Why are Britain's farmers protesting over Labour's inheritance tax changes?
Farmers and their allies will begin to gather from midday on Tuesday for speeches outside Parliament. Industry leaders say the plan put forward by chancellor Rachel Reeves during her first Budget last October, is 'marching the UK into a food crisis'.
Police have warned attendees that they face arrest if they bring unauthorised tractors to Whitehall, as has been seen at previous events. This marks the first time such a warning has been put in place, with several tractors hitting the streets on central London in recent months.
A Metropolitan Police spokesperson said: 'It is a criminal offence to breach the conditions or to incite others to do so – anyone doing so may face arrest.' However, a limited number of agreed tractors have been authorised.
Organiser and farmer Olly Harrison has said the protesters will aim to explain to MPs 'the levels of investment needed in agriculture just to produce something simple like a pancake'.
Here's everything you need to know about the issue:
Previously, farming businesses qualified for 100 per cent relief on inheritance tax on agricultural property and business property.
But now the tax is being imposed on farms worth more than £1 million, with an effective tax rate of 20 per cent on assets above the threshold, rather than the normal 40 per cent rate for inheritance tax.
The Government says that the actual threshold before paying inheritance tax could be as much as £3 million, once exemptions for each partner in a couple and for the farm property are taken into account.
The government has said 'difficult decisions' had to be made to fill a £22 billion fiscal hole it inherited from the Conservatives, and it is targeting the agricultural inheritance tax relief to make it fairer.
It said figures showed that 7 per cent of the wealthiest estates account for 40 per cent of the total value of agricultural property relief, costing the Treasury £219 million.
According to the Treasury, some 27 per cent of estates claiming agricultural property relief (APR) were above the £1 million threshold in 2021/2022, suggesting that nearly three-quarters of farms would not fall within the scope of the charges.
The Treasury says around 500 estates a year are expected to pay inheritance tax under the changes.
However, the National Farmers' Union (NFU) says farm businesses have also qualified separately for business property relief, which can cover things such as harvested grain and livestock, machinery and diversified businesses such as camping on a farmer's field.
Now the two are combined, with a single £1 million allowance before inheritance tax is levied, which could mean more farms are in scope.
The NFU points to figures from the Environment Department (Defra) showing that 66 per cent of farm businesses in England have a net value of more than £1 million.
But the government has countered that analysis, saying that looking at asset value alone does not necessarily mean the farm will be affected, as it depends on individual circumstances.
According to the NFU, while farms may have a high nominal asset value – the value of their land and business assets – the returns from farming are often very low, so farming families may not have the reserves to pay for inheritance tax liabilities without selling off assets.
The NFU's president Tom Bradshaw said the change had left elderly farmers in the 'cruellest predicament', as they may not live for another seven years to take advantage of exemptions for gifting assets, or to hand over assets in a way that qualifies for the gifting exemption.
He has also warned the changes could undermine investment as farmers will be wary of increasing the balance sheet as they will be liable to pay inheritance tax on it.
There are also concerns that it could affect tenant farmers if landowners no longer benefit from having a tax exemption for farmed land.
Mr Bradshaw said there was a feeling among farmers that the Government did not understand food production.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Number Of Migrants Crossing The Channel Has Hit A New Milestone. Is It Time To Make It Easier To Reach The UK?
