logo
Tariff Turbulence: The ripple effects of Trump's trade policies on Indian exports

Tariff Turbulence: The ripple effects of Trump's trade policies on Indian exports

Time of India02-05-2025
The White House has been abuzz with 'tariffic' activity in the past few days. The fast-evolving nature of the situation has certainly kept the concerned parties on their toes, including the present authors.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
Pakistan reopens Attari-Wagah border to allow stranded citizens in India to return
Key Jammu & Kashmir reservoirs' flushing to begin soon
Air India sees Pakistan airspace ban costing it $600 mn over 12 months
On April 2, US President
Donald Trump
signed an executive order (EO) titled 'Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to Rectify Trade Practices that Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits'.
To 'rebalance global trade flows', the EO set out the 'Reciprocal Tariff Policy' imposing additional tariffs on all imports from all USA trading partners. The tariffs were stated to start at 10% and were to subsequently increase to country-specific rates. For India, the aggregate increased tariffs under the EO stood at 26% (inclusive of the initial 10%).
The initial increase of 10% tariff became applicable on goods entering US Customs Territory from 12.01 EDT, April 5, 2025. The country-specific increased tariff rates were made applicable from 12.01 am EDT on April 2, 2025.
Also Read:
India, US trade deal coming soon even as Vance claims India 'took advantage' of America
Live Events
Goods exported from India to the US between April 5, and April 9, were subject to 10% tariffs, and goods exported after April 9 were subject to 26% tariffs. The tariffs under the EO were specified to apply only to non-USA content of a specific article, provided at least 20% percent of the value of such article is USA originating.
However, another executive order on April 9 put a 90 day pause/suspension on the country specific tariffs introduced under the first EO. The suspension/pause operates on goods entering for consumption or withdrawn from a warehouse for consumption on or after 12.01 am EDT on April 10 and is to continue till 12.01 am EDT on July 9.
Meanwhile, India and the USA are also reportedly negotiating a comprehensive trade deal with the terms of reference having been agreed upon. It is also reported that India may be planning to reduce the tariffs levied on imports from the USA, and the same may also find place in the comprehensive trade deal being negotiated between the two countries.
The top exports products from India to the US include electrical machinery, equipment and parts, natural or cultured pearls, precious or semi-precious stones, pharmaceutical products, medicines for retail sales, nuclear reactors and boilers, diamonds, mineral fuels and oils, petroleum oils, textiles and apparel, chemical products (including plastics, organic and inorganic chemicals), automotive components (including engine parts, transmission components, electrical systems). Exports in the above sectors are likely to be affected by the increased tariffs.
Given the approach adopted by the US, it is unlikely that any potential trade deal will entirely reverse the tariff rates to what existed prior to the first EO. Thus, Indian entities engaged in exports to the USA, including in the above sectors, might have to prepare themselves for an increase in the tariffs on exports to the US. In any case, for the immediate future and pending finalisation of the trade deal, the increased levy of 10% will be applicable to all imports from India to the USA.
Consequently, entities exporting from India as well as importing in the USA, might feel the need to review their contracts to examine the implications of such tariffs. Contractual claims and disputes are also likely to arise as a result.
Elaborate and well negotiated contracts usually include clauses covering the effect of increased levies on pricing, 'change of law' and 'force majeure' clauses, clauses fixing liability for taxes, duties and other levies as well as clauses on limitation of liabilities. The specific language of such clauses will determine how the increased tariffs affect the respective parties.
For instance, if the contracts provide for pricing to be inclusive of leviable taxes / duties, the increase in tariffs might also increase the price of goods exported. 'change of law' clauses might require the party suffering any financial implication due to such change in law, to be compensated by the other party to neutralize the effect of such change. However, given the financial exposure, such clauses may potentially lead to calls for renegotiation of the contract or even invocation of dispute resolution mechanisms.
Similarly, depending on the language, 'force majeure' clauses may or may not cover situations like these increased tariffs. This is because force majeure clauses typically deal with situations where the contract cannot be performed at all and not when the performance becomes financially onerous. Clauses in such contracts which limit the liabilities of parties might also come in for closer examination and review if required.
Entities which have been historically exporting goods on a fixed price / fixed fee basis or under not so elaborate contracts are also likely to feel a pressing need for review of their terms of export and assess any potential financial liability due to these tariffs. Skeletal contracts not containing 'change of law' or 'force majeure' clauses might require detailed review, negotiation and might also be more exposed to monetary claims to be determined as per applicable law.
The "
Trump Tariffs
" under the EO are likely to have significant ramifications for trade between India and the US. Their abrupt introduction, current pause and unpredictable (even if potentially positive) future are likely to create confusion and potential disruptions in the supply chain.
Exporters and importers will need to carefully review and potentially renegotiate their contracts to address the financial implications of these increased tariffs. The situation may lead to contractual disputes, with specific focus on clauses related to pricing, change of law, force majeure, and liability for taxes and duties. As the trade landscape adjusts to these new tariffs, parties will need to navigate the complexities to mitigate financial and operational impact.
(Raj Panchmatia and Peshwan Jehangir are Partners, C. Nageshwaran is Counsel and Palak Vashisth is Associate at Khaitan & Co. The views expressed are personal.)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration unveils stricter subsidy rules for wind, solar projects
Trump administration unveils stricter subsidy rules for wind, solar projects

