All the Retailers Nike Left & Then Returned: Amazon & Wholesale Shift
Back in 2020, Nike made a bold move: it began cutting ties with a wide range of retail partners as part of its Consumer Direct Acceleration (CDA) strategy. The idea was simple — sell more through Nike's own stores and digital channels, and less through what the company described as 'undifferentiated' wholesale accounts. Big-name retailers like Amazon, Zappos, Belk and Dillard's suddenly found themselves without access to Nike product, as the brand focused on controlling its own narrative and margins.
More from WWD
Nike Makes Buzzed-About Return to Amazon
Sneaker Shock: Yes, Nike Is Raising Prices Too on Select Products Amid Trump's Tariffs
From Clicks to Commerce: Unlocking Sales in the Digital-First Era
But just a few years later, the tides are turning.
As Nike faces increased pressure to meet demand, manage inventory and keep pace with shifting consumer behavior, it's quietly rebuilding relationships with some of those same retailers. The biggest headline? Nike is returning to Amazon — a move that comes after the height of its DTC push.
It's a sign that the Swoosh is rebalancing its strategy, acknowledging that wholesale — especially with the right partners — still plays a major role in how and where customers want to shop.
Nike is returning to Amazon after a six-year hiatus, relaunching its official storefront. The move follows its 2019 exit, when Nike left the platform citing brand control concerns. Now, Amazon will block select third-party sellers starting July 19 to prioritize Nike's listings. Alongside the return, Nike announced price hikes this month of $2–$10 on adult apparel and equipment, and $5–$10 increases on most footwear, citing tariff-related pressures. Products under $100, kids' lines, and the Air Force 1 will be exempt. The strategy reflects CEO Elliott Hill's broader effort to protect margins while expanding reach.DSW was among a host of retailers caught in the crossfire of Nike's 2021 retreat from broad wholesale. Once a high-volume channel for athletic footwear, the chain lost access as Nike prioritized tighter distribution and DTC growth. At the time, Bill Jordan, president of DSW parent company Designer Brands Inc., said sales of Nike products account for less than 4% of revenue in 2019. But in October 2023, the Swoosh returned to DSW's floors — albeit under new terms. The renewed partnership includes select lifestyle and performance silhouettes, available both in-store and online.Once a mainstay of Nike's wholesale network, Macy's found itself on the outs in 2021 as Nike pulled back from dozens of traditional partners in favor of direct channels. 'Nike's decision to no longer sell to nine multi-branded wholesale accounts is positive for Nike, as it takes control of more of its own destiny,' Sushquehanna Financial Group analyst Sam Poser wrote at the time.
But after a nearly two-year absence, Nike apparel and gear quietly returned to Macy's in fall 2023 —marking a calculated reversal. Macy's began carrying an expanded selection of Nike products in October 2023, including apparel, plus size women's, big and tall men's, kids, bags and gear, both online and in 'key locations nationwide,' according to CEO Jeff Gennette. Nike products were introduced to additional stores in 2024.Nike's 2022 shift toward selling directly to consumers hit Foot Locker hard. With Nike products accounting for more than 60% of its inventory at the time, the retailer was forced to scale back projections after learning it would receive fewer shipments. Shares fell, and Foot Locker quickly began cutting its reliance on a single vendor. That included bringing in Reebok through an exclusive deal with Authentic Brands Group, doubling down on Puma, and building up partnerships like with LaMelo Ball.
'Our journey to diversify our mix of business and expand our reach as a house of brands and banners is ongoing,' then-CEO Richard Johnson said at the time.
By the following year, the tide had started to turn. Under new CEO Mary Dillon, Foot Locker and Nike rekindled their relationship. Nike returned to store shelves with a more curated product mix, and the two companies resumed joint planning efforts — a sign that, even with scaled-back allocations, the connection still held weight.In 2021, Nike discontinued its wholesale relationship with Urban Outfitters as part of a broader strategy to streamline its retail partnerships and focus on direct-to-consumer sales. This decision was part of Nike's initiative to reduce its wholesale accounts by over 50 percent, aiming to concentrate on 40 key retail partners and its own DTC channels.
