Achakzai rejects 'unjust' water distribution formula
Addressing a grand jirga organised by PkMAP in Swabi district on Saturday, Achakzai, who is also the head of the Tehreek-e-Tahaffuz Aaeen-e-Pakistan, stressed that Pakistan can only function effectively if all four federating units are granted their due share of resources. "This country wasn't handed to us as charity - our elders made great sacrifices for it," he said. "Each province must receive what it rightfully deserves."
Achakzai criticised the current water-sharing model, which allocates 50 per cent to Punjab, 38 per cent to Sindh, eight per cent to Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, and three per cent to Balochistan. He entirely rejected this formula and called for a new, equitable system.
The PkMAP chairman also urged Pakistan and India to demonstrate maturity and restraint in their bilateral relations, warning that a nuclear conflict is not child's play. "Neither the people of the two nations nor the modern world can afford such a war," he added.
The veteran nationalist politician condemned the exploitation of natural resources by powerful nations and corporations, calling for an end to external control over local wealth. "We demand that our resources be returned to us. Powerful and wealthy countries must stop occupying the natural and mineral wealth of weaker nations," he said.
Achakzai slammed the narrative labeling Pashtuns as terrorists, saying that Pashtuns are, in fact, a peace-loving people. "Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is rich in blessings, many of which are even mentioned in the Holy Quran," he added.
The PkMAP chief questioned the legitimacy of using national resources to pay back IMF loans. "Let the government show us how much the IMF has actually loaned and how much has been invested in K-P, Sindh, Punjab, and Balochistan," he demanded.
Achakzai also rejected the outcome of the February 8 general elections as a "national tragedy" in which voters were denied their rights through coercion. "The biggest act of terrorism in Pakistan occurred during these elections when people were forced at gunpoint to surrender their vote," he claimed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 hours ago
- Express Tribune
K-P Assembly session on peace turns into war of words
A special session of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly, convened to consult on the province's law-and-order situation and propose effective measures for peace, ironically descended into political point-scoring, blame games and verbal crossfire on Tuesday, with little substantive progress made. The session, chaired by Muhammad Idrees after a three-hour delay, suffered from poor attendance on both treasury and opposition benches. The repeated quorum breaks, along with the absence of several provincial ministers, further disrupted proceedings. Opening the debate after the recitation of the Holy Quran, PML-N MPA Farukh Khan warned that terrorism was rearing its head again. "This province was once the cradle of peace, home to the Gandhara civilisation, but then a time came when it was drenched in blood," he lamented. He said the public looked to the House with expectations. Recalling Nawaz Sharif's tenure as prime minister, he claimed it had brought peace to the country, and emphasised that the nation now required the "same spirit". "Since the 18th Amendment, law and order has been a provincial subject. The story must begin here, with positive proposals from this House. In times of crisis, governments and oppositions work together we must get on the same page and make history by truly representing our province." However, he pointed out that the province can seek help from the federation. "We cannot endure more lost lives, broken homes, and abandoned lands. Speeches alone will not do, the government must take the lead, and we are ready to stand with it." Ali Shah said the situation was forcing people from Bajaur to flee their homes. "My heart bleeds for them. Conditions in Balochistan and K-P are deteriorating. In Punjab, there is neither an operation nor any drone strike, but our borders have become insecure." Special Assistant to the Chief Minister Sohail Afridi pointed out that no opposition member had spoken against military operations in the merged districts, whereas PTI's entire leadership had opposed the move alongside the provincial government. To this day, the leaders of opposition parties have neither taken a clear position nor issued a statement against the operations. The blood of the Pashtuns continues to be traded," he said. Afridi lashed out at the Awami National Party, saying that "a party led by Aimal Wali cannot lecture us on political maturity". "Political speeches will not achieve anything. Not a single opposition member condemns the operation. During the regime change episode, all opposition parties were part of the London Plan. These people want to disrupt the province's peace once again." A self-created law-and-order situation has been engineered in the province, he alleged and added that the PTI, under any circumstances, support military action in the province.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
IMF flags gaps in Pak corruption detection
The identification of politically exposed persons remained uneven and there were insufficient corruption-specific red-flags that could detect misuse of the public office in Pakistan, according to initial findings by a corruption diagnostic assessment mission of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF has shared the draft observations along with recommendations with the government, giving Islamabad an opportunity to review these before the Governance and Corruption Diagnostic Assessment report is released by the end of this month, sources told The Express Tribune. "The effectiveness of the politically exposed persons' identification remains uneven across sectors due to limited access to comprehensive data, absence of automated screening tools in smaller institutions, and a lack of corruption-specific red flag indicators that would help detect misuse of public office, stated the draft report. The lender has recommended issuing new guidelines by learning from the best global practices to identify the misuse of the public office and check any corruption in the government contracts. Pakistan committed to the IMF in September last year that it would fully publish the report once it is completed. Under the $7 billion deal, the IMF had dispatched the