logo
New Zealand AML/CFT Compliance Updates To Require A Customer Risk Rating Model

New Zealand AML/CFT Compliance Updates To Require A Customer Risk Rating Model

Scoop12 hours ago

Press Release – Asia Pacific AML
Businesses that are captured under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act must now rate customers (interchangeably referred to as clients) and retain record keeping of the Customer Risk Rating Model.
The Financial Markets Authority has issued the AML/CFT Customer Risk Rating Guideline. The Department Internal Affairs, another AML/CFT Supervisor, has set its boundaries of what regulatory expectation looks like for a Customer Risk Rating Model.
Regulation 12AC
Regulation 12AC came into force on 1 June 2025 and relates to obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act.
Businesses that are captured under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act must now rate customers (interchangeably referred to as clients) and retain record keeping of the Customer Risk Rating Model.
Fast Implementation
AML360™ has a demonstrable solution for all sized businesses. Our systems allow businesses to quickly implement a reliable and tested risk-based solution.
Providing a flexible scorecard and risk matrix model, risk configurations are easily updated to meet sector environment changes and regulatory updates.
AML/CFT Risk Score Card
The term Risk Score Card and Risk Matrix can be used interchangeably.
The Score Card may in practice refer to the Risk Indicator level with a score of 1 for Very Low and a score of 5 for Very High. In between may be Low, Medium and High.
The Score Card reflects the risk level that either increases (drives upward) or reduces (drives downward) the overall risk level.
Where Score Cards reflect the individual risk sources, the Risk Matrix reflects the overall Risk Range.
AML/CFT Ongoing Monitoring
A Customer Risk Rating will feed into the frequency of Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting.
Customer Risk Rating Reports and Ongoing Monitoring Records need to be maintained to demonstrate decision-making.
AML/CFT Auditors and AML/CFT Supervisors will expect to test adequacy.
Risk-Based Approach
There does not need to be perfection in a risk-based approach. The AML/CFT Act expects reasonable adequacy.
Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting should reflect that the Customer Risk Rating is in alignment with the Account Activity. When the risk levels of the account activity increase – so too should the Customer Risk Rating. When the risk levels of the account activity or products services decrease – so too should the Client Risk Rating.
Case Management and Escalations
Case Escalation systems should be available to enable the Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer to make determinations of whether a 'red flag' triggers suspicious activity.
Customer Risk Ratings and Ongoing Monitoring
This is where the real elbow grease starts with an AML/CFT compliance framework.
If the business operations rely on labour intensive systems, then AML/CFT Compliance costs will likely be high. Not only will AML/CFT compliance costs be high, but AML/CFT compliance efficiency will likely be low.
Labour Intensive Processes Push Up Costs
AML/CFT compliance frameworks rely heavily on data management and risk decision-making. The process of decision-making is required to be demonstrated.
Humans cannot think very fast when determining a lot of difference data sources. To streamline AML/CFT compliance, data science and data reporting systems are necessary. AML360™ AML/CFT regulatory technology combines data analysis and reporting to assists AML/CFT compliance efficiency, reduce operational cost and protect business brand.
Ongoing Monitoring Requires Flexibility
A Customer Risk Rating Model needs to have flexibility. This flexibility should enable Risk Score Cards and Risk Appetites to adjust to the business environment and regulatory updates.
Regulatory updates may come from Sector Risk Assessments, National Risk Assessments, Codes of Practice or Guidelines. The quicker an AML/CFT Programme can adjust to these changes, the better the level of regulatory compliance.
AML360™ Regulatory Technology
Don't make the mistake of leaving AML/CFT compliance on the back-burner.
Take control, reduce operational costs and gain compliance efficiency with AML360™.
Our Customer Risk Rating Models are flexible to the Nature, Size and Complexity of business and industry sectors.
AML360™ incorporates testing reports to support your risk rating methodology.
Don't waste time or take regulatory risk with labour-intensive processes.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Zealand AML/CFT Compliance Updates To Require A Customer Risk Rating Model
New Zealand AML/CFT Compliance Updates To Require A Customer Risk Rating Model

