INTERVIEW: 'Spain's golden visa will return with a change of govt'
As of April 3rd 2025, the golden visa ceased to be an option for those wanting to gain residency in Spain by either buying property worth €500,000, investing €1 million in shares in Spanish companies, €2 million in government bonds, or transferring €1 million to a Spanish bank account.
Now that this visa option is no more, what are the consequences? Have affluent non-EU nationals been left disappointed because they missed the deadline? And how are those who missed out now looking to pursue Spanish residency?
The Local Spain spoke to three lawyers who specialised in the Spanish golden visa to see what's happened since.
Mark McMillan from Sun Lawyers said: 'We rushed the last-minute visas through and quite a few with €1,000,000 deposited in Spanish bank accounts due to the time taken to process property purchases'.
'The disappointment with regards to the golden visa came from people who bought together with their spouses but could not apply due to their type of marital regime (separation of assets, which is the norm in the UK) and not having bought real estate for the mandatory €500,000€ each or at least in one sole name,' McMillan revealed.
Immigration lawyer Mayrem Essadik, head of Marfour Law, was relieved that she managed to submit golden visa applications for all her clients before the deadline, but 'many have been forced to make the one-million-euro investment because their chosen properties are not yet ready to complete the process of purchase,' she told The Local Spain.
'We are very disappointed, as we believed that alternative investment options would remain available. In the end, many clients were left with no choice but to go with the €1 million bank investment – something that was not part of the original draft of the law,' she added.
The primary reason given by the Spanish government for scrapping the golden visa scheme was the alleged impact wealthy foreigners have been having on Spain's housing market by buying up expensive homes locals couldn't afford and thus driving up prices, hence why the Barcelona-based lawyer can't understand why the golden visa's financial investment options have been cancelled as well.
Essadik also highlighted another group of people who just missed out on Spain's golden visa – those who had bought off plan and whose properties were not yet complete. 'We have cases of clients who purchased properties in 2023, for example, but since the property won't be ready until June 2025, they have been affected. Although the purchase was already underway, they will not be able to qualify in time for the golden visa. This is the sad situation.'
Maria Luisa de Castro from CostaLuz Lawyers told The Local she has several clients who missed out on the golden visa because they applied too late. 'Many clients contacted us too late, and given the uncertainty and tight deadlines, we chose not to take risks with timing. Unfortunately, some clients were hoping to benefit from the golden visa's advantage of not becoming tax residents in Spain, but they didn't manage to complete their property purchases in time'.
Spain's visado de oro was one of the best residency options as it allowed holders to spend less than 183 days in Spain while still holding onto residency, and it didn't require them to become tax residents either.
So now that the deadline has passed, what type of visa options are foreigners looking at to move to Spain?
'The non-lucrative visa (NLV) has clearly become the preferred option for many clients now,' explained de Castro.
'Many clients would have much preferred the golden visa, mainly for tax reasons. It offered them the flexibility to live in Spain without becoming tax residents — something the NLV does not allow,' she added.
She also expressed that there's a growing interest in the digital nomad visa (DNV), 'although it requires meeting more specific conditions that not everyone can satisfy'.
McMillan also believes that a lot of foreigners with that kind of capital needed for the golden visa have businesses or are working professionals, meaning that the DNV option open to them.
'The DNV route for people working remotely for foreign companies opens the way for access to the "Beckham's Law" (regimen especial aplicable a los trabajadores desplazados a territorio español) at a flat 24 percent tax on their salaried/invoiced incomes as a displaced worker which finally could be an extremely lucrative and tax-efficient way to live in Spain".
McMillan is referring to the fact that if you work for a company abroad and get the DNV (not those who are self-employed) you may be able to benefit from the Beckham law, which means you can pay a flat tax rate of 24 percent instead of on a sliding scale.
'I am converting many golden visas to DNVs and advising a lot of people on coordinating the right setup to meet the criteria,' he explained. 'This is opening up an excellent alternative'.
Nevertheless, Essadik believes that there fewer legal solutions to offer people who wish to move to Spain, and that 'the process is becoming less accessible overall'.
The general consensus so far among property experts say that the abolishment of the golden visa won't have any impact on the general property market, nor on the luxury real estate sector.
De Castro of CostaLuz Lawyers agrees with this view, believing that cancelling the golden visa will help Spain's housing crisis at all and believes it was a political decision.
"The golden visa was not responsible for Spain's housing problems, and its cancellation has done nothing to solve them," she explained.
"I'm convinced that once there is a change of government, the golden visa – or a similar programme – will return."
Spain's golden visa was initially introduced by the right-wing Popular Party government of Mariano Rajoy in 2013 as a means of drawing international investments when the country was in the midst of an economic crisis.