Governance and Corruption Diagnostic Assessment Mission to Pakistan this year, which met with about three-dozen government and state institutions. On the request of Pakistan, the IMF had extended the deadline to publish the report from July to the end of August this year. The politically exposed persons include the head of the state, the head of the government, politicians, bureaucrats, judiciary, military officials, and senior executives of the state-owned enterprises, ambassadors and the members of parliament. There are special checks for the opening and operations of bank accounts of the politically exposed persons. Whereas the report has identified some major gaps, it has also acknowledged the efforts that the Pakistani authorities made to put in place a basic structure to minimise the chances of corruption and the misuse of the public office by politically exposed persons. The draft report states that the identification of the politically exposed persons is guided by regulatory requirements issued by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), and the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) for their respective supervised entities. It added that the Financial Institutions and Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Persons (DNFBPs) are required to apply enhanced due diligence measures before dealing with the politically exposed persons. The enhanced scrutiny measures include obtaining senior management approval, establishing the source of wealth, and conducting ongoing monitoring. But smaller institutions do not effectively apply these safeguards, observed the special mission in its draft. The draft stated that the institutions are largely responsible for developing their own internal systems to identify and manage the risks beyond the official lists given by the regulators. The draft report further stated that reporting institutions to the regulators often lacked clarity on corruption-specific typologies and risk indicators. Sources said that the IMF was of the view that despite the specious transaction report guidelines and the red-flag indicators for various sectors and typologies, reporting institutions have limited access to typologies that reflect common methods of laundering corruption proceeds. As part of the safeguards, the FBR had also established an online platform through which financial institutions can screen customers against official lists of federal public officials, including senior civil servants serving in grade 17 to 22 and members of parliament. The sources said that the IMF has referred to some best international practices adopted by countries like Canada and Colombia, which helped mitigate chances of corruption through better detection of cases. Canada has published red flag indicators for transactions involving government contracts, municipal procurement, and politically exposed persons' related behaviour, use of corporate entities or consultants in public sector schemes, and layered payments, rapid contract turnover, and unexplained wealth accumulation in low-salary public roles. Likewise, Colombia's financial intelligence unit developed sectoral indicators targeting healthcare procurement during Covid pandemic, SOE-linked laundering via construction firms and extractive industries, and payments routed through regional entities to avoid detection. The sources said that Pakistan could benefit from issuing specific guidance on identifying unusual financial behaviour linked to the politically exposed persons and state contracts. The spokesman of the Ministry of Finance did not respond to the questions whether the consultations on the IMF findings have been completed and would the report be published by end of this month. The sources said that the Ministry of Finance had given last Friday a deadline to the various departments to respond to the IMF's observations and recommendations. Some of the entities have accepted a few observations while others have sought revisions by disagreeing with the IMF's findings. The sources said that due to the cumbersome process involved in going through every recommendation, there is a possibility that the government may take longer than required time to publish the document.
Business Recorder
2 days ago
- Business Recorder
Fiscal trap: is it time to end the cycle of endless consolidation?
In the context of Pakistan, conduct of macroeconomic policy rests on two broad pillars: an increasingly independent monetary policy and a persistently constrained fiscal policy. Over the past two decades, the SBP has gradually acquired operational and legal autonomy, helping it to steer monetary policy with a degree of institutional discipline. By contrast, fiscal policy remains hostage to entrenched political bargains, rigid structural arrangements, and an ever-expanding government footprint that now threatens to push the upper taxation and public debt limits of what the economy — and its citizens — can bear. At the heart of this dilemma is Pakistan's mounting dependence on predatory taxation and borrowings for federal deficit financing. Limited access to external capital markets — largely due to weak external credit ratings and recurrent balance of payments crises — has forced successive governments to lean heavily on domestic borrowing. But with local banks already saturated with government paper, the room for even higher domestic borrowings has shrunk dramatically. The result is an endless cycle of fiscal consolidation — tightening budgets year after year, squeezing the after-tax profitability of businesses and disposable income of households, that ultimately results in suppression of investments and growth recovery. The FY26 federal budget, shaped under the latest IMF-supported EFF arrangement, starkly illustrates how deeply this pattern is now entrenched. Headline numbers may suggest progress: the government pledges to shrink the overall deficit from 5.6 percent to 3.9 percent of GDP, while nudging the primary surplus up slightly to 2.4 percent. Yet beneath these surface figures lies a troubling reality: nearly all the adjustment burden falls on over-ambitious revenue targets and suppressed primary spending, not on a genuine structural rebalancing of fiscal architecture. The revenue side alone tells the story. Tax collections are budgeted to grow by nearly 19 percent in FY26, which is on the back of 29 percent growth in actual tax collection in FY25. If history is any guide, continued mobilization of additional predatory taxation will prove