Around a year later, Nike quietly resumed wholesale with Urban Outfitters. In May 2025, Urban Outfitters launched an immersive in-store experience, 'On Rotation,' which the company says is aimed at 'meeting the evolving needs of Gen Z and deliver community-driven, memorable retail experiences.'Nike stopped shipping products to Zappos in late 2020, part of a move to cut back on the number of retailers it worked with. The company was shifting its focus toward selling through its own stores and website, as well as a tighter group of retail partners. Zappos was among several names dropped during that shakeup, alongside chains like Dillard's and Fred Meyer. At the time, Nike said it wanted to 'create the marketplace of the future,' focused on fewer, more differentiated partners.
But by mid-2023, amid excess inventory and shifting consumer demand, Nike re-engaged with some of the retailers it had left behind. While not as publicly detailed as returns to Macy's or DSW, reporting from 'The Wall Street Journal' and 'Business Insider' confirmed that Zappos was among the accounts receiving product again.When Nike implemented its Consumer Direct Acceleration (CDA) strategy, Belk was also on the chopping block of retailers no longer carrying Nike. The 2020 move reflected Nike's broader effort to prioritize digital growth and owned retail over what it called 'undifferentiated' wholesale partners.
But by late 2022 and into 2023, that approach began to shift. Analysts, including Sam Poser, pointed out that Nike's direct channels weren't meeting all of the consumer demand. As a result, Nike started to send more product back into wholesale, especially to family and moderate-tier retailers — a category that includes Belk.
When Nike launched its Consumer Direct Acceleration (CDA) strategy, Shoe Show was among the retail partnerships that ended. The 2020 pivot leaned into Nike's own storefronts and digital platforms, shedding wholesale partners it considered less integral.
But fast-forward to late 2022, and things started to shift. Analysts like Sam Poser noted Nike's direct channels weren't fully meeting consumer demand. The brand began reallocating product back to the wholesale side — especially to moderate and family-focused retailers like Shoe Show. In Nike's December 2022 earnings call, CEO John Donahoe didn't mince words: 'Wholesale play is a very important part of that. It provides a very strong footprint, both physical footprint as well as digital.'
Best of WWD
Mikey Madison's Elegant Red Carpet Shoe Style [PHOTOS]
Julia Fox's Sleekest and Boldest Shoe Looks Over the Years [Photos]
Crocs Collaborations From Celebrities & Big Brands You Should Know
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
32 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content
OTTAWA - Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news. The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news. The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news. In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money. In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act. Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content. Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be 'equitable.' It said the contribution requirement is 'inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues.' Apple also said the regulator 'acted prematurely' and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was 'equitable.' It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay. The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming. Motion Picture Association—Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations. It said in court documents that none of the streamers 'has any connection to news production' and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news. 'What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money,' it said. 'That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production.' In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news. 'While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services,' the broadcasters said. 'For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade.' A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments. 'The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants,' the office of the attorney general said. 'Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters.' The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve 'an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden.' 'This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament' and cabinet, it added. The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers. The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies. In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation. Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances. While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025.

Business Insider
41 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk's feud with Trump likely won't blow up Tesla's robotaxi push, analysts say
Elon Musk 's public sparring with President Donald Trump last week may have briefly put a dent in Tesla's value, but analysts say they can't see any reason the feud would have a long-term impact on the company's business, including its robotaxi ambitions. The feud between Musk and Trump began with the Tesla CEO's criticism of the GOP's spending bill, which slashes EV tax credits and is estimated to add more than $2.4 trillion to the national deficit. The clash then escalated with threats coming from both sides: Trump threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's companies, and the CEO fired back by saying he'd shut down SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft before reneging. During Musk's fight with Trump on Thursday, Tesla's stock dipped 14%, wiping out $138 billion from the company's market cap. The company recovered some of the losses the following day. Yet the CEO saw one of his biggest single-day hits to his net worth with an estimated $34 billion