The PP's current leader Alberto Núñez Feijóo has referred to Pedro Sánchez's decision to cancel the golden visa as a "smokescreen" to help "cover up" his "incompetence" vis-à-vis housing policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local Spain
a day ago
- Local Spain
Inside Spain: Catalonia backs ban on foreign residents buying homes
Property For Members In this week's Inside Spain we look at how the Catalan Parliament has voted in favour of preventing temporary residents who've lived in the country for under five years from buying homes. Restrictions on foreign property ownership appear to be at the forefront of national and regional political agendas in Spain currently. Most recently, we've had Pedro Sánchez's ruling party push forward with the idea of a new 100 percent tax which would double the property price for non-residents of the EU. But there are those who want to take it one step further and restrict actual foreign residents in Spain from buying homes. The plenary session of the Catalan Parliament on Thursday supported a motion by separatist party the Republican Left (ERC) calling on the government to limit the purchase of temporary residents to "curb speculation." ERC is the party which already tried to get the Spanish Congress to do this, but the proposal was rejected. Now they're attempting to do the same but just in Catalonia, where 45 percent of 25 to 40-year-old residents are foreign born. The legal text specifies that only foreigners who have "permanent residency" - those who have officially resided in Spain for five years - should be able to purchase a property, and that they would to prove this residency period first to the region's housing department before being able to buy. The premise for this is that there has to be limits for property purchases from overseas which aren't for 'habitual and permanent residence'. The initiative received the approval of the Catalan Socialists-Units parliamentary group and ERC, Comuns and CUP, while right-wing parties Junts, PP, Vox and Aliança Catalana rejected it. A similar left-right political divide has been seen on a national level vis-à-vis the 100 percent property tax. At one point, far-right party Vox referred to such proposals as 'xenophobic'. The Catalan Parliament's green-lighted document also stipulates that a supplementary tax could be introduced on the transfer of real estate to non-EU residents, in line with what Spain's ruling Socialists have proposed, although it's unclear if this would be exactly the same. Furthermore, a "differentiated regime" could be established for legal entities from other EU states wishing to acquire a property for commercial use. The Catalan Parliament has also approved a restriction on foreign investment in real estate development if for commercial purposes. Interestingly, what was rejected was a proposal to reduce the Property Transfer Tax (ITP) on the purchase of a first home for residents. Crucially, even though the Catalan Parliament has voted in favour of this motion, it remains a declaration of intent with no immediate effect. In other words, foreigners - regardless of their nationality or residency - can continue to buy properties in Catalonia as this is not a law that's in force. What the motion and vote does require is that Spain's Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and the Catalan leader, Socialist Salvador Illa, take action to create a 'legal framework' to make these limits on foreign property ownership a reality. Whether this actually occurs will remain to be seen, subject as well to the possibility that such measures may contravene EU legislation on the free movement of capital from within and outside of the bloc. What does seem to be clear is that hardly a week goes by in Spain currently without a new proposal from a political party or a region hard hit by the housing crisis - usually those with large foreign populations as well - suggesting foreigners should be limited from buying Spanish property. As with every war of attrition, it may just be that one side caves in eventually, and that some legislation affecting foreign home ownership in Spain does pass. People doubted the cancellation of the golden visa scheme - which gave Spanish residency to non-EU nationals who bought property worth €500,000 - would ever happen. But after a year of legal rigmarole, the residency scheme for wealthy foreigners did get scrapped. See Also
Local Spain
2 days ago
- Local Spain
Passenger compensation for flight delays set to decrease in Europe
Airline passengers in the EU enjoy the world's most generous system of compensation if their flight is delayed or cancelled. However these rights seem set to decrease after the European Council agreed to an overhaul of compensation rules, following intense lobbying from the airline industry. The agreement to extend delay times and cut compensation levels was made at a European Council summit, despite opposition from Germany and Spain. Controversially, the Council bypassed discussions with the European Parliament and made its decision legally binding using a process that has not been deployed in more than a decade. However the European Parliament can still make changes to the new rules - it has four months to respond with a proposal that must be backed by a majority of 361 MEPs. So what changes? The ruling doesn't scrap all the customer protections, but it changes the rules on compensation payments - changing both the payment amounts and the delay time after which compensation rules kick in. Under current EU Air Passenger Rights Regulation rules, passengers can claim between €250 and €600 in compensation if a flight is delayed by at least three hours, if the delay is the fault of the airline. Under the agreed changes, compensation will only be due after a four-hour delay for flights of less than 3,500 kilometres. For longer flights, airlines would be obliged to pay compensation if flights land at least six hours late, compared to the current three-hour standard. Under the new rules, €300 compensation will apply for delays of more than four hours – while €500 will be payable for