Labour has been accused of creating a 'crisis over nothing' as the number of small boat crossings since the last election to reached 50,000. Home Office data confirmed that 474 asylum seekers made the perilous crossing yesterday, taking the total since Keir Starmer became prime minister 13 months ago to 50,271. According to the Daily Express, that is quicker than under Tory PMs Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'Labour has surrendered our borders, and the consequences are being felt in our communities, from rising crime to shocking cases of rape and sexual assault by recent arrivals. 'This is an invasion Labour are too cowardly to confront. Only the Conservatives will stop the crossings and restore control of Britain's borders.' The number of small boat crossings are a major source of embarrassment for Labour, which pledged during last year's general election to 'smash the people-smuggling gangs' responsible. And even government minister Jacqui Smith, who served as the home secretary under Gordon Brown, told BBC Breakfast this morning that number pf crossings under Labour was 'unacceptable'. But independent migration policy researcher Zoe Gardner, told HuffPost UK the government is focusing on the wrong issue. She said Labour should instead increase the number of legal immigration routes to the UK, thereby taking away the need for asylum seekers to risk their lives in the English Channel. She said: '50,000 people since Labour came to power corresponds to about 5 or 6% of all immigration during that period. 'If it wasn't coming on boats but through safe, regulated routes instead these numbers would not even register. 'By refusing to offer safe routes, the government has created a crisis out of nothing at all.' Net migration in 2024 was 431,000 – much lower than the historical high of 906,000 recorded in 2023, but still a number which dwarves how many arrived people arrived in small boats during the same period (37,000). The government has often been criticised over its lack of safe and legal routes for people to claim asylum in the UK. And, as human rights organisation Amnesty International explained, a 'safe and legal route' means a journey formally approved by the government. But, 'the government allows nobody to make a claim for asylum in the UK unless they are physically present in the UK' and 'it is impossible to come to the UK for the purpose of seeking asylum in any way permitted by the government's immigration rules'. The only exceptions apply to people from Ukraine and someone who has family in the UK or has a partner or child who has been granted asylum in Britain. There is also a visa route for some Afghans who have worked for the government. As Amnesty International noted on its website: 'Seeking asylum from persecution is lawful – refugees don't need anyone's permission to do so.' It concluded: 'It is a government choice to require refugees wishing to seek asylum in the UK to rely on dangerous journeys and people smugglers.' The government is desperate to bring the number of small boat crossings down and prove to voters it is dealing with the migration crisis. It announced a new 'one in, one out' returns scheme with France last week, which will allow the UK to return one person to France who entered the Britain via so-called 'illegal' means. The UK then has to accept someone with a greater claim to asylum in Britain from France. The first returns are expected to take place in the coming weeks, but the impact will likely be very small initially as the scheme is tested. Related... Almost Half Of Brits Are Getting An Essential Fact About UK Immigration Wrong Yvette Cooper Delivers Brutal Commons Slapdown To Chris Philp Over The Tories' Immigration Failures 'A Horrific Moral Failure': Campaigner Slams Labour And Tories Over Illegal Immigration
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
US Short-Term Yields Fall as Inflation Data Boosts Rate-Cut Bets
(Bloomberg) -- US short-term debt yields declined after mostly benign July inflation data boosted expectations the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates next month. While Treasury yields across maturities failed to sustain their initial drop to session lows, the two-year note's yield remained three basis points lower on the day as swap traders priced in nearly 90% odds of a Fed rate cut on Sept. 17, up from about 80% before the data. Rising yields in UK and euro-zone debt markets — including the highest German 30-year yield since 2011 — contributed to weakness in longer-term Treasuries after the inflation report. Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion New York Warns of $34 Billion Budget Hole, Biggest Since 2009 Crisis To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Chicago Schools' Bond Penalty Widens as $734 Million Gap Looms Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain The consumer price index data for July drew another verbal assault by US President Donald Trump against Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not having cut interest rates already — even as it also showed a bigger-than-estimated increase in the annual rate of core inflation to 3.1%, the highest level since February. Trump's social media posts included the suggestion that Powell will face a lawsuit in connection with Fed building management. 'Maybe just avoiding upside surprises on inflation is enough for the market to continue pricing in more rate cuts,' said Zachary Griffiths, head of investment-grade and macroeconomic strategy at CreditSights. 'We view this print neutral, but still think the Fed will cut in September,' probably by half a percentage point 'as the labor market has become the focal point for policymakers.' Weak July employment data released Aug. 1 sparked the bond market's biggest gain this year. Longer-dated Treasury yields were higher by about four basis points near session highs after erasing declines sparked by the inflation data. The 30-year bond's rose nearly to 4.9%, the highest since Aug. 1, after erasing a drop to 4.82%. Germany's 30-year yield climbed seven basis points toward 3.30%. The July increases in the overall and core consumer price indexes matched economist estimates. The overall annual rate was unchanged at 2.7% while the core annual rate, which excludes food and energy, increased more than anticipated to 3.1%. The dollar weakened against a basket of peers after the data. 'It feels like the market was worried about a worse number' that could have put the brakes on Fed rate cuts, said John Briggs, head of US rates strategy at Natixis North America. What Bloomberg Strategists Say... 