Scoop

time12 hours ago

  • Scoop

New Zealand AML/CFT Compliance Updates To Require A Customer Risk Rating Model

Press Release – Asia Pacific AML Businesses that are captured under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act must now rate customers (interchangeably referred to as clients) and retain record keeping of the Customer Risk Rating Model. The Financial Markets Authority has issued the AML/CFT Customer Risk Rating Guideline. The Department Internal Affairs, another AML/CFT Supervisor, has set its boundaries of what regulatory expectation looks like for a Customer Risk Rating Model. Regulation 12AC Regulation 12AC came into force on 1 June 2025 and relates to obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act. Businesses that are captured under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act must now rate customers (interchangeably referred to as clients) and retain record keeping of the Customer Risk Rating Model. Fast Implementation AML360™ has a demonstrable solution for all sized businesses. Our systems allow businesses to quickly implement a reliable and tested risk-based solution. Providing a flexible scorecard and risk matrix model, risk configurations are easily updated to meet sector environment changes and regulatory updates. AML/CFT Risk Score Card The term Risk Score Card and Risk Matrix can be used interchangeably. The Score Card may in practice refer to the Risk Indicator level with a score of 1 for Very Low and a score of 5 for Very High. In between may be Low, Medium and High. The Score Card reflects the risk level that either increases (drives upward) or reduces (drives downward) the overall risk level. Where Score Cards reflect the individual risk sources, the Risk Matrix reflects the overall Risk Range. AML/CFT Ongoing Monitoring A Customer Risk Rating will feed into the frequency of Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting. Customer Risk Rating Reports and Ongoing Monitoring Records need to be maintained to demonstrate decision-making. AML/CFT Auditors and AML/CFT Supervisors will expect to test adequacy. Risk-Based Approach There does not need to be perfection in a risk-based approach. The AML/CFT Act expects reasonable adequacy. Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting should reflect that the Customer Risk Rating is in alignment with the Account Activity. When the risk levels of the account activity increase – so too should the Customer Risk Rating. When the risk levels of the account activity or products services decrease – so too should the Client Risk Rating. Case Management and Escalations Case Escalation systems should be available to enable the Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer to make determinations of whether a 'red flag' triggers suspicious activity. Customer Risk Ratings and Ongoing Monitoring This is where the real elbow grease starts with an AML/CFT compliance framework. If the business operations rely on labour intensive systems, then AML/CFT Compliance costs will likely be high. Not only will AML/CFT compliance costs be high, but AML/CFT compliance efficiency will likely be low. Labour Intensive Processes Push Up Costs AML/CFT compliance frameworks rely heavily on data management and risk decision-making. The process of decision-making is required to be demonstrated. Humans cannot think very fast when determining a lot of difference data sources. To streamline AML/CFT compliance, data science and data reporting systems are necessary. AML360™ AML/CFT regulatory technology combines data analysis and reporting to assists AML/CFT compliance efficiency, reduce operational cost and protect business brand. Ongoing Monitoring Requires Flexibility A Customer Risk Rating Model needs to have flexibility. This flexibility should enable Risk Score Cards and Risk Appetites to adjust to the business environment and regulatory updates. Regulatory updates may come from Sector Risk Assessments, National Risk Assessments, Codes of Practice or Guidelines. The quicker an AML/CFT Programme can adjust to these changes, the better the level of regulatory compliance. AML360™ Regulatory Technology Don't make the mistake of leaving AML/CFT compliance on the back-burner. Take control, reduce operational costs and gain compliance efficiency with AML360™. Our Customer Risk Rating Models are flexible to the Nature, Size and Complexity of business and industry sectors. AML360™ incorporates testing reports to support your risk rating methodology. Don't waste time or take regulatory risk with labour-intensive processes.

New Zealand AML/CFT Compliance Updates To Require A Customer Risk Rating Model
New Zealand AML/CFT Compliance Updates To Require A Customer Risk Rating Model

