logo
I bought a trampoline for the local kids to enjoy but my spiteful neighbour made us rip it down – they lead a sad life

I bought a trampoline for the local kids to enjoy but my spiteful neighbour made us rip it down – they lead a sad life

The Sun5 hours ago

A GRANDMA claims she has to pull down her trampoline after a 'spiteful' neighbour complained to the council about kids bouncing on it.
Lorraine Roberts bought a trampoline for children on her estate in Southampton, Hampshire, and erected it on council-owned common area in February.
2
2
The 67-year-old believed all her neighbours were happy with the 16-foot equipment until she received a call from Southampton City Council last month [May 19].
Grandma-of-ten Lorraine says staff told her an unknown neighbour had complained about the 'noise and mess' children make while playing on it 'all day, every day'.
She was reportedly then ordered to take it down from the grassy area before it is forcibly removed on 'health and safety' grounds.
Shocked Lorraine admits the children can be noisy while playing but says she lives just a 'couple feet away' and orders anyone off the trampoline by 8pm.
She's since described the neighbour's complaint as 'gutless' and believes the residents should've been consulted before the decision was made to ban the equipment.
The grandma said the local children are 'disappointed and upset' over the trampoline's removal and she remains hopeful the decision can be overturned.
Southampton City Council say play equipment such as trampolines present a 'significant health and safety risk' so are banned on council-owned shared areas.
Lorraine said: "Just over a year ago, one of my neighbours put a trampoline on a shared area of grass because a lot of kids play there but it was quite flimsy.
"I've got grandchildren that play on the close so I said I'd buy a bigger, sturdier one.
"Everybody loved it. Kids were on it all day, every day. It keeps them off their iPads and PlayStations."
Although the Grandma admitted the kids are noisy on the trampoline, as far as she's concerned "they're going to be noisy either way."
"I didn't know anyone had any issue with it. I thought the neighbours were happy with it.
"We all think it's spineless how [the neighbour] didn't say anything to our face. They're gutless and we've got to live with them."
Lorraine insists it's the residents' roles to take responsibility for the children, not the council.
She says the kids will still cause noise and mess without the trampoline but now they don't have anything to play on.
Lorraine said: "I was quite shocked when [the council] said they'd received a complaint from one of the neighbours. Why didn't they approach us?
"They said it was a health and safety issue but I said you're not responsible, we are. We take responsibility for the children.
"They said it's got to come down. I said no and she said if you don't take it down we will.
"I was really disappointed for the children's sake. I just like the children having something to play with.
"The complaint was about the noise and mess but you're still going to get that without the trampoline but now they won't have anywhere to play.
"The council should've come round, had a meeting with the whole close and asked what we all thought instead of just saying 'take it down'.
"There was no discussion. We want to see if we can get this overturned. The children are all upset by this."
A spokesperson for Southampton City Council said: 'Shared areas of council-owned grass within our communities are spaces for everyone to enjoy safely.
"While we understand the importance of outdoor play, play equipment such as trampolines present a significant health and safety risk, and cannot be safely monitored around the clock.
"For this reason, we do not permit their use in these shared areas.
"The residents are within walking distance of two parks which provide good access to play facilities.
"We are aware that this type of play equipment can be expensive, which is why we sent letters to the community to give the owner the chance to collect the trampoline themselves.'
Lorraine took to social media to voice her concerns with the neighbour's complaint and council's decision to remove the trampoline.
Lorraine said: "I cannot believe that some spiteful person from our close has complained to the council that our children are making too much noise whilst playing on the trampoline."
Another user said: "They lead a very sad life to complain about the children."
A third added: "You're joking. Isn't it good they are laughing and playing or do they want them either stuck in bedrooms or playing with guns outside? What has this world come to?"
Another said: "What a small minded person. It's lovely to hear children playing outside."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE Astonishing moment British survivor of Air India plane crash walks BACK towards flaming wreckage to rescue his brother, telling bystander: 'He's burning to death, I have to save him'
EXCLUSIVE Astonishing moment British survivor of Air India plane crash walks BACK towards flaming wreckage to rescue his brother, telling bystander: 'He's burning to death, I have to save him'

Daily Mail​

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE Astonishing moment British survivor of Air India plane crash walks BACK towards flaming wreckage to rescue his brother, telling bystander: 'He's burning to death, I have to save him'

