The best Amazon Prime Day deals end tonight. Here are the most popular picks you can still buy
Now, the clock is ticking on some of the biggest deals of the year. So, if you've been waiting to click 'add to cart,' let tonight be your time to stop scrolling and start saving on top brands like GE, Apple, Stanley and more.
We'll continue tracking down all the top Prime Day deals that our readers are shopping and the ones that our Prime Day professionals recommend buying. Our biggest tip? We suggest you move quickly as the prices are sure to increase later tonight.
The four-day Amazon Prime Day sale is winding down and the best deals will end tonight, July 11. Don't miss out on the season's hottest discounts and biggest markdowns on popular finds from Apple, iRobot, DeWalt and more.
📆 Mark your calendar! Tune in for a special Amazon Live event on Friday, July 11 at 3:00pm ET, where I will reveal the most popular deals from the week and the top last-chance finds you'll want to shop before Prime Day 2025 ends.
Listen up: Apple AirPods Pro 2 hit lowest price of 2025 for Prime Day
More: 13 popular Amazon Prime Day deals that might surprise you
More: Today's best Prime Day deals on Sony, Dyson, Shark
More: We're clocking the best Apple Watch deals during Prime Day this week
📲 Stop scrolling: Here are the top 5 iPad Prime Day deals you'll want to grab
5 editor-approved Prime Day tool deals: Save up to 51% on DeWalt, Ryobi, Fanttik 🛠️
More: 5 popular Prime Day generator deals starting at $125 🔋
More: Spoil yourself with Amazon Prime Day deals that are actually worth it
I'm a frequent flyer: Shop 10 Prime Day travel deals I'm packing first ✈️
The 2025 Amazon Prime Day sale started on Tuesday, July 8 and ends at the end of day on Friday, July 11.
USA TODAY Shopping will be covering all the Prime Day 2025 deals during the sale, including post-Prime Day deals, so be sure to follow along!
Yes, you must be an Amazon Prime member to access the best Prime Day deals. The July Prime Day sale has tons of special Prime-exclusive discounts on select products that can help members save more than anyone else. Plus, joining Prime helps guarantee you get other perks like fast shipping all year long, access to Prime Video, Prime Reading, Prime Gaming and more.
→ More: Is an Amazon Prime membership worth it? Here's what you need to know
New members can try one week of Amazon Prime benefits for just $1.99. After that, Prime costs $14.99 per month or $139 per year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
JP Morgan Says Apple's Set To Beat Q3 Estimates
Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) looks set to beat when it reports Q3 fiscal 2025 on Thursday July 31 despite headwinds from cooling iPhone demand and modest Services growth. J.P. Morgan's Samik Chatterjee says the near?term setup is stronger than imagined given H1 pull?forward benefits, App Store link?outs in the US and the looming DOJ versus Google lawsuit in Services. The bank forecasts revenue of $89.6 billion, with iPhone at $39.9 billion, iPad at $7.7 billion, Mac at $7.4 billion and Services at $26.7 billion, some $600 million above the $88.96 billion consensus and sees EPS of $1.43. The firm keeps an Overweight rating and $250 price target after Apple has beaten revenue and EPS estimates for seven straight quarters. Services growth has remained healthy but lackluster, and the iPhone 17 rollout is failing to excite an install base used to major feature leaps. Apple's installed device base tops 2 B active units, giving it a cushion if upgrade cycles slow. Analysts will also watch for any updates on Siri enhancements and Vision Pro traction as Apple leans into AI amid peers. J.P. Morgan's Overweight thesis hinges on this resilience amid a tougher macro backdrop. Production headwinds have eased versus 90 days ago, hinting at smoother supply chains. Why it matters: A beat on July 31 could give AAPL shares a lift and set the stage for the iPhone 17 launch. Investors will be watching the Q3 result live and tracking early demand signals for Apple's next phone. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio
Business Wire
18 minutes ago
- Business Wire
Shareholder Alert: Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP Announces the Filing of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Apple Inc.
NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Today, prominent investor rights law firm Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP ('BLB&G') filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California alleging violations of the federal securities laws by Apple Inc. ('Apple' or the 'Company') and certain of the Company's current and former senior executives (collectively, 'Defendants'). The action is brought on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Apple common stock between June 10, 2024, and June 9, 2025, inclusive (the 'Class Period'). This case is related to a previously filed securities class action pending against Apple captioned Tucker v. Apple Inc., No. 5:25-cv-05197 (N.D. Cal.). The case is captioned City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Plan v. Apple Inc., No. 25-cv-06252 (N.D. Cal.). The complaint is based on an extensive investigation and a careful evaluation of the merits of this case. A copy of the complaint is available on BLB&G's website by clicking here. Apple is a multinational technology company most well-known for its iPhone. It also sells other smart technology products and offers a variety of integrated software and services through the operation of various platforms, including the App Store. Since 2011, iPhones and other Apple smart devices have contained software for the Company's digital personal assistant, called 'Siri.' In recent years, a number of Apple's competitors have introduced artificial intelligence ('AI') capabilities, which put pressure on Apple to incorporate generative-AI technology into its iPhones and especially to introduce advanced AI-based Siri features. In 2020, Epic Games, Inc. ('Epic') sued Apple, challenging Apple's restrictions on app developers' ability to communicate with, and direct consumers to, purchasing mechanisms outside of those offered by Apple's App Store (the 'Epic Action'). Apple takes a 30% commission on all revenues generated from its App Store, and Epic's efforts to open other avenues for app-related payments posed a threat to one of Apple's major revenue streams. After the companies initially went to trial in 2021, the court presiding over the action issued a 180-page order enjoining Apple's 'anti-steering' rules, which the court found were anti-competitive (the 'Epic Injunction'). This injunction went into effect on January 17, 2024, after Apple had exhausted its appeals. The complaint alleges that, throughout the Class Period, Defendants made misrepresentations and omissions that fall into two categories: (i) statements regarding the launch of new generative-AI based Siri features; and (ii) statements concerning Apple's compliance with the Epic Injunction, including statements relating to any impacts on revenue from this compliance. Throughout the Class Period, starting with the Company's 2024 Worldwide Developers Conference, Apple represented to investors that the Company would be rolling out a number of AI-supported features for Siri in the first half of 2025, promising that 'over the next year' or 'in the coming months,' Siri would gain AI functionality that would enable it to 'take hundreds of new actions in and across Apple and third-party apps,' and 'deliver intelligence that's tailored to the user and their on-device information.' The Company also repeatedly represented that it had implemented a plan to comply with the Epic Injunction. In truth, Apple faced significant undisclosed challenges in developing the generative AI-enabled Siri, including meaningful quality challenges, that would make it unable to rollout the features in the first half of 2025 as had been stated. Additionally, the Company willfully violated the Epic Injunction by implementing new measures to prevent developers from deploying competitive alternatives to in-app purchases. Apple's defenses and justification for those measures were reverse-engineered to hide its anti-competitive motives from the court and investors. The truth began to emerge during a series of evidentiary hearings held by the court in the Epic Action from February 24 through February 26, 2025, in response to a motion from Epic seeking to enforce the injunction and hold Apple in civil contempt. On February 25, 2025, a senior Apple employee testified that the impact on the Company's finances was a key factor in its decision to implement a particular anti-competitive aspect of its 'compliance plan,' and that eliminating this would cost the Company 'hundreds of millions if not billions,' in App Store revenue. As a result of these disclosures, the price of Apple common stock declined by $6.68 per share, or 2.7%. The truth was further revealed on March 7, 2025, when an Apple spokesperson was quoted by multiple news outlets, disclosing that the launch of the Siri generative-AI features would be delayed. Specifically, the spokesperson stated that '[i]t's going to take us longer than we thought to deliver on these features and we anticipate rolling them out in the coming year.' In response to this news, the price of Apple common stock declined by $11.59 per share, or 4.8%, the following trading day. The following week, on March 12, 2025, Morgan Stanley published a report, stating that '[t]he delayed rollout of a more advanced Siri means Apple will have fewer features to accelerate iPhone upgrade rates in FY26.' The report presented evidence that around 50% of iPhone owners who did not upgrade to an iPhone 16 said that the delayed Apple Intelligence rollout impacted their decision not to upgrade. As a result of these disclosures, the price of Apple common stock declined by $11.16 per share, or 5.1% over the following