loss. Still, some analysts say this storm will pass. "Musk's and Trump's relationship has an impact on the stock and maybe investor sentiment, but as far as the actual business impact for Tesla, I never thought Trump getting elected was positive or that negative for Tesla," Seth Goldstein, Morningstar analyst, told Business Insider. "So with the feud that started between Trump and Musk, I never really viewed that as that positive or negative for Tesla either." While it may not be helpful to no longer be in Trump's good graces, Goldstein said the president has already made clear that he would cut EV subsidies, which the analyst viewed as having the most negative impact not just on Tesla but on all EV makers. Gene Munster, Tesla investor and managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, estimated in a Friday report that the elimination of the tax credits could reduce 2025 deliveries by 15%. Trump wishes Tesla well As far as Tesla's June robotaxi launch in Austin goes, which Musk says will unlock trillions of dollars of market value for his company, analysts say there's little reason to believe the administration would want to hinder progress there. "In my view, the White House has little to gain in standing in front of autonomy, given autonomy is central to physical AI, and for the US to be a leader globally in AI, it also needs to be a leader in physical AI," Munster said in his Friday report. "The bottom line, I expect cooler heads to prevail and the Federal Government will continue to support the growth of these services." Goldstein told BI that he doesn't see many avenues the administration could take to hinder Tesla's robotaxi progress. He said the Department of Transportation is reviewing federal standards for autonomous vehicle safety. "In theory, if Trump wanted to see Musk face retaliation and target Tesla, they could, say, require autonomous vehicles to have lidar in order to be approved by the federal government for operation, but I don't think they're going to get that detailed," Goldstein said. "I think that Trump could more easily just target SpaceX by just cutting their contracts if he really wanted to hurt Elon, versus making some really weird, nuanced policy." Spokespeople for the DOT and the White House did not respond to a request for comment. In a note on Friday, Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas wrote that Musk's feud with Trump doesn't impact the "longer-term vectors that drive the stock's value." "AI leadership, autonomy/robotics, manufacturing, supply chain re-architecture, renewable power, critical infrastructure... Tesla still holds so many valuable cards that are largely apolitical, in our opinion," Jonas wrote. By late Friday afternoon, the online jabs had slowed down, but the Trump-Musk alliance remained on ice. The president told NBC News on Saturday that he doesn't expect to mend his relationship with Musk and warned the CEO against supporting Democratic candidates. Still, during a press gaggle on Air Force One on Friday, Trump said he hadn't thought about Musk but wished him and his company well. "I mean, I hope he does well with Tesla," Trump said.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
China: US needs to ‘stop spreading disinformation,' correct ‘wrongful actions'
China said on Tuesday that the United States needs to 'stop spreading disinformation' and correct 'wrongful actions' as the trade tensions between the two countries continue. China's foreign ministry spokesperson Lin Jian claimed the U.S. 'falsely accuses and smears' China and that Washington has taken 'extreme suppression' measures. He listed 'chip export controls, blocking EDA sales and announcing plans to revoke Chinese students' visas' as actions that have 'seriously disrupted the consensus and hurt China's legitimate rights and interests.' 'China firmly opposes them and has lodged strong protests with the US,' Lin wrote in a Tuesday post on the social media platform X. Treasury Department Secretary Scott Bessent said on Sunday that President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping will likely talk 'soon' — a conversation that will include discussing critical minerals. 'I am confident that when President Trump and party Chairman Xi have a call, that this will be ironed out,' Bessent said during his Sunday appearance on CBS's 'Face the Nation.' 'But the fact that they are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement — maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional.' The world's two biggest economies have accused each other in recent days of violating the terms of the trade agreement struck during the meetings in Geneva last month. Trump hammered China on Friday, arguing that Beijing violated the terms of the agreement. 'Two weeks ago China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace which is, by far, number one in the World. We went, in effect, COLD TURKEY with China, and it was devastating for them. Many factories closed and there was, to put it mildly, 'civil unrest.' I saw what was happening and didn't like it, for them, not for us,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation, and I didn't want to see that happen,' the commander-in-chief added. China fired back on Monday, saying that Washington was in breach of the trade agreement, citing the guidance on chip export controls, the pause of sales of chip design software to China and the revocation of F-1 student visas of Chinese students in the U.S. After the May talks in Switzerland, the Trump administration brought down the tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent. China lowered its duties on U.S. goods from 125 percent to 10 percent. Lin, the foreign ministry spokesperson, added on Tuesday that pressure and 'coercion are not the right way to engage China.' 'We urge the US to respect the facts, stop spreading disinformation, correct its wrongful actions, and act to uphold the consensus reached between the two sides,' the spokesperson added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.