This is the dramatic moment the British man who was the miraculous sole survivor of the Air India plane crash attempted to return to the inferno of the accident to save his brother. Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, 40, was captured on camera staggering towards a building engulfed by ferocious flames as dense smoke billowed in the air. In the video, exclusively obtained by MailOnline emergency worker Satinder Singh Sandhu, who is wearing a turquoise turban and orange shirt, can be seen waving his arms as he desperately shouts at Mr Ramesh to come towards him to escape the devastation. It was previously thought that images that have gone viral showed Mr Ramesh incredibly emerging from the crash moments after the Air India jet smashed into the hostel of a medical college on 12 June. But MailOnline can reveal that what they actually show is him walking towards Mr Sandhu after he luckily spotted him attempting to walk back into the horrific crash site and vociferously pleaded with him not to. Mr Sandhu, who was the first emergency worker at the scene told MailOnline: 'I saw a man in a white t-shirt walking back towards the fire. He appeared quite dazed and confused and I shouted: 'Stop. What are you doing? Don't go back in there. You'll die.' 'I was shouting as loud as I could and waving my arms pointing to the flames. There was a lot of panic and confusion but luckily for him, he heard me.' He added: 'The man had initially walked away from the crash but how he did that I don't know. Fortunately, I saw him walking back towards it and couldn't believe that anybody would do such a thing. I was screaming at the top of my voice and begging him not to go back in there, telling him to get away and walk to me.' Mr Sandhu revealed that after hearing his desperate pleas, Mr Ramesh turned, started walking towards him and told him: 'My family member is in there, my brother and he's burning to death. I have to save him.' Mr Sandhu, 41 said: 'I walked nearer to Mr Ramesh, grabbed him by the arm and led him away to a waiting ambulance. I had no idea that he was a passenger on the plane and thought he was a resident of the hostel or a passer-by. 'He was very disoriented and shocked and was limping. There was also blood on his face, but he was able to speak. He told the paramedics that he was flying to London when the plane fell and that he wanted to go back to save his family.' The horrific crash killed all but one of the 242 passengers and crew on board. Mr Ramesh's older brother Ajay, 45 who was seated across the aisle from him is also believed to have been killed although his body has yet to be formally identified. The brothers, who live in Leicester, had been in India visiting relatives. Mr Sandhu, who is responsible for a fleet of ambulances at Ahmedabad's Civil Hospital close to where the crash occurred revealed that he was having lunch last Thursday when he heard a loud explosion. He immediately dropped his plate and ran towards the blast and after seeing the devastation before him, made the first emergency call of the incident at 1.41pm alerting his boss Jeetendra Shahi that he should send as many ambulances as possible and the other emergency services. In the call, which MailOnline has a recording of he says in a remarkably calm voice: 'There is a fire near Civil (hospital). It is a plane crash or something, I don't know. Please ask the team leader to send ambulances and fire brigade at the earliest.' Mr Shahi responds: 'Yes, I am sending.' Mr Sandhu revealed: 'When I got there it was horrific. There were burnt bodies scattered all over the street, huge flames and lots of smoke and people were running around and shouting. 'At first I wasn't 100% sure if it was a plane crash but then I looked up and could see part of an aircraft stuck in the building and realised what had happened.' Mr Sandhu revealed that it was only in the evening of last Thursday that he was informed that Mr Ramesh was a passenger on the plane and the sole survivor. He said: 'I still can't believe how he walked away from that crash. But what is more shocking is that if it hadn't been for me, he'd have gone back into the flames because he was determined to save his brother. 'I feel very honoured to have saved Mr Ramesh but at the same time, I was only doing my duty. My job is all about saving lives.' Mr Ramesh is still being treated at the Civil Hospital but has not sustained any serious injuries. He is expected to be discharged shortly. Mr Sandhu said: 'I'd love to meet him one day because I feel that I now have a very special connection with him. His survival is an unbelievable miracle and the one positive thing that has come out of this terrible tragedy.'

Tesco's 69p buy will kill garden moss in just 24 hours & turns your lawn a luscious green during hot weather
Tesco's 69p buy will kill garden moss in just 24 hours & turns your lawn a luscious green during hot weather

The Sun

time28 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Tesco's 69p buy will kill garden moss in just 24 hours & turns your lawn a luscious green during hot weather

A HANDY buy from Tesco is being hailed as a garden game-changer — and it costs just 69p. Fed-up Brits battling ugly moss patches on their lawns can wipe them out in just 24 hours using Tesco's Lemon Washing Up Liquid. The trick is being shared by gardening whizzes who swear by this easy hack — and it's as simple as mixing a few squirts of the lemon-scented liquid with warm water and spraying it directly onto the moss. Experts say this household item kills moss without harming your grass, giving your lawn a greener, healthier look in no time. Moss can quickly take over your lawn, especially in areas where the grass is thin or patchy. Unlike weeds, it spreads through spores, making it a right pain to control — and most weedkillers just don't touch it. But the gardening gurus at The Turf Grass Group say: 'It is not very difficult to get rid of moss in your lawn.' And you don't need any fancy chemicals. Just mix the washing up liquid with tepid water and give the moss a good soaking using a garden sprayer. After 24 hours, it should turn brown or orange — a sure sign it's dead and ready to be raked away. Once the moss has been zapped, go over the area with a metal rake to lift it out. Because moss has shallow roots, it comes up easily — no digging required. Be sure to bag it up and bin it, though. Leaving it lying around can spread spores back onto your grass and undo all your hard work. One shopper said: 'I tried this hack after reading about it online and was shocked by how well it worked. "The moss died off fast and the grass looked better in just a few days.' And it's not just moss that this hack helps. With regular care, your lawn can soak up more sunlight, water, and nutrients — which is especially important during heatwaves when grass can quickly turn dry and dull. 3