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump administration unveils stricter subsidy rules for wind, solar projects

The US Treasury Department on Friday unveiled stricter rules for how solar and wind projects can qualify for federal tax subsidies that President Donald Trump's new tax and spending law is phasing out over the next two years. The revisions change longstanding definitions for what it means for a project to be considered under construction by requiring developers of big solar arrays and wind farms to complete physical work rather than simply show that they have invested capital. The changes are in response to an executive order Trump issued last month directing the Treasury Department to restrict tax credit eligibility unless a substantial portion of a facility is built. Since taking office in January, Trump has repeatedly sought to stall development of wind and solar energy, calling them unreliable, expensive, and overly dependent on Chinese supply chains. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act , which Trump signed into law last month, requires projects to begin construction by July of next year or enter service by the end of 2027 to qualify for a 30 per cent tax credit and bonuses that can push the subsidy even higher. Under the new rules, which will affect projects that start construction as of September 2, utility-scale projects will be required to show substantial and continuous physical work to be eligible for the credits. They will still have four years to claim the subsidies. For the last decade, project developers had also been able to "safe harbor" projects for four years by incurring 5 per cent of total costs before a credit expired or stepped down to a lesser value. According to an agency document, "substantial" work does not include permitting, design or holding components in inventory. Small projects of under 1.5 megawatts will still be able to use the 5 per cent "safe harbor" provision, Treasury said, a positive for the residential solar industry. A solar industry trade group said the rules would harm businesses and undermine lawmakers' intentions with the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. "This is yet another act of energy subtraction from the Trump administration that will further delay the buildout of affordable, reliable power," Solar Energy Industries Association CEO Abigail Ross Hopper said in a statement. "American families and businesses will pay more for electricity as a result of this action, and China will continue to outpace us in the race for electricity to power AI."

Market outlook: Global events, GST reforms, FII trends to drive Dalal Street this week
Market outlook: Global events, GST reforms, FII trends to drive Dalal Street this week

Hans India

time17 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Market outlook: Global events, GST reforms, FII trends to drive Dalal Street this week

Mumbai: The Indian stock market will take cues from a mix of global and domestic triggers when it reopens for trading this week after the Independence Day holiday. Experts say factors such as the outcome of the Donald Trump-Vladimir Putin meeting, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's announcement on GST reforms, movements in US markets, and the ongoing buying and selling trends of foreign and domestic investors will play a major role in deciding the direction of Dalal Street. Last week, the Nifty and Sensex finally broke a six-week losing streak, closing with gains of around 1 per cent. However, foreign institutional investors (FIIs) continued heavy selling, offloading shares worth nearly Rs 10,000 crore in the cash market. Domestic institutional investors (DIIs) cushioned the fall with strong purchases of about Rs 19,000 crore. Sector-wise, pharma and auto stocks led the recovery while FMCG shares lagged behind. One of the biggest triggers for the coming week is the understanding reached between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin on the Ukraine conflict. Their meeting in Alaska on Friday did not produce a ceasefire but both leaders signaled progress, which could boost market sentiment globally. Back home, Prime Minister Modi's Independence Day announcement of GST 2.0 reforms is being seen as a positive sign for investors. The PM said the government would roll out major rate cuts by Diwali, especially on everyday-use goods, to make the tax regime more business- and consumer-friendly. Analysts believe this could improve market confidence. Global cues from Wall Street will also have an impact. US markets ended mixed last week, with the Dow closing in the green while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq slipped on weak industrial output data despite stronger retail sales numbers. In addition, corporate actions such as dividends, rights issues, stock splits and bonus shares lined up for more than 100 companies this week are likely to add stock-specific movements. Meanwhile, the trend of FIIs and DIIs will remain crucial. Crude oil prices, which cooled off after the Trump-Putin talks, may also provide some relief, said analysts.

US halts issuing visas for Palestinian children seeking medical aid after right-wing campaign
US halts issuing visas for Palestinian children seeking medical aid after right-wing campaign

New Indian Express

time23 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

US halts issuing visas for Palestinian children seeking medical aid after right-wing campaign

The US has halted all visitor visas for Palestinians, including those for children injured in Israel's genocidal war on Gaza and seeking medical care, amid growing pressure from right-wing influencers. 'All visitor visas for individuals from Gaza are being stopped while we conduct a full and thorough review of the process and procedures used to issue a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas in recent days,' the Department of State said in a message posted on X. The move came after far-right influencer and President Donald Trump's ally, Laura Loomer, who described herself as a "proud Islamophobe," posted on X that Palestinians 'who claim to be refugees from Gaza' had entered the US via San Francisco and Houston this month. In her post, she claimed that the children reaching US for medical care were shouting 'jihadi chants' and 'doing the HAMAS terror whistle.' 'How is allowing for Islamic immigrants to come into the US America First policy?' she wrote on X, adding that Palestinians had arrived in Missouri and claiming that 'several US Senators and members of Congress' had texted her to express their fury. Loomer's demand was backed by Republican lawmakers Chip Roy of Texas and Randy Fine of Florida. Fine called the arrivals a 'national security risk,' while Roy said he would inquire about the matter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store