
Alluri, a beacon of revolutionary spirit: Collector Ranjith
Kurnool: Alluri Sitarama Raju stands as a timeless symbol of revolutionary spirit and his valor continues to inspire youth, said district Collector P Ranjith Basha. On the death anniversary of the legendary freedom fighter, he garlanded the portrait of Alluri Sitarama Raju and paid respects at the Collectorate Mini Conference Hall on Wednesday. Speaking on the occasion, the Collector described Alluri as a luminous force in the history of India's freedom struggle.
'His fight against British colonial rule marks a distinct and significant chapter in our independence movement,' he noted. Praising Alluri as a great revolutionary, who laid his life for the welfare of society, the Collector emphasised the importance of social responsibility among all citizens, urging people to draw inspiration from Alluri's ideals and contribute to the service of the nation and society. The Collector further underlined the importance of acquainting students with the history of Alluri Sitarama Raju. 'His legacy should inspire us all to support those in helpless conditions,' he added.
During British rule, tribal populations in the forest regions faced severe hardships and exploitation. The British imposed restrictions on the collection and sale of forest produce, subjecting the indigenous people to severe oppression. Alluri led a fierce resistance against these injustices and secured liberation for the tribals, the Collector remarked. He urged the youth to move forward with Alluri's spirit as their guiding force. Adoni Sub-Collector Maurya Bharadwaj, CPO Himaprabha Karraju, Collectorate AO Vijayashree, Special Deputy Collector Chiranjeevi, District Tourism Officer Vijaya, District Co-operative Officer Ram Anjaneyulu, and several other officials attended the event.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
9 hours ago
- NDTV
Lost Ship Carrying $16 Billion Treasure Confirmed As "World's Richest Shipwreck", Sparks Ownership Battle
Researchers have confirmed the discovery of the San Jose, a Spanish galleon shipwreck believed to hold one of history's greatest lost treasures, valued at around $16 billion. The find has sparked a multi-billion-pound legal battle over ownership of the gold, silver, and emeralds on board, which had lain undisturbed in the Caribbean waters for over 300 years, the Telegraph reported. Colombian scholars have confirmed that the wreck discovered off the coast of Cartagena in 2015 is indeed the legendary San Jose galleon, which sank in 1708 during a fierce battle with the Royal Navy. The ship, dubbed the "holy grail of shipwrecks," was carrying treasure from Peru to Spain to fund the War of the Spanish Succession when it was intercepted by British forces led by Charles Wager. As per The the San Jose galleon met its end when its powder magazines exploded during the battle, sending the ship and its treasure to the ocean floor. After being lost for centuries, an expedition in 2015 used underwater drones to locate the wreckage, and experts are now confident that the identity of the ship has been confirmed. "This body of evidence substantiates the identification of the wreck as the San Jose Galleon, a hypothesis that has been put forward since its initial discovery in 2015," the academics found. "The finding of cobs created in 1707 at the Lima Mint points to a vessel navigating the Tierra Firme route in the early 18th century. The San José Galleon is the only ship that matches these characteristics. This find presents a rare opportunity to explore an underwater archaeological site and deepen our understanding of colonial maritime trade and routes," they concluded. Photographs of the wreck show silver coins minted in 1707 at the Lima Mint, Chinese porcelain from the Kangxi period (1662–1722), and cannons inscribed with markings dating back to 1665. Who Owns The Treasure Now? The discovery of the San Jose galleon's treasure has sparked a heated dispute over ownership, with multiple parties vying for the claim. The governments of Colombia, Spain, and Peru are all staking their claims, while indigenous communities and descendants of Peruvian miners are also seeking a share. Additionally, the treasure hunting company Sea Search Armada, formerly known as Glocca Morra, claims a portion of the treasure, citing their earlier discovery of the wreckage in 1981. However, Colombia disputes this claim, and a $10 billion lawsuit is ongoing, adding complexity to the already contentious issue of who should rightfully own the treasure.