exceedingly difficult to achieve without intensifying the pressure on an already burdened formal sector. As per the IMF's First EFF Report (published in May 2025), the baseline medium-term macroeconomic framework projects real growth to increase modestly from 3.6 percent in FY26 to 4.1 percent in FY27, and then stabilizing around 4.5 percent through FY30. Despite official claims regarding the implementation of structural reforms, projected baseline growth remains constrained by the persistent imperative to avert balance of payments crises. The tenuous nature of the current fiscal consolidation strategy is underscored by the EFF baseline macroeconomic projections. Specifically, the growth rate of tax revenues is projected to decline progressively, from 17 percent in FY26 to 12 percent in FY27, 10 percent in FY28, and stabilizing at approximately 11 percent in both FY29 and FY30—corresponding to an estimated 12 percent of GDP. Concurrently, primary expenditure (excluding debt servicing) is projected to increase from 10 percent of GDP in FY26 to 12 percent in FY27, peak at 13 percent in FY28, and revert to 11 percent in FY29 and FY30—equivalent to roughly 14 percent of GDP. Predictably, under this fiscal framework, debt servicing obligations are projected to gradually decline from 8 percent of GDP in FY25 to 5 percent by FY30. Nevertheless, the First EFF Report classifies the overall risk of sovereign stress as 'high' in both the short and medium term, while the long-term risk is assessed as 'moderate,' despite the projected stabilization of debt servicing within the baseline scenario. This 'high' sovereign stress is mainly due to elevated gross external financing needs, low fiscal and forex buffers. One cannot understand Pakistan's fiscal trap without examining the legacy of the 7th National Finance Commission (NFC) Award of 2010. This constitutional arrangement mandates that 57.5 percent of federal tax revenues be transferred to the provinces—a well-intentioned federalist constitutional design to devolve functional responsibility and spending. In theory, this should have allowed the federal government to shrink its own footprint. In practice, however, the federal government has only grown larger. Federal expenditures have risen at an average annual rate exceeding 14 percent since 2010, leaving a gaping hole between net federal revenues and ever-growing debt servicing costs. Each fiscal year now begins with a stark arithmetic: once transfers to the provinces are made, the federal government must borrow—domestically and at increasingly high cost—just to cover current expenditures, let alone development spending. Half of all federal spending now goes to service debt. The cycle sustains itself through more borrowing, higher taxes, and a steady erosion of fiscal credibility. To bridge this gap, the ongoing EFF programme stitched a National Fiscal Pact (NFP), committing provinces to run surpluses. But these provincial surpluses are retained and reinvested locally, not flowing back as revenues to narrow the federal deficit. For FY26 budget, this leaves the federal government with an estimated standalone deficit of over PKR 6.5 trillion—even as the consolidated national deficit appears moderate on paper. The EFF baseline projections suggest that headline debt-to-GDP ratios to decline from 78 percent to 64 percent by FY30, assuming tight adherence to primary surplus targets. But such headline improvements disguise the deeper malaise: the ratio of public debt to tax revenue will remain among the highest in comparable economies, and the underlying fiscal asymmetry between federal obligations and available net revenues will persist. What, then, is the alternative? Incremental tinkering—shaving a few percentage points off expenditure here, tweaking taxes there—has failed to break the cycle for over a decade. A more credible pathway would start with an interim recalibration of the NFC Award. By treating debt servicing and defence spending as first charges on federal revenue, and adjusting the vertical revenue share in the centre's favour, the structural imbalance can be narrowed over the medium term. Equally critical is the question of domestic debt restructuring. Both provincial budgets and well-capitalised domestic banks can absorb carefully managed adjustment costs of debt restructuring. Such domestic debt restructuring must be underpinned by robust legal safeguards and vigilant oversight to protect financial sector stability. The goal of domestic debt restructuring must be to free up fiscal space and then to lower the tax burden on businesses and improve disposable incomes that will help to revive private investment. But these measures alone would not suffice without durable institutional guardrails. Pakistan needs a fiscal charter that binds governments to prudent borrowing and spending ratios, closes avenues for regressive and predatory taxation, and enforces broadening of tax base and mandatory tax compliance. A permanent parliamentary fiscal oversight mechanism could further strengthen accountability, ensuring that borrowing decisions and contingent liabilities are subject to transparent scrutiny. None of this will be politically easy. Rebalancing the NFC Award is a deeply sensitive undertaking in a federation where provincial autonomy is jealously guarded. Domestic debt restructuring invites resistance from powerful stakeholders. Yet the stakes could hardly be clearer: without structural recalibration, Pakistan's fiscal policy will remain shackled to a perpetual cycle of consolidation that neither restores' macroeconomic stability nor unlocks the country's latent growth potential. The broader aim must be to free fiscal policy from its reactive, debt-driven posture and enable it to function alongside monetary policy as a genuine countercyclical tool. In the absence of this, macroeconomic stability will remain elusive, private investment will remain stifled, and the promise of inclusive growth will remain perpetually deferred. The depressing social and economic outturns during FY23-FY25 should serve as a wake-up call, the next FY27 budget must not be yet another missed opportunity. The time for halfway measures is long gone. Pakistan's political leadership must decide whether they wish to continue administering the same palliative year after year—or whether they are finally prepared to confront the structural roots of the fiscal trap that has held the economy back for far too long. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