'The inflation numbers released this morning support the prevailing narrative that the Federal Reserve is likely to cut in September and at least one more time in 2025 to ensure a soft landing. Still, the steepening yield curve shows that inflation and deficit worries persist.' —Edward Harrison, Macro Strategist, Markets Live For the full analysis, click here. Positioning ahead of the CPI report included continued buying of an options position that would benefit from a half-point Fed rate cut in September. The Fed usually moves interest rates in quarter-point increments, though its three late-2024 rate cuts began with a half-point move in September. The core CPI trend 'is a bit problematic for the Fed,' said Tom di Galoma, managing director at Mischler Financial Group. While a quarter-point cut in September is likely, additional moves will depend on subsequent inflation readings, he said. Treasury yields approached the low end of their range since late April after the July jobs report, and Fed policy makers will see August employment data before making their September decision. 'The jobs rally took all the air out of the bond market rally potential until Jackson Hole at least,' said George Goncalves, head of US macro strategy at MUFG. Powell is slated to speak next week at the Fed's annual symposium in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, and may use the opportunity to shed light on any change in his view that inflation risk tied to tariffs the Trump administration has instituted this year warrants caution in lowering rates. Speaking Tuesday, Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid said he favors keeping interest rates on hold for the time being to prevent robust economic activity from adding to inflation pressures, and Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin said it's still unclear whether the central bank should concentrate more on controlling inflation or bolstering the job market. Other Fed officials have indicated a willingness to ease rates, with Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman — both appointed by Trump — dissenting from last month's decision to keep policy steady, and citing concerns over a slowing jobs sector. (Adds comments, updates yield levels.) Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan The Social Media Trend Machine Is Spitting Out Weirder and Weirder Results Klarna Cashed In on 'Buy Now, Pay Later.' Now It Wants to Be a Bank The Game Starts at 8. The Robbery Starts at 8:01 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Northern Ireland ‘absolutely crucial' for UK's growth prospects
Northern Ireland is 'absolutely crucial' for the UK's growth prospects, the Chancellor has said during a visit to Belfast. Rachel Reeves made her first trip to the province as Chancellor and was asked whether she considers Northern Ireland to be an 'economic basket case'. As part of her trip, Ms Reeves visited the film-making facilities at Studio Ulster and also paid tribute to Northern Ireland's defence sector. Studio Ulster, which sits on the shores of Belfast Lough, was officially opened in June in what have been termed the world's most advanced virtual production facilities spanning 75,000 square feet. Speaking at the studios, Ms Reeves said: 'Northern Ireland is absolutely crucial for the United Kingdom, including for our growth prospects. 'We've got here, at Studio Ulster, not just the best facilities in the UK, but the best facilities in the world, for a part of our economy that is globally growing at such a fast rate.' Ms Reeves added that a plan to step up defence spending to 3.5% of GDP will mean 'more good jobs paying decent wages in Northern Ireland'. 'My economic belief, my strong belief, is that all parts of the country should be able to contribute to economic growth and prosperity, and all parts of the country should benefit from economic growth and opportunities. 'That has not been the case for far too long in the UK.' She also met deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly and Finance Minister John O'Dowd as part of her engagements. Ms Little-Pengelly said she used the 'in-depth' meeting with Ms Reeves to 'urge the Chancellor' to take decisions to encourage economic growth in Northern Ireland and transform public services. She told reporters: 'We believe that Northern Ireland has huge economic potential, but we do need that investment and growth. 'But we also wanted to raise with the Chancellor that some of her decisions could have a disproportionate impact on our businesses, on our farmers, on our economy of Northern Ireland.' Mr O'Dowd said he told the Chancellor that Northern Ireland's public finances 'remain constrained'. He said: 'We made a very strong case to her that decisions made in London which may reflect realities in that region don't necessarily reflect the realities here.' Ms Reeves described the relationship between the UK Government and the Northern Ireland Executive as a 'partnership approach'. The Chancellor told reporters she wants Stormont to spend its funding 'wisely' to get the best value for money for taxpayers. This includes growing the economy and creating good jobs that are well paid, Ms Reeves said. 'The UK Government, the Northern Ireland Executive have got a joint commitment to improve the lives for people here,' she added. 'We have made the record settlement at the spending review just a couple of months ago. 'Three-year settlement for day-to-day spending, a five-year settlement for capital investment and that means that the money we need for our public services in Northern Ireland and across the UK is now available. 'Now spend that money wisely to get the best value for money for taxpayers. 'We also need to grow the economy and create more good jobs, paying decent wages here.' Ms Reeves also referred to Thales, a defence firm in Belfast, which is manufacturing equipment to be sent to Ukraine. She said this is creating more jobs and bringing in higher salaries. The Chancellor also said that farmers with agricultural property worth more than £3 million 'should make a contribution'. Asked whether she had 'sympathy for farmers who are now facing an inheritance tax bill', Ms Reeves told reporters: 'We didn't increase taxes that ordinary working people paid. 'Their national insurance, income tax, VAT, fuel duty did not go up in the way the previous Tory government had in their plans, so protecting the incomes of ordinary working people. 'And since we came into office, real wages have been rising at a faster rate than inflation, and specifically on agricultural property relief (APR), if you've got agricultural property worth less than £3 million and you own it jointly with a partner, you'll pay no inheritance tax when you pass that farm on. 'But I do believe that if you do have agricultural property worth more than £3 million, you should make a contribution, but the APR, the inheritance tax on that is half the rate that anybody else pays, just 20%, and it's payable over 10 years interest-free.'
