Upcoming K-pop survival show ‘Under15' faces familiar backlash for featuring child contestants

Korea Herald

26-03-2025

The upcoming K-pop audition program 'Under15,' set to premiere on March 31, is under fire for featuring contestants as young as eight, prompting concerns over the sexualization and commodification of minors.
Industry insiders say the controversy underscores a longstanding issue in the entertainment scene, highlighting the urgent need for improved public perception and the adoption of clearer guidelines on casting children and adolescents in nationally broadcast reality shows.
The survival show, which aims to form a new girl group with an average debut age of under 15, introduced 59 female participants in promotional materials released earlier this month. The contestants, all girls younger than 16, appeared wearing heavy makeup and styled in mature clothing, leading to a public outcry on social media over the portrayal of girls in a context some interpreted as inappropriate and exploitative.
Recruiting child idol hopefuls is nothing new in the K-pop industry. According to a local entertainment company official, most agencies set the upper age limit for new trainees at 15.
'Nowadays, future K-pop stars begin training as early as age six. The oldest we usually accept as trainees is 15, unless the candidate is exceptionally talented — whether in singing, dancing or even just having standout visuals,' the official said. 'These days, elementary school graduation ceremonies have become one of the most popular places for casting trainees.'
A poster released on March 12 drew particular criticism for using product label-like graphics to describe the girls with phrases such as 'bright and bubbly' and 'luxury and unique.' Critics accused the show's producers of treating children as marketable products, reinforcing harmful beauty standards and objectification at an early age.
Lee Jong-im, a lecturer at Seoul National University of Science & Technology's Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, criticized the imagery and its implications.
'The barcode-style graphic was a major problem. The production team said it was meant to resemble a student ID, but that explanation doesn't make sense,' Lee said. 'The video shows the girls receiving makeup, and the close-up shots of their eyes could evoke a feeling of fetishization. It reflects a lack of thoughtful consideration during the promotion process.'
Lee also pointed out the absence of proper safeguards when casting participants of such a young age, adding that producers seemed to emphasize youth over artistic direction or care.
'There appears to have been no serious deliberation about how to shape the show's creative direction. When it comes to participants under the age of 15, there should be better protection measures,' she said.
Citing international standards, Lee noted that the BBC, for example, prohibits its producers from following underage participants on social media and only allows contact through parents. 'Such guidelines are necessary to protect children from unnecessary exposure and inappropriate relationships with producers,' she added.