delays of more than six hours involving flights of more than 3,500km. In exchange for the higher delay thresholds, airlines will have to streamline the complex and obfuscatory compensation process - in which many airlines make it very complicated to claim financial compensation but very easy to claim airline vouchers. There is also a strengthening of the rights for passengers with a disability. And what doesn't change? Other compensation rules remain unchanged, especially around the 'extraordinary circumstances' definition which covers whether airlines have to provide any compensation at all. Compensation for delays or cancellations is not paid if the problem is due to 'extraordinary circumstances' – the exact definition of this in the legislation is vague but it generally applies to situations like extreme weather, political instability, security risks or problems with air traffic control. Strikes are usually not considered to be extraordinary circumstances, neither are routine mechanical problems or staff shortages. The rules cover airlines that are registered in the EU – such as the Ireland-based Ryanair – or flights taking off from an EU or Schengen zone country. Since Brexit the rules no longer apply to the UK, but the British government has mostly "copied and pasted" it into UK legislation. Also unchanged are rules on flight cancellations and airlines responsibility to provide food, accommodation and alternative travel for passengers whose flights are delayed or cancelled. In truth this is not well policed - passengers are often simply told to make their own arrangements for accommodation and alternative travel and submit compensation claims to the airline later. Airlines do, however, routinely provide refreshments, usually in the form of food vouchers to passengers whose flights are delayed. Why the change? In a word - lobbying. Airlines had argued that the compensation payments were too high, especially for budget airlines where the compensation may be higher than the cost of the ticket. Airlines also said that they were unable to provide a replacement aircraft and crew within three hours in many European locations, and that this can lead to additional flights being cancelled because high compensation payments have already been incurred. When does this happen? The change is not immediate, first the European Parliament has four months to stage any objections and if no objection is received, then an introduction date will be set.
Local Spain
2 days ago
- Local Spain
How would Spain's proposed 21% VAT rate on tourist flats work?
A new proposal by the Spanish government could mean that up to 80 percent of tourist flats in Spain pay VAT, known as IVA (El Impuesto sobre el Valor Añadido) in Spanish. The ruling Socialist-led coalition recently presented a draft bill intended to ease access to housing, especially rentals, among Spaniards. The post-pandemic increase in the number of tourist flats (pisos turísticos) in Spain have been blamed by many across the country for cutting market supply and raising prices. Among the proposed measures, charging VAT on tourist flats is an attempt to dissuade landlords from renting to tourists. Currently, holiday flats that also provide hotel services, such as cleaning or bed linen changes, must pay the same VAT as a hotel, a rate of 10 percent. However, the new proposals would change that quite substantially. The government wants to impose a higher rate of 21 percent on tourist flats rented to the same tenant for no more than 30 nights in municipalities with over 10,000 inhabitants, even if they do not provide hotel services. If the bill goes through the Spanish Congress and is approved, around 295,000 tourist flats will be obliged to pay the new rate. The text proposes that short-term rentals (of less than 30 nights) should be taxed like any other economic activity. This affects around 80 percent of all registered tourist homes in Spain and more than 368,000 in total, according to the latest data from Spain's national stats body, INE. 'It is a matter of tourist homes being taxed as what they are: an economic activity,' said Isabel Rodríguez, Minister for Housing and the Urban Agenda, in a press conference presenting the draft legislation. The idea will be debated in Congress during the first half of June. However, the measure, if passed, will very likely be challenged in court as some tax experts warn that the measure is unconstitutional, according to reports in the Spanish media. That means the measure is far from certain to happen. What's the current law on VAT for holiday rentals in Spain and what would change? As currently constructed, the law means that VAT is only levied on holiday rentals when the accommodation offers extra-hotel services – servicios extrahoteleros in Spanish — and at the lower 10 percent rate. In most cases, the services provided by managers and owners of holiday homes are limited to handing over the keys, cleaning at each departure, and little more. In these cases, short-term tourist rentals are legally equivalent to renting a flat or dwelling and are therefore exempt from VAT. However, when hotel services are offered like daily cleaning or breakfasts, VAT has to be applied. Without the reform pushed by the government, the Spanish tax authorities do not consider the length of stay as a condition or determinant when declaring the rental income of a holiday home. The government wants to widen the net of holiday rentals that pay VAT while simultaneously increasing the rate by more than double. Which holiday rentals pay VAT? Under the current rules, according to Spanish property website Idealista other circumstances that make a holiday rental liable to VAT include: Why does the government want to do this? By widening the number of tourist flats that can be charged VAT, the Spanish government aims to, firstly, increase tax revenues, but secondly, and perhaps most importantly, disincentivise landlords from putting their property on the tourist market as opposed to the long-term rental market. However, the move also mirrors European legislation. The European VAT in the Digital Age