Scoop

time13 hours ago

  • Scoop

New Zealand AML/CFT Compliance Updates To Require A Customer Risk Rating Model

The Financial Markets Authority has issued the AML/CFT Customer Risk Rating Guideline. The Department Internal Affairs, another AML/CFT Supervisor, has set its boundaries of what regulatory expectation looks like for a Customer Risk Rating Model. Regulation 12AC Regulation 12AC came into force on 1 June 2025 and relates to obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act. Businesses that are captured under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act must now rate customers (interchangeably referred to as clients) and retain record keeping of the Customer Risk Rating Model. Fast Implementation AML360™ has a demonstrable solution for all sized businesses. Our systems allow businesses to quickly implement a reliable and tested risk-based solution. Providing a flexible scorecard and risk matrix model, risk configurations are easily updated to meet sector environment changes and regulatory updates. AML/CFT Risk Score Card The term Risk Score Card and Risk Matrix can be used interchangeably. The Score Card may in practice refer to the Risk Indicator level with a score of 1 for Very Low and a score of 5 for Very High. In between may be Low, Medium and High. The Score Card reflects the risk level that either increases (drives upward) or reduces (drives downward) the overall risk level. Where Score Cards reflect the individual risk sources, the Risk Matrix reflects the overall Risk Range. AML/CFT Ongoing Monitoring A Customer Risk Rating will feed into the frequency of Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting. Customer Risk Rating Reports and Ongoing Monitoring Records need to be maintained to demonstrate decision-making. AML/CFT Auditors and AML/CFT Supervisors will expect to test adequacy. Risk-Based Approach There does not need to be perfection in a risk-based approach. The AML/CFT Act expects reasonable adequacy. Ongoing Monitoring and Reporting should reflect that the Customer Risk Rating is in alignment with the Account Activity. When the risk levels of the account activity increase – so too should the Customer Risk Rating. When the risk levels of the account activity or products services decrease – so too should the Client Risk Rating. Case Management and Escalations Case Escalation systems should be available to enable the Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Officer to make determinations of whether a 'red flag' triggers suspicious activity. Customer Risk Ratings and Ongoing Monitoring This is where the real elbow grease starts with an AML/CFT compliance framework. If the business operations rely on labour intensive systems, then AML/CFT Compliance costs will likely be high. Not only will AML/CFT compliance costs be high, but AML/CFT compliance efficiency will likely be low. Labour Intensive Processes Push Up Costs AML/CFT compliance frameworks rely heavily on data management and risk decision-making. The process of decision-making is required to be demonstrated. Humans cannot think very fast when determining a lot of difference data sources. To streamline AML/CFT compliance, data science and data reporting systems are necessary. AML360™ AML/CFT regulatory technology combines data analysis and reporting to assists AML/CFT compliance efficiency, reduce operational cost and protect business brand. Ongoing Monitoring Requires Flexibility A Customer Risk Rating Model needs to have flexibility. This flexibility should enable Risk Score Cards and Risk Appetites to adjust to the business environment and regulatory updates. Regulatory updates may come from Sector Risk Assessments, National Risk Assessments, Codes of Practice or Guidelines. The quicker an AML/CFT Programme can adjust to these changes, the better the level of regulatory compliance. AML360™ Regulatory Technology Don't make the mistake of leaving AML/CFT compliance on the back-burner. Take control, reduce operational costs and gain compliance efficiency with AML360™. Our Customer Risk Rating Models are flexible to the Nature, Size and Complexity of business and industry sectors. AML360™ incorporates testing reports to support your risk rating methodology. Don't waste time or take regulatory risk with labour-intensive processes.

Foreign exchange fined amid transactions deemed 'objectively suspicious'
Foreign exchange fined amid transactions deemed 'objectively suspicious'

1News

timea day ago

  • 1News

Foreign exchange fined amid transactions deemed 'objectively suspicious'

An Auckland-based foreign exchange and money remittance company has been convicted and fined $1.125 million for failing to report suspicious activities and to submit prescribed transaction reports. An investigation by the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) found that Qian DuoDuo Limited, which traded under the name Lidong Foreign Exchange, found it failed to report 197 international transactions to China between June 2018 and September 2019. The transactions, which totalled over $19.14 million, included 26 "objectively suspicious" activities with a value of $4.72 million and 171 involved prescribed transactions with a value of $14.42 million. The value of the nearly 200 transactions represented around one fifth of the gross value transactions undertaken by Qian DuoDuo Limited for the 2018/2019 financial year. Two individuals who completed the transactions, Xiaoyu Lu and Musubayoufa Fuati, were convicted of criminal offending. ADVERTISEMENT Fuati was convicted of structuring transactions to avoid anti-money laundering laws, while Lu was convicted of providing unregistered financial services, as well as multiple counts of money laundering. Both pleaded guilty to their charges. In sentencing, the Auckland District Court found the company failed to carry out adequate customer due diligence on the source of Fuati and Lu's funds and relied on questionable verification documents despite recognising a high risk that its operations could be used to launder money. Anti-money laundering and countering financing of terrorism director Serge Sablyak said Internal Affairs took offences under the Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 "very seriously". "Suspicious transactions have the potential to be linked to money laundering or terrorist financing activities. Prescribed transaction reports are vital in alerting law enforcement to suspected offenders and make money laundering and terrorist financing difficult to hide." Sablyak said Qian DuoDuo Limited had a "history of non-compliance". "In 2017, the Department took civil action against the company following non-compliance with its obligations, and the High Court confirmed multiple breaches of the company's legal obligations. "When financial institutions, including money remitters, continue to fail to meet their obligations under the Act, the Department can and will take action." ADVERTISEMENT Qian DuoDuo Limited appealed the District Court's decision to the High Court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store