two trading sessions. Then, on April 3, 2025, The Wall Street Journal published an article criticizing Apple for overpromising on its AI capabilities and chiding the Company that it 'shouldn't announce products until they're sure they can deliver them.' On this news, the price of Apple common stock declined by $20.70 per share, or 9.2%. On April 30, 2025, the court presiding over the Epic Action issued an order finding Apple in willful violation of the Epic Injunction, holding Apple in civil contempt, and referring the matter to the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California to investigate whether criminal contempt proceedings were appropriate. Finally, on June 9, 2025, Apple held its 2025 Worldwide Developer Conference where it notably failed to announce any updates regarding advanced Siri features beyond that the Company 'needed more time to reach a high quality bar.' Industry commentators were underwhelmed with this news, with CNN commenting that 'it's unlikely that any of the announcements made at Monday's event will change the perception that Apple is behind its competitors in AI.' These disclosures caused the price of Apple common stock to decline by $2.47 per share, or 1.2%. The filing of this action does not alter the previously established deadline to seek appointment as Lead Plaintiff. Pursuant to the June 20, 2025 notice published in connection with the Tucker action, under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Apple securities during the Class Period may, no later than August 19, 2025, seek to be appointed as Lead Plaintiff for the Class. Any member of the proposed Class may seek to serve as Lead Plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain a member of the proposed Class. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact Scott R. Foglietta of BLB&G at 212-554-1903, or via e-mail at BLB&G is widely recognized worldwide as a leading law firm advising institutional investors on issues related to corporate governance, shareholder rights, and securities litigation. Since its founding in 1983, BLB&G has built an international reputation for excellence and integrity and pioneered the use of the litigation process to achieve precedent-setting governance reforms. Unique among its peers, BLB&G has obtained several of the largest and most significant securities recoveries in history, recovering over $40 billion on behalf of defrauded investors. More information about the firm can be found online at
CBS News
19 minutes ago
- CBS News
Forget ChatGPT. Tea is the most downloaded app on Apple's App Store.
The most downloaded free app on Apple's App Store currently isn't ChatGPT, Threads or Google. It's Tea, a dating advice app that lets women review men they've gone out with, as well as warn other single women about dates they claim went awry. Tea Dating Advice, an app for helping women vet their dates, is also a top app on the Google Play Store, where it's been downloaded more than 100,000 times. The app's maker says it offers a measure of security for users that traditional dating apps don't. Tea doesn't match singles with potential dates; rather, it's a place for women to share information about men they've dated. Tea lets users run background checks on potential matches, check to see if they have criminal records or appear on sex offender databases, and more, all through the app. The app also ensures that users who sign up are women by requesting that they submit a selfie for verification. That's aimed at protecting users against so-called catfishing schemes, in which people create fake online personas, often as part of a scheme to defraud others. Tea declined to comment for this article. To be sure, most of the features that Tea offers already exist. Social media forums, such as the Facebook group called "Are we dating the same guy?," also let women compare notes about their dates in a community forum. The main difference: scale. Tea has more than 1.6 million users, according to its website. "What this app seems to be doing is centralizing all that into one very large community," Doug Zytko, an associate professor at the University of Michigan-Flint who researches human-computer interactions for safety, told CBS MoneyWatch. Zytko, who has extensively studied dating app designs, said that safety "has not been prioritized" for most such tools in the market, which he said helps explain why Tea has struck a chord with women. "The dating app safety features that exist are largely reactive in nature. They're not about keeping people safe, but are punitive actions one can take after something has occurred," he added. Zytko also acknowledged the concerns of some men, voiced on forums like Reddit, that Tea users could share false information about them. "If inaccurate information about a man is being shared, that damages his dating prospects and social reputation," Zytko said. "That's scary, but it's not a reason to discount the app." Another potential risk is one common to all social media platform, and digital information more broadly. Tea confirmed to CBS News that its app was hacked Friday morning, with bad actors accessing a data storage system containing information, including selfies, that members had uploaded prior to February 2024. Additionally, hackers accessed almost 60,000 images from posts, plus comments and direct messages, the company said. "Tea has engaged third-party cybersecurity experts and are working around the clock to secure its systems," the company said in a statement, noting that it is investigating the incident. "At this time, there is no evidence to suggest that additional user data was affected."