India Today
18 hours ago
- India Today
How Caste, a word of Spanish origin, redefined Indian social order during British rule
One word that still thrives in India and continues to challenge society is caste. The word originated in Spain and was later used by Portuguese, and it was the British who institutionalised it within the Indian derived from casta, is now deeply linked with India's ancient social structure, the varna system, in which esoteric individuals based on the work performed and, by extension, their place in per the Rig Veda, the varna system divided society into four main groups: Brahmins, the learned class; Kshatriyas, the rulers and warriors; Vaishyas, the merchants and landowners; and Shudras, those who did manual labour. Outside this structure were those considered 'untouchables.' The first official Indian census was conducted in 1871, well before independence. It recorded over 2,500 castes. These caste listings included all professions -- for example, Sonar, a term for goldsmiths, was listed as a backward the 1931 census, the number of recorded castes had risen to over 3,000. This was the last time a caste-based census was held -- pre- or though caste -- a word not native to Indian soil -- became the most defining social construct of the land, shaping society for over two centuries, how did this happen? What changed and divided Indian society so deeply that it is now difficult to separate from it?advertisementWas Indian society fragile from the beginning, or did it evolve over time, with the differentiation of work and social categories outlined in the varna system becoming more rigid? These are the questions scholars and academics have long sought to answer. Specimen of various described castes(Image: Wikimedia Commons) VARNA, JATI, AND CASTEThe varna system, as mentioned in the Rig Veda, is thousands of years old and outlines how society and work were structured. Though there were four main varnas, epics like the Mahabharata and Ramayana offer examples of how these identities could born a Kshatriya, was later revered as a Rishi due to his conduct. The story of Eklavya is often cited -- denied training by Dronacharya due to his varna, Eklavya's father, Hiranyadhanu, nonetheless served in King Jarasandha's army, showing that lower-caste individuals were not excluded from warfare or Indian texts, jati -- meaning birth -- is often mentioned less often than varna, but the concept is more complex. While varna divided society into four broad categories, jatis represented thousands of lineage- or occupation-based groups, though endogamous (a practice of marrying or mating within a specific group, such as a caste, ethnic group, religious group), varied across Dumont, a French anthropologist, linked jatis to religious purity and pollution, but others argue their origins are more secular, rooted in economics, politics, and jatis are often associated with jobs, they have not strictly limited occupational roles. Genetic studies suggest jatis practiced endogamy since the Gupta period, possibly are not exclusive to Hindus -- they are found among Muslims, Christians, and tribal populations, without one single hierarchical English word caste, now so commonly used in the Indian context, did not originate here. It came by way of Portugal. When the Portuguese first made landfall in India in the year 1498, they applied word 'casta' -- a term used for lineage or stock -- to describe the many birth-bound communities they English language took this word in by 1613, and it Sumit Guha, in his account Beyond Caste, writes of how Portuguese became a seafaring tongue, spoken in distant corners of Asia. Through this language, the West began to make sense of Indian life or tried time, the British would carry out that task further. Guha notes that 'casta' spoke first of blood -- of purity in animals, then people which derived from the concept of purity of blood, limpieza de imagined that a community's worth could be preserved by guarding the bloodline, especially through the modesty of its women. Dr Ambedkar with the leaders of 'Scheduled Caste Federation'. Scheduled Caste Federation Conference, Nagpur (Image: Wikimedia Commons) Anthropologist Morton Klass reminds us that there is no true match for the word caste in any Indian tongue. The Iberians, shaped by their own worldviews and prejudices, used casta to rank peoples they met -- first in Asia, then in the the Brisitsh engaged more with Indian society, they began to see it through their own them, India's jatis seemed like ordered groups, made to preserve ancestry. This view suited the world they came from -- a world where bloodlines and hierarchies mattered Portugal and Spain were deep in the trade of enslaved people only made such ideas more historian Charles Boxer once observed that the beliefs the Iberians carried -- whether by sea, cross, or sword -- did not fade quickly. For many years, race and rank walked hand in hand. The echoes, perhaps, still CASTE CENSUS AND ORIGIN OF NEW JATISWhen the British arrived in India, they stepped into a land full of rich traditions, local customs, and complex social networks. After centuries of invasions and changes in power, Indian society had become layered and diverse -- very different from what the ancient texts once community had its own way of life, and it was unlike anything the British had dealt with make sense of this diversity and to rule more efficiently, the British started recording details about the people. This led to the first complete census of India in 1871. It wasn't just about counting people -- it was about sorting them into groups based on caste, religion, occupation, and other like Sumit Guha believe that this was the first major step in giving caste a rigid and official place in Indian census didn't just reflect what society looked like; it shaped how people came to see themselves and each also recorded each individual's caste, religion, occupation, and age. These accounts went on until 1941 and had one major impact -- Britishers began defining how people came to be viewed in was fluid and dynamic began to become fixed on paper. Specimen of caste in India (Image: Wikimedia Commons) One sociologist, Michael Mann, has stated that these censuses were more of what the British required to govern rather than what the Indians British rarely knew how things actually operated here, so they relied on older religious writings and counsel from higher-caste leaders -- particularly Brahmins -- to determine how to document Indian British realised that if everyone could be put into tidy compartments, it would be possible to manage such a large nation. But not always.A Brahmin in Bengal, for instance, was more like other Bengal castes than like Brahmins elsewhere -- so the concept of one definite 'Brahmin' identity didn't quite Brahmin identity was there before the British, but it wasn't always rigid or were allowed to shift between roles, and there was openness for change. But once the British began inserting caste into official documents, it started to become more fixed and less accessible to why some authors think that the British didn't only document caste -- they assisted in forming what it was. Others think caste existed naturally but concur that the British made it more rigid in human let's pose the big question: did the British have a hand in establishing India's caste system, or did they reformulate it to suit their means of domination? That's something historians still debate Watch


Time of India
19 hours ago
- Time of India
300-year-old mystery of world's most valuable shipwreck solved with San José £16 billion treasure
Beneath the Caribbean waves, the Spanish galleon San José, believed to be carrying treasure for more than three centuries, now estimated at over £16 billion, has been identified by the researchers in Colombia. Discovered in 2015 off the coast of Barú Island near Cartagena, the wreck has long been shrouded in mystery and claims of hidden riches. This historical analysis and underwater archaeology, experts say, there's no doubt: this is the long-lost San José. The identity of the wreck has now been officially confirmed, but the focus now turns to how the treasure will be recovered and who will ultimately control it. According to the reports, the San José was not just a treasure ship, but it was a key player in a geopolitical conflict. Its sinking helped shift the balance of power in the War of the Spanish Succession (1701–1714), a European war sparked by competing claims to the Spanish throne. Spanish warship carrying colonial treasure sunk in 1708 mystery solved The Spanish galleon San José fleet was tasked with transporting valuable cargo from Spain's colonies in the Americas back to Europe. In June 1708, during the height of the War of the Spanish Succession, the ship encountered a British squadron and was attacked off the coast of present-day Colombia. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Husband Leaves Sick Wife For His Mistress. When He Returns For Her Inheritance, She Does This Learn It Wise Undo The ship exploded during the battle and sank to the ocean floor, taking with it 600 crew members and a cargo of gold, silver, and emeralds mined in Peru. These riches were destined to fund Spain's war effort against the Grand Alliance, a European coalition that included Britain. The loss was a devastating blow to the Spanish crown and became one of the most legendary maritime disasters in European history. Decades of shipwreck mystery resolved with key historical artefacts Although the wreck was found in 2015 using underwater drones, it has taken years for scientists and archaeologists to gather enough evidence to confirm its identity. That confirmation came through a detailed analysis of artifacts recovered from the ocean floor: Silver coins minted in 1707 at the Lima Mint in Peru provided critical dating and geographical evidence, tying the cargo to a specific Spanish trade route. Chinese porcelain from the Kangxi period (1662–1722), a common luxury item in colonial trade which was found in abundance, indicating the ship's cargo included exotic goods from Asia via Spanish trade networks. Bronze cannons bearing Spanish royal emblems and markings from 1665 further solidified the ship's origin and era. World's most valuable shipwreck sparks a global ownership dispute Due to the size and presumed value of its treasure, the San José has long been referred to as the 'holy grail of shipwrecks.' It was rumored to be carrying over 200 tons of gold, silver, and emeralds, making it arguably the most valuable shipwreck ever discovered. The cargo was intended to help Spain fight a war that would reshape Europe's colonial empires. Its rediscovery has not only thrilled historians and treasure hunters but also reignited one of the most complex legal and diplomatic disputes in maritime history. Now that the wreck has been definitively identified, a multi-party battle over ownership has emerged. At the heart of the issue is the value of the treasure and competing claims from nations, companies, and communities: According to the ET reports, tThe discovery ignited a fierce ownership by: Colombian Government: Under a 2020 law, Colombia claims full ownership of the wreck and all its contents, arguing it lies within its territorial waters and forms part of its national heritage. Spanish Government: Spain argues that as a state-owned military vessel, the San José and its contents remain Spanish property under international maritime law. Peruvian Government: Since much of the treasure was mined in Peru by Indigenous and enslaved labor, Peru contends it has a moral and historical right to a portion of the treasure. Indigenous Communities and Descendants of Miners: Some Indigenous groups and families in Peru are also demanding recognition and reparations for the exploitation that made the treasure possible. According to the ET reports, Sea Search Armada (formerly Glocca Morra): A US treasure-hunting firm that claims to have discovered the wreck back in 1981, the company is demanding a £7.9 billion payout, stating that the current find lies within two miles of their originally reported coordinates. Also Read| Meet the London doctor who's 41 but biologically 24; here's his life longevity secrets revealed with 3 core supplements