminating tariffs on rice and pepper because India exports these items in large volumes. But GTRI contends that subsidised grain exports from developed nations like the US and EU have been a major driver of global grain price volatility, which can impact India's farmers and exports. Niti Aayog's recommendations also address the supply gaps for reciprocal access, but GTRI says they ignore the structural risks to India's 700 million farmers. Citing past experiences, such as binding zero tariffs for rice and wheat under GATT in the 1960s/70s, GTRI says it left India vulnerable and forced costly renegotiations. India should go for a flexible tariff regime. 'Keeping tariff flexibility is not outdated protectionism--it's a smart, essential policy tool to protect food security, support rural incomes, and respond to market shocks. Once this flexibility is given up in a trade agreement, getting it back is extremely difficult,' said Ajay Srivastava, founder of GTRI. Niti Aayog also backs importing GM products like DDGS and soybean seeds under strict controls. However, GTRI argues that India's fragmented logistics and weak regulatory enforcement make such containment unfeasible. 'Once GM material enters the domestic chain, it risks contaminating local agriculture, creating trade disputes, and undermining public trust,' added Srivastava The government planning body also recommends importing dairy and poultry products from the US, subject to the US meeting sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) measures rather than tariffs. On dairy products, the US has challenged India's SPS requirement that imported milk must come from animals not fed meat, blood, or internal organs. The US sees this as an unjustified trade barrier, but India considers it essential for public health and cultural values. GTRI says replacing tariffs with weaker and challenge-prone SPS standards can erode both safety and ethical standards. It adds that NITI Aayog's recommendations are risky and require broader public consultation before being considered. (ANI)