Action you can take if a neighbour's tree overhangs your garden – and who has to foot the bill
Action you can take if a neighbour's tree overhangs your garden – and who has to foot the bill

The Sun

time29 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Action you can take if a neighbour's tree overhangs your garden – and who has to foot the bill

AN expert has revealed what you should do if a neighbour's tree overhangs your garden, and who has to pay for it. With temperatures in the UK skyrocketing this week, plants and trees across the country will be seeing vigorous growth. 1 And although many gardening fans will likely be delighted with the rapid growth of their prized plants, some trees and hedges may end up growing into the neighbour's garden. In order to prevent overhanging branches turning into furious rows between neighbours, Natalie Welsh, head of property at HCB Widdows Mason shared what your rights are in this tricky situation. "It can be really frustrating when branches or plants from your neighbour's garden start to spill over into your space", she said. "In England and Wales, you're allowed to cut back any branches that cross onto your property, but only up to the boundary line. "Just make sure you don't step onto your neighbour's land or damage the tree itself." When trimming a tree back, you are not allowed to lean into your neighbour's garden, since that can be considered trespassing. Natalie advised that before taking any drastic action, it's best to have a friendly chat with your neighbour first. Politely explain to them that the overhanging branches are a problem for you, and let them know that you plan to cut them back. If the branches are overhanging onto your side, you're responsible for the cost of having them removed, not your neighbour", Natalie continued. "Once you've cut them back, you're also responsible for getting rid of the branches properly." Your kids are breaking law if they kick their ball over neighbour's fence, High Court rules after couple sued next door Natalie revealed that the cut-back branches actually belong to your neighbour, so you can offer to return them to them after you have chopped them down. However, you cannot throw them over the fence into your neighbour's garden, as this is classed as fly-tipping, which is illegal. "If your neighbour doesn't want the trimmings, then it's down to you to dispose of them responsibly, whether that's your garden waste bin or taking them to the recycling centre", the expert said. "In most situations, a friendly word with the neighbour may help establish views of ownership over any respective boundary in question and avoids any disputes or misunderstandings later. I had a two-year bin war with my next door neighbour Gemma Smith and Sophie Wood were engaged in a weekly feud for a year over their wheelie bins. When Gemma moved next door to Sophie, 34, who is unemployed, in November 2020 they were civil to one another. Gemma, who is single and doesn't work due to stress, says: 'Sophie seemed nice and we'd stop and exchange pleasantries. 'But it all changed at the beginning of 2022, when Sophie's bin was full and she put her rubbish bag in mine. 'I took it out and put it on top of her bin. 'It fell off, gulls pecked at it and there was rubbish everywhere.' Both women refused to clear up the mess, claiming it was the other one's fault. Gemma says: 'I felt so angry. 'There was cat litter spread all over my drive — it was absolutely disgusting and we ended up shouting at each other. 'We were both as bad as each other — we'd walk past each other and I'd tell her she was a lazy cow and to clean up after herself. 'We'd scream insults at each other." Within six months Sophie had set up a CCTV camera and threatened to report Gemma to the council. In retaliation, Gemma set up the baby monitor — which can record video — to try to pin more wrongdoing on Sophie. Then last July Sophie spotted Gemma in tears on her doorstep following a burglary at her home. Gemma says: 'Sophie came straight round and asked if there was anything she could do. 'We are now the best of friends and help each other out all the time." "Boundary disputes can often become costly and acrimonious - if you're not sure about your rights or think things might get tricky, it's a good idea to speak to a legal expert first." If you take fruits from your neighbour's trees without permission, it could potentially be classified as theft or trespass, depending on the circumstances and the value of the fruits. The penalties for theft or trespass can vary. In the UK, for example, penalties for theft can range from fines to imprisonment, depending on the severity of the offence and the value of the items stolen. It's important to remember that taking someone else's property without permission is illegal and can lead to legal consequences. Penalties can also include community service orders, injunctions, or in extreme cases